{"id":167055,"date":"2009-01-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009"},"modified":"2018-12-13T21:06:43","modified_gmt":"2018-12-13T15:36:43","slug":"ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 25726 of 2008(K)\n\n\n1. M\/S REVEN -AIR SECURITY AGENCY,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE CHIEF OPERATIONS MANAGER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN\n\n Dated :14\/01\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                                 S.SIRI JAGAN, J.\n\n                       ==================\n\n                          W.P(C).No.25726 of 2008\n\n                       ==================\n\n                Dated this the 14th day of January, 2009\n\n                                 J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
      This writ petition is filed by a security agency. They were<\/p>\n
originally engaged by the 2nd respondent for rendering security<\/p>\n
services, in accordance with the notifications issued by the<\/p>\n
Government of India in respect of security agencies comprised of the<\/p>\n
ex-servicemen. After the initial period of two years of contract with the<\/p>\n
petitioner was over, the 2nd respondent invited fresh tenders in which<\/p>\n
the 3rd respondent was selected. The petitioner has filed this writ<\/p>\n
petition challenging the award of the security work to the 3rd<\/p>\n
respondent on the ground that as per the orders of the Government of<\/p>\n
India every security agency who is engaged as per the orders of the<\/p>\n
Government of India is entitled to one extension of the contract by<\/p>\n
another term of two years. It is under the above circumstances the<\/p>\n
petitioner as filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs:<\/p>\n
           “(a)    To declare that the petitioner is entitled for extension of the
\n      work allotment referred to in Exts.P12 for a further period of 2 years after
\n      the expiry of the initial 2 year work allotment period.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
            (b)    To issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ,
\n      order or direction, directing the respondents not to allot the work of
\n      security service coverage in the work sites of the 2nd respondent in the
\n      Cochin Terminal, Irumpanam allotted to the Petitioner in pursuance of
\n      Ext.P12 to any person or agency other than the Petitioner, for another 2<\/p>\n
w.p.c.25726\/08                          2<\/span><\/p>\n
      year period from 1.9.2008.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
             (c)   To issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ,
\n      order or direction, directing the respondents to allot to the Petitioner the
\n      aforementioned work of security coverage in the work site of the 2nd
\n      respondent allotted to the Petitioner in pursuance of Ext.P12 for further
\n      2 year period from 1.9.2008.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      2.     This Court has already held in several writ petitions that<\/p>\n
such security agencies are entitled to one extension as per the<\/p>\n
Government orders. That being so, the action of the respondents in<\/p>\n
engaging the 3rd respondent is clearly unsustainable. Accordingly, this<\/p>\n
writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to<\/p>\n
engage the petitioner for another term also in accordance with the<\/p>\n
orders of the 1st respondent on the subject. It would be open to the 3rd<\/p>\n
respondent to approach the 2nd respondent for preferable treatment in<\/p>\n
the matter of award of contract for the next period on the ground that<\/p>\n
they were selected this year and on account of this judgment, they are<\/p>\n
being denied the benefit of the agreement executed by them. In such<\/p>\n
event, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same sympathetically.<\/p>\n
      Writ petition is disposed of as above.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
sdk+                                                  S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE\n\n\n          \/\/\/True copy\/\/\/\n\n\n\n\n                                 P.A. to Judge\n\nw.p.c.25726\/08                     3<\/span>\n\n\n\n\n                           S.SIRI JAGAN, J.\n\n                   ==================\n\n                     W.P.(C).No.25726 of 2008\n\n                   ==================\n\n                Dated this the 29th of August, 2008\n\n                             O R D E R\n\n<\/pre>\n
      Admit. Learned Assistant Solicitor General takes notice for the 1st<\/p>\n
respondent. Learned standing counsel takes notice for the 2nd<\/p>\n
respondent.\n<\/p>\n
w.p.c.25726\/08                      4<\/span><\/p>\n
      Learned standing counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that the<\/p>\n
2nd respondent has only chosen to a security agency from a panel<\/p>\n
forwarded by the Director General of Resettlement, in which the<\/p>\n
petitioner was not included. He also submits that from the panel the<\/p>\n
2nd respondent has chosen one security agency and issued work order<\/p>\n
to them even prior to the filing of this writ petition. Whatever that be,<\/p>\n
in so far as this Court has upheld the right of similarly placed security<\/p>\n
agencies for automatic extension for a further period of two years,<\/p>\n
unless 2nd respondent has a case that they were dissatisfied with the<\/p>\n
performance of the petitioner, the petitioner cannot be declined the<\/p>\n
benefit of extension. Therefore, there would be an interim order<\/p>\n
directing that the petitioner be continued as a security agency of the<\/p>\n
2nd respondent until further orders. The petitioner shall implead the<\/p>\n
security agency to whom the work order has been issued by the 2nd<\/p>\n
respondent, for which the 2nd respondent shall furnish the address of<\/p>\n
the security agency, to the counsel for the petitioner.<\/p>\n
sdk+                                            S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE\nH\/O.\n\nw.p.c.25726\/08    5\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court M\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 25726 of 2008(K) 1. M\/S REVEN -AIR SECURITY AGENCY, … Petitioner Vs 1. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, … Respondent 2. THE CHIEF OPERATIONS MANAGER, For Petitioner :SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-167055","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-13T15:36:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-13T15:36:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":675,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009\",\"name\":\"M\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-13T15:36:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-13T15:36:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-13T15:36:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009"},"wordCount":675,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009","name":"M\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-13T15:36:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-reven-air-security-agency-vs-union-of-india-on-14-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Reven -Air Security Agency vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167055","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=167055"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167055\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=167055"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=167055"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=167055"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}