{"id":168857,"date":"2010-11-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010"},"modified":"2016-07-11T15:15:14","modified_gmt":"2016-07-11T09:45:14","slug":"rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Delhi High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Mool Chand Garg<\/div>\n<pre>*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI\n\n+     FAO 169\/2010\n                                     Date of Decision : 08.11.2010\n\n      RAJIV LUTHRA                                 ..... Appellant\n                         Through:    Mr.P.P.Ahuja, Adv.\n\n                  versus\n\n      NEENA LUTHRA &amp; ORS.                         .... Respondents<\/pre>\n<pre>                    Through:         Mr. Pramod Kr. Sharma, Adv. for\n                                     Respondent No.-3.\n      CORAM:\n      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOOL CHAND GARG\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>1.    Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed<br \/>\n      to see the judgment?\n<\/p>\n<p>2.    To be referred to Reporter or not?\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?\n<\/p>\n<p>:     MOOL CHAND GARG,J (Oral)\n<\/p>\n<p>1.    This order shall dispose of an appeal filed by the appellant<br \/>\nassailing the order dated 04.02.2010 passed by the learned ADJ, Delhi<br \/>\nwhereby while modifying the order directing maintenance of status quo<br \/>\nof the suit property which was passed ex parte, the ADJ has observed<br \/>\nas follows:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      &#8220;Although there is no denial that preserving the possessory<br \/>\n      and title status of the flat in question would be required to<br \/>\n      avoid complication in this suit but considering the unilateral<br \/>\n      cancellation of registered GPA, the blanket status quo order<br \/>\n      cannot be allowed to continue as it is. Hence that status<br \/>\n      quo order qua injucting the defendant from selling,<br \/>\n      alienating, transferring or creating third party interest in the<br \/>\n      suit property is made absolute pending trial but with a rider<br \/>\n      that in case defendant No.3 so desire, he can alienate the<br \/>\n      property with prior permission of this Court. The permission<br \/>\n      application as and when move, if so moved, shall accompany<br \/>\n      the full particulars of the prospective buyer apart from<br \/>\n      ensuring personal appearance of the buyer in the Court.<br \/>\n      This would ensure the prospective buyer, if any, who intends<br \/>\n      to get transposed in place of defendant No.3 would be<br \/>\n      impleaded automatically under Order 22 r 10 CPC. This<br \/>\n      rider is also necessary because the suit in hand appears to<br \/>\n      be an offshoot and a spillage of the matrimonial dispute<br \/>\n      between the plaintiff and defendant No.1. Application U\/O<br \/>\n      39 (1)(2) CPC stands disposed of accordingly.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">FAO 169\/2010                                                  Page 1 of 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p> 2.    The appellant is the original plaintiff and is aggrieved by the<br \/>\naforesaid modification. Brief background of this case is that on the day<br \/>\nwhen the suit was filed the appellant and respondent No.1 were<br \/>\nhusband and wife but later on they were divorced by a decree of divorce<br \/>\nobtained by mutual consent. The dispute in hand is qua flat No.C-304,<br \/>\nVenus Apartment, H-4\/5 Pitam Pura Delhi. Admittedly, the appellant<br \/>\nand respondent No.1 became joint members of respondent No.2-society.<br \/>\nThe flat in hand was jointly allotted to them after consideration of `6.50<br \/>\nlacs was paid.   Admittedly this flat was under possession of various<br \/>\ntenants from time to time.      Also, admittedly owing to matrimonial<br \/>\ndispute, appellant herein admittedly executed a registered GPA<br \/>\nregistered with Sub Registrar, Jammu in favour of respondent no.1 on<br \/>\n25.06.1999. Apart from this document an agreement and an affidavit<br \/>\nwas also executed upon which the appellant has also admitted his<br \/>\nsignature but has denied the text. As per the agreement the power of<br \/>\nattorney was executed by the appellant in favour of respondent No.1<br \/>\nafter receiving consideration of `3 lacs from her.     This GPA, as per<br \/>\nappellant, was revoked on 06.10.2003 unilaterally at Delhi before Sub<br \/>\nRegistrar, Pitam Pura.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    It is said that by virtue of power of the GPA dated 25.06.1999,<br \/>\ndespite its revocation on 06.10.2003, respondent No.1 entered into an<br \/>\nagreement for sale of the flat in question with respondent No.3 on<br \/>\n31.03.2004 and handed him over the possession of the flat. Aggrieved<br \/>\nof this transaction, the appellant approached the trial Court with the<br \/>\nsuit praying or cancellation for the agreement to sale apart from seeking<br \/>\npossession of his undivided share in that flat and for permanent<br \/>\ninjunction.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.    In view of the aforesaid admitted facts which goes to show that<br \/>\nwith respect to the suit property, there is admission on behalf of the<br \/>\nappellant that the first respondent was also a joint member of the<br \/>\nrespondent No.2\/society along with the appellant and the flat in<br \/>\nquestion was jointly allotted to them after payment of `6.50 lacs. There<br \/>\nis also an admitted fact that a registered power of attorney was<br \/>\nexecuted by the appellant in favour of respondent No.1, his wife on<br \/>\n25.06.1999 after receiving consideration of ` 3 lacs from her.        It is<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">FAO 169\/2010                                                 Page 2 of 3<\/span><br \/>\n based upon the aforesaid document, respondent No.1 entered into an<br \/>\nagreement to sell the property.     However, she has not been able to<br \/>\nexecute the sale deed as the power of attorney stands revoked.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.    In these circumstances, unless evidence is recorded, it cannot be<br \/>\nsaid that the appellant is the absolute owner of the property and thus,<br \/>\nis liable to restrain the respondent from exercising any power of<br \/>\nownership with respect to the said property.       The learned ADJ has<br \/>\nprotected the interest of both the parties by modifying the ex parte<br \/>\ninterim order passed in favor of the appellant on the date of filing of the<br \/>\nsuit. The order virtually amounts to restrain the first respondent from<br \/>\nalienating the property in favour of the third party unless permission is<br \/>\nobtained from the Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.    Taking all these facts into consideration, I find that there is no<br \/>\nreason to set aside the impugned order passed by the ADJ in this<br \/>\nappeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.    No Costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.    A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned along<br \/>\nwith the<br \/>\nC.M.7475\/2010<br \/>\n      Dismissed as having become infructous.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                            MOOL CHAND GARG, J<br \/>\nNOVEMBER 08, 2010<br \/>\n&#8216;anb&#8217;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">FAO 169\/2010                                                  Page 3 of 3<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010 Author: Mool Chand Garg * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 169\/2010 Date of Decision : 08.11.2010 RAJIV LUTHRA &#8230;.. Appellant Through: Mr.P.P.Ahuja, Adv. versus NEENA LUTHRA &amp; ORS. &#8230;. Respondents Through: Mr. Pramod Kr. Sharma, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-168857","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-11T09:45:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-11T09:45:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":865,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-11T09:45:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-11T09:45:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-11T09:45:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010"},"wordCount":865,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010","name":"Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-11T09:45:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajiv-luthra-vs-neena-luthra-ors-on-8-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajiv Luthra vs Neena Luthra &amp; Ors. on 8 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168857","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=168857"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168857\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=168857"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=168857"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=168857"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}