{"id":168717,"date":"1985-07-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1985-07-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985"},"modified":"2015-01-11T09:57:18","modified_gmt":"2015-01-11T04:27:18","slug":"panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985","title":{"rendered":"Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: ILR 1985 KAR 2904<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: C Urs<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: C Urs<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>Chandrakantaraj Urs, J.<\/p>\n<p>1. The Revision Petitioner in this Court under Section 115 C.P.C., is a tenant. Sometime when he acquired lease of the building in question, he was paying Rs. 75\/- as rent. Thereafter, it is alleged that the landlord demanded<br \/>\nRs.175\/-per mensem as rent which he paid. That enhancement of rent was paid from 1974. In 1979, the landlord-respondent in this proceedings filed eviction petition HRC No. 55\/79 in the Court of the Munsiff, at Davanagere seeking eviction of the tenant on the ground that he required the premises for his own use and occupation, the ground available to the land-lord under clause (h) of proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 21 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the &#8216;Act&#8217;). During the pendency of the proceedings, an application was made under Section 29(1) of the Act by the landlord seeking payment of arrears of rent from the tenant before he proceeded to contest the eviction petition. In accordance with Section 29 of the Act an enquiry was held and in that enquiry the tenant was held to be in arrears of rent and he could not contest unless he deposited the arrears of rent within the time given by the Munsiff. Aggrieved by that order, he preferred a revision to the District Judge, under sub-section (2) of Section 50. He also filed an application before the District Judge that he is not liable to pay rent more than at the rate of Rs. 75\/-having regard to the provisions in sub sections 2 and 3 of Section 18 of the Act. The contention, elaborated, was that the landlord was precluded from taking any premium or like sum, in cash or in kind, other than the agreed rents and therefore, the enhancement of rent by Rs. 100\/- in 1974 was a sum received or such premium received in cash and in terms of sub-clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 18 of the Act and such amount was liable to be adjusted at the instance of the tenant. Therefore, it was contended that no rent was due by way of arrears. The Learned Judge rejected the contention solely on the ground that enhanced rent could not be equated to the premium or sum, in cash or kind or consideration referred to in sub-section (2) of Section 18 of the Act. Therefore, the present Revision Petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.    Mr. Prasad, Learned Counsel  for  the petitioner,  has contended before me  that the Learned District Judge had erred in  construing  sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 18 of the Act. His argument was  repetitive of what was argued before the District Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    A careful reading of sub-section (2)  of Section 18 of the Act along with  sub-section (1) of Section 18 of the Act brings  about the  true  meaning and  intent of the words employed  in  sub-section (2) of Section 18   of   the   Act. Section 14 of the Act  provides  for the fixation of fair rent by the Rent Controller under  the  Act.    Sub-section (l) of Section 18 of the Act speaks of cases where the fair rent has been fixed while sub-section (2) of Section 18 of the Act contemplates cases where such fair rent has not been fixed. Where the fair rent has not been fixed, after coming into the force of the Act, the land lord is precluded from<br \/>\nreceiving any premium or any sum or other consideration, in cash or kind, in addition to the stipulated rent. In case, if he has so received, as provided under Clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 18 of the Act, it is liable to be adjusted or refunded at the wish of the tenant. The words employed are :\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;no person  shall after the commencement of this Part receive or stipulate for the payment of any sum as premium or pagree  or any<br \/>\n  consideration  whatsoever   in cash or kind in  addition to the agreed rent.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>4. A plain reading of the above provision clearly indicates that the agreed rent, therefore, has reference not<br \/>\nnecessarily to the rent agreed to, either before the commencement of the Act or after the commencement of the Act. It merely refers to whatever is the rent agreed to between the tenant and the landlord at any given point of time. The Court must take assistance from the words previously employed in the provision. Those words ate &#8220;any sum as premium or pagree or any consideration whatsoever in cash or kind.&#8221; Normally premium or Pagree or<br \/>\nconsideration as they have been used mean something other than the rent but in addition thereto and connotes a receipt of some article of agreed value or cash which may be in the form of cash or kind. If increase in the rent, by mutual con-sent was to be included, nothing would have prevented the Legislature to state that after coming into force of the Act no landlord shall enhance the rent even by agreement and even if the tenant is willing to pay the same. Clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 18 of the Act does no more than precluding the landlord from receiving any premium or like sum or consideration in cash or kind. Mr. Prasad tried to derive assistance to clause (b) of sub section (2) of Section 18 of the Act from sub-section (3) of Section 18 of the Act, to support his case. I do not see any assistance to sustain his contention from the arguments advanced. Sub section (3) of Section 18 of the Act stipulates that anything in<br \/>\ncontravention of sub-section (2) of Section 18 of the Act to be void. That does not help in any way the petitioner because no premium, consideration or any sum or pagree was paid in addition to the rent. The Court should not lose sight of the Golden Rule of construction when confronted with such provisions and such contentions. The Golden Rule is to read the Statute as it is without creating ambiguity where none exists. Rent of the premises is the rent agreed at a particular point of time during the subsistence of the lease. It is liable, by agreement, to increase as well as decrease.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.    It  is  next contended that  the  order under  revision requires intervention of this Court as the District Judge  has wrongly asserted in the order that several other grounds  in the application  were not pressed by the Counsel.    I do not think this  Court should permit such assertions  without an affidavit from  the Counsel who argued before the Learned District Judge.  The practice of making such assertions must also be discouraged by this Court as Mr. Prasad stated that despite his asking the Learned Counsel, he has not given any affidavit.   This  shows that Counsel made assertions either to another Counsel whom  they have instructed  or to the Court without courage to speak truth.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. In the result, this Petition is dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985 Equivalent citations: ILR 1985 KAR 2904 Author: C Urs Bench: C Urs ORDER Chandrakantaraj Urs, J. 1. The Revision Petitioner in this Court under Section 115 C.P.C., is a tenant. Sometime when he acquired lease of the building in question, he was paying Rs. 75\/- [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-168717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1985-07-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-11T04:27:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985\",\"datePublished\":\"1985-07-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-11T04:27:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985\"},\"wordCount\":1134,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985\",\"name\":\"Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1985-07-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-11T04:27:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1985-07-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-11T04:27:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985","datePublished":"1985-07-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-11T04:27:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985"},"wordCount":1134,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985","name":"Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1985-07-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-11T04:27:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchaksharappa-vs-vijayakumar-on-11-july-1985#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Panchaksharappa vs Vijayakumar on 11 July, 1985"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=168717"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168717\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=168717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=168717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=168717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}