{"id":167746,"date":"2008-06-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008"},"modified":"2019-04-07T11:52:38","modified_gmt":"2019-04-07T06:22:38","slug":"ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Victory Exports vs M\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Victory Exports vs M\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n
  '-.MANAGlI\u00a7iG DIRECTOR  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
 FROM THE RESPONDEIWS wmcn ULTIMATELY<\/p>\n
1<\/span>
\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN<\/p>\n
DATED Tms ‘rm 24th DAY 01? JUNE.   “F L  % u
\nTI-E HONBLE MRJUSTICE L 1s:ARA*z.AI\u00a2A    <\/p>\n
WRITPE’I’I’I’ION xo.1s3%1%:\/209?(r:;M..m\u00bb\u00a3s3- = %  <\/p>\n
Between;\n<\/p>\n
1 M18 vxcrromr
\nA PAR’FNERSHI.FF_’IR’M
\nREP Bvrrspgsmajam .\n<\/p>\n
SR! D KSURESH.\n<\/p>\n
No.11\/2, 21m mzgon,”   %
\nNJHC QQMPLEX. “ii:\n<\/p>\n
STH mun GARE’-?HIVNAGx%R”-..__ . ~
\nBANGALORE-9 M ‘  \u00bb  ”\n<\/p>\n
% V? . …PE’i’I’I’lONER
\n(BY 3121. L w\u00a7&..CHII\u00a7i:\u00a7t4fLP\u00a7D.A}’fYA, ADV.)<\/p>\n
1  M13 wM\u00a5sc::m:, MNERALS LIMITED
\n‘ A’c3~_c>v’:%._c:>15* E\u20acARBiATAI{A UNDERTAKING
\nH.m.NG ‘I’1″$-0″1’\u20ac?F’iCE AT NO 39
\n M cmona B5’-\u00a5NGALORE~1\n<\/p>\n
— REP BY \u00a7’rs’cHAzRMA:e &<\/p>\n
  ‘A\u00abjt_mfSR1.c GOWRISHANKAR, ADV.)<\/p>\n
 \u00abms WP FILED PRAYING TO, CALL FOR THE RELEVANT<\/p>\n
RESULTED IN ISSUING NON-SUPPLY OF IRON ORE WASTE MUD IN\u00bb
\nTERMS OF THE LE’l”l’ER OF IN’l”\u00a7NT D’I’.12.3.2004 WHICH WAS<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
MODIFIED on 15.3.2006 AS PER H9<\/p>\n
RESPECTIVELY. mmcr mm RESPONDENTS TO””$:U?E*LY
\nMETRIC TONNE ore’ mom om WASTEAA\u00bbVMIJD.”‘ATVV’4’TI\u00a7\u00a77 xRAV’1’E’._VOF5
\nRS.90[- PER mm IN TERMS-OF my \u00a3N1fEI\u00a7’i”\u00a7 DT. <\/p>\n
12.3.2904 WHICH was MODIFIED ON’—A15b3.20(_)6,.’A.AND
\nINTERIM ORDER ‘:*o DIRECT  SUPPLY
\n17.434 METRIC mamas opmon QRE.1_k’A_S’fE  aft’ THE RATE<\/p>\n
or RS901- PER mm IN’ 2*s;RMs  -\u00abf{\ufb02}:1i.’43’.\u00ab.LE’i’l’ER or-‘ zmmrr %<\/p>\n
D’r.12.3.2oo4 WHICH was MOD\u00a7.FfE-EDEGN <\/p>\n
Th-is”    in ‘B’ 3011])
\nbefore the Count V’  followirg:\n<\/p>\n
The  petition hw prayed for cnnection [<\/p>\n
   17484 metric ton of Iron Ore waste
\nmuci   per PDMT in terms ofbetter of Intent<\/p>\n
 1?2;I3\/20o<:– wn1ch was mum on 15\/3\/2006. The<\/p>\n
'   petitioner for allotment of iron one waste <\/p>\n
 by the respondent and the petitioner was allotted<\/p>\n
   V  "  ore waste mud from both Subbaraymhalli and<\/p>\n
 iron ore mines. The petitoncr was allmed 95,000<\/p>\n
PDMT by way of 3 Letter of Intcnts dated 26\/12\/2003,<\/p>\n
T<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
19\/2\/2004 and 12\/3\/2994 of iron are watts mut__!;_’\u00e9t\u00ab’ <\/p>\n
Rs.25,, Rs.75\/-and 123.90\/~ per mm   \u00bb<\/p>\n
B1 and B2. Howevm-‘, the respondent   ti<\/p>\n
waste mud to the pe\ufb01tionaer. Henee- V  ._ pt 1″ :tiVo1t\u00a2t’  <\/p>\n
petition.\n<\/p>\n
the learned nouns:-1 f1;1*\u00a3If:iC;h\u20ac  .. <\/p>\n
3-  tetiumwr is that the
\nrespondent ttagtsteted under the Indian
\nCompanies At:t”  it is  ivy the State of Karnataka and
\nntattge  A”I*ti.Vc::v1_t__2___J.:2 ofthe Constitution. The impugned<\/p>\n
\u00a3031, of the respondent in not supplying the iron<\/p>\n
   the rights guaranteed undw Article 14,
\n %tj.139%%(1.)%(g)   conmtutton. The petitioner has paid<\/p>\n
L A  wntctt has been accepted by the tespondmt.
\n   being a statutory authority ought to hava
\n%  tm terms of letters of intent. me impugned actim of<\/p>\n
 the respondent is illegal, arbitrary and without the authority of<\/p>\n
law. The amount was aclcnarwlcdged by the rmpondent in<\/p>\n
‘i<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
March, 2004 and even after so much of time iron <\/p>\n
was not supplied to the peti\ufb01onw  <\/p>\n
and loss to the petitioner. The  *1<\/p>\n
respondent is arbitrary and hostilgt ‘IV’b.c
\nupon the decision of this   which
\nwas disposed of on   which xespondmt
\npreferred appeal in w% A   came to be<\/p>\n
dismis\u00e9ed.\n<\/p>\n
4.    the respondent Sri
\n   of objectiorm. The ieamod
\ncounsel sj1broitool1._ tha3;’  is filed a\ufb01er a lapm of 3
\n   tho  delay and Latches alone the writ<\/p>\n
 rejected. Further he has submitted that<\/p>\n
 o ‘m:-. writ peataonzshoz maintainable in View of farm tact am the<\/p>\n
 is question of that for which he has to<\/p>\n
   competent civil Court. In para 9 ofthe statement<\/p>\n
 ‘of:j’_objcctio–  n it is stated man: the price has been revised as the<\/p>\n
 have spiralod na\ufb02onally and hztema\ufb01onally and tha\ufb01om<\/p>\n
the respondent is not in a position to supply the goods at the<\/p>\n
T<\/p>\n
5<\/span>
\nagreed prices. It is submittw that the petition. is  \ufb01s\ufb01t
\nandithastobencjectcd.   L   A 1  <\/p>\n
5. The ooxrhention of the ;)e1;itic:\u00bb;iFz\u00e9,?i*’:’i:-3  <\/p>\n
letter of intent entered into
\nshould have supplied the agmed  v\u00e9a\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9   1%
\non its part is vioiative of Ijfovismns of<\/p>\n
Cons\ufb01tution of    direction to the.<\/p>\n
respondent to       of intent are an
\nagreemant   which is not a statutory
\nand  \ufb01ri the  of the respondent
\nThough ..r\u00a2s;\u00a746i:ci\u00a2nt.v”isA.a  it is like any other individual
\n  ‘vagr\ufb01ent with any private panics.<\/p>\n
 The’ enlzened into are the qumtion of facts<\/p>\n
   disputed, they are disputed quw\ufb01m of facts.
\n_  question of facts cannot be adjudged by this
\n Article 226 of the Constitudon and oonmquently<\/p>\n
  _  sought for by the petitioner cannot be issued.<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
6. The ti cmntm\ufb01on of the petitiozm’  tpt<\/p>\n
tcrms enshrined in lettcrs of intent on   <\/p>\n
is viola\ufb01ve ofArticle 14 & mung)  V<\/p>\n
statutory obligations on the  -_ thc’  Vt
\ncontractual obliga\ufb01ons    not be
\nviolativc of Article 14 and 1a\u00a7”(i;)gg;t;1%  14 ._o ft31c constmmon
\nexpressly providers    arbit:I  cm
\nthe part ofthe   does not arise in
\nthe present   of the parties in
\nthe p1’cscnt:E_caseA   out of a contract betwem
\nthem. The  under Article l9(1)(g) of me
\n  xio  by virtue of non performance<\/p>\n
o’fobltigiatiio11.f_g$n   of the respondent. In this case, the<\/p>\n
  rmpondcnt will not twin! attract
\n  19″(t;.ug;,;  the contention of the petitioner that the<\/p>\n
 violated Article 14 and 19(1)(g) also cannot be<\/p>\n
‘.*”‘4″.upj1.\u00e9I<i;g H<\/p>\n
 The petitioner fuxther contends that the impugned<\/p>\n
\u00e9c\ufb01on on the part of the respondent is without authority of law,<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
7<\/span><\/p>\n
illegal and arbitmly. To substantiate the same, <\/p>\n
has not placed my matmial to hold that the
\nillegal, arbitrary and violates   ‘  I<\/p>\n
obligation between the parties is__
\nparties should comply the    such an
\nobligation n%sari1y  contract involving
\nleading of evidence .’.bOth e~auLana%  Such an<\/p>\n
exercise cannot  <\/p>\n
8. No idoiibe  that in pursuance to
\nletters of  \u00abhe  sums of money in the
\nyear 20045 .   is also not disputed by the
\n \u00e9\ufb01ut so   a\ufb01er this length of time, there is no<\/p>\n
  of the respondent as per the terms of the<\/p>\n
 Tietters  payment of money and receipt of the<\/p>\n
‘ ”  notvfn dispute, that itself does not \ufb01ve jurimiction to<\/p>\n
V   entertain a writ petition and gmnt rt-.-1% as prayed<\/p>\n
  1.   raga. V V.  ._ <\/p>\n
8<\/span><\/p>\n
9. Petitioner drew my attention to the order <\/p>\n
Court in w P No.48 144\/2004 disposed of on 29\/et.(:m5.ioiiimithis <\/p>\n
case also the respondent is one and tho”sam_e7…A  iti.  <\/p>\n
appears one and the same where
\nbetween the parties, there is    tor thc
\nrespondent and henw  die   pe\ufb01tion<\/p>\n
approached this    the impugied
\naction on the     and dirt the
\nrespondent   petitioner. Against the
\nsaid order    msmndmt preferred writ
\nappeal which’   dismissed. Hence petitioner
\n t_he’  enures to the benmt of the
\npewter    and circumstances are one and the<\/p>\n
  in the said petition to be extended in this I<\/p>\n
 ..  gone through the said judment. In my<\/p>\n
  view, question of statutory obligation and<\/p>\n
 Veoiietitti\ufb01onal obligation are not discussed and they were not the<\/p>\n
 naatter therein and it is also not a question for<\/p>\n
 eonsideration whether conuactual obligations can be gone in the<\/p>\n
Writ jurisdiction and decided as is held in DIVISIONAL FOREST<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
 by .V ‘of’the contract, ifthc corxtract is capable ofwing
\n  orthewrtymaysuefor damw. Sacha<\/p>\n
  a petition either for weci\ufb01c perfonb or forj
\n” ” recoverimdamages. A:-igI1ttoreiieff\u00a3owm\ufb01’omaco@’aet<\/p>\n
9<\/span>
\nOFFICER V. BISHWANATH TEA CO. LTD. (AIR<\/a> 1981  1368)<\/p>\n
which is extracted below:  V<\/p>\n
“2.1 It is undoubtedly true that the High Court can mtg
\nexiraordinmy jurisdiction a petition __te ”  W
\nprerogative writs for any other
\nissued where there is executiveV.wt4_ion ilavzav 63*.” V’
\neven in respect of a  tlV.1e’:a i:r.a.bzi_= bf
\nequality before law or equal of law.  <\/p>\n
can also \ufb01le a  3a right under a
\nstatute. Hm,   mspotxdetu was referable
\nto nothing    iebgb, n\u00e9amly, clause 2 Part IV.
\nThe   a  repgb\ufb01ilxction of pmviso to Rule
\n37 of A\u00e9mxii   Rate Regulation but that
\nby itself is an gum-imz\u00a3bb:o  that what the mpommt was
\n_ V doi11’g_iWassbA   provision.<\/p>\n
 b?2;b2bA]()n ‘  1;’ gt a breaw of contract is compxained of: 3
\n  of such breach may we for spec1\ufb01’ c<\/p>\n
.  onshnarily be cognizable bythc Civil Court. The Big
\n in its emwrdmy jurisdidtioa would not ou\ufb01naxily<\/p>\n
hastobeciaimedinaciviIoo::rtwheu*eas1$forweci\ufb01c
\npe1fm’:nameofoemractorf<x':\u00a3unagmcm1ld.be4\ufb01}ed.<\/p>\n
'I<\/p>\n
  of the present mac.\n<\/p>\n
  ‘ 1*0.%1:’ i :\u00a7 furt.hcr true mas; Axticie 225 of the Constitution
\n   j  no this Court. The State
\n could be challenged before this Court and also unda-
\n cinzumstarw this Court exwcisw such a discretionary<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
And in xuzcmmmm smen & ons. v. HA1u).AYAi;
\nBRAR&ORS. (AIR 1976 SC22!6)asfollow\u00a7:””‘        4% x u<\/p>\n
becaime\ufb02isc1eaa’\ufb01vmac1osepH\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7&1:\u00a2f..tin\\#ri\u00a3:p\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7iathu
\nmemially the    to  an<\/p>\n
%w e.nIered.into   ‘And the Co-\n<\/p>\n
operative Bankg\"     mfamcanent\nof: binding     % mam is that\nthe   enforce a comm qua\n<\/pre>\n
 We  jg\u00a3kiheu:i\u00a2e amplitude of Article 226
\nand its  injustice an cannot agave
\nthat    ordinary ooutse without even
\n .    enfotcedunda Article 226″.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘\u00a3i<:\u00e9i3c.t;:  the said decision is of no help in the<\/p>\n
"\\<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
power and crztmtain contractual obi <\/p>\n
obligations. In the present cm, the digp-‘ate  <\/p>\n
is of not a stamtory and oans\ufb01tmiorial     5<\/p>\n
simplc contractual obligation  115  <\/p>\n
entertained.\n<\/p>\n
For the   fails and 1: is<\/p>\n
accordingly  ;,”    bf this writ petition will .
\nnot come   “agitate their rights bdkxe _
\nshall not   any efthe o  made. in .\n<\/p>\n
 as   expressed one way IX’ the other in. L<\/p>\n
   parties.\n<\/p>\n
35\/”\u00a7..,
\nEdge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Victory Exports vs M\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008 Author: L.Narayana Swamy ‘-.MANAGlI\u00a7iG DIRECTOR RESPONDENT FROM THE RESPONDEIWS wmcn ULTIMATELY 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN DATED Tms ‘rm 24th DAY 01? JUNE. “F L % u TI-E HONBLE MRJUSTICE L 1s:ARA*z.AI\u00a2A WRITPE’I’I’I’ION xo.1s3%1%:\/209?(r:;M..m\u00bb\u00a3s3- = % […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-167746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Victory Exports vs M\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Victory Exports vs M\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-07T06:22:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Victory Exports vs M\\\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-07T06:22:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1562,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Victory Exports vs M\\\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-07T06:22:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Victory Exports vs M\\\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Victory Exports vs M\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Victory Exports vs M\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-07T06:22:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Victory Exports vs M\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-07T06:22:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008"},"wordCount":1562,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008","name":"M\/S Victory Exports vs M\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-07T06:22:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-victory-exports-vs-ms-mysore-minerals-limited-on-24-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Victory Exports vs M\/S Mysore Minerals Limited on 24 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=167746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=167746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=167746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=167746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}