{"id":168135,"date":"2008-04-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008"},"modified":"2014-05-25T08:23:23","modified_gmt":"2014-05-25T02:53:23","slug":"ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S San Engineering And … vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S San Engineering And … vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH courrr or KARNATAKA AT _BANGALC'I\u00e9E' ,\nDATED THIS THE 01-t DAY or-' APRIL,  if' =7 j\nBEFORE;  \u00a7 4  \nTHE HONYBLE MR. JUSTICE KSHQ_K:~i3. f\nWRIT PE'I'I'l'IO-N No.'iTf85D of'2bp7.   %  \n\nBETWEEN\n\n1 Mia San Engineering and -1Loo()mo1:ivc_ \"\nWhitc\ufb01cd Ro_ad',\u00ab \nBangaiorc -:5-,66;\ufb014:8,.,   . -- \nRepresented by'. iii\u00e9' \nCompany \nSri Iiishbin \nAgcd'.,abo_u_t 5\".2.'vy\u00a2-;;a1*a.\n \" V t    pmouszz\n\n   S 'I'M:-r rub-n-nuf A II'nno+a\\\n\n1   ofizlciia,\nRep:gse.i1!0.\u00a2i..by Ministry of\nand Natural Gas, _\nNew Delhi, Iepreaentud by its Secretary,\n of Government of India.\n\n2 u - Indian Oil Corporation Ltd..\nri\" ' Line Biirisiranj,\n\nNo.719, 4\"' Block,-7\"' Main,\n\n1\" Biock. Kaiyannagar.\n\nBangalore, represented by its\n\nPresiding O\ufb02iocr,\n\nSri R.R.Jannu, K.A.S.\n\n1.. RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
_.__ .5 L. -a…V’_’ -…..\n<\/p>\n
 anti fzuim nu”|.’iuuui’iu1i, d .<\/p>\n
bl!<\/p>\n
{W Sri B.PapegWds. :”u’3G% for R-1, Sri Vijaya S’nar$at”.~.._\u00b0enior<\/p>\n
Advocate for Sri B.K.Aridhar, Advocate fa11..!?:f2_\u00bb,). ~  V ” <\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is \ufb01led under Articles 226 ‘ofthe..
\nConstitution of India praying to quash no’\ufb01ce”  by. the
\nrespcndent No.2, d_t.1-1.05. 2007 on the ven\u00a3!o1\\of:i11e”g>et;itionei1.Sr3I.
\nAbdul Javced vide [Annexure–A, 14.05.2\u00a3)G7′ on._fhe_ “vef.ui’e1f’ecf’ the  ”<\/p>\n
.n-u-n-taunt:-l’l11.n_= ‘<\/p>\n
\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01r Vidw’i’- r1.u.u6.nu.nv A au\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02 3%-<\/p>\n
This ‘”‘”t Peti’ri’n “ming ‘iii me; nu. dash. C{‘i’&1″‘i made the
\nfollowing ‘<\/p>\n
 ,_,_,_.1ji._j__i-tt:Cl.  \u00a2:uierse::1.A,1 have taken it<\/p>\n
“viii the }.-.31’;-M. adv-m…at.es<\/p>\n
appearing for   \u00e9_  *<\/p>\n
 ‘The V  i this petition is to the notice.<\/p>\n
dt.1\u00a2.L(J2=’.J.’.-f.}u0′._7_’ ‘{.A;1iiie_iii.:ir:E-,iA:\u00a7; crdezg t_i_t,2’_7.(_)’_7.2_0O7 [Annexure-B]<\/p>\n
V ”  “3.   ‘1)wa1*akana\ufb021, the leamed counsel for the<\/p>\n
pet ‘  the acquisition proceedings urg1n’ g the fo11ow1n’ g<\/p>\n
V’ — .  The notice at Annexume-A is issued to and in the name
\nof the petitioncr’s vendor. although the petitioner is<\/p>\n
the recorded owner of the land in question.<\/p>\n
FIBH.\n<\/p>\n
T”I1e preliminary noti\ufb01cation is sketchy anti It<\/p>\n
does not contain the material :not
\nmention as to who are __the__owne”rs” the it ‘in <\/p>\n
question. Where exactly:”:thef_:pro1iose(i  ‘A<\/p>\n
pass through in mctipe\ufb01so\ufb01er\ufb01} vast’  4<\/p>\n
acres 32 guntas is not:ii:i’o11t11Ked.  ‘-<\/p>\n
The order at   the concerned
\n has  u  the petitioner’s
\n   that the objections<\/p>\n
 “The  to set up his industry. The<\/p>\n
li\u00e9ssiiig. of  pipeline would come in the<\/p>\n
  wsy  A  full bene\ufb01cial use of the petitioner’s
\n It is the speci\ufb01c case of Sri Dwarakanath
\n_’ .  it is feasible and viable to shift the proposed<\/p>\n
  nipeline to the outer boundary of turning point 30 and<\/p>\n
Q0 Dir
\nIu-IQI I-F’<\/p>\n
dninn {kin
\nwuss I..|.:.n:I,<\/p>\n
exciuded and saved from the acquisition proceedings.
\nPM<\/p>\n
– w–rl.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4. On the other hand. Sri Vijaya Shankar. ‘senior<\/p>\n
counsel for Sri B.K.Sridhar for the 2″‘ respondent  the<\/p>\n
route of the proposed pipeline is prepared. so not ntfeet  <\/p>\n
use of the pathway, mad crossings,  “isms,  ”<\/p>\n
etc. He submits that the questioziis notiwliether<\/p>\n
has to be straight or curved;  ensuiing that the<\/p>\n
c..s:ns.ge use t..e h..igh;<s:;b_o;e   ._.__.s 1..-_.1 Qn mv
\nQil\ufb01\u00e9ii\ufb01i" to th' 23" res'**"da:-nt's  :lt7_';1a*\u00b0 "-"'m'ed the pmsenm<\/p>\n
of the     submission on behaif of the
\n2nd 1espondent'T." i1'1P;'trneiio.ns"ii  that there cannot be any
\nrealigxiznent    of the existence of the Hoskote<\/p>\n
Kere and  'vicinity of the lands in question.<\/p>\n
  Sri PspeV__\u00a7.'\u00a7ov.vda, learned ACGSC appearing for the 1*'-<\/p>\n
 respondent\u00e9   the submissions of Sri Vijaya Shanitar,<\/p>\n
the iiearnedfsenior counsel.\n<\/p>\n
6. On e..re-J.l _,n_L_e:n_=n_ti_ns -1′ the submissions made at
\n‘=.’:.\ufb01_’ ‘near, I t’-id ttmt the \ufb01r-‘t s”b’*-is-‘En ‘awed en be..a’.f M’ the<\/p>\n
i  pe\ufb01\ufb01oner is devoid of merits. The notice at Annexure-A sppea\ufb01 to<\/p>\n
it nave been issued in the name of and to the person whosoevefs<\/p>\n
name \ufb01gures in the revenue records. It is trite position in law that
\n[J 1″‘) n I<\/p>\n
PUSH<\/p>\n
the land acquisition o\ufb01cer is not required to hold a enquiry
\ninto who is the owner of the land in question. i  in  A<\/p>\n
-4
\n?\n<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
\nI’
\ni’
\n3<\/span><\/p>\n
5?\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
the presumption is that the persons interested  the
\npublic at large have a constriietive   Macrluisition
\nproceedings. I have   issued ‘under Section
\n3(1) of the Petroleum and  (\ufb01cquisi\ufb01on of Right
\nof User in Land);  It does contain
\nthe brief dese:ri1itioii’   to what is prescribed<\/p>\n
under Sectiiori fifihe “SaidiAct;””I’~have therefore no hesitation in<\/p>\n
 _   as the second contention that the preliminary’<\/p>\n
it inoti\ufb01catior:  sketehjf ‘and vague is concerned, what can be<\/p>\n
 said noti\ufb01cation is that for the transportation of<\/p>\n
‘r_espondent Corporation and for the said purpose, it  “eees<\/p>\n
pe..i-..:l.,.u..,. . p:{r_id1;cts \ufb01vor_n Devanagondi to New Bangalore
\nhte1*””tio* “‘ Air”-‘rt, D”vanah% yimliue has to be laid u.-3’ the 2″”<\/p>\n
E:\n<\/p>\n
E:\n<\/p>\n
   the right of user in the land. The public purpose is clearly<\/p>\n
in set out. Further the preliminary noti\ufb01cation speci\ufb01es the sub-<\/p>\n
division number and also the area. The brief description of the<\/p>\n
FIBH<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
land con\ufb01rms to the legislative prescription <\/p>\n
3(2) of the said Act. I therefore reject the second it *<\/p>\n
ED
\nE
\n”5?\n<\/p>\n
it
\nit<\/p>\n
of the objections aiso merits seiions co1tsi(iemtioii;. .V
\nAuthority has held that there Stat\u00bb  tat: ooiieitieiing the
\npetitioner’s objections, arsj\ufb02iey   A  5(1) of the
\nsaid Act states that if    for laying of the
\npipelines under; has  ohjec\ufb01ons within 21 days
\nfrom the date!    noti\ufb01cation. In the
\ninstant   iino\ufb01\ufb01chtion was published on
\n\u00ab;;34_g3_g-:VJ,iQ7_” pi   ‘……1-.t in hint ha-an<\/p>\n
i5.04.2%7. _V v.i-‘1’oW_e\ufb01::-,1’? vttie<\/p>\n
 V.   Al\ufb02\ufb02\ufb02e\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02g of the objections  the prescribed<\/p>\n
  itiisientitled the petitioner to have its objections<\/p>\n
 ..’I’i1\u00a7eiv.Division Bench of this court in the case of<\/p>\n
 v. STATE or xannnruu All!)<\/p>\n
 i   “reported in 193412) KLJ 326. has held that the<\/p>\n
 ‘1~_.ohjec\ufb01ons not \ufb01led within the period piesciibed under law need<\/p>\n
-JI<\/p>\n
can In… ……4I…..:4.’._… 1…… _. ………-.e…;.;,,..
\n.\ufb01.\u00a3nmn.n c an I’..I’-lllflvll Illa IILIVU fl-U <\/p>\n
oonsider the “,_,ieo1ions \ufb01_Ied    _
\nspecified. The tzmthorities have <\/p>\n
to afford an opportunity of u<\/p>\n
._g_
\n\u00a7.\n<\/p>\n
In
\n:3 E<\/p>\n
or a person interested who  objections ‘or_’<\/p>\n
time speci\ufb01ed  ;\u00a7ta\u00a7’.4te;~–..\u00a22!t\u00e9i~even noti\ufb01es such
\nowner or person    cause as is
\nrequire\u00a2:1:Au21deri}\u00a7. 323(3) that’  confer any right
\non__ size):  1to_ar;~ appa\ufb01uhim of being heard
\n  \ufb02ied by such<\/p>\n
4%,; “\u00bbmt:.. ‘-ha “2;-;.=:~..\u00ab_;-:\u00a2ere;.r m an .53; o-.-.2<\/p>\n
L av: rv \u00abJu-\n<\/p>\n
 au:ho\ufb01iy.js%shhhtoo <\/p>\n
in mew’ of the.._’;aw- jam’  datum-.~~’tVby the E1v1s1o’ ‘ ” I1 Bench, the competent<\/p>\n
-‘V_s.uthvofi1y__of the .2″? nespondent cannot be held to be at fault for<\/p>\n
V7  the objections.\n<\/p>\n
  ” use of the pe\ufb01\ufb01oncfs property in question is an issue,<\/p>\n
  has to be considered by the concerned authorities. This<\/p>\n
‘4 .4  Court, in exercise of its power under Article 226 of the Constitution<\/p>\n
FIEH.\n<\/p>\n
of India cannot deliver any \ufb01nding on whether it is or<\/p>\n
viable to shift the proposed pipeline to the outer  ‘of<\/p>\n
turning point Nos.30 and 32. In    <\/p>\n
refer to a judgment of the Hon’ble    of it<\/p>\n
aunmanem KHUBHALGlRil._,:_G98AVi   harms use<\/p>\n
_L_QQU!\u00a7!’!’!\u00a2.J!! QFFIGEE-,  All ” ‘199\u00a7.i Q!) 3169,;<\/p>\n
to which piece is convenient -for eatab\ufb01snm?  the bus sum’ (i. The<\/p>\n
relevant poltioaof     hereinbelow:<\/p>\n
 as :jtp.iiii’i  Shri UCR.Lalit, learned
\n sertiof  large congregation of lalchs
\n ‘peoJptel’\u00a2:{or:=e” the temple town of Lord<\/p>\n
V _v   of relieving the congestion by
\n  bus stand’ and bus depot to
\n‘ a place in the ottt=slcirts of dty, extersion itsetf
\n*   to the congregation Though the argument
\n plausible and attractive, we cannot go into
\n question. It is for the Government to take a<\/p>\n
ll  ltiecision and it is not for this Court to give any
\n in that behaif”. ‘The Government did take
\noetatra decision. It is wzaity true that the area
\nreserved for residential purpcae. It is not the case<\/p>\n
that they are establishing the bus stand in the
\nresidential area for the first time. In fact bus stand<\/p>\n
F\/TBH.\n<\/p>\n
is already existing and acquisition was for<\/p>\n
\u20ac:’3c’f\u20aci’\ufb01iOii of the e5r’si’i'”ag has stared. L’__\ufb01c’i\u00e9r.  ‘ .<\/p>\n
einenmstasnees, we do not \ufb01nd    i <\/p>\n
justification warranting intetferenoef ,\u00ab T<\/p>\n
__ _ _.__.-.. __…__ -___ -9–.’-_ _ __;,_’._._\u00a3__’.;  _\n<\/p>\n
11. in i’_i’1c icsui i icgeific in K\u00a5 >\u00a3\ufb01 reus i to i.i’n:<\/p>\n
acquisition proceedings.  it “is”  to the
\npetitioner to give -appropriate     respondent
\nas to which route of the is viable and which
\nroute is not    presume that the
\nauthorities ._ the pe\ufb01\ufb01onefs case and<\/p>\n
take appropIiaitej5deeision’-inthe niather.<\/p>\n
12.””Ffu’rt11er,_:stitiioziities concerned still persist in<\/p>\n
acquiring the”righteof– the land in question, it is open to the<\/p>\n
 V’ : to A. seeici “”‘ap”prop1-iate compensation if compulsory<\/p>\n
  right of user in the land in question, is<\/p>\n
injn.wions1y.sifeciing his other property.<\/p>\n
 .s _ _ not This Writ petition is dismissed but subject to the above<\/p>\n
 _ isaiti-1iheI’ties and observations. No order as to costs.<\/p>\n
bvr<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S San Engineering And … vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri IN THE HIGH courrr or KARNATAKA AT _BANGALC’I\u00e9E’ , DATED THIS THE 01-t DAY or-‘ APRIL, if’ =7 j BEFORE; \u00a7 4 THE HONYBLE MR. JUSTICE KSHQ_K:~i3. f WRIT PE’I’I’l’IO-N No.’iTf85D of’2bp7. % BETWEEN 1 Mia […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-168135","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S San Engineering And ... vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S San Engineering And ... vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-25T02:53:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S San Engineering And … vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-25T02:53:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1456,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S San Engineering And ... vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-25T02:53:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S San Engineering And … vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S San Engineering And ... vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S San Engineering And ... vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-25T02:53:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S San Engineering And … vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-25T02:53:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008"},"wordCount":1456,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008","name":"M\/S San Engineering And ... vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-25T02:53:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-san-engineering-and-vs-union-of-india-on-1-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S San Engineering And … vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168135","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=168135"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168135\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=168135"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=168135"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=168135"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}