{"id":168646,"date":"2007-10-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-10-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007"},"modified":"2018-11-17T13:42:58","modified_gmt":"2018-11-17T08:12:58","slug":"jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007","title":{"rendered":"Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nBail Appl No. 6298 of 2007()\n\n\n1. JABIR, S\/O MOHAMMED,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. SANAL, S\/O BALAN,\n3. RAFI, S\/O MUHAMMAD,\n4. SHAMEEM, S\/O HASSAN,\n5. THAJUDHEEN, S\/O ISMAYIL\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DY. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n\n Dated :17\/10\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                               R.BASANT, J.\n                            ----------------------\n                         B.A.No.6298 of 2007\n                      ----------------------------------------\n                Dated this the 17th day of October 2007\n\n                                 O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>      Application for regular bail. The petitioners are accused 1 to 5<\/p>\n<p>in a crime registered for offences punishable inter alia under Section<\/p>\n<p>308 I.P.C. The facts of the case are disturbing. It must persuade the<\/p>\n<p>members of a refined and civilized community to hang their heads<\/p>\n<p>down in shame. Two women, one of them pregnant, were suspected<\/p>\n<p>to be involved in the commission of theft. A crowd of local people<\/p>\n<p>allegedly attempted to deliver instant criminal justice, it is alleged.<\/p>\n<p>They allegedly attacked the two women, attempted to outrage their<\/p>\n<p>modesty by disrobing them allegedly to find out whether any stolen<\/p>\n<p>property is hidden. It is further alleged that ignoring the cries of the<\/p>\n<p>victims, one of whom was pregnant and one of whom was having a<\/p>\n<p>child with her, they were beaten black and blue. They could be saved<\/p>\n<p>ultimately only when the police party on information came to the<\/p>\n<p>scene and tried to rescue them. They were taken to the local hospital.<\/p>\n<p>They were admitted with injuries. One of them allegedly escaped<\/p>\n<p>while she was undergoing treatment as in-patient.                The incident<\/p>\n<p>appears to have attracted media coverage. That helped the police to<\/p>\n<p>easily proceed further in the investigation of the crime.              Video<\/p>\n<p>recordings of the events were available with a local videographer.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">B.A.No.6298\/07                      2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The police have seized the same also.          This had helped them<\/p>\n<p>considerably in the conduct of the investigation. The police have<\/p>\n<p>identified ten persons as the persons, who along with others,<\/p>\n<p>constituted the unlawful assembly and indulged in the culpable overt<\/p>\n<p>acts. The petitioners were arrested and produced before the learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate on 8\/10\/2007. They continue in custody from that date.<\/p>\n<p>Accused 6 to 10 are reported to be absconding.           They are not<\/p>\n<p>available for arrest.\n<\/p>\n<p>       2.    The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners are absolutely innocent. The media appears to be playing<\/p>\n<p>havoc. Because of the coverage by the sensation mongering media,<\/p>\n<p>the police is compelled to act to satisfy the public outcry. In that<\/p>\n<p>attempt, they are ignoring the facts and truth and making reckless<\/p>\n<p>and wild allegations against the petitioners. In these circumstances,<\/p>\n<p>it is prayed that the petitioners may be granted regular bail.<\/p>\n<p>       3.    The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in any<\/p>\n<p>view of the matter, the allegation under Section 308 I.P.C is not<\/p>\n<p>justified at all. The petitioners do not deserve to continue in custody<\/p>\n<p>any longer. They may be released on bail subject to any appropriate<\/p>\n<p>conditions, submits the learned counsel for the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>       4.    The learned Director General of Prosecutions, who has<\/p>\n<p>himself appeared in this case, opposes the application. The learned<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">B.A.No.6298\/07                      3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Director General of Prosecutions submits that the allegations do<\/p>\n<p>constitute an offence punishable under Section 308 I.P.C. A holistic<\/p>\n<p>and exhaustive consideration of the materials is necessary. It is not<\/p>\n<p>the actual injuries inflicted which can be reckoned as be all and end<\/p>\n<p>all in a case like this at this early stage. The dangerous trend of<\/p>\n<p>crowds taking law into their own hands and attempting to administer<\/p>\n<p>instant criminal justice is raising its ugly head in the Kerala context<\/p>\n<p>also.  Refined societies and communities in which there is rule of law<\/p>\n<p>must frown upon such attempts.         Though such attempts may be<\/p>\n<p>manifestation of the dissatisfaction of even the right thinking<\/p>\n<p>members of the community against the inadequacy of the criminal<\/p>\n<p>justice delivery system, such attempts deserve to be and must be<\/p>\n<p>frowned upon. The attitude to the crime shown in this case must<\/p>\n<p>emphatically convey that a refined society must not and shall not<\/p>\n<p>tolerate this. The learned Director General of Prosecutions in these<\/p>\n<p>circumstances prays that the petitioners may not be granted bail at<\/p>\n<p>this stage. There is nothing at the moment to conclude that the<\/p>\n<p>offence under Section 308 I.P.C is not made out. The nature of the<\/p>\n<p>attack, the nature of injury suffered, the manner in which the victims<\/p>\n<p>were saved of further damage, must all be borne in mind by the court<\/p>\n<p>while deciding the question whether at this stage can be inferred that<\/p>\n<p>the offence under Section 308 I.P.C has been committed, submits the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">B.A.No.6298\/07                       4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>learned Public Prosecutor.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5.    At this early stage of investigation, I shall not embark on a<\/p>\n<p>detailed and hairsplitting discussion as to whether the allegations are<\/p>\n<p>acceptable and whether the data collected are credible.            While<\/p>\n<p>considering an application for regular bail, the court has to advert to<\/p>\n<p>various circumstances. The nature and gravity of the offence alleged,<\/p>\n<p>the abhorrence with which the civilized society views the crime, the<\/p>\n<p>stage of investigation, the quantum and quality of the data collected<\/p>\n<p>must all be taken into account. Suffice it to say that on an anxious<\/p>\n<p>consideration of all the relevant inputs, I am satisfied that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners are not entitled to be enlarged on bail at this stage.<\/p>\n<p>      6.    The disapproval of this court against the nature of the<\/p>\n<p>crime must get reflected in the order passed. I take the view that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners are not entitled for bail at this stage.<\/p>\n<p>      7.    In the result, this petition is dismissed. However, I may<\/p>\n<p>hasten to observe that the petitioners shall be at liberty to move this<\/p>\n<p>court for bail again at later stages of the investigation not, at any<\/p>\n<p>rate, prior to 26\/10\/2007. I expect the investigating officer         to<\/p>\n<p>expeditiously complete the investigation.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                    (R.BASANT, JUDGE)<br \/>\njsr<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">B.A.No.6298\/07    5<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">B.A.No.6298\/07    6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       R.BASANT, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>         CRL.M.CNo.\n<\/p>\n<p>            ORDER<\/p>\n<p>21ST DAY OF MAY2007<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Bail Appl No. 6298 of 2007() 1. JABIR, S\/O MOHAMMED, &#8230; Petitioner 2. SANAL, S\/O BALAN, 3. RAFI, S\/O MUHAMMAD, 4. SHAMEEM, S\/O HASSAN, 5. THAJUDHEEN, S\/O ISMAYIL Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-168646","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-10-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-17T08:12:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-10-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-17T08:12:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\"},\"wordCount\":929,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\",\"name\":\"Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-10-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-17T08:12:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-10-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-17T08:12:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007","datePublished":"2007-10-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-17T08:12:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007"},"wordCount":929,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007","name":"Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-10-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-17T08:12:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jabir-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jabir vs State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168646","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=168646"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168646\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=168646"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=168646"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=168646"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}