{"id":166466,"date":"2010-02-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010"},"modified":"2016-09-29T11:48:27","modified_gmt":"2016-09-29T06:18:27","slug":"smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n
_ . _. .- ..-. .. ..n....~ . u\\.vIl -.vuu-u ur Iuutuntnlin HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C'\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKAAT \n\n \n\nDATED THE THE 1=rr DAY OF  if O f%    _\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HOITBLEMR. JUSTICE <\/pre>\n
slrr.\n<\/p>\n
mo mm 5 pOan:mnaumsH;
\nAamngvspnfwqctmn\ufb01s   ‘ ‘<\/p>\n
s[0–L+\\_TE. H  %
\n~=En ABM’?\n<\/p>\n
    O<\/p>\n
310 LMEH PO ,
\nAGED 40 mm,<\/p>\n
 .. ….. 14
\n.   P3HN ,
\n‘ _ HEB_Uli’.–\u00ab.EOBLI, ‘l\u00a7A.LI.IEAHD DISTRICT,\n<\/p>\n
 -577 101<\/p>\n
     VIGHIIEBHWAR. s. BHABTRL ADV.)<\/p>\n
”\n<\/p>\n
am’.\n<\/p>\n
w\/o mm amnnmn.\n<\/p>\n
AGED ABOUT as mans.\n<\/p>\n
SR1. 1-KITTABIDDAIAH,<\/p>\n
3\/o mm smmmn,
\nAGED ABOUT 40 YEARS<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
–. …,.._…. …..- M…m.uwa mun coum or KARMATAKA men COURT or KARNATAKA I-new COURT or KARNATAKA men cc<\/p>\n
3 SKI. REVANEZA,
\nS] O LATE SIDDAIAH,
\nAGED ABOUT 32 ‘mm.\n<\/p>\n
4 am’. C @ Gtmn\ufb01,
\nw\/o LATE wwmm,
\nmm mm smmma, V ‘
\nASED A3023’? 30 mass.\n<\/p>\n
3 am. 8I1)\ufb01AEVA3\u00a3MA,’ __”‘–~._
\nmo mm smnmn,
\nAGEDABQUT zamam.\n<\/p>\n
mmm or 3UDDA1\u20ac&YA3s*A\u00a3{A_.P\ufb01I\u00e96sW\u00a3,.
\naware}:\n<\/p>\n
H _ ,    ;’.”.”RmPoNnEN’rs
\n[BY am. 8  REI33;!’\u00a7*e_~AI3%I.}… ‘<\/p>\n
 F1}:-;E13″‘–Uf.3.16v\u20ac}~w~fJF cpc Amsr ms:
\nJumuaazrr _ItWZ?3_a 23m-swim 31.3. 1 1.2095 pasam m
\nR.A.H. :22; Oi’ %1=*1’1._I:=z2′ ‘rm ABEL. CIVIL JUDGE
\ncslwm. mm;UR,ALLowma mm mm; Am asrrme
\nAsmx   {DEGREE m*.23.a.2ao1
\nPAS8ED. Hi’ c.’e._He.549i94 03 ‘ms mm <23 THE H ADDL.\n<\/p>\n
_. _ CIVIL  <\/p>\n
 H VA _ amnlAm:\u00a7.’3;5b mxwmm,
\n ‘guess  mm ma
\n*  4:3
\n =\u00a7i; LATE smmmn,<\/p>\n
{gem Aamrr 6? mm,<\/p>\n
” ‘ ~. _ “‘ sR1.Pm’1:A.smmmH,<\/p>\n
3:9 mm smmmzz,
\nAGED Aamrr 49 Y\ufb01di\ufb01.\n<\/p>\n
3) 32:. mvwm,
\nago mm smmma.\n<\/p>\n
AGEE mm}? 47 mm.\n<\/p>\n
5-mu CQURT or KARNATAKA man cmzm Ur mxmumu. rliun ………. .. ………..,…..\n<\/p>\n
+3 sm.c%uA@mm1>AuA,<\/p>\n
W\/C) mm wwm\ufb01,
\nmm mm ammmn,
\ngem ABOIH’ 45 vmms.\n<\/p>\n
5) 3111′. SI.’\u00a3.\\HARE’VA.MlE\ufb01.,   <\/p>\n
D\/0 mm smmma,
\nAGED ABOUT 43 Ymm.\n<\/p>\n
mammomnmwm’   V<\/p>\n
mm or smnamvamxaw;-YA.
\n\ufb01EBBURHGBLI,
\n’11I\ufb02URTALUK&D}3″\u00a3., “j <\/p>\n
am. 8.K.VEHKATA\n<\/p>\n
333. 3.1:’ mgr\u00bb.-.a::rm.\u00a7%v – ‘<\/p>\n
\ufb01g<\/p>\n
am:\n<\/p>\n
SRECE  Ii’E’F\u00a7t”1.Rm  <\/p>\n
1)<\/p>\n
W10  H.P}8EN ,
\n9-aw AB’???\n<\/p>\n
  ~<\/p>\n
~ 31:: ‘\ufb01.P.$mV ,\n<\/p>\n
– 5GE33__A3L’3\u00a7IT_ 4? mass.\n<\/p>\n
%~s12’n.*:A:;’ua?PA,*  %<\/p>\n
520 x;x*mH,r*.sH1vAaAunaaH,
\nAemmom 45 mm.\n<\/p>\n
33:. mm,
\n% age mm H.1=.sms:ARAmm–I,<\/p>\n
 55% A351?!’ 43 vmm.\n<\/p>\n
E? SE. mamvssnwm. 8. SEASTRI-~ ADV. FQR CIR}<\/p>\n
Z<\/p>\n
IGH COURT KAR .n
\n‘”9″ NATAKA H1GH\u00a29u\u00a7r or KARNATAKA men comm 0F mmnsam nlun Wu… .. ……. —\n<\/p>\n
‘THIS RSA FILEB 1118.100 OF CFC Aim’
\nJUIJGBIEXT AHD DEGREE DT.03.I.1.2005 PASSEI3 <\/p>\n
R.A.xm.122;2oo1 cm TEE mm 01? THE
\nmmm (sanm, muck. ALLc:wmG THE
\n$E’I”!’I!i’G asmm ms wmmm AND  amgam . 1  4_
\nnA’mn.23.o3.2oo1 masm: H1 c.s.xo.5+9g;–1V..911″-frzm  ., ”
\nmm arr mm II Ann); awn JUnc;E”{‘..m,n1:\u00bb3  <\/p>\n
-mum mum co1mm.%oH\u00abF=0Iz  %%<\/p>\n
DAY, ‘rm (mum DELIVERED I?oLLowm;.3;: *<\/p>\n
1%’ . T219  20% had
\n\ufb02ed a suit  he had parfected 11%
\nan      ax mm
\na\u00a7unom’ n    % a\ufb01zpelhnt 3-om mm-ram
\nwith    the case ofthe rmpondenx<\/p>\n
  to am Pathaiah am since.\n<\/p>\n
 _  hk dmtlx, reapam\ufb01ant mn\ufb01med ta
\n_  land as Pakiah Md died issue laws and
\n%  %’&\u00a7%iJ%Aha&  mm ar\ufb01 mm mate in 11$ Eamm \ufb01r
\n   years and cities the appalhm whc was joint
\nx  Eamgmrmmbma starta\ufb01  mhh% msesaian,<\/p>\n
hehas\ufb011ed$:euit\u00a3or&1ara\ufb01nnthathe}msimd<\/p>\n
& title by same poasmsmn.\n<\/p>\n
\u20ac<\/p>\n
IIVUII N-I-I-uunv -5-r nun-uuu<\/p>\n
136?? LUUK3 U?’ IERKNJ-\\IRr\\.M WIIVI1 \\..qA_uu ur lxnusnluu-uxn nu.”-3 hvvn. V. ,,_,..m,,.,,,.”,,., ,<\/p>\n
2. The trial Court decreed the suit for pcmaeaaicsn<\/p>\n
an we}! as isnjuxsctian. The appellant
\nappeal before the First Appeme
\nAppella\ufb01e Ccmrt held that the <\/p>\n
not to have: been granted i:n$’wg\u00a7>ur\u00ab’\u00a22_f\ufb01  <\/p>\n
it was mmsmbr claimed
\nthat he: was the owrm’ wan aattim
\nup the claim af._1’mv’iI!:g~   by adxmua
\nmansion. _    :–~1,’i\u00abposaeaaiaan mm-
\na long   the First
\n  __:rmpondent was exx\ufb01tled. to<\/p>\n
pcrotac1::n’    untii dispca%ad in<\/p>\n
   has ma an awl in the.\n<\/p>\n
L   L  ma-49512995 tan chaaw that po1’5mn
\n ma gu\u00e9ment whmeby the First Amman Court has<\/p>\n
  the anasmg af am Trial Cmzrt as m the
\n  _  1′  mvim \ufb01ed titk: by admae poaaeaskrn.\n<\/p>\n
4. ‘Im enamel far the appelmt in
\nR.S.A.H\u00a23.8′?3]2m6v would submit that tk had in<\/p>\n
Z<\/p>\n
WWI’! – ..\n<\/p>\n
uvunl ur nmwantnixn mun Lguxii or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNAIAKB mun Lvunu. vr mun”.-..n..n …\n<\/p>\n
qumtian is johrt fa1:m’1y property. The claim eff<\/p>\n
raspanrlent that he was in pm-mhsiua A’
\nthe time cf Pathaiah \u00abmum defaat rm vemy.
\ntn be set up, as ‘ \ufb02y heh by  iv <\/p>\n
am could mt: claim of    V.\n<\/p>\n
as title by adveazse   amnam
\nCaurt havixg  T ‘A  in
\naeekirg to   of the
\nmpomm:-.._  1-army mm
\n naught
\nfor by    E1 sen-wig to protect. the
\npmmsiog;  reliance on the following<\/p>\n
   1995 3:: 73 [Thakur mm
\n Arvind Kumar) and Am 2900 ac<\/p>\n
 4f\u00a7zgh{aua; through ma. V3. Ram<\/p>\n
imwgh ma.)<\/p>\n
  Wmla the: Couml fur th appellant in the
\n   eamm appml mbms that the Firat Appellate Court
\n9’ “wasrmtjusttt’iawir:ravemingjudmm1tofthetr7m1<\/p>\n
Caaurt. It k afber Patm.ia.1:1’a dgath that the<\/p>\n
raspsr\ufb01ml ap\ufb01hm has occupied the land ha questiozz<\/p>\n
Z<\/p>\n
I
\nn
\nn
\nn
\n3<\/span>
\n5<\/span>
\nI
\nI
\n3<\/span>
\ni
\nI<\/p>\n
Isl! I \\u\\d’Iur-\\- I-VI<\/p>\n
iiw\ufb01 MUUKI vi” AHIRHHIMAH ruun w…\\.q.un- vr nnn.un:nn.r- -nun n….vun- VII l\\r|nl1rur\\I\\.r-I. u<\/p>\n
and tbs claim ef adverse possessing was <\/p>\n
joint; fa.m’1y mmbm and Long poamssnn.
\ncvidmced by mlevant revenue records,   %
\nCourt was nzfuled intn lwlding   T
\ncomcted appeal was claimngfta   <\/p>\n
advme paauasaimx. Tiara
\nof the appeiiaxxt.    only
\npuzauarxt no the dam   am!
\ntharefom.    V’  the true
\ngm  aeekisng to distux-‘b
\nrm   H\u00a2nc>a, though tbs First
\n the pwsuassinn at’ the<\/p>\n
  lam passme\ufb01mn held by
\n was mt juati\ufb01ed in rwm\ufb02g the<\/p>\n
 . 4- ” VA   as t& h1a1′ Court fmvx\ufb01 me: that<\/p>\n
   wfected 1% \ufb02ick by actvme poaawaim.\n<\/p>\n
V.    By way af reply, \ufb02u $n& Comma} \ufb01r tin
\n   f  t -apipellant m R.S.A.He.8’73I2006 wosuld submsx that me
\n% ‘pa-opmymi;ma1ywaujo:u1tsam1y pmpmy. mam<\/p>\n
a.bm:wec:fa!1::xmmhersafthefam51yha\\mmade
\n@5’msmt}:mauit,,thea%1@inthsm d<\/p>\n
Z<\/p>\n
uwu:\\a-p~—-.– .. ._…….\n<\/p>\n
I15″ I \\u\\.J’iJl\\l VJ!’ AEKIVHIEHR riitarl  U!’    OF  “lb” LUUKI Elf’ l\\l”|l\\I’lr\\Il’*I.I\\r\\ I an<\/p>\n
appeal seeking in sex:-up 9. claim for advez-as <\/p>\n
the pm of advmrae poasmakm or any   ‘
\nwhich the appellant was   ixg’;\n<\/p>\n
have been yanma by the comma’ %<\/p>\n
7. The sulwtantiai \u00e9ift
\nin the respectitue appeal;   poaaasainn
\nof the appenant  a ancnxg cf
\nfact ‘m     an this mam
\nthat      said appellanfa
\n mama by the cam
\nbeiesnfg     mm Appenate Ccurt faund<\/p>\n
   E as ‘n being the NW 35 mm<\/p>\n
: V at;  paaaeaaion was immistcnt az\ufb01 this
\n L   me. as as\u00bb appropriate vim-,:1=e rm
\n% {man after death ef Pathaiah, the ammnt
\n  in ma”: pmmainn as age.Pmt other mmbera
\n  ‘esijthe family adwebr to th\ufb01r inimwt an\ufb01 aim: lapse of
\n3tima,t1my mught no *mmsemwim has pmmm. In<\/p>\n
t’hbvfaewafmematt\u00a2r.th:snsEefgan@bytEmTria1
\n  . by \ufb02m First App\ufb01ahe<\/p>\n
\u00e9<\/p>\n
:\u00ab x\\~’?’Q<\/p>\n
E
\nE
\nE
\nE
\nE
\n5<\/span>
\nE
\n3<\/span>
\n3<\/span>
\n:\n<\/p>\n
L:\n<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
:\n<\/p>\n
kw
\n3<\/span>
\n3<\/span>
\n_:: ,,
\nQ ,.\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
Q
\n5:\n<\/p>\n
Q
\n5:\n<\/p>\n
Z
\n‘5
\nIL
\nG
\nI”\n<\/p>\n
K
\n:3
\n6<\/span>
\nU
\n::\n<\/p>\n
Q<\/p>\n
Court seeking to preheat the a.ppeUant.vVwT”:’:ix;\n<\/p>\n
R.S.A.F:’o.2405}’2005 is in the xmture cf  _
\nh\ufb01uncwn restrainim the  ‘ 1.1.1:: V’  3  .,  vb *
\nR.8.A.Ka.8’I=’3[20\ufb016 \ufb01wam   <\/p>\n
of the appellant ems:\n<\/p>\n
saw. Whether the phat of    be
\nazxsi wouhl yet   the
\nFirst Appeihm ‘Cgurt   declura\ufb01mn
\n   court has only
\n V. at’ an imona\ufb01tsent plea
\nthat was   the de\ufb01ance of adxmse<\/p>\n
  be upm in be set-up by tm
\nsmuld be mama on the: mama cf fact<\/p>\n
in} imy be imtitxmd, by the appe\ufb01nnt in<\/p>\n
 “=1;- _444″v.\u00a3.8.$.H\u00a7;\u00a7’f$i2006,wmeh xmmy has ham mam by
\n_ 3 ‘    Apmlla\ufb01s Gnu.r%:. In this vim sf rm mm,
\n    in no mum far mwfweama with 11% mm of
\n ~  First Appelhtse Caurt that the &sesa:%an cf the “‘<\/p>\n
swam in R.S.gA.I\u00a7e.24G5!W05 Imda ta be protmted<\/p>\n
Q<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010 Author: Anand Byrareddy _ . _. .- ..-. .. ..n….~ . u\\.vIl -.vuu-u ur Iuutuntnlin HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C’ IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKAAT DATED THE THE 1=rr DAY OF if O f% _ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-166466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-29T06:18:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-29T06:18:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1301,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-29T06:18:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-29T06:18:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-29T06:18:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010"},"wordCount":1301,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010","name":"Smt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-29T06:18:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rudramma-radhamma-vs-smt-narasamma-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Rudramma @ Radhamma vs Smt Narasamma on 1 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166466"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166466\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}