{"id":168520,"date":"2008-05-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008"},"modified":"2018-02-03T01:18:17","modified_gmt":"2018-02-02T19:48:17","slug":"peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008","title":{"rendered":"Peeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Peeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
w P No.217\u00a7_}jgQO7.\n\n..1_\n\nEN THE HIGH coum op KARNATAKA AT  _\n\nDATED THIS THE 31$? DAY OF_MIs\u00a7\ufb01f~~20\u20aci8   '  \n\nTHE H()N'BLE MR. J:.rsT1C\u00a7;\u00ab.A;'s.PAC}:-}+uit\u00e9URE;  V\nWRIT PETITION No;2.i75\/2o07%.:LG:;rx--C;vc)\n\nBETWEEN\n\n \n\nPEEKA NAIAK  \ns\/0 SAMYA NAIK  '\n\nAGEIDABOUT4-QYRS  V   \n\nR\/AT KAALEVE13;\u00a7.1~:A':fr:A  _  \" \nVIL1AGE,C}IALLi-KEVRE TQ__  '  \ncH1TRADURG:s'Q1sT'\u00ab-- \u00bb     PETITIONER\n\n{BY SVRIJ'. ':\u00ab.4L.'jir;M 'E;::%:.fi~i.A:\"1\\e;:iRTHi?;'ADV. )\n1 RAMA ANAYAKA'; \" \n, .,s\/0 SAMYAVNAIK\n AGE MAJOR\" ____ \n\n  RACARAJA NAYAKA\n\n'  _ G R'AM19:.NAIKA @ SAAJAN\n' AvG':3_MA\u00a7?OR\n\nBern ARE .EfE$IBENTS OF\nCHIKKAJOGIHALLI TANDA\n\n .  ' KUDLiGI_ TQ BELLARY DIST\n\" V' P31533126\n\n'   BHIMA NAIK\n\nS] O SGMLA NAIK\n\nAGE MAJOR\n\nR\/O. ULIANAHALLE VILLAGE\n\nKUDLIGI TQ BELLARY DIST  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
{BY SR1 J.M. ANIL KUMAR, ADV. FOR R1 85 2)<\/p>\n
W P No.2 175\/2007.\n<\/p>\n
-2-<\/span><\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PETITION ES FILED UNDER AR’rICL5i:’:>\u00a7_2\u00b0;{oF
\nTHE CONSTITUTION ow INDIA PRAHNG TO QUAS_\u00a7”THE..QEDER<\/p>\n
3’1″. 23.1.2007 IN es 83\/98 BY THE CIVIL .m’sc}_12:.:”[..:”tR;\u00bb:.\u00a7fr~:1″<\/p>\n
KUDLEGI, VIDE ANX-E, ORDER ON IMIQ. 123;  <\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PETFFION comes; on<\/p>\n
DAY, THE COURT MADE THEs’FQLLOVW{NG: <\/p>\n
This petition   the orders on<\/p>\n
I.A.Nos.12 and V 13   of the<\/p>\n
petitioner     readwith Section<\/p>\n
151   the plaint and also<\/p>\n
reopening the   -t<\/p>\n
2. ,T1_1e  reievant’fof”‘tne purpose of this petition<\/p>\n
a;’e’as u1viduer:;p_.p<\/p>\n
 the suit seeking declaration that<\/p>\n
_p1aint\ufb01fl’s   owners of the suit schedule land and<\/p>\n
  ef’. permanent injunction restra1mn’ ‘ g the<\/p>\n
A’ from trespassing and interferring with the<\/p>\n
  ~  p _  possession and enjoyment of the suit property.<\/p>\n
respondent appeared, \ufb02ied the written statement and<\/p>\n
:3; \\<\/p>\n
W P No.2 175 [ 2007.\n<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
\ufb01led, even Without giving the date Wheia’. <\/p>\n
dispossessed Wouid itself give an  he  ‘K
\nnot at all diligent in seeking   ‘<\/p>\n
application seeking reopening of thocase of L.<\/p>\n
was on the basis of the amoviaoiiftnent so”a.g}:1tv’fo1;;’f\u00a7When the
\npe\ufb01tioner is not en\ufb01izisd  iihere is no
\nquestion of  Trial Court has
\ntaken into   tizroi\u00e9app\ufb01c\/a\ufb01on is filed
\nonly to  ii’1oV’:\u00bb\u00a7pfoceedi11gs and further
\nthat   the amendment. There
\nis   show that the petitioner was<\/p>\n
diligent in}  shiendment of the piaint. In View of<\/p>\n
   oiifcunisfaiioes, I do not \ufb01nd any merit in this<\/p>\n
   the writ petition is liable to be dismissed<\/p>\n
ein\u00e9is djssiissed accordingly.<\/p>\n
\u00a7:3!s’*s<\/p>\n
JL<\/p>\n
w.p. No.2175\/2007
\nASPJ: V l<\/p>\n
10.06.2008 ‘J
\nonnaa on BEING spoxxn NH”,<\/p>\n
The learned counsel for the petitioner \u00e9\ufb01unior<\/p>\n
counsel} had argued the matter and lateruafter that<\/p>\n
dictation, the learned senior oounselihfor the
\npetitioner submits that the iriai Court 055 wrong in
\nrejecting the application and that the multiplicity
\nof the proceedinds_cdnld he atoided it the amendment
\nis grantedg”Eheitwiishs\ufb01elevantb_to note that this
\nsubmission \ufb01es oensidered while dictating the Order
\nand as the,p\u00e9titronerreag.\ufb01ot diligent in filing the<\/p>\n
applicatioal andx’didl=not’ even mention the date or<\/p>\n
month} or. year_ of ldispossession from the suit<\/p>\n
;1_\ufb01reperty;h ih* his application for amendment and as<\/p>\n
the applieation was filed subsequent to the closure<\/p>\n
at” of evidenoegithe provisions of Order 6 Ruie 17 C?C<\/p>\n
z”*\u00a2require the petitioner to prove that he was diligent<\/p>\n
h<.allualbng. As there was no material on this aspect<\/p>\n
V"-L\u00a7f the matter, the petition has been rejected. In<\/p>\n
ih*._ the circumstances, I do not find any grounds to<\/p>\n
modify the Order already dictated. The request of<\/p>\n
54<\/span><\/p>\n
the learned counsel fer the petitioner for review ofh'””‘<\/p>\n
modification is rejected.\n<\/p>\n
4 a
\n+..-.\u00a2<\/p>\n
K3m*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Peeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008 Author: A.S.Pachhapure w P No.217\u00a7_}jgQO7. ..1_ EN THE HIGH coum op KARNATAKA AT _ DATED THIS THE 31$? DAY OF_MIs\u00a7\ufb01f~~20\u20aci8 ‘ THE H()N’BLE MR. J:.rsT1C\u00a7;\u00ab.A;’s.PAC}:-}+uit\u00e9URE; V WRIT PETITION No;2.i75\/2o07%.:LG:;rx–C;vc) BETWEEN PEEKA NAIAK s\/0 SAMYA NAIK ‘ AGEIDABOUT4-QYRS V R\/AT KAALEVE13;\u00a7.1~:A’:fr:A _ ” VIL1AGE,C}IALLi-KEVRE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-168520","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPeeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Peeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-05-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-02T19:48:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Peeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-02T19:48:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008\"},\"wordCount\":478,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008\",\"name\":\"Peeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-02T19:48:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Peeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Peeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Peeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-05-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-02T19:48:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Peeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008","datePublished":"2008-05-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-02T19:48:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008"},"wordCount":478,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008","name":"Peeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-05-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-02T19:48:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/peeka-naiak-vs-rama-nayaka-on-31-may-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Peeka Naiak vs Rama Nayaka on 31 May, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168520","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=168520"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168520\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=168520"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=168520"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=168520"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}