{"id":167288,"date":"2009-03-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009"},"modified":"2017-12-30T09:00:08","modified_gmt":"2017-12-30T03:30:08","slug":"sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n<pre>WP No.3340I2007\n\nSri.Sanjay Sliatagcri, Adv for R2) V _\n\nThis petition is \ufb01led under Articles 226  the _  \nCozzs\ufb01tution of India praying to qua-mh._the .order= .9-.:1s;&lt;md\u00bbVi1x,_\nwcwmisc. No.2 of 2006 dt.14.[11.2(_)[}\u00a7  &#039;th_e&quot; \nCoxnmissimzzer for Worlmen, vide   etc, \u00bb.  W\n\nThis petition comm&#039; g 1'3\u00bbT.t_V'\u00a7:\"&gt;'*;.-'... 'E'  L'\ngroup, this day, the Court made \"'t},3e\u00bbfo1I&lt;xwi11_g:&quot;Ae .  \n\n  e %_........a R 1r2.....w@ Reee  L\nI. This writ peti\ufb01on. is   &#039;The case of the\n29*&#039; respondent &#039;is; :}:__1e w\u00e9ls  duties under the<\/pre>\n<p>petitioner.  3 &#8216;Fa,  of employment, he<br \/>\n  and ring \ufb01nger. He<br \/>\nwas taitcexi ._tO  treatment and the injuries:<\/p>\n<p>resulted   A ciaim is lodged by the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;~  _  i*es;_i en;_1entAA &#8220;f0r&#8230;&lt;::ompeg1sation before the &#039; Commissioner<\/p>\n<p> &#039;   \ufb02ompensaiion. The petitioner was noti\ufb01ed.<\/p>\n<p>it  entrusteci the matter to a counsel 150<\/p>\n<p> put;   But thereafter vam.s&#039; heti. The<\/p>\n<p>V\u00bb V&#039; V.   vwsings commenced and engled awazding compensation<\/p>\n<p> {he 21&quot;&#039; mspondent. Smoe the peti\ufb01aner was not<\/p>\n<p>u  &quot;fepresented during the course of the enquiry before the<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>9%&#039;<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner, he \ufb01led an applica\ufb01on under Order IX Rule \ufb02<\/p>\n<p>WP No.3340 12007<\/p>\n<p>13 0f the Code of Civil  for setting asigit\u00e9  <\/p>\n<p>award. The Commissioner was 9f,&#039; the u<\/p>\n<p>become functus oi\ufb01cio and was  in:_ a;..*<\/p>\n<p>recall his own order. Hence,    <\/p>\n<p>2. Mr. Hegde,  fQ:$f&#8217;tI1e&#8221;\u00a31e\ufb01tioncr<br \/>\nsubmits that the commgsg-;n\u00a2r;\u00a7&amp;s jgs\ufb01\ufb01ed in rejecting<br \/>\nthe application&#8217;    &#8216; the Workmezfs\n<\/p>\n<p>  -..{f&lt;v31r&quot;&lt;s\u00a7\u00a7v.V_cx:&#039;r&#039;\u00a7_  Rules&#039;) empowers<\/p>\n<p>the  under Order<\/p>\n<p>osi*i:io&#039;n  fair<\/p>\n<p>IX Rule 137gft_t.e _,  <\/p>\n<p>3. Mr.-.S.&#8221;F.a1iagt}\u00e91ti,  counsel for the 2&#8243;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>:.1\u20acs130nI{73i&#8217;1t   petitioner is required to \ufb01le an<\/p>\n<p>At&#8221;;\/.5 &#8211;Woxkmcn\ufb01s Compcnsatinn Act (for short<\/p>\n<p>  fthc  the rejection&#8221; of the application is<\/p>\n<p>   award. He also places reliance on a<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9 of-.t}:1i#&#8221;&#8216;Cou1&#8217;t in the case of snzxmsmm mm vs.<br \/>\n jimrax am 2005 ms 29%.\n<\/p>\n<p>  .4 Before considez-mg the merits of the case, the decision<\/p>\n<p>  .-uzeiicd on by the 2&#8243;&#8216; respondent is to be lookw into. \ufb02<\/p>\n<p>u\\<\/p>\n<p>WP M3340\/2007<\/p>\n<p>Appamn\ufb02y, that was a case where an   H<br \/>\npassed and an applica\ufb01on was \ufb01led under   &#8211;\u00ab<br \/>\nCPC and the Commissioner has &gt;ti::\u00a7&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>on merits. Hence, in those     o<br \/>\nthe View that an appeal would    Act V<br \/>\nand mcoume cannot   of the<br \/>\nRules. Hence, I am of  decision is not<\/p>\n<p>applicabie.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.     be noticed that for the<br \/>\nmasolis  _t1r.c&#8217; petitioner, he could act<br \/>\npart1&#8217;Cipa t\u00a3:  the.  The counsel whom he had<\/p>\n<p>cn.gagcd_a1sou dicfnot  in the proceedings. Hence,<\/p>\n<p>.  r:31\u00a7:iccf&amp;cxpazte. Rule 41 of the Rules would<\/p>\n<p>   certain provisions of CPC would apply to<\/p>\n<p>Quiodcr Workmcnfs (bmpensation Act. Indeed, it<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;-\u00bbWouid&#8221;  that Older IX in its entirety is applicable.<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01ifhcii&#8217;, it is so, the Commissioner was not justifieci in<\/p>\n<p>   the application on the ground that he does not have<\/p>\n<p> juxistiictigm inasmuch as he has become functus o\ufb02icio.<\/p>\n<p>indeed, I am not inclined to oonsiicr Wiznethcr the awaxtt \ufb02<\/p>\n<p>wv No.3340,12em<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">: 5 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>passed by the Oommissioncr at the \ufb01zst instance<\/p>\n<p>considered as an expartc as that would 1Yf:q11iIfjE72:&#8221;\u20ac3Vi:(ii\u20acE\u00a3iCa?3;..ii\u20ac)&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>be adduced on behalf of the pe\ufb01tionc; as &#8216;\u00a35533: 2&#8243;*{i <\/p>\n<p>respondent in support of their  I:i\u00e91d:euc.:;$,~AiuiI1i$<\/p>\n<p>required to be done by&#8217; _ thga <\/p>\n<p>Consequently, the following ord\u00e9f-\u00a35; p.a__sse\u00a3ii ~ . T_<br \/>\nPetition is   at Am1cxum&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>F rejecting the app\ufb01ca\ufb01c\ufb01 f:311&#8217;cvlr:A\u00abI; Oif1_cif&#8217; &#8216;Rule 13 on the<\/p>\n<p>gonna of  \u00a7ta;\u00a7dsvv&#8221;;\u00a7\u00e9t&#8221;&#8216;\u00e9isidc. The matter<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;.:.!18&#8221;-Com&#8217; m&#8217; jssidglcr for \ufb02esh disposai in<br \/>\na&lt;:coIt1Va11cs:&#039;wifl\ufb01:1V  itstozc the said application to<\/p>\n<p>the \ufb01le  in accordance with law having<\/p>\n<p> , A&#039; xega\ufb01\u00e9d  the  in &#039;be let in by the petitioner as well as<\/p>\n<p> *__ \u00bb   % x\ufb02gpqndent<\/p>\n<p>&#039; A  Rtzl\u00e9i ii\u00e9zsned and made absoiutc.<\/p>\n<p>sa\/5<br \/>\n15:55<\/p>\n<p>Jm.\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009 Author: Ajit J Gunjal WP No.3340I2007 Sri.Sanjay Sliatagcri, Adv for R2) V _ This petition is \ufb01led under Articles 226 the _ Cozzs\ufb01tution of India praying to qua-mh._the .order= .9-.:1s;&lt;md\u00bbVi1x,_ wcwmisc. No.2 of 2006 dt.14.[11.2(_)[}\u00a7 &#039;th_e&quot; Coxnmissimzzer for Worlmen, vide etc, \u00bb. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-167288","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-30T03:30:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-30T03:30:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":576,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-30T03:30:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-30T03:30:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-30T03:30:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009"},"wordCount":576,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009","name":"Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-30T03:30:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sikandar-ahamed-vs-the-labour-officer-on-19-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sikandar Ahamed vs The Labour Officer on 19 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=167288"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167288\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=167288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=167288"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=167288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}