{"id":166544,"date":"2007-06-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-06-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007"},"modified":"2017-08-21T18:59:08","modified_gmt":"2017-08-21T13:29:08","slug":"moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007","title":{"rendered":"Moosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Moosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMFA No. 1322 of 2000()\n\n\n\n1. MOOSA\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. A.K. UMMER\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.M.HUSAIN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.P.BALACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :07\/06\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                    J.B.KOSHY & K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JJ.\n\n                 -------------------------------------\n\n                          M.F.A.No.1322 OF 2000\n\n                 -------------------------------------\n\n                          Dated 7th June,  2007\n\n\n\n                                  JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Koshy,J
\n        .\n<\/p>\n
              Appellant\/petitioner   met   with   a   motor   accident   by<\/p>\n
which he sustained serious injuries while he was travelling as<\/p>\n
a   pillion   rider   in   a   motor   cycle   driven   by   the   fourth<\/p>\n
respondent.  The lorry driven  by the  first  respondent owned by<\/p>\n
the second  respondent and insured by the third respondent hit<\/p>\n
the   vehicle   and   the   accident   occurred.            He   claimed   a<\/p>\n
compensation   of   Rs.1,50,000\/=.     The   Tribunal   found   that   the<\/p>\n
accident   occurred   due   to   the   negligence   of   the   first<\/p>\n
respondent.     Insurance   company   (R3)   was   directed   to   deposit<\/p>\n
the   amount.        However,   only   Rs.24,950\/=   was   awarded   as<\/p>\n
compensation.     Only   quantum   of   compensation   is   disputed   in<\/p>\n
this   appeal.     Hence,   we   are   considering   that   aspect   alone   in<\/p>\n
this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
              2.   Appellant   was   aged   30   at   the   time   of   the<\/p>\n
accident.   According   to   him,   he   was   a   coolie.     The   accident<\/p>\n
occurred on 29.12.1991.  The Tribunal fixed only Rs.1,000\/= as<\/p>\n
monthly   wages.     He   was   an   able   bodied   man   maintaining   a<\/p>\n
family.  When second schedule was framed in 1994, the notional<\/p>\n
income   of   a   non-earning   person   was   fixed   as   Rs.1,250\/=<\/p>\n
MFA.1322\/2000                        2<\/span><\/p>\n
(Rs.15,000\/=   per   year).     It   is   true   that   the   accident<\/p>\n
occurred   on   29.12.1991.     Appellant   is   not   a   non-earning<\/p>\n
person,   but,   is   an   earning   person.             In   the   above<\/p>\n
circumstances,   we   are   of   the   opinion   that   at   least<\/p>\n
Rs.1,250\/= should   be fixed as monthly income.   He was aged<\/p>\n
30 at the time of the accident.   It was repeatedly held by<\/p>\n
the   Apex   Court   that   multiplier   has   to   be   fixed   taking<\/p>\n
guidance from the second schedule.  A three member bench of<\/p>\n
the   Supreme   Court   in        Smt.Supe   Dei   and   others          v.\n<\/p>\n
M\/s.National   Insurance   Company   Ltd.   and   another  (JT   2002<\/p>\n
(Suppl.1)   SC   451)   held   that   the   second   schedule   of   the<\/p>\n
Motor   Vehicles   Act   is   framed   for   the   purpose   of   awarding<\/p>\n
compensation   under   Section   163A,   but,   it   serves   as   a<\/p>\n
guideline   for   determination   of   compensation   under   Section<\/p>\n
166   of   the   Motor   Vehicles   Act.     Since   the   victim   of   the<\/p>\n
accident   in   that   case   was   aged   32,   considering   the   second<\/p>\n
schedule,   Hon’ble   Supreme   Court   accepted   17   as   the<\/p>\n
multiplier.     In  United   India   Insurance   Co   Ltd.  v.  Patricia<\/p>\n
Jean Mahajan and others  (JT 2002 (5) SC 74), the Apex Court<\/p>\n
held   that,   except   in   very   rare   cases,   multiplier   system<\/p>\n
should not be deviated from.  The other methods, which were<\/p>\n
in   vogue   prior   to   the   introduction   of   the   multiplier<\/p>\n
system,   were   held   to   be   no   more   good   system.     It   was<\/p>\n
MFA.1322\/2000                        3<\/span><\/p>\n
further   held   that   normally   the   multiplier,   as   indicated   in<\/p>\n
the   second   schedule,   should   be   applied.     Though   the   second<\/p>\n
schedule   is   found   to   be   a   safe   guide   for   the   purpose   of<\/p>\n
calculation   of   the   amount   of   compensation,   in   special<\/p>\n
circumstances, it can be varied.  In that case, it was also<\/p>\n
held   that   if   the   multiplicand   is   very   high,   a   lesser<\/p>\n
multiplier can be taken.  In  Abati Bezbaruah  v.  Dy.Director<\/p>\n
General,   Geological   Survey   of   India   and<\/a>   another  ((2003)   3<\/p>\n
SCC   148),   it   was   held   that   structured   formula   mentioned   in<\/p>\n
the   second   schedule   gives   guidelines   for   determination   of<\/p>\n
the   amount   of   compensation   in   terms   of   Section   166   of   the<\/p>\n
Motor Vehicles Act.   Deviation from the structured   formula<\/p>\n
can be resorted to only in exceptional cases and ordinarily<\/p>\n
the above multiplier system should be followed.   If that be<\/p>\n
so, 17 is the apt multiplier.\n<\/p>\n
            3. Now, we will come to the disabilities occurred<\/p>\n
to the appellant due to the accident.  He was treated as an<\/p>\n
inpatient   for   13   days   in   the   Medical   College   Hospital,<\/p>\n
Calicut.     Subsequently   also   he   has   undergone   treatment.\n<\/p>\n
Disability   certificate   was   issued   by   Dr.C.C.Suresh   M.S.,<\/p>\n
Department   of   Surgery,   Medical   College   Hospital,   Calicut<\/p>\n
which was marked as Ext.A5.  The above certificate reads as<\/p>\n
MFA.1322\/2000                                4<\/span><\/p>\n
follows:\n<\/p>\n
                            “Certified   that   I   have   today<\/p>\n
            examined   Sri.Moosa   30   years   who   was<\/p>\n
            under   my   treatment   from   29.12.91   as   IP<\/p>\n
            59313   following   an   alleged   traffic<\/p>\n
            accident   which   occurred   on     29.12.91<\/p>\n
            following   which   he   was   admitted   at   MCH<\/p>\n
            Calicut         after         reference                from         KPM<\/p>\n
            Hospital,   Malappuram   and   he   was   having<\/p>\n
            Head   Injury   with   CT   proved   communited<\/p>\n
            depressed   fracture   of   Right   frontal<\/p>\n
            base   and   was   discharged   on   6.1.92   with<\/p>\n
            an   advice   of   long   term   Anticonvulsant<\/p>\n
            drugs.     As   he   is   now   having   recurrent<\/p>\n
            Headache   and   occasional   epileptic   fits<\/p>\n
            which  can  be  due  to  the  post  traumatic<\/p>\n
            sequelae.     So,   I   consider   that   the<\/p>\n
            above   patient   is   having   a   permanent<\/p>\n
            disability of about fifteen percent.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
According   to   the   doctor,   appellant   has   15%   disability.\n<\/p>\n
Appellant   also   has   a   case   that   due   to   the   accident   he<\/p>\n
developed         depressive         mood         and         he          was         treated         by<\/p>\n
Dr.D.Sreekumar,             Associate             Professor                of          Psychiatry,<\/p>\n
Government   Health   Centre,   Calicut.     Ext.A8   shows   that   he<\/p>\n
has  developed     organic  mood  disorder.    On  the  basis  of  the<\/p>\n
certificates   produced   (Exts.A5   and   A8),   compensation   was<\/p>\n
not   calculated   on   a   scientific   basis,   but,   only   Rs.7,500\/=<\/p>\n
was   granted   as   compensation   for   disability   and   loss   of<\/p>\n
earning   power.     Ext.A5   certificate   shows   that   he   is   having<\/p>\n
epilepsy  due  to  the  accident.     There  was  head  injury.   The<\/p>\n
MFA.1322\/2000                        5<\/span><\/p>\n
doctor   certified   15%   disability.              Considering   Ext.A5<\/p>\n
certificate   and   the   nature   of   his   job,   we   take   10%<\/p>\n
disability.  If  that be  so, compensation  payable will be<\/p>\n
Rs.15,000 x 17 x  10 = 25,500\/=.  The  Tribunal  has awarded<\/p>\n
                    100<\/span><\/p>\n
only   Rs.7,500\/=   for   disability   and   loss   of   earning<\/p>\n
capacity.   Hence, the claimant is entitled to an additional<\/p>\n
amount of Rs.18,000\/= on this count.   For disfigurement and<\/p>\n
loss of teeth, the Tribunal has awarded Rs.2,000\/=.  We are<\/p>\n
not interfering with the same.  We have taken Rs.1,250\/= as<\/p>\n
monthly   income.     For   loss   of   earnings   for     the   period   he<\/p>\n
was actually bed ridden, the Tribunal has given Rs.3,000\/=.\n<\/p>\n
Since we have taken Rs.1,250\/= as the monthly income, he is<\/p>\n
entitled   to   an   additional   amount   of   Rs.750\/=   under   that<\/p>\n
head.     It   is   the     case   of   the   appellant   that   the   entire<\/p>\n
medical   bills   were   not   produced.     The   medical   certificates<\/p>\n
show   that   he   needs   continuous   treatment.     He   has   also<\/p>\n
produced  various medical bills to show that even now he is<\/p>\n
continuing   treatment.     Medical   bills   for   only   Rs.656\/=   was<\/p>\n
produced before the Tribunal.   But, the Tribunal found that<\/p>\n
during   the   period   of   treatment     all   the   medical   bills<\/p>\n
cannot   be   produced   and   the   amount   awarded   for   medical<\/p>\n
expenses   was   Rs.1,500\/=.     Considering   the   future   treatment<\/p>\n
and   nature   of   head   injury,   we   are   granting   an   additional<\/p>\n
MFA.1322\/2000                       6<\/span><\/p>\n
amount   of   Rs.5,000\/=   for   medical   expenses   and   future<\/p>\n
medical   expenses.         Even   though   it   is   contended   that<\/p>\n
compensation   awarded   under   other   heads   are   also   very<\/p>\n
meagre,   we   are   not   giving   any   enhancement   under   other<\/p>\n
heads.        Therefore,   the   appellant        is   entitled   to   an<\/p>\n
additional   amount   of   Rs.23,750\/=.     The   above   amount   of<\/p>\n
Rs.23,750\/=   should   be   deposited   by   the   third   respondent<\/p>\n
insurance company, over and above the decreed amount by the<\/p>\n
Tribunal,   with   8%   interest   from   the   date   of   accident   till<\/p>\n
its   deposit.     Since   the   accident   occurred   in   1991   and<\/p>\n
considering   the   age   of   the   appellant   etc.,   on   deposit   of<\/p>\n
the amount, the appellant is allowed to withdraw the same.\n<\/p>\n
             The appeal is partly allowed.\n<\/p>\n
                                           J.B.KOSHY<\/p>\n
                                             JUDGE<\/p>\n
                                        K.P.BALACHANDRAN<\/p>\n
                                             JUDGE<\/p>\n
tks<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Moosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MFA No. 1322 of 2000() 1. MOOSA … Petitioner Vs 1. A.K. UMMER … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON For Respondent :SRI.M.M.HUSAIN The Hon’ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY The Hon’ble MR. Justice K.P.BALACHANDRAN Dated :07\/06\/2007 O R […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-166544","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMoosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Moosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-06-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-21T13:29:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Moosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-06-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-21T13:29:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1129,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007\",\"name\":\"Moosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-06-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-21T13:29:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Moosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Moosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Moosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-06-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-21T13:29:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Moosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007","datePublished":"2007-06-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-21T13:29:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007"},"wordCount":1129,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007","name":"Moosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-06-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-21T13:29:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/moosa-vs-a-k-ummer-on-7-june-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Moosa vs A.K. Ummer on 7 June, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166544","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166544"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166544\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166544"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}