{"id":167977,"date":"2010-10-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010"},"modified":"2017-01-11T09:30:20","modified_gmt":"2017-01-11T04:00:20","slug":"v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"V.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
V.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nSA.No. 121 of 2002()\n\n\n1. V.LAKSHMI KUTTY, LEKSHMI VILASATH,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. SADASIVAN, NEDUMTHARAYIL VEEDU,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. VIJAYAMMA, NEDUMTHARAYIL VEEDU,\n\n3. KRISHNAN, CHOTTIYAR, NEDUMTHARAYIL,\n\n4. K.VIJAYAN, SWAROJ BHAVANAM,\n\n5. K.SOMAN, SWARAJ BHAVANAM,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.SUBHASH CYRIAC\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :21\/10\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                    S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J\n                    --------------------------------------\n                       S.A No.121 OF 2002 F\n                       --------------------------------\n              Dated this the 21st day of October 2010\n\n                               JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
      Plaintiff in a suit for fixation of boundary and recovery of<\/p>\n
possession is the appellant. Concurrent decision rendered by the<\/p>\n
two courts below non-suiting her, is challenged in the second appeal.<\/p>\n
She claimed title over two items of properties under A1 and A2 sale<\/p>\n
deeds and possession thereof was sought to be substantiated by<\/p>\n
producing A3 tax receipt. Her claim over the above properties was<\/p>\n
resisted by the defendants, who, in fact, had raised inconsistent<\/p>\n
pleas as to having tenancy and also of prescribing title by adverse<\/p>\n
possession.    The appellant\/plaintiff amended the suit to claim a<\/p>\n
further relief of recovery of possession alleging of subsequent<\/p>\n
trespass by the defendants over the properties and putting up of a<\/p>\n
structure therein.     Both the       courts, on the materials placed,<\/p>\n
negatived the claims canvassed by the plaintiff, and she was<\/p>\n
nonsuited. Correctness of the decision so rendered is sought to be<\/p>\n
impeached in the second appeal.\n<\/p>\n
      2. The records of the case have been collected to examine the<\/p>\n
entertainability of the appeal. Perusing the records with reference to<\/p>\n
the judgments rendered by the courts below and also the<\/p>\n
submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant\/plaintiff, I<\/p>\n
find the appeal does not involve any question of law, leave alone any<\/p>\n
S.A No.121 OF 2002 F               – 2 –<\/span><\/p>\n
substantial question of law for receiving it by this court, to have a<\/p>\n
disposal on merits after issuing notice to the respondents. The title<\/p>\n
deeds, on which the appellant\/plaintiff relied, showed the boundaries<\/p>\n
of the two properties only with reference to the survey numbers, with<\/p>\n
no further demarcation whatsoever, and the         case set up by the<\/p>\n
plaintiff as to subsequent trespass over a portion of the property by<\/p>\n
the defendant was found untrue on the materials placed, which<\/p>\n
indicated that long prior to the institution of the suit, the structures<\/p>\n
allegedly as put up by the plaintiff subsequent to suit, were in<\/p>\n
existence and occupied by the defendants, weighed with both the<\/p>\n
courts to reach a conclusion that the plaintiff is not entitled to the<\/p>\n
reliefs canvassed in the suit. It is also seen that if not the whole, but<\/p>\n
major portion of the properties described in the plaint, as determined<\/p>\n
by the advocate commissioner deputed by the court, with buildings<\/p>\n
comprised therein, are under the occupation of the defendants.<\/p>\n
Though the plaintiff had moved an amendment in the suit to seek<\/p>\n
recovery, it is seen, what was the property sought to be recovered,<\/p>\n
which is alleged to have been trespassed upon by the defendants<\/p>\n
after institution of the suit, has not been separately scheduled, nor<\/p>\n
stated in the plaint. A portion of the suit property was trespassed<\/p>\n
and a structure was put up therein by the defendants, was the case<\/p>\n
advanced by the plaintiff to seek the additional relief of recovery of<\/p>\n
possession by way of amendment. She had no case that the whole<\/p>\n
S.A No.121 OF 2002 F                 – 3 –<\/span><\/p>\n
property was trespassed upon and reduced into possession by the<\/p>\n
defendants. Suit was initially filed for injunction and for fixation of<\/p>\n
boundary, but, later, amended for recovery also, but, without<\/p>\n
specifying the area alleged to have been trespassed upon by the<\/p>\n
defendants.      In the incomplete data as to which was the area<\/p>\n
trespassed upon by the defendants and determination of that area,<\/p>\n
none of the reliefs canvassed in the suit could have been granted to<\/p>\n
the plaintiff, especially in a case where the title deeds refered the<\/p>\n
boundaries of the properties only by survey numbers and that alone.<\/p>\n
Though the claim of recovery under the amended suit was based on<\/p>\n
title, it is seen that the plaintiff did not move for a declaration of her<\/p>\n
title, taking such steps as were necessary for identifying her<\/p>\n
property, as covered under A1 and A2 sale deeds. The materials<\/p>\n
tendered in the case would also show that some portions in the<\/p>\n
survey number, within which the plaint items also fall, had been<\/p>\n
acquired by the Railways, which, in fact, was set up by the<\/p>\n
defendants to resist the suit claim as well. When that be the facts on<\/p>\n
the materials tendered in the case, dismissal of the suit by the trial<\/p>\n
court as confirmed by the lower appellate court negativing the claims<\/p>\n
of the plaintiff does not warrant any interference.            Appeal is<\/p>\n
dismissed.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n                                          S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\nvdv                                                 JUDGE\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court V.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM SA.No. 121 of 2002() 1. V.LAKSHMI KUTTY, LEKSHMI VILASATH, … Petitioner Vs 1. SADASIVAN, NEDUMTHARAYIL VEEDU, … Respondent 2. VIJAYAMMA, NEDUMTHARAYIL VEEDU, 3. KRISHNAN, CHOTTIYAR, NEDUMTHARAYIL, 4. K.VIJAYAN, SWAROJ BHAVANAM, 5. K.SOMAN, SWARAJ BHAVANAM, For Petitioner […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-167977","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nV.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"V.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-11T04:00:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"V.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-11T04:00:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":735,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010\",\"name\":\"V.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-11T04:00:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"V.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"V.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"V.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-11T04:00:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"V.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-11T04:00:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010"},"wordCount":735,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010","name":"V.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-11T04:00:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-lakshmi-kutty-vs-sadasivan-on-21-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"V.Lakshmi Kutty vs Sadasivan on 21 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167977","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=167977"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167977\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=167977"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=167977"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=167977"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}