{"id":166614,"date":"2009-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009"},"modified":"2017-07-25T01:52:00","modified_gmt":"2017-07-24T20:22:00","slug":"barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009<\/div>\n
RSA No.1794 of 1996                                                            1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH\n\n                                           R.S.A. No. 1794 of 1996\n                                      Date of Decision:November 18, 2009\n\n\n\nBarber Shiv Kumar No.14\/B                            ...........Appellant\n\n\n                                Versus\n\n\nHaryana State and another                             ..........Respondents\n\n\nCoram:        Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina\n\n\nPresent: Mr.Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the appellant.\n         None for the respondents\n\n                                **\n\nSabina, J.\n<\/pre>\n
                  Plaintiff-Shiv Kumar filed a suit for declaration . The suit of<\/p>\n
the plaintiff was decreed       by the    Sub Judge IInd Class, Karnal vide<\/p>\n
judgment and decree dated 16.8.1994.            Aggrieved by the same, the<\/p>\n
defendants filed an appeal which was partly accepted and the suit was<\/p>\n
decreed to an extent that order dated 14.9.1992 passed by the Deputy<\/p>\n
Director PTC Madhuban was illegal but it was further held that petitioner<\/p>\n
was not entitled to back wages by the Additional District Judge, Karnal vide<\/p>\n
judgment and decree dated 31.1.1996. Hence, the present appeal by the<\/p>\n
Plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n
                 The facts of the case, as noticed by the Additional District<\/p>\n
Judge in paras 2 to 5 of its judgment, read as under:-<\/p>\n
             “2. Shiv Kumar, plaintiff, was working as Barber in PTC,<\/p>\n
             Madhuban Karnal. A charge-sheet Exhibit P1\/C under Rule 7 of<\/p>\n
             Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1952
\n RSA No.1794 of 1996                                                         2<\/span><\/p>\n
         (hereinafter referred to as Rules,1952) was served upon the<\/p>\n
         plaintiff on October 16,1991 alleging therein that he remained<\/p>\n
         absent from August 31, 1991 to October 1,1991 without taking<\/p>\n
         leave. It is further the case of the plaintiff that earlier a charge-<\/p>\n
         sheet Exhibit DW1\/2 was issued to him on May 18,1991 under<\/p>\n
         Rule 7 of Rules, 1952 alleging therein that he remained absent<\/p>\n
         from February 27,1991 to March 11,1991 and he was accordingly<\/p>\n
         suspended with effect from March 11,1991.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         3. To the chargesheet dated October 16,1991, Exhibit P1\/C. The<\/p>\n
         plaintiff filed reply dated November 4,1991, submitted with the<\/p>\n
         Punishing Authority on December 2,1991. Reply was found to be<\/p>\n
         unsatisfactory, as a result of which regular departmental enquiry<\/p>\n
         was ordered on December 23,1991. Shri Hazari Singh, Deputy<\/p>\n
         Superintendent of Police was appointed as an enquiry Officer.<\/p>\n
         After holding the enquiry and other procedure laid down in Rule 7<\/p>\n
         of Rules, 1952, Deputy director PTC Madhuban, Karnal,<\/p>\n
         dismissed the plaintiff from the service by order dated September<\/p>\n
         14, 1992, which has been challenged by the plaintiff by filing the<\/p>\n
         present suit.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         4. The suit was contested. A Joint written statement was filed by<\/p>\n
         the defendants interalia pleading therein that the plaintiff<\/p>\n
         remained absent from the duty on three occasions, firstly, from<\/p>\n
         February 27,1991 to March 11,1991;secondly, from May 23,1991<\/p>\n
         to June 12,1991 and thirdly from August 31,1991 to October<\/p>\n
         1,1991. On all the three occasions, the departmental enquiry was<\/p>\n
         initiated against the plaintiff. The plaintiff was suspended on
\n RSA No.1794 of 1996                                                           3<\/span><\/p>\n
          March 11,1991 for his being absent from the duty from February<\/p>\n
          27, 1991 to March 11,1991. He was again suspended on October<\/p>\n
          4,1991 for remaining absent from August 31,1991 to October<\/p>\n
          1,1991.     Two more departmental enquiries were also pending<\/p>\n
          against the plaintiff and notices of dismissal were also issued in<\/p>\n
          those two enquiries. In other words, it has been pleaded that the<\/p>\n
          order dated September 14,1992 passed by the Deputy Director<\/p>\n
          PTC, Madhuban was perfect and no interference should be called<\/p>\n
          therein.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
          5. The plaintiff had filed replication to the written statement filed<\/p>\n
          by the defendants controverting the contents of the written<\/p>\n
          statement and reiterating the averments made in the plaint”.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
               On the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were<\/p>\n
framed by the trial Court on 8.1.2001:-\n<\/p>\n
          “1.Whether the order dated 14.9.1992 passed by the Director PTC<\/p>\n
          Madhuban dismissing the service of the plaintiff read with order<\/p>\n
          of the appellant authority, if any, are illegal, arbitrary, malafide,<\/p>\n
          not binding on the rights of the plaintiff, if so, its effect?OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
          2.In case issue no.1 is decided in favour of the plaintiff, whether<\/p>\n
          the plaintiff is entitled to the consequential relief alongwith<\/p>\n
          interest, if so, how much and at what rate?OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
          3.Whether the suit is premature?OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
          4.Whether there is no cause of action?OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
          5.Whether the suit is bad for non-joinder, mis-joinder of necessary<\/p>\n
          parties?OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
          6.Whether the plaintiff has not come with clean hands?OPD
\n RSA No.1794 of 1996                                                         4<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           7.Whether this court has got no jurisdiction?OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           8.Whether proper court fee has not been affixed?OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           9.Relief.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant, I am of<\/p>\n
the opinion that the present appeal deserves to be dismissed.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                Plaintiff-appellant had filed a suit for declaration that the<\/p>\n
order dated 14.9.1992 whereby he was dismissed from service was illegal<\/p>\n
and arbitrary. The suit of the plaintiff was decreed by the trial Court. The<\/p>\n
judgment and decree of the trial Court were modified to the extent that the<\/p>\n
plaintiff was not entitled to salary for the period he had remained out of<\/p>\n
service.   Plaintiff was working as a Barber with the defendants.          He<\/p>\n
remained absent from duty from 27.2.1991 to 11.3.1991, 23.5.1991 to<\/p>\n
12.6.1991 and 31.8.1991 to 1.10.1991.        Admittedly the services of the<\/p>\n
plaintiff were terminated after holding a departmental inquiry against him.<\/p>\n
The Courts below have ordered that the order of dismissal was illegal. The<\/p>\n
State has not filed any appeal challenging the judgment and decree of the<\/p>\n
learned Additional District Judge whereby it was held that the dismissal<\/p>\n
order is illegal.   The learned Additional District Judge has denied the<\/p>\n
benefit of back wages to the plaintiff on the ground that since the plaintiff<\/p>\n
had not worked for the said period, consequently, he was not entitled for the<\/p>\n
salary for the period he remained out of employment of the Police<\/p>\n
Department. Learned counsel for the appellant has placed reliance on a<\/p>\n
decision of the Full Bench of this judgment in Radha Ram vs. Municipal<\/p>\n
Committe Barnala<\/a> (1983)85 PLR 21 wherein it was held as under:-<\/p>\n
           “12. Now apart from precedent on larger consideration of<\/p>\n
           principle as well the stand of the appellant herein commends itself
\n RSA No.1794 of 1996                                                        5<\/span><\/p>\n
         for acceptance. Once the relief of setting aside or quashing the<\/p>\n
         order of termination has been granted or a declaratory decree has<\/p>\n
         been passed to the similar effect. It necessarily follows that the<\/p>\n
         employee in the eye of law continues to be in service and as a<\/p>\n
         necessary consequence thereof would be          entitled to all the<\/p>\n
         emoluments flowing from that status. He must be deemed to be in<\/p>\n
         a position identical with that existing prior to the passing of the<\/p>\n
         order of termination of his service. In the felicitous language of<\/p>\n
         their Lordships the emoluments of the post are a logical<\/p>\n
         consequence of setting aside the order of termination. In such a<\/p>\n
         situation to insist upon the filing of a second suit for a relief<\/p>\n
         which directly flows from the declaratory decree can hardly be<\/p>\n
         warranted. The hallowd rule that the law disfavours multiplicity<\/p>\n
         of proceedings would again require that the consequential relief<\/p>\n
         should be recorded in the original proceedings itself. This seems<\/p>\n
         to be the more so in view of the recent judgments of the final<\/p>\n
         court adverted to above holding that in essence the cause of action<\/p>\n
         for the claim to salary and emoluments is co-terminus with the<\/p>\n
         decree setting aside the wrongful termination. Therefore, no issue<\/p>\n
         or bar of limitation now raises any hurdle in this context. It<\/p>\n
         deserves recalling that on the earlier view that the right to salary<\/p>\n
         and emoluments was likely to become barred after a period of<\/p>\n
         three years from the date of the order of termination itself there<\/p>\n
         might have been some jurisdiction for the need of a separate suit<\/p>\n
         for emoluments etc. to test it on the envil of limitation. However,<\/p>\n
         since such a view has now been given the go-by and its
\n RSA No.1794 of 1996                                                          6<\/span><\/p>\n
          anomalous results have been authoritatively noticed by the final<\/p>\n
          Court in State of Madhya Pradesh V. State of Maharashtra and<\/p>\n
          Maimoona Khatun’s<\/a> case, it seems wholly wasteful to require a<\/p>\n
          fresh spurt of litigation for the recovery of emoluments which<\/p>\n
          necessarily flow from the quashing of the termination order or the<\/p>\n
          grant of the declaratory decree”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
In the present case, the plaintiff had remained absent from duty. Although<\/p>\n
the order of dismissal passed after holding a departmental inquiry against<\/p>\n
the plaintiff has been held to be illegal but in the facts and circumstances of<\/p>\n
the present case, the learned Additional District Judge has rightly held that<\/p>\n
the plaintiff is not entitled for the salary for the period he had not worked.<\/p>\n
The view taken by the learned Additional District Judge cannot be said to be<\/p>\n
perverse. The judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n
fails to advance the case of the appellant.\n<\/p>\n
               No substantial question of law arises in this regular second<\/p>\n
appeal which would warrant interference by this Court       Accordingly, this<\/p>\n
appeal is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                   ( Sabina )
\n                                                      Judge<\/p>\n
November 18, 2009<\/p>\n
arya\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009 RSA No.1794 of 1996 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 1794 of 1996 Date of Decision:November 18, 2009 Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\/B ………..Appellant Versus Haryana State and another ……….Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mrs. Justice […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-166614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBarber Shiv Kumar No.14\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-24T20:22:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\\\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-24T20:22:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1381,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\\\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-24T20:22:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\\\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-24T20:22:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-24T20:22:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009"},"wordCount":1381,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009","name":"Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-24T20:22:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/barber-shiv-kumar-no-14b-vs-haryana-state-and-another-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Barber Shiv Kumar No.14\/B vs Haryana State And Another on 18 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166614"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166614\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}