{"id":168786,"date":"2009-12-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009"},"modified":"2019-01-01T03:43:31","modified_gmt":"2018-12-31T22:13:31","slug":"s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"S S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
S S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\nDATED THIS THE 9TH DAY 01-\" DEcEMBE12.,__2'a:o9jV'_T'V.  ' 1%\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE _L.NAiiAYAA1.\\IA SW_AMY'~ \" 1'\n\nCRLIIVIINAL PETITION N\u00a3ji.\"v-753$i'2008  S\n\nBENNEEN:\n\nS.S. KALE\n\nDISTRICT OFFICER, _ ._  ' *\nDEPARTMENT. OE-.BAc:K WARD'  .\nCLASSES MINoRITIE.S;'     \nDIST. GAI3AG;__';.'_ ._  I\n\nNOW A--T--TMAPJGA'L.(;_).RE;_: '\n\n PETITIONER\n(BY SR1.B.v... S'OMAF5LI_}\u00a7,'~I5IDVOCATE)\n\n' ,TI'iE STATEI.t)'F.KARNATAKA\n\nI  REPRESENTED\" BY ITS\n\n'STATE PU'BLjI>c PROSECUTOR,\n\nCIRCU_\u00a3'\u00a3' BENCH,\nDHARWAD.\n\n.. \";3A\\[Ai;SAE\n*  MAI;1I<SAE NADAF,\n-AGE. 26 YEARS,\n\nOCC.ADVOCATE,\n\n" "R\/0. HARATI,\n\n\n\n{Q\n\nTQ. 85 DIST. GADAG.\n\n(BY SRI. PH. GOTKI-IIND1, H.C.G.P. FOR  ' \n(R-2 -- PARTY IN RERSON--RRESENT;._ ' \n\n...   _\n\nTHIS CRL.P IS FILED U\/S. 4:52 :_OF:'(iR..P...C'-i3'f:<f1'Fi}3Ai\nADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO--.SET\u00ab.A\u00a3~3I'DEv_\nTHE ORDERS PASSED BY LEARNED?,D'IST. jS.E_SSI_ONS \n\nJUDGE, OADAG IN CRL. REVIS-ION PETETION 'Noi~-.65'\/2008\nDATED O4\/10\/2008 AND THE ORDER PASSED {BY THE\nLEARNED I ADDL. CIVIL .J.UDGE"'('J~R'.'DN-;I} 85 JMFC COURT,\nGADAG IN PC. No. 203\/2006 (CQC.,NO.w29_\/2.008) MAY PLEASE\nEE SET ASIDE AND ENTIRE"P'I?.C'C\u00bbEE3D1i'-lG'S,INITIATED BY\nTHE RESPONDENT NO. 2WA"O.AINS':\u00a7 T'I+IE"~.I'\u00e9ETITIONER MAY<\/pre>\n
PLEASE EE QUASHED.   _  –  *<\/p>\n
THIS”‘RETITONJ*\u00a7e:’OIvi–INC OiN”‘I\u00ab*OR HEARING THIS DAY,
\nTHE COURT MADE? FOL’;…OwI’NG;\n<\/p>\n
  \u00bb QRDER<\/p>\n
v.’i”{i3eV_Ci)r(ier ;i3a’sse_Ol___ir1 Revision Petition NO. 65\/2008 dtd.<\/p>\n
 been chalienged by the petitioner and has<\/p>\n
sOu’ght–.,fOr.vS\u00e9i_:~ting,aside the Same. Petitioner Submits that the<\/p>\n
2nd reis”pOntierit.i has filed a Complaint U\/Sec. 200 Cr.P.C., in<\/p>\n
 “iV;V,1:11C171′..’\u00a7h\u20aci1’\u20ac’E3.I”T1\u20ac’d Magistrate has initiated proceedings against<\/p>\n
Detitioner. The petitioner has made an application for<\/p>\n
I’<\/p>\n
“\\<\/p>\n
M.)<\/p>\n
setting aside the proceedings initiated against him. <\/p>\n
had preferred a Revision Petition before the District: .85 VSeVs’siionis”e if<\/p>\n
Judge, Gadag, which also came to be d<is1'n-issec3Z_'i_ i<\/p>\n
2. The 2115* respondent had rnadejan a.pVp1Aic’a.t’ioir’;:_’iifor’~<\/p>\n
Consideration of his case for the iseiiection  iforiiLaW
\nGraduates given by the Cz”O}Vr.’\u20acI”I1I’7.!1’\u00e9i’1:t-i.i__:i:  f\\Iotifieation two
\nposts were reserved in fax’.\/ion;-“oi” –‘i’he respondent
\nNo.2 being a person’: beioriging  has made an
\neffort for sele-Ctfon  there were two
\nQuaii\ufb01ed   view of the same, the
\npetitionershoiiiid both persons for the stipend of<\/p>\n
Law Graduates, *Despit’e_ tithe’ same, he has selected oniy one<\/p>\n
“‘Candida\u00abf,e:__an,d 2\ufb0151″\u00abr.espondent was not selected. Being<\/p>\n
iaggrieved  .__sarne, he has made objection to ail the<\/p>\n
authoritiesi   parties to the Committee of Selection. The<\/p>\n
‘Commiittee’i.avifa.s headed by Chief Executive Officer, Zilia<\/p>\n
 Fanci\ufb01ayatiii President Bar Association, Gadag, District Pubiic<\/p>\n
._}?roseciitor, G-adag, Secretary, District Legal Aid Board, Gadag,<\/p>\n
‘\u00ab.:i3istrict Government Pleader 511% Deputy Commissioner of<\/p>\n
Backward Class and Minorities Department, Gadag. ME’*Jef:-<\/p>\n
filing the objections with a request for being se1’eeted\u00bb.@toii ii<\/p>\n
stipend for Law Graduate, the same has’-not ~bee.ni iieonsidef1?ed~..<\/p>\n
and \ufb01nal list has been displayed.\n<\/p>\n
3. Aggrieved by the same,’  phreferreyd
\nin Writ No. 26611\/2O0V5,,_.whiych”  be””aEi’owed on
\n19 \/ 01\/ 2006, wherein a   the petitioner
\nto consider the Clairn of th\u00a7eiiQ”r;ici  the High Court<\/p>\n
has also set aside.__ of 4:? respondent. After the
\njudgment”iofiiitheiiif\ufb02ighifiCoi1rt’,’ petiitionier has selected the 21″‘
\nrespondent, ii<\/p>\n
4.V_The iiearnedy ‘;Coi1;;_nse”1 for petitioner submits that the<\/p>\n
iipe_titioinie’r  oniyi t’h’e”aiuthority for conducting selection, the<\/p>\n
i(3omni1’ttee’-toonisitiituted by the Government has not selected the<\/p>\n
  23\u00a2’ “n=.s’p\u00a2nderi’t.’;_ ..iThe selection made by Committee has been<\/p>\n
 _ only impiernented by the petitioner. This aspect has not been<\/p>\n
 I considered by the Sessions Jucjfe in Revision Petition No.<\/p>\n
he has made a prayer to set aside the Order passed <\/p>\n
Sessions Judge, Gadag.\n<\/p>\n
5. The 2nd respondent–party in person.hasi_:appe’arediiand <\/p>\n
submitted that the Noti\ufb01cation hasi’iissi;te:\ufb01i <\/p>\n
petitioner and a classification is al–s:o’~t.rxnadei’by
\nthe selection list has also been  hin’i’be_forei whom
\nonly he has made objection?  Hence he
\nsubmitted that the petitionerwis  who<\/p>\n
has committed an iillegai_l_–:er1’dr_forzwhicif1.thei\u00a7*;d respondent has<\/p>\n
been put  hasiprieferred a Writ Petition,<\/p>\n
which also came. to be ‘dispovs_eiid-.,o\u00a3.-in his favour.<\/p>\n
e:_;”1*ttt; 2&1′-\u00bb reisponszlent submits that, though the<\/p>\n
in Committee  selection, but petitioner is the competent<\/p>\n
autiiiority Notification and also in publishing the<\/p>\n
V iiselection list.’ Hence he alone has been made a party. Hence<\/p>\n
it  ‘petitioner  submitted to dismiss his petition.<\/p>\n
Ml have heard the arguments made by petitioner and<\/p>\n
 the 2nd respondent–party in person.\n<\/p>\n
*(<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
8. Et is seen from the materials placed in the petiti.on_rand<\/p>\n
I have also gone through the documents produced;”aiong..i__iA}iti;h <\/p>\n
the Memo by the 2nd respondent. It is made. the” <\/p>\n
petitioner, who is the authority for issztzing\u00e9thje “Notifica4tio’niiaiji_ti<\/p>\n
representing on behalf of the Depu_ty Con1rnissione–r\u00a3,.  is. the <\/p>\n
competent authority, though  _p’etitiV’o~n_e’r  H issued
\nNoti\ufb01cation Classifying   of  Cx3vateg0ry~I
\nand further though the  for selection,
\nthe same has not   he said attitude of<\/p>\n
the petitioner  an offence and<\/p>\n
derelictioh of “his’vbeh.aif. f Hence, I find no reasons to<\/p>\n
aiiow this ;i5etition.i  V<\/p>\n
V-i.A\u20ac(:C<)'rdi11g1y, piietitioin is dismissed.<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court S S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009 Author: L.Narayana Swamy IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY 01-” DEcEMBE12.,__2’a:o9jV’_T’V. ‘ 1% BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE _L.NAiiAYAA1.\\IA SW_AMY’~ ” 1’ CRLIIVIINAL PETITION N\u00a3ji.”v-753$i’2008 S BENNEEN: S.S. KALE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-168786","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nS S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-31T22:13:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"S S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-31T22:13:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":736,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009\",\"name\":\"S S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-31T22:13:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-31T22:13:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"S S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-31T22:13:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009"},"wordCount":736,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009","name":"S S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-31T22:13:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-s-kale-district-officer-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-9-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S S Kale District Officer vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168786","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=168786"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168786\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=168786"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=168786"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=168786"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}