{"id":168556,"date":"2009-02-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009"},"modified":"2017-12-23T04:23:14","modified_gmt":"2017-12-22T22:53:14","slug":"majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 24 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 24 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n
 _ 'V of  Majare Ramaswamy Rsiya, of\n\nI<AZ}vfi'a;\u00bb{:31'::z3.:A_  of K.G.Byadrahal}i, Kasaba Bobii,\n\n'VVconsu:'m*ueted yresidential houses and they have been\nx V' iijesidiifig Vihere since about 80 years. They claim title :0\n igiroperty also. Suf\ufb01ce it to say that the respondent<\/pre>\n
‘4 bomora\ufb01on starte\u00e9 interfeiing with their peaceful \ufb02<\/p>\n
This WP is \ufb02ied under Articles 226 and 227 of the
\nConstitution of India pI’Ei_’}*’iI1g to quash the Katha extract
\nissue\u00e9 by the respeI1deI1t~c:erpe1″atie1’1 on 2\u00e9.(}5.’;?_.\u00a3O\u20ac’)? ,
\nvide AnnexL1re~Ct, in respect of property I.D.No.\u00a33;?;;<\/p>\n
4, in ward No.92, Marappa Garden.   L”  ._ <\/p>\n
This WP coming on for   ” -\u00bb.\n<\/p>\n
Group this day, the Court made t;he”foi1o1xf4ing:    I
\nonnsee ‘<'m-'<\/p>\n
The petitioner is qtiesiie\ufb01izig the'v"'i'e.eifi9n of  ;
\nrespondent–Ci0rporatien in e\ufb01'eeting.V the name
\nof 3. tiiird person thefe'iiii' ti\ufb01\ufb01eszjieiiizigfize possession of
\nthe Petitioner her\ufb01i\ufb02.  V<\/p>\n
2. __ 5_Ifli1e~_ “;:e:i:i’\u00a7io:1er   jasseciation and the<\/p>\n
members of Vthe”vV-4#jX’sso{:i\u00a7\u00e9\u00a3ti.o:1 -i are the owners and in<\/p>\n
pessessiorr,_<)'E' Vtlfie_  admeasuxing 5 acres 39<\/p>\n
 Taluk. Their claim is that they have<\/p>\n
\/\/4"\n<\/p>\n
% etgamet is ua2;1e :5 Viiieeet aside.<\/p>\n
  for resperedem: No.3 submits that indeed, the
\n 1’espemie1″2t has purchased the property to an\n<\/p>\n
  -\u00bbe:<}tent of 1,80, 188 sq. mtrs. Hence supperts the change<\/p>\n
V of khata extract. He further submits that the fact that<\/p>\n
4. Mr.Man’Lkappa. Peril, Eearned counsel appeaeing
\nfor the petitioner vehemently submits that
\nby the petitioner has been decreed heiding \ufb02i\u00e9t
\nin possession of the entire extej:1f’ef ‘A
\nwould submit that the q11e$ti0n.\u00bbA:t\u00a5f
\nonly for the purpose of V   Jjthe ‘V
\npetitioner is in posseeeioI;eV”‘er;d:’  f1\u00e9’r\u00a7dir:g’ thereef
\nagainst the pet.iti03:1e:*    as a res
\njudicata, He ~ fi:e*\u00a7\u00a7i.1er   , pTfefe1*e eonsideririg
\nthe “—t\u00a7vt1e7’i:\u00a7e\u00a7\u00a7’d’.::’e-feepoyndent to enter his
\nname,  be conducted which
\nhas  eeee. Kile petitioner was also not<\/p>\n
1″1otjf;ed.L E~\u00a7enee;\u00bb.\u00a7:e  ;$:1::V}:3\u00a7i:r1its that the impugned ‘khata<\/p>\n
 5,__’v’\u00a7\\\u00a3:1!f2’&nax1t}1a K\ufb01shnamzi\ufb01hy, learned Counsel<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
‘X<\/p>\n
the petitioner has parted with a part: of the property :31”: g<\/p>\n
‘ V. suit as \u00e9d\u00e9f\u00e9jldants. Indeed, it is also to be<\/p>\n
 ~ndtjc\u00e9d,. t;%1;-ii:%V Ea:*.t \u00bb:1o point of time, ‘::he pe1:itioner’s name<\/p>\n
 : Iioti\ufb01ezi in the circumstances, wcxuld not arise.
\n T.  however, What is signi\ufb01cam: is that the petitioner\n<\/p>\n
  -hmwas \ufb01led a comprehensive suit seeking deciaration of<\/p>\n
title in respect of the entire extent of 5 acres 39 gmms.\ufb01<\/p>\n
favour of his brothers children does not necessarily
\ndiserztitle him in getting his Rama entszred iI1..__ftft1e<\/p>\n
revenue recarcis.\n<\/p>\n
6. 13vIr.Puttegowda, learned: – ‘COI1’I1.S\u00a73:  api\u00a7\u00e9@1’i1\u00a7g[‘fof’–
\nth\u00e9 Carporation submits that tin  \u00e9i};:{\ufb01liC\u00e9fiq\u00a71′ <\/p>\n
respondent No.3, the khata ha.js\u00a7”beenV.  <\/p>\n
‘7. I have perused  L’vi’\u00e9\u00e9su–it is  It is 3130 not in dispute<\/p>\n
that 31.6 re4$pQ:I1d\u20ac.;i”1t’$- %i\u00e9i;{3ther’s children are parlzies in<\/p>\n
W235-..appvea1\u00a7i.:’1g in the khata. Hence, the qu\ufb01sticm of they<\/p>\n
X<\/p>\n
 k% “‘a:;;:1.:\u00a7r;:y:% <:$1*.1;;;'1i1'11\u00a7::?V,%\u00a7iA($v mat bind the civil court. and they
\n ciecide the issues befare then}<\/p>\n
  _ inci\u00e9'pen,;\u00e9eI'3f;:"" \u00a3\u00a7f them and also having regard to the
\n "4"'~–VVVL\u00a7%zzid\u00a7;n\u00a3:eV–i\u00e9t in by the parties. Hence, the apprehensiera
\n   petitioner can be alieviateci by makixzg an<\/p>\n
 " c}l;i$e1vati0n to that effect. ,\ufb01<\/p>\n
The civil court is seized of the matter. Time and again,
\nit is stated that whenever a more corzxprehensffi\u00e9
\n\ufb01led in respect of the property, the entries
\nwill be regulated by 1:116 final decision my A
\nthe said suit. It is to be rj;;s;\u00a2;\u00a7g'%
\nrespondent is not a pariy saic1 s'u3'q_t.
\nif he feeis that he is –.ea\u00abggr;i\u00abefi7*ec}" b\u00a7; any
\ndecision to be renderet\u00e9 he shall make
\nan appliczaticljr    the said suit.\n<\/p>\n
8.   thfe petitioner is that<\/p>\n
  to the interest of the<\/p>\n
petitioner \ufb02are made-L:.’b}*”‘t?3,u\u20ac’corporation in the imptlgleci<\/p>\n
0rde1f.,– –. xAp\u00a3ja;;\u00a2\u00a31t\u00a7jI,  Qbservations n1adc~:=: by the<\/p>\n
X’<\/p>\n
   ;fe_\u00e9ords relating 1:0 this 32156 are kept in safe cust;0ciy<\/p>\n
 ” . wit}1 {he Registrar Judicial, The regstxy shall retzmrx %<\/p>\n
Csnseqtiantiyf, the foiiowing order is passed: <\/p>\n
(1) The khata extraciii 511311 1:36: ragtilatedj”\ufb01fL%”L–\u00ab\u00bb_\u00a7i:.\u00a2
\njL:dg:11ent and decree to be I’\u20ac:2Vt1(ir\u20ac,f:I’;s:;:’.4.c’%.:4.
\nCivil Court in the sujji  hjg;  K 2
\ndaclaration of title and i:i;iVui.if(:tior–1;’-   ‘V V’<\/p>\n
(2) ‘1’11e=’ civil cam’:  b\u00a7;\u00a7’   ‘V L’
\nof me 0bS\u20acIv’%’F3;\u00a7iOHf’3″‘i”i;,}\u00a5:;i_:(\u00a7,\u20ac’#VV tfi\u00e9’ ‘\u20ac31oI*;:”ao1*a.tion
\nwhile directi\ufb01g $   :’=*,.==..$p'{:;r1de111: No. 333
\nmama       ‘<\/p>\n
(3) Tfgi\u00e9  Hv”:j’\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7iAepen(1ent}y’ decida the<\/p>\n
iii: an the basis 0f<\/p>\n
 j A5913 Eatfe Tilet\u00e9 i;1:2.  jtha parties.<\/p>\n
   iiic\u00e9rf\ufb01safatgibn has violated all order of
\n ;_..:\ufb011*1j1gnc%;i\u00e9r:'”granted by the Civi}. Court, it is
\n  _  the petitioner to initiates: such other
\n against. the respondent for vi.o1at.i0n 01″<\/p>\n
” _ f;1″1e: imeritn arder.\n<\/p>\n
V’ x  :PL1r$ua.nt to an carrier passed by this court, U516<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
J’<\/p>\n
the racords to Mrfllttegowda, Eearned csunsel for___ the<\/p>\n
Corparation.\n<\/p>\n
Petition stands dispcsed of accardingly  ”<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 24 February, 2009 Author: Ajit J Gunjal _ ‘V of Majare Ramaswamy Rsiya, of I<AZ}vfi'a;\u00bb{:31'::z3.:A_ of K.G.Byadrahal}i, Kasaba Bobii, 'VVconsu:'m*ueted yresidential houses and they have been x V' iijesidiifig Vihere since about 80 years. They claim title :0 igiroperty also. Suf\ufb01ce […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-168556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMajare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan ... vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan ... vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-22T22:53:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 24 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-22T22:53:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":876,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan ... vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-22T22:53:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 24 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan ... vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan ... vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-22T22:53:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 24 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-22T22:53:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009"},"wordCount":876,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009","name":"Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan ... vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 24 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-22T22:53:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/majare-ramaswamy-palya-harijan-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-24-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Majare Ramaswamy Palya Harijan … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 24 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=168556"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168556\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=168556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=168556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=168556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}