{"id":16649,"date":"2008-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008"},"modified":"2016-09-07T15:36:23","modified_gmt":"2016-09-07T10:06:23","slug":"mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao &#8230; vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao &#8230; vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.Bhakthavatsala<\/div>\n<pre>1\n\nRSA No.36}:-'Z608\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF N0vEMBER_.'?;\u00e908V'_';-f f  .\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE Hownm DR. JUSTICE K.  \u00e9  T\n\nREGULAR SECOND APPEAL x'QV,'361\/2063   1.\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nMohanrao,\nS\/&lt;2 Laxman Rae Kuikami,\nAge: 61 years,\n\nOcc: Business, _\nR \/ 0 Behind Krishna \nBagalkot-S8?&#039; 101. __   \n\n: ($5 \n\n(By Sri V R D\u00e9agar,  I\n\nAND:\n\n1.<\/pre>\n<p> Assistant Etix\u00e9zszizutive Engineer.\n<\/p>\n<p>Kaniiataka .P'&lt;&#039;}W\u00a2rV &#039;i&#039;1jansmiss&#8211;i=:.u.c:&#039;<br \/>\nC0ipo1&#039;3;i:i-an&quot; Ltd&#039;. ,&#039; .\n<\/p>\n<p>Bagaligoi-:58&#8242;? 1&#8217;Qi;~   <\/p>\n<p> &#8216;  C\u00a7\u00abit&#8217;is;hj\u00e91;f1\u00a7a:gozi\u00e9ia\u00a7\ufb01ii,&#8217;;_  R<br \/>\n 40 years, <\/p>\n<p>(kc: Business, <\/p>\n<p>&#8216; aaoiuiisnankax Tr\ufb01ders,<\/p>\n<p>C3&#8217;uru3jd\u00a3ia$i::war Taikics,<\/p>\n<p>V  a _Bf&#8217;aga31;0t-Z&#8217;38;&#8217;?.&#8211;&#8216; 101.\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant<\/p>\n<p>Rcsggxmdents<\/p>\n<p>  \u00a3&#8217;I&#8217;his Regular Second Appeal is filed tmdzrr Section 100 of the Code<\/p>\n<p>ofilivil Procedure, against the juciwent and decree dated 24.10.2007&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>RSA N0.361f2008<\/p>\n<p>passed in R A No.56\/2006 on the file of the 1 Add}, Civjl\ufb01uudge (Sr.<br \/>\n[)iv1:3..), Bagaikot, dismissing the Appeal and upholding&amp;_a_i;z.i &#8216;V<br \/>\nthe judgment and deems dated 20.4.2005 passed in  on<br \/>\nthe \ufb01le of the Add}. Civil Judge: (Jr. mm), B\u00a71ga}kot;~~  , ff   &#8221;  ~ <\/p>\n<p>This Appeal coming on for admissio\u00a3;.&amp;thi$T diay\ufb01fh\u00e9  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;(he foliowing:\n<\/p>\n<p>The appe\ufb02ant\/plainti\ufb02  No. &#8216;G3; the \ufb01ie of Add]. Civil<br \/>\nJudge (Jr. Divn.) at Bagaikot, j,s&#8217;*&#8217;c.*.:=fg3:*e&#8217;&#8211;t;Lis&#8221;Li\ufb011cier Section 100 of<\/p>\n<p>the Code of Civil  3-;.~tj&#8211;:\u00a7$i:3g\u00e9&#8221;the judgment and deems<\/p>\n<p>dated 24.10.20a?&#8217;Tvm\u00e9;::\u00a7 i\u00a3i*;:\u00a7:&#8211;A&#8221;&#8216;N. q..S6\/&#8217;Q3355 on the \ufb01le of Civil Judge (Sr.<br \/>\nDim.) as weI1 &#8216;r_as&#8217;    &#8220;decree of the triai Court dated<br \/>\n20.4.2006 made  3 2$i\u00a2,&#8217;i9.;*&#8217;;e&lt;}\u00a7\u00a73 an the \ufb01le of Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.)<\/p>\n<p>at.Baga1k0t4   <\/p>\n<p> 2.  of the learned Counsel for the appellant.<br \/>\n*3&#8243;.  for the appellant submits that the Courts<\/p>\n<p> vv\ufb01elow   upon the \u20ac1OC&#8217;\u20ac.lI11t&#8217;I1t[I&#8217;E:I}t note (Ex.P&#8211;24}, which<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; .;_:1-:2-:1: sig3:1e\u00a2&#8217;;i_1t\u00a7}* the land Ioxvd and there was no consensus ad idem to<\/p>\n<p>  \ufb01at  eydsts landiord and mnam; re:-iationship between the<\/p>\n<p>A    1%.? and the iandiord of the said premises and tha right of the<\/p>\n<p>4\u00a7isf&#8217;3}\u00a7&#8217;1ant for get\ufb01rag e1ecmc sc\ufb01on. it is also conten\u00e9e\u00e9 that<\/p>\n<p>RSA No.36if2(}O8<br \/>\nboth the Courts beiow erred in not considering the documentatfi-evi\ufb01enee<br \/>\nplaced on record by the plainti\ufb01 in respect of the suit  hole<\/p>\n<p>that the defendant No.2 is trespasser.\n<\/p>\n<p>4, The appcnam\/p1asm_ie&#8221; \ufb01leci a sang for X<\/p>\n<p>injunction, dixec\ufb01ng the defendant   electricity<br \/>\nsupply given to the suit prexnises   is the<br \/>\ntenant in respect of the suit   pleaded that in the<br \/>\neastern side of the     9&#8242; x 14&#8242;), the<br \/>\ndefendant No.2  bitsi:ne.ss  and styie of Gouri<br \/>\nShankar Tzadaseauagev &#8216;1e{;i2V1.\u00ab\u00a7\u00a3sked the plaintiff to run the<br \/>\nsame bnsinessijin  on, the defendant No.2 obtained<br \/>\npower supply  the p1aim:i\ufb01&#8217;s knowledge. The<br \/>\n iseneidii legaiu toiithe defendant No. 1 for disconnection of<\/p>\n<p>petite:   the ..e1efenda.nt No.1 did not concede the zeqnest of the<\/p>\n<p>._plaintiA\ufb01Z&#8217; gaeeeeaee that the p1a:inti\ufb01&#8217; had aineady \ufb01led a suit<\/p>\n<p>it  defendant&#8217;  in O S No.168\/2006 for permanent injunction.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; i t1efendant..NoE1\/ KPFCL remained absent before the trial Court. The<\/p>\n<p> entered appearance and filed written statement admitting<\/p>\n<p>  was running a tea shop in T P No.67, but he denie\u00e9 all<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;together  avfennents. It is contended that the shop premises belongs to<\/p>\n<p>Sit Shitvayogi Mandir Trust one he is a tenant under the said Trust and<\/p>\n<p>he has been paying rents Iegulariy. It was aiso contended that the Trust<\/p>\n<p>RSA No.361:&#8217;2W8<br \/>\nitself secured power supply to the premises a\ufb01d the defe\ufb02dantjisrpaying<br \/>\nelectricity charges to the authority concerned and prayed  of<\/p>\n<p>the suit with costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. 011 the basis of the p1eadi11gs, . the<br \/>\nissues. In support of the case of the vhhegote<br \/>\nRW-1 besides examining one   as<br \/>\nP.W-2 and got marked Exs.?&#8211;}. to    defendant No.2<br \/>\ngot: him examined as     hearing arguinents<br \/>\nand perusing evider2eel&#8217;l\u00bbm:iiteriol answered issue No.1 in the<br \/>\nnegative   &#8216;terrrpiove that the defendant No.2<br \/>\nunlawfully obtziizied  shop from defendant No. 1. The<br \/>\ntrial Court \ufb01lrtherlll\u00e9musweredll&#8217;Viee1;;%&#8221;_.&#8217;;\\}o.2 in the negative holding that the<br \/>\n   and dismissed the suit. Feeling<\/p>\n<p>agg1i\u00a7ex{edV:Vb3I__thee_&#8217;jud\ufb01nent and decree of the irial Court, the plaintiff&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>  A No.56\/2006. The lower Appellate Court<\/p>\n<p>eonsisiexed   urged and came to a conclusion that there was<\/p>\n<p>  restlie  and dismissed the same. This is impugned in this<\/p>\n<p>x   There is a conemmnt \ufb01nding by the Courts below. There ie no<\/p>\n<p>illegality or in\ufb01rmity in the imp*\u00a31@.ed judgment of the 1&#8243; Appellate Court<\/p>\n<p>RSA No.361:&#8217;2\u00a3)i)8<br \/>\ncon\ufb01rming the judgment of the ma} Court. Ne substantial cjsjqes\ufb01on of<\/p>\n<p>question of law arises for consideration in this Appeal. _ __ .V .\n<\/p>\n<p>7. In the result, the Appeal fails and the same if <\/p>\n<p>Bjs<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao &#8230; vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008 Author: K.Bhakthavatsala 1 RSA No.36}:-&#8216;Z608 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF N0vEMBER_.&#8217;?;\u00e908V&#8217;_&#8217;;-f f . BEFORE THE Hownm DR. JUSTICE K. \u00e9 T REGULAR SECOND APPEAL x&#8217;QV,&#8217;361\/2063 1. BETWEEN: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16649","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao ... vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao ... vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-07T10:06:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao &#8230; vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-07T10:06:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":770,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao ... vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-07T10:06:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao &#8230; vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao ... vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao ... vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-07T10:06:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao &#8230; vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-07T10:06:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008"},"wordCount":770,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008","name":"Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao ... vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-07T10:06:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohanrao-son-of-laxman-rao-vs-assistant-executive-engineer-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mohanrao Son Of Laxman Rao &#8230; vs Assistant Executive Engineer on 18 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16649","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16649"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16649\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16649"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16649"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16649"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}