{"id":1670,"date":"2008-03-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008"},"modified":"2017-01-21T09:18:19","modified_gmt":"2017-01-21T03:48:19","slug":"n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"N Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
N Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: H.Billappa<\/div>\n
%\n\n' IN THE HIGH WURTOF KARNATAKA, \n\nmm nus 'ms 31\" may or mncn  %\n\nBEFORE\n\nma HON'Bl.E MR.    & '\n\n:   7 I  \n\nBETVEN:\n\n1. N.Sai*oja_jm;n\"a,'*w--.      .\nA9ed3t>\u00a2Lrt%s%4% '\naw\/0 IY'Y3s'r3pa _' --\n23. Svumi\ufb01i\ufb01g 5?'  %\nIndain, \nBangafom-22_.  \" \n\n 2.  ..... ..\n\n._ \"  60 y\u00e9rs,\n%  3%'\/_'cs= I;vS\u00a7d\u00bb3shiva Ready.\n\n3. A  p.A.a\u00a2pan\u00bb;a may,\n\n Agedamm: 41 years,\n\".-Nib Prabhakara R\ufb01dy,\n52\"'S3; \n\n%%  Govardhan,\n\nAged about 39 vars,\nS\/o Lsadmhiva Raddy.\n\n\n\n2 am 4 are r\/at No.895, 4\"' cm,\n16\"' Main, MICO Layout,\nB'm II Sage,\n\nBangazore --- S60 0276.   1  %  T 1 \n\n(Common in\n\n(By sn Yoganarasimha,   \" \nAND:   A.\n\n1. M\/s.Gov\u00a7rdhanmeau\u00bbe,...[ \nAFirmofPa_rmmrs,VV....._jV.   ' '\n45\/2, xndssaiaa suburb.   A. \nYeshwai'3tha_pur, .T'un1kyr Read, \n33\"?'-\"\u00b0'3'    \u00ab' \n\n2. M\/s; unsted0xvW!..%:a. Pvt. Ltx!.,\n, -- by its Managing Director,\n  46:2, Yesmeanthapur, Tumkur Row,\n aangam - 550 022.\n\n    Toots (Pvt) m,\n\n. '  by Em? Dirwtor,\n 4.6\/2,.'(esmvan\ufb021apw, Tumleur Road,\n - 566 022.  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
   35?. M\/s. Gmmsdhanv lheatre.<\/p>\n
A \ufb01rm of Partners, 46\/2,
\nInduwial Suburb, Yahwanthapur,
\n‘Turnkur Rom, Bangalore ~— 22<\/p>\n
by its Manning Director.\n<\/p>\n
kl\/..\n<\/p>\n
Lnarayana Raddy,
\nAged about 63 years,
\n23\/1, V Cross, I Main Road,<\/p>\n
Yeshvvanthpur,   <\/p>\n
Bangalore — 22.<\/p>\n
\n\nC.M.Krishna Raddy,  \nAged about 58 yars,  \n\nS\/o  Redd?-_     _ --.. \n\nC. Mvaradaraja     \" \n\nAged about 65 yams,-1\n\nBoth are  1' H .\n\nTami!    \n\n '.  Sn      ..... .. 7\n\n\"  50 years,\n\nA ' %  {W\/6 c.M.Monan Raddy,\n\n<\/pre>\n
 . R.faEt..\u00a7’\u00bb:em”arwjaIi, No.55\/A,
\n%%  13″”C\u00a7m3s, IVMain,<\/p>\n
 Msaliwwwam,
\n “‘ 3-\n<\/p>\n
” Since mi by his U25.\n<\/p>\n
Meera,
\nAged abwt 52 years,<\/p>\n
(3)<\/span><\/p>\n
wlo Lm R.Samnal:h Kumar.\n<\/p>\n
A\u00bb<\/p>\n
(b) Dhanaiakshrt\ufb01,<\/p>\n
Aged about 30 years,
\nD10 Late R.Sampath Kumar.\n<\/p>\n
Boa’: are residing at M02911,
\n1″ ‘A’ Main, Shixmahail\u00e9p
\nBangalore — 10. V<\/p>\n
7. R.Kuppamma,
\nAged about 32 years,
\nW\/oLateG.Raja Raddy,   %
\nNo.49, III crom,c,~a;aupu:~am,
\nBangaIore–~21.  *      –\n<\/p>\n
8. M\/s.\n<\/p>\n
r:e:tres\u00e9\u00bb1t\u00e9sd1–Ihy_it~31′?\u00ab*.a_na”g\u00a7:1g,_l3irecbor,
\n546\/2,’Yae;\u20ac!fnn{a:1tha;)u;, Tumiaxr Road,
\nBangaiare  ‘- ‘<\/p>\n
9. M\/s. Eariao\ufb02oy 1?::ois.{Pvt.) Ltd.,
\n5 by its Managing Ezirectm,
\nyj   apur, Tumkur Road,
\n”  — 560 022.  RESPONDENTS<\/p>\n
‘V   Sr. Contact for
\n‘ _ 5.LJ%h, Adv.,, for R-1)<\/p>\n
‘:3-aeiae, <\/p>\n
gum R.s=.A.’gp_aga 1.3\/5. 95 Riw. onder 41 Rule 1 of cm<\/p>\n
against the judgment and cmee dazed 31.3.1999 passed in
\n *  1108189 by me V Add. City Civil Judge, Bangalare,\n<\/p>\n
—  c\ufb01smiming the suit for dactara\ufb01an and  .<\/p>\n
me
\nE\ufb01appeaicomingonforhearirgtzhisclay\ufb01hecourt<\/p>\n
 delivered the fo\ufb02cwing:-\n<\/p>\n
V,<\/p>\n
V-3’\\<\/p>\n
J
\nThese two appeas \ufb01led by the plaintiffs am
\nagainst me judgment am decrees dated 31.o3.1%999kk   <\/p>\n
by the v Addi. City ma Judge, Bangalore, in   <\/p>\n
1109of89.\n<\/p>\n
2. By the impugned   <\/p>\n
court has dismm-zed’ we sure: \u00e9sgj*o.s.\u00a7to.11ea[m9Tand <\/p>\n
granzea ;:d9;19-39 for 1\/8″‘ share with symbolic<\/p>\n
 .?..f   that, me appeIIanm–p|am’\ufb01s have<\/p>\n
% 4.,  mead the fad: in o.s.no. um\/39 are as<\/p>\n
% x   erimnas plan\ufb01ff, 1.5% may, med suit in<\/p>\n
‘ VA   .~.0i.S.No.11G8\/89 for mandatory injunction and p<%ion
\nVctaiming\ufb01zatheismeerduaveawnerofthesdtsdwedtse<\/p>\n
L\/<\/p>\n
preperty. According tn him, sat sdzedule  is a
\nportion of see No.1A, which has been aimted up hia1j;bjI,:t:fse<\/p>\n
erstwhile C.I.T.B. and poesssion certificate    .<\/p>\n
on 31.08.1970 and Lease-cum-safe' "–7ai:=}a 'V<\/p>\n
executed in his favour and he <\/p>\n
enjoyment of sine No.1\/A. It is  ,  s;seeaeme kk<\/p>\n
property being a port:i\u00a7Jaa.'1of_Asi\u00a3:e'V'  "of super
\nstructures and me  and<\/p>\n
5;.  ex:  the piaintiff, i.e.,
\n   six emers purch\ufb01 the<\/p>\n
p . 1% j'iar}d\u00abe\u00a7_e eueepe and it memes in at same Sq.H:.<\/p>\n
  partnership firm by name M\/s.Go\\ardhan<\/p>\n
 _  1" defendant and it mme into existence from<\/p>\n
_  i9e.9a..19?i and dzerea\ufb02aez it took on lame the wjacmt sine<\/p>\n
   regmrea lame deed dated 25.05.1973.<\/p>\n
2%..\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5. 111eo:igindpiaI?n\ufb01ffw$orreof|iveparju{&s.of<\/p>\n
the 1* defendant \ufb01rm. Later on, the <\/p>\n
mm others re\ufb01red from the 1% <\/p>\n
partnership was reconstituted on <\/p>\n
defendant built the    <\/p>\n
piaintiff permitted the \ufb01rst   of ms
\nsite and thus, the 1*’  “if: possession
\nof the sat ecnee.-ee   was built,<\/p>\n
some    up in the sat sctmule
\nproperty,’ go  er things of the 1* defendant.
\n net out a poruen of the mining to me<\/p>\n
  they are in occupation of me suit<\/p>\n
  &  <\/p>\n
 ‘me 1″ defendant is in permissive possession of<\/p>\n
‘    scmule property and has put up etmcmres in an<\/p>\n
%    cf time. me plain\ufb01ff is not a party m the connect or<\/p>\n
 any understanding betvmen the defendants intense. The<\/p>\n
plaintiff is the absoiute owner of the suit scheduke propmy.<\/p>\n
The 1” defandant has mzproved pmpeny,  <\/p>\n
8. Vacant space   <\/p>\n
is part of site No.1A has  mad by  “turd.<\/p>\n
shoring bricks,     on
\nmabariais. The plainatfis  max works by
\nname Govar\ufb02ha\ufb01   No.1 suddenly
\nturned    injunction<\/p>\n
9.’   has filed its written statement<\/p>\n
   \ufb01rm: defendant is a nagmed’ \ufb01rm \ufb01t-.u:aed’<\/p>\n
  1c};9.197:L22.%% As per the registered sale deed dam<\/p>\n
& &   iannag irv{Sy.Nos. 4511A and 4512A of mhwanmpur, Bangalore<\/p>\n
  Taiuk, bearing Munidpa No.46. He mad the property,<\/p>\n
a  favour of eight persons, namdy I.Sadmhiva Raddy,<\/p>\n
‘1<\/p>\n
I.Narayma Ready, N.Radhak3-ishna Ready, N.Nagaraj,
\nC.M.Krishna Reddy, cmvamamju Raddy, R.San\u00a7_9a\ufb01:\ufb01_:’a’nd<\/p>\n
Smt. Kuppamma, through regimred sale <\/p>\n
2.5.1959 and 5.3.1971.\n<\/p>\n
10. The said 8   to <\/p>\n
Site No. 1A measuring East tn    no
\nSouth 0+170’\/2 and   the work
\nno the plaintiff and contxibiji;ed.”\u00e9q\u00a7.;aE’\u00a3yv…”j’i99’f34ain\ufb01ff became<\/p>\n
in  \u00a7_.e., Site No.1A. merem, the
\npiaintiff    mam dated 9.3.1971 agmmm<\/p>\n
    join\ufb01y. The agreement damd<\/p>\n
 9′.S..’19.7:”1._:vis.,’a::\ufb01$gistered document and site mm has been<\/p>\n
hesg;95oe:\u00a7u9y %aha possasm by an. The plaintiff is not in<\/p>\n
“‘-..\u00a2xc!t1siv\u00a71~ possession of the site No.1A, mucmm the suit<\/p>\n
r    property. Since 25.5.1973 the 2″ defendant is in<\/p>\n
  and enjoyment of the site No.1A as twee and<\/p>\n
 super-smxrmrams, \ufb01encing, and stone piiiars have been put up<\/p>\n
by the 1” defendant.\n<\/p>\n
10 <\/span>\n<\/p>\n
11. As per the docummts dam-.1 2.5.1959, ..s.3f;19?_1,<\/p>\n
27.7.1970 9 9.3.1971, eight persons including   <\/p>\n
in possmon of three hits of land bea\ufb01ng   ” ‘V<\/p>\n
9 46\/2A. Out of eight    <\/p>\n
N.Radh|a-ishna Reddy and  gm”<\/p>\n
deed in favour of their’   _an{A3A hoiding
\n2\/&e’=5ha1’e.      .\n<\/p>\n
12.   seven others<\/p>\n
 ‘U79   It came into mcmence an
\n1o.9.1972k97a.m1   on 13.9.1972. The<\/p>\n
__of  that he and six others had<\/p>\n
   of land and itwafs (rakes: on lease by the<\/p>\n
 been denied and it is mmaenaea, the mac<\/p>\n
 and me suit: scheduie property is also a part of the<\/p>\n
‘   deed and the tease is for a paiod of % years mm an<\/p>\n
 optian fa’ renewal.\n<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
13. The 1″ defendant is in pomemion  <\/p>\n
of me $13; bearing Municipat I\u00a7gs.46{2  K V’<\/p>\n
me suit schedule property.\n<\/p>\n
14. In terms of   1?’  took up
\nI |. of  .. .. in
\nthe} leasehold  jg  .by an end of
\nocmber 1924%%   At present, the
\n averments in para 4 of
\nme   am it is amended, the tease
\nMd   Cinema Theatre and me mar<\/p>\n
   are”iit””e:~cclm’1ve \ufb01ion and enjoyment of the<\/p>\n
   1:; is aiso  the plaintiff has lost his<\/p>\n
   he is not the absoaum owner of the suit<\/p>\n
 ‘..=.ct1edt.-A:’:\u00a2=1.f’:.propertw,’ and tha-efone, has prayed for dismissal cf<\/p>\n
15. ‘medefendana2and3ha\\~e\ufb01!ed\ufb01m’rw\ufb01tms’3<\/p>\n
 1st*aternents contending that they are privace iirmmd eompanies<\/p>\n
L\/.\n<\/p>\n
l& ,–\n<\/p>\n
and they are not in occupation of any portion of<\/p>\n
scheduie prwerty and they are in occupation c-fja
\nthe basement area of Govardhan  and 1m: L   g  <\/p>\n
have prayed for dismessaa ome st\u00a7f;’.__ <\/p>\n
15. The Trial court <\/p>\n
1. Does    soie and
\nabsolute  of f’  schedule<\/p>\n
     the 1″ defendant
\n. ” iein pomiissivo possession M the schedule<\/p>\n
3. “o\u00ab..4whether’~suit….scheduIe property is part of
\n~ ~ _  property missed in 1″ defendant and
\n   the ‘1″…defendant is in possession of it as<\/p>\n
‘ ” _’ \u00a7\u00a3_’$SOf?\n<\/p>\n
 4;  the property as described in the<\/p>\n
‘ H vipiaint schedme is in m<i~stence and<\/p>\n
'='defendants2and3areinpossm1onoft:he<\/p>\n
suit scheda\ufb01e property as tenants of 1*'
\ndefendant?\n<\/p>\n
k% 5. Whether the 1*’ defendant has put up
\ns\ufb01ucizures on me suit schodum property
\nwithmepmnissionof\ufb02zepiain\ufb02\ufb02?<\/p>\n
6. Whetherthesuithasbeen pmperiyvaiued
\nand court fee paid ‘:5 suf\ufb01cient?<\/p>\n
L\/.\n<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
7. Whether piaintiff is entitied in a wcme cf____
\nmandatcry injunctian? W 2 <\/p>\n
3. Whether piaintiff is mpg: from c:aameng %   %  _<\/p>\n
possession?\n<\/p>\n
9. Whether piaintiffis enh’\u00a7j&d”t<3.  L<\/p>\n
the suit schedule T A. .1<\/p>\n
10. Ta what other re'{i_ef_Vif   pr%a \u00e9r\u00e91if\u00a7….i\u00a7.j’3 %
\nentitied no?\n<\/p>\n
17.      Issue No.1, 2, 5, 7<\/span>
\n& 9 in mgnegam;e;%;asue’LjNe;&3,4,5 & 8 in the af\ufb01rma\ufb01ve and
\n1ssumq.1o”&.11k w p\u00e9r  \ufb01na! order and oonseqmuy, has<\/p>\n
% k% ‘c::ska\u00e9:s%  traasust  paaanti\ufb02-‘.
\n by that, the agoenams have \ufb02ied RFA .<\/p>\n
5s3;99.L % % <\/p>\n
” ”     The learned counsei fm the appeliants cwantendm<\/p>\n
”  ti\u00e9xat the suit scheduie property is a por\ufb01on of site No.1A,<\/p>\n
 which has been aemea no me paasnarr, by the erstwhiie<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
C.I.T.B. and the plaintiff is are exclusive  <\/p>\n
schedule promrty and the 1″\n<\/p>\n
possmsion of the suit scheduie   ”  <\/p>\n
plain\ufb01ff is ent:tI’ ed for  H\u00e9 <\/p>\n
issues have been rramegs  % 321% the bur:$eV\u00a7n is am
\nplated wrongiy. Farmer;  is wrormv
\nconstrued and    Funmr, he
\nbenami     provisions of Benami
\n Inviting my atwmon ho Ex.o.s,<\/p>\n
he  siAr’ice\u00ab iwsors have not become the<\/p>\n
‘ V.   used, stating that the lwrs are the<\/p>\n
   of any cmsequencm. It is therefore, he<\/p>\n
  the impugned judgment and decree cannot be<\/p>\n
20.Asmnsttnis,the1earnedcomsaiforthe1’*
\nracspondentsubrnittedthatthermoondent\ufb02alisa\ufb01rrnand
\nm 2&3mmmam.mamwbmuwm&<\/p>\n
\u00a2\/<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
the plaintiff was one of the partners of the 1*’    4_<\/p>\n
Further, rm submmed that me 5 <\/p>\n
por\ufb01on of site mm which has  _    L<\/p>\n
by the erstmzhile C.I.T.B. Ha gamma * a   <\/p>\n
sale agreement has  ‘of  plaintiff.
\nFurtmr, he submnm  produced any
\ntitte deed,   iE’x.P.1 pawn
\ncerti\ufb01cate  agreement. He also
\n  %%exis:enee from 10.9.1972
\nand it   and me siee was aim
\nprio\u00a7*-..:.~   that, as per Ex.D.3, the<\/p>\n
%         an agreement dated 9.3.1971 declaring<\/p>\n
   and own the site mm join\ufb02y. He also<\/p>\n
invimd”  ‘on to the evidence of PW.1 and subsumed’<\/p>\n
.’4   in his evidence has admma that site No.1lA was<\/p>\n
   jointiy. Further, he submilmd mat he withdraws are<\/p>\n
T   of benami. He aiso subnwru-ad’ that, by virtue of B<.D.3,<\/p>\n
allmespersonshavebwomethejointawnes-sof\u00a7teNo.1A.<\/p>\n
19<\/span>
\nHe also subn-am that, one Radhakrishwa <\/p>\n
N.Nagaraj have executed a gift deed, in favour  _<\/p>\n
M.Geetha as per mam 04 am mjeWpia#nti\u00a3F~’~ <\/p>\n
mm tn the said gift me.  ,;l’s\u00a3:.<\/p>\n
plaintiff 5 mpped from dai\ufb01rg   <\/p>\n
mvm: my atmnuon tome  <\/p>\n
that, in view’ of the   cannot ciaim<\/p>\n
\ufb01rm to        aiso subrnithad<\/p>\n
that,  “it is mm, aii the sews<\/p>\n
Imsa,S’*A_a&~ sine No.1A and cm-efore, me<\/p>\n
palaiwff the mcdusive cmner cf the suit<\/p>\n
% k%   he subnitted that Section 60 of<\/p>\n
 also mum in the way of the piantiff<\/p>\n
daimirrgi  He also swarmum that an the :w<\/p>\n
  %  snagaah\u00e9ve \ufb01led the stat for  mam he summ
\n_ % 1′   plaintiff is mpped from damning pcmmmn and
\n  the impugned jmgment and decree does not eat:<\/p>\n
furirrha-term. Healsaplacedr\ufb01iancacnthedwsioncf<\/p>\n
L\/.\n<\/p>\n
1″?\n<\/p>\n
the Hm’ble Supreme Court nepomea in AIR
\n573, no amend maze the plaintiff  “<\/p>\n
\n\nexctusive ownership to the suit    e\n\nsubrmtnea that   equity and\nlaw, me law     that the\nallotment      a\ufb02ctrmnt rm hm:\nmade in    because we plaintiff\nthe     that there can be no\n\n0:\n\n   \n  \n\n<\/pre>\n
 60 of the Easernemt Act. He also<\/p>\n
  tenant cannot deny the titie and the<\/p>\n
  owner can maintain the suit. He at-so<\/p>\n
  that the lease cum saie agreement provides that<\/p>\n
 r shat! not aiienahe the property and therefore,<\/p>\n
 agrmment centrary to this, cannot be of any<\/p>\n
consequence. He, therefore, submimd that the impugned<\/p>\n
judgment and decree cannot be sustained in law.<\/p>\n
L\/ee<\/p>\n
18<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
22. I have carefuliy considaed the subrnwon$___rnade<\/p>\n
by the learned counsei for the parties.<\/p>\n
23. The point mat asises for my  <\/p>\n
whether the impugned judgmen’c””‘amj’_   2<\/p>\n
interfa-mce?\n<\/p>\n
24. It is rdevant suit    <\/p>\n
injunction and possess .igz\ufb02..__ .   is the<\/p>\n
   property. According in
\nhim, the wit’  ” is a portion of site No.1\/A,
\nwnicgrsnas ‘ _% asmea%  t\u00a3.$:him., by the asimhiie crra. He has<\/p>\n
%    produced Exhibits P1 to P7. In his<\/p>\n
  vA’;;!%:in\ufb02ff has stated mat see Nc.1A wm a\ufb02otted<\/p>\n
bo”‘h\u00a7m,\u00bb.f erstwhile CITB and possmn\ufb01on cm\ufb01\ufb01mee wa<\/p>\n
  2139.  no mm and he is the exciusive mama’ of the suit<\/p>\n
 maty, which is pat cf site No.1A. Ex.P.1 is the<\/p>\n
R\/A<\/p>\n
26<\/span><\/p>\n
have ceased ta be the partners from 23-2-1977.  <\/p>\n
xerox cepy of the lease deed dated 1255- K <\/p>\n
Lsadashivareddy, I.Narayanz\u00a7keHdy; 3  -I ‘A <\/p>\n
C.M.Krishnareddy, C.M.Vamdarejareedy\ufb02=\u00ab  <\/p>\n
Rsampath, in faveur of the \ufb01rst1Eieife:1dantVenc'{:it:\u00a7 <\/p>\n
25. The \ufb01rst derekseant   suit schedule
\nproperty is adjecejjti-tc “Municipai No.46
\nand     Lsadashivareddy,
\nI.Naray;gr}gv   C.M.Krishna Raddy,
\nN.Radhei<rie\ufb01n\u00e9   Raddy, Kuppamma<\/p>\n
and '\ufb01oug\ufb01t 5: e\u00e9zeeiring site Ne.1\/A and therefore,<\/p>\n
  the  to the paasnurf and contributed the<\/p>\n
  in pursuance of that, the plain\ufb01\ufb01 has<\/p>\n
  _ accA;1:\u00e9redv."vt!':e.LA i.e., site No.2\/A and thereafter, he has<\/p>\n
  "an agreement dated 9-8-1937: in favoer of<\/p>\n
  'I';!V\\Vi'a'ra\u00a7ranarecidy, Nagaraj, C .M.Kn'shnareddy,<\/p>\n
VT :9' 'Nkladhakzishnareddy, C.M.Varadaraja Reddy, Kuppamma and<\/p>\n
V U Sampath deciaring his intention to enjoy and own the<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
2.!<\/p>\n
property jointly and each of them have got a ;eha.re.
\nThereafizer, two of them, nameiy
\nN.Nagaraj have executed a gift: deed, in
\nM.Gee’d1a, as per Ex.D.4 (originai
\nsigned the gift deed as a
\nLsadashiva Raddy, I.Narayana
\nReddy, C.M.Varadaraja and Sampath have
\nexecuted a leasedeed, i:ri”‘Fa\u00a7’.euffefijtiieih\ufb01eei\u00e9tiafendant and its
\npartners,  ieasing out the
\nproper\u00a7es…beann\u00a7\u00a5.;::E:A:N\u00a7_’  and also the suit
\nscheduie_  the piaintiff cannot ciaim<\/p>\n
that he is  exeiiusive  of the suit schedule property<\/p>\n
 v  _ancF.’:Lij*ie  ‘frem’ doing 50.<\/p>\n
V  if of the defendants two witnesses have<\/p>\n
M V’ .   and eight documents have been produced.<\/p>\n
 his eiuidence, D.W.1 has stated that site No.1\/A was<\/p>\n
1′   in fawur of Sadashiva Reddy and he has executed an<\/p>\n
we original 0g Ls?i1.{(J’1 Li \u20ac>< \u00ab36<\/p>\n
 '  \u00bb " 'agreement dated 9~8-1971, a per Ex.D-3\/iand as per Ex.D.3,<\/p>\n
D.\n<\/p>\n
i.\/<\/p>\n
5L3
\nhas aise stated that property bearing No.46\/2 and 11A beiong<\/p>\n
to the to-cnwners and aii the ccmwners have contrib_uted.._:the<\/p>\n
amount and the propertia have been leased in  <\/p>\n
defendant No.1 and defendant   \u00b0’ ‘V<\/p>\n
construction.\n<\/p>\n
2?. Em)-1 is the ext’ta c—t…of ttregiister  <\/p>\n
shows that piaintiff i.e.,  others
\nnameiy I.Narayana  and I.Raghava
\nRaddy have  f.rom;;tHe:  23-2-1977.
\nEx.D-2 is the   constitution ef the
\nfirm.  H330 Lsadashiva Raddy,
\nI.Naraya’na .Reddy and I.Raghava Raddy<\/p>\n
have vretiret:l””frc_:’m V1%:ii–1e ‘E’_isrm\u00a7\u00bbLV Ex.D-3 (original Ex.D.6) is the<\/p>\n
  dated “””\u00a7’–8-19?: executed by the plaintiff i.e.,<\/p>\n
   in faveur of I.Naray-ana Raddy,<\/p>\n
V    Raddy, N.Nagaraja, C.M.Krishnareddy,<\/p>\n
 4″=. ‘C.,M,Vata\u00a3}araja Raddy, Kuppamma and Sampa\ufb02a dedaring his<\/p>\n
 a._\u00e9’z’ntes:tAi’e~n ea awn and enjoy the property i.e._. site No.1\/A<\/p>\n
L\/at<\/p>\n
deed as a consen\ufb01ng witness. Thereafter, I.Sadashiv.e <\/p>\n
Udarayana Raddy, M.Geetha, C.M.Knshne*~  <\/p>\n
C.M.Varadaraja Raddy, Kuppamrna””‘ and  have.&*hh<\/p>\n
executed a tease deed detect 25-5–41e9:*3_htTas<\/p>\n
favour of the \ufb01rst defendant  ewey 1’<\/p>\n
‘are the joint owners. In  the ‘\ufb01rs: defendant<\/p>\n
has put up the construction  Now
\nthe plaintiff  ‘Vheilis   of the suit
\nschedule  ‘  a h ‘<\/p>\n
2V9,’ ”     contended by the {earned<\/p>\n
counsel  apgtne\ufb02z-zhntu,  defendant No.1 cannot raise the<\/p>\n
 r  .pIee._jof henarni,  v\ufb01ewof the speci\ufb01c bar under section 4 of<\/p>\n
 fact remaire, the piaintiff, by his conduct has<\/p>\n
Ehnzention to enjoy and own the propety join\ufb01y<\/p>\n
 thereafter, has signed me gift dead as a consenting<\/p>\n
A   and ewereafter, has executed the lease deed aiong<\/p>\n
..w%th the others stating that they are the joint owners.<\/p>\n
V Therefore, the plain\ufb01ff cannot contend, he is the exctusive<\/p>\n
u.\/<\/p>\n
needs to be moulded. He also submitted that the t31ai ‘Co.L:rt<\/p>\n
has granted 1\/8″‘ share with symboiic  <\/p>\n
1\/7″‘ share with physica! possession and therefos\ufb01,  teiief’ ~ <\/p>\n
needs to be mouided.\n<\/p>\n
32. As against th\u00e9s, the learned coon$el’: for’; <\/p>\n
r\ufb01pondent contended that the   as
\nthere is a renewal c|ause{j~\u00ab  that teal Court
\nhas rightiy granted 1\/8’*v’A.s!*3.:a’_rje \u00e9noi..Lth\u00e9ref;o%e*,’V”it does not can<\/p>\n
for interference.    i V’
\n ‘IA  coneidefed the submissions made
\nby the !earned’coon.\u00a7\u00a7e\u00a7.eFor.:t::se \u00abparties.<\/p>\n
_ 34, ‘it  reieventto note, the trial Court has granted<\/p>\n
‘ V’  ‘A1\/8″‘ \u00e9h\u00e9zdfe with syrntioiic possasion. There are eight sharers.<\/p>\n
  uha’$%e gifted their share in favour of their sister<\/p>\n
M.{3″eetna’.’ Therefore, the tea! Court has granted 1\/8″‘ share,<\/p>\n
    Therefore, it does not cat} for interference.<\/p>\n
.’  Hovveizer, in so far as symboiic possession is concerned, it<\/p>\n
29<\/span><\/p>\n
needs to be modi\ufb01ed as the lease period is ever and vacant<\/p>\n
space is aiso avaiiable.\n<\/p>\n
35. Therefore, the appeal is allowed in  <\/p>\n
judgment and decree passed by _:.-he   ‘* <\/p>\n
O.S.No.1109\/89 stands modified gsanerag 1;’a%*e %<\/p>\n
physicai powsion.   etake steps, \u00a3n
\naccordance   to  <\/p>\n
Sd\/-3
\nTudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court N Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008 Author: H.Billappa % ‘ IN THE HIGH WURTOF KARNATAKA, mm nus ‘ms 31″ may or mncn % BEFORE ma HON’Bl.E MR. & ‘ : 7 I BETVEN: 1. N.Sai*oja_jm;n”a,’*w–. . A9ed3t>\u00a2Lrt%s%4% ‘ aw\/0 IY’Y3s’r3pa _’ — 23. Svumi\ufb01i\ufb01g 5?’ % Indain, Bangafom-22_. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1670","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nN Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"N Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-21T03:48:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"N Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-21T03:48:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2593,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008\",\"name\":\"N Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-21T03:48:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"N Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"N Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"N Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-21T03:48:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"N Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-21T03:48:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008"},"wordCount":2593,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008","name":"N Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-21T03:48:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-sarojamma-vs-ms-govardhan-theatre-on-31-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"N Sarojamma vs M\/S Govardhan Theatre on 31 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1670"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1670\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}