{"id":167718,"date":"2010-05-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010"},"modified":"2015-05-19T10:01:45","modified_gmt":"2015-05-19T04:31:45","slug":"shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court<\/div>\n
Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010<\/div>\n
Bench: Anoop V.Mohta<\/div>\n
    wp4647.00.sxw                                   1\n\n                    IN THE  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n\n                          APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                    \n                            WRIT PETITION NO. 4647 OF 2000\n\n\n\n\n                                                            \n    Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble,\n    Aged 34 yrs. Occupation Service\n    now removed, R\/o. Panutre,\n\n\n\n\n                                                           \n    Taluka Panhala, \n    District Kolhapur.                                               ....Petitioner.\n\n\n\n\n                                             \n              Vs.\n\n\n    1\n                               \n              The State of Maharashtra\n                              \n    2         The Chairman, Shri Datta Shikshan\n              Prasarak Mandal, Panutre, \n              Taluka Panhala, \n              District Kolhapur.\n          \n\n\n    3         The head Mastress, \n       \n\n\n\n              Girls High School & Junior College at Kale,\n              Taluka Panhala, District Kolhapur.\n\n    4         The Education Officer, (Secondary),\n\n\n\n\n\n              Kolhapur Zilha Parishad, Kolhapur,\n\n    5         The Presiding Officer, School Tribunal,\n              Kolhapur Region, Kolhapur.                             ....Respondents.\n\n\n\n\n\n    Mr. G.N. Salunkhe for the Petitioner.\n    Mr. Sagar Mane i\/by Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for Respondent No.2.\n    Mr. A.P. Vanarase, AGP, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 4. \n\n\n                                   CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.\n<\/pre>\n
                                    DATE    :  7th May, 2010\n\n    JUDGMENT:-\n\n\n\n                                                            ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 15:56:12 :::<\/span>\n     wp4647.00.sxw                                        2<\/span>\n\n\n    1         The Petitioner has challenged the impugned order and Judgment of \n\n\n\n\n                                                                                         \n<\/pre>\n
    the School Tribunal (the Tribunal), Kolhapur   dated 10\/12\/1999, thereby <\/p>\n
    his Appeal on the ground that Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 forcibly obtained <\/p>\n
    his resignation on 05\/01\/1997, and illegally terminated his services, was <\/p>\n
    dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
    2         On 22nd  November, 1994, the Petitioner was appointed as a peon in <\/p>\n
    Respondent No.3- Girls High School & Junior College.  The Petitioner who <\/p>\n
    is belonging to the Scheduled Castes, became a permanent employee on <\/p>\n
    30\/04\/1996.   However,   full   salary   was   not   paid.     Therefore,   the <\/p>\n
    representation was made by the Petitioner,  accordingly to Respondent No.<\/p>\n
    2. The Petitioner signed the muster roll up to 31\/12\/1996.  As alleged, the <\/p>\n
    Petitioner was forced to sign some blank papers on 05\/01\/1997 and treated <\/p>\n
    the same as resignation letter by putting undue influence.  It was undated <\/p>\n
    and   blank   resignation   letter.   The   Petitioner   kept   the   carbon   copy   of   the <\/p>\n
    same with him.  As Respondent No.3 obstructed the Petitioner to attend the <\/p>\n
    duties on 20th  February, 1997, a representation was made to Respondent <\/p>\n
    Nos. 2 and 4 and ultimately on 31\/03\/1997, filed an Appeal before the <\/p>\n
    Tribunal, Kolhapur.\n<\/p>\n
    3         Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 defended the same by submitting that the <\/p>\n
    Petitioner   on   1st  October,   1996   tendered   resignation   which   was   duly <\/p>\n
                                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:56:12 :::<\/span>
\n     wp4647.00.sxw                                         3<\/span><\/p>\n
    accepted through the Management Resolution on 05\/11\/1996 itself, though <\/p>\n
    on   record,   no   duplicate   copies   were   produced   nor   any  Resolution.     The <\/p>\n
    Petitioner produced the carbon copy of undated blank resignation letter.  By <\/p>\n
    impugned order dated 10\/12\/1999, the Tribunal, Kolhapur dismissed the <\/p>\n
    Appeal   by   holding   that   the   Petitioner-Appellant   failed   to   prove   that   his <\/p>\n
    resignation was forcibly obtained on 5th  January, 1997 and therefore, not <\/p>\n
    granted order of reinstatement.\n<\/p>\n
    4<\/span><\/p>\n
              Relevant Section 7 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools <\/p>\n
    (Conditions  of  Service)   Regulation   Act,  1977   (for   Short  “the   Act)     is  as <\/p>\n
    under:-\n<\/p>\n
              “Section-7. Procedure   for   resignation   by   employees   of
\n              private schools:- If any employee intends to resign his post in <\/p>\n
              any private school, at any time after the appointment date, he  <\/p>\n
              shall draw up a letter of resignation in duplicate and sign both
\n              the copies of that letter and put the date thereon.  He may then
\n              forward   one  copy  to   the  Management  by   registered   post  and
\n              keep the other copy with him.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
    5         Relevant Rule 40 of The Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools <\/p>\n
    Rules, 1981 (for short, “the Rules”) is as under:-\n<\/p>\n
              “Rule-40.(1)   A   permanent   employee   may   leave   service   after
\n              giving   three   calender   months   notice   and   a   non-permanent
\n              employee   may   leave   service   aftergiving   one   calender   month’s
\n              notice.   The Management may, however, allow an employee to
\n              leave service earlier on payment of pay (excluding allowances)
\n              for three months, or as the case may be, one month in lieu of
\n              notice by the employee.   The amount in lieu of notice shall be
\n              restricted to the pay or the period by which the notice period <\/p>\n
                                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:56:12 :::<\/span>
\n     wp4647.00.sxw                                       4<\/span><\/p>\n
              falls short.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
              (2) If any Management allows an employee to leave service  <\/p>\n
              earlier either without due notice or without making payment of
\n              pay in lieu of notice as specified in sub-rule (1), a proportionate
\n              amount of pay in lieu of notice shall be deducted from the grant  <\/p>\n
              due to the school concerned.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
              (3) An employee entitled to vacation shall not give notice of
\n              resignation during the vacation or so as to cover any part of the  <\/p>\n
              vacation.  The notice of resignation shall not be given within a
\n              month after the beginning of the first term of the year.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
    6         Section 7 of the Act provides that the employees to draw up a letter <\/p>\n
    of resignation in duplicate and sign both the copies by putting the date on <\/p>\n
    it.  He may forward one copy of the said resignation to the Management by <\/p>\n
    R.P.A.D.   and   keep   the   other   copy   with   him.     In   the   present   case,   as <\/p>\n
    observed,   the   Petitioner-Appellant   tendered   resignation   voluntarily   on <\/p>\n
    01\/10\/1996.   The   effective   date   was   01\/11\/1996.     The   Petitioner <\/p>\n
    withdrawn the substantial amount of Rs. 13,060\/- from his Account leaving <\/p>\n
    the   balance   amount   of   Rs.162\/-   only,   as   per   the   passbook   produced   on <\/p>\n
    record by the Management.   The Petitioner has tendered the resignation <\/p>\n
    and  voluntarily  withdrawn  the  amount on   the  date  of  acceptance   of   his <\/p>\n
    resignation letter.   The Appellant failed to prove that the resignation was <\/p>\n
    never tendered on 01\/10\/1996.  The Management accepted the resignation <\/p>\n
    by giving one month time for its effect, as permissible under the Rules as <\/p>\n
    reproduced above.  The acceptance of resignation letter, in the present facts <\/p>\n
    and circumstances, is well within the framework of the Act and the Rules.\n<\/p>\n
    As per Rule 40 itself, the Management can waive even the notice period of <\/p>\n
                                                               ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:56:12 :::<\/span>
\n     wp4647.00.sxw                                        5<\/span><\/p>\n
    three months and can accept the resignation earlier, as done in the present <\/p>\n
    case.     (Hemant Govind Vaidya Vs. Vasant Dada Sugar Institute & Anr.\n<\/p>\n
    2000(1)   Bom.C.R.   558).    By   not   sending   the   resignation   letter   by   a <\/p>\n
    Registered post A.D., by keeping the copy as prescribed, that itself cannot <\/p>\n
    be   the   reason   to   interfere   with   the   order   of   acceptance   of   volunteer <\/p>\n
    resignation as done in the present case, which was duly acknowledged by <\/p>\n
    the Management.  It is not mandatory to sent the resignation letter to the <\/p>\n
    Management by Registered Post A.D., he may sent the same by registered <\/p>\n
    but that does not mean that he cannot tender the resignation personally.\n<\/p>\n
    There is no bar to accept the resignation immediately after one month.\n<\/p>\n
    7         The Petitioner-Appellant himself failed to prove his own case that the <\/p>\n
    resignation was obtained on 05\/01\/1997 though produced one carbon copy <\/p>\n
    of the same.  The learned Tribunal has dealt the same in paragraph No. 5 in <\/p>\n
    detailed   and   found   that   the   original   Resignation   letter   and   the   alleged <\/p>\n
    carbon copy produced on record are totally different.   There are various <\/p>\n
    disputes  and discrepancies  in these  two documents. Both the  documents <\/p>\n
    were   different   in   all   aspect   except   the   basic   contents.   There   is   nothing <\/p>\n
    placed on record to show that the Petitioner lodged any complaint or raise <\/p>\n
    any   grievance   that   he   was   forced   to   resign   on   05\/01\/1997,   as   alleged.\n<\/p>\n
    Mere production of such carbon copy which, as recorded by the learned <\/p>\n
    Judge,   was   “prepared   subsequently”   and   as   the   Petitioner   failed   to <\/p>\n
    substantiate the same and\/or put any other contra material to the case of <\/p>\n
                                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:56:12 :::<\/span>
\n     wp4647.00.sxw                                           6<\/span><\/p>\n
    management,   with   regard   to   the   alleged   forcible   resignation   dated <\/p>\n
    01\/10\/1996, I see there is no case now, to find fault in the order.\n<\/p>\n
    8         While admitting the Petition, except early hearing, the Court has not <\/p>\n
    granted any ad-interim relief.  The Petitioner failed to substantiate his own <\/p>\n
    case. The case so placed and submitted by the Management and in view of <\/p>\n
    the reasoning so given on record though there are allegations made about <\/p>\n
    the fraud and coercive undue influence and as the same remained unproved <\/p>\n
    for want of material, I see there is no case made out by the Petitioner to <\/p>\n
    disturb the reasoned order.\n<\/p>\n
    9         Resultantly,   the   Petition   is   dismissed.     No   order   as   to   costs.   Rule <\/p>\n
    discharged.\n<\/p>\n
                                                             (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)<\/p>\n
                                                                    ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:56:12 :::<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010 Bench: Anoop V.Mohta wp4647.00.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4647 OF 2000 Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble, Aged 34 yrs. Occupation Service now removed, R\/o. Panutre, Taluka Panhala, District […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-167718","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-19T04:31:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-19T04:31:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1144,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010\",\"name\":\"Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-19T04:31:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-19T04:31:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-19T04:31:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010"},"wordCount":1144,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010","name":"Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-19T04:31:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-kushappa-mahadeo-kamble-vs-4-the-education-officer-on-7-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Kushappa Mahadeo Kamble vs 4 The Education Officer on 7 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167718","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=167718"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167718\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=167718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=167718"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=167718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}