{"id":169300,"date":"2007-11-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-11-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007"},"modified":"2018-10-22T04:06:47","modified_gmt":"2018-10-21T22:36:47","slug":"tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007","title":{"rendered":"Tmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Madras High Court<\/div>\n
Tmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS\n\n                        DATED  : 13.11.2007\n\n                             CORAM:\n\n             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. MOHAN RAM\n\n           Criminal Original Petition No.29087 of 2007\n                                \n\n\n\nTmt.J.Jayashree               \t\t\t\t..Petitioner\n\n\n           Vs\n\n\n1.  State of Tamil Nadu\n    Rep. by the Commissioner of Police\n    Greater Chennai\n    Egmore\n    Chennai 8.\n\n2.  The Deputy Commissioner of Police (Law & Order)\n    T.Nagar Police District\n    T.Nagar\n    Chennai 17.\n\n3.  The Sub Inspector of Police (Law & Order)\n    R-7 K.K.Nagar Police Station\n    K.K.Nagar\n    Chennai 78.\n\n4.  The Station House Officer\n    Tada Police Station\n    Nellore District\n    Andhra Pradesh.\n\n5.  The Central Bureau of Investigation\n    Rep. by the Superintendent of Police\n    Special Crime Branch\n    Rajaji Bhavan\n    Besant Nagar\n    Chennai 90.     \t\t\t\t\t..Respondents\n\n\n\n\nPrayer:  Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal\nProcedure to transfer the investigation in Crime No.1888 of  2007\npending  on the file of the third respondent and Crime No.100  of\n2007  pending on the file of the fourth respondent to  the  fifth\nrespondent  \/ CBI and direct the fifth respondent to  investigate\nthis case and file a final report in accordance with law.\n\n\n\n\n   For Petitioner  : Mr. M.Satyanarayan for M\/s. N.S.Sivakumar\n\n   For Respondents : Mr. Hasan Mohamed Jinnah, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R-1 to R-3\n                     Mr. P.Madha Rao, Sub-Inspector for R-4.\n                     Mr. N.Chandrasekaran for R-5.\n\n\n\n                                \n                            O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
      The  petitioner lodged a complaint on 29.07.2007  with  the<\/p>\n
third  respondent  stating  that her  husband  was  missing  from<\/p>\n
27.07.2007 and sought for appropriate action to trace her husband-<\/p>\n
Mr.R.Narayanan.  The third respondent registered a case in  Crime<\/p>\n
No.1888  of 2007 for ‘man missing’.  On 02.08.2007 the petitioner<\/p>\n
being  informed  by the Sub-Inspector of Police attached  to  the<\/p>\n
fourth  respondent  Police Station that they have  found  a  body<\/p>\n
below  a culvert of Mambattu Road on 28.07.2007 and after  seeing<\/p>\n
the   photograph  of  the  body  the  petitioner  identified  the<\/p>\n
photograph as that of her husband.  The petitioner came  to  know<\/p>\n
that  the fourth respondent after holding inquest and post-mortem<\/p>\n
had  buried the body of her husband on 30.07.2007 itself.   After<\/p>\n
due permission the body was exhumed and last rites were performed<\/p>\n
at Sulurpet.  The fourth respondent-Police has also registered  a<\/p>\n
case  in Crime No.100 of 2007 on 28.07.2007 for the offence under<\/p>\n
Sections  302  and  201 Indian Penal Code.  As  per  the  inquest<\/p>\n
report prepared by the fourth respondent, 12 injuries were  found<\/p>\n
on the head, face and other parts of the body of the petitioner’s<\/p>\n
husband  which  indicate  that the death  was  due  to  homicidal<\/p>\n
violence.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      2. It is the case of the petitioner that there is no mutual<\/p>\n
co-operation between the third and fourth respondents with regard<\/p>\n
to  the  above said two cases.  The petitioner has stated in  the<\/p>\n
petition  that  both  the third and fourth  respondents  are  not<\/p>\n
evincing  any  interest in investigating into the matter  stating<\/p>\n
that  the offence had not taken place in their jurisdiction;   so<\/p>\n
far the mobile phone and car of the petitioner’s husband have not<\/p>\n
been  traced;   no steps have been taken to collect  the  records<\/p>\n
pertaining  to  the  calls made and received through  the  mobile<\/p>\n
phone  of her husband;  in view of the lapses on the part of  the<\/p>\n
third  and fourth respondents there is no progress at all in  the<\/p>\n
investigation  of  the  cases.  On the above  said  grounds,  the<\/p>\n
petitioner  has  come before this Court seeking transfer  of  the<\/p>\n
investigation in Crime No.1888 of 2007 pending on the file of the<\/p>\n
third respondent and in Crime No.100 of 2007 pending on the  file<\/p>\n
of the fourth respondent to the Central Bureau of Investigation.<\/p>\n
      3. The third respondent has filed a counter affidavit.   In<\/p>\n
the counter affidavit various steps taken by the third respondent<\/p>\n
after registering the case in crime No.1888 of 2007 have been set-<\/p>\n
out  in  detail.  The third respondent has also referred  to  the<\/p>\n
registration  of the case in Crime No.100 of 2007 by  the  fourth<\/p>\n
respondent and regarding the steps taken by the fourth respondent<\/p>\n
in  the  course  of investigation.  It is further stated  in  the<\/p>\n
counter  affidavit  that  the cause of action  being  within  the<\/p>\n
jurisdiction  of  Tada Police Station, no parallel  investigation<\/p>\n
can  be conducted and the investigation has to be pursued by  the<\/p>\n
fourth  respondent only.  It is further stated that  the  records<\/p>\n
and  statements  pertaining to Crime No.1888 of  2007  are  being<\/p>\n
forwarded to the fourth respondent and it is also stated that  in<\/p>\n
the  said  circumstances investigation by any specialised  agency<\/p>\n
may not advance the case any further.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     4. At the time of hearing of the above petition, Mr. P.Madha<\/p>\n
Rao,  Sub-Inspector of Police attached to the fourth  respondent-<\/p>\n
Police Station was present in the Court with the C.D. File.   The<\/p>\n
fifth respondent was represented by Mr. N.Chandrasekaran, learned<\/p>\n
counsel for CBI cases.  The fourth respondent has produced a copy<\/p>\n
of  the  communication  in  R.C.No.4812\/compliance\/2\/2007,  dated<\/p>\n
22.10.2007  sent  by  the  Director  General  of  Police,  Andhra<\/p>\n
Pradesh, Hyderbad to the Director General of Police, Tamil  Nadu.<\/p>\n
A  perusal  of  the  said communication shows that  the  Director<\/p>\n
General  of  Police, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad has  informed  the<\/p>\n
Director  General of Police, Tamil Nadu that the  case  in  Crime<\/p>\n
No.100  of  2007  on the file of the fourth respondent  is  being<\/p>\n
transferred  for  further investigation to the third  respondent-<\/p>\n
Police  and  a  request has been made to direct the concerned  to<\/p>\n
take  necessary  action  in  the matter  as  the  subject  matter<\/p>\n
pertains  to  Crime  No.1888 of 2007 on the  file  of  the  third<\/p>\n
respondent and the entire C.D. file pertaining to Crime No.100 of<\/p>\n
2007 has also been enclosed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      5.  Heard  Mr.  M.Satyanarayanan learned  counsel  for  the<\/p>\n
petitioner, Mr. Hasan Mohamed Jinnah, learned Government Advocate<\/p>\n
(Crl. Side) for Respondents 1 to 3, Mr.P.Madharao, Sub-Inspector,<\/p>\n
for  the  fourth  respondent  and  Mr.  N.Chandrasekaran  learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the CBI Cases for the fifth respondent.<\/p>\n
      6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though<\/p>\n
the  petitioner’s  husband was missing from  27.07.2007  and  the<\/p>\n
complaint  was lodged on 29.07.2007 no effective steps have  been<\/p>\n
taken  by  the third respondent and though the fourth  respondent<\/p>\n
has registered a case in Crime No.100 of 2007 so far no effective<\/p>\n
steps  have  been taken to trace the missing car and  no  details<\/p>\n
have  been  collected in respect of the calls made  and  received<\/p>\n
through the mobile phone of the petitioner’s husband;  while  the<\/p>\n
third  respondent has taken a stand that since the body has  been<\/p>\n
found  within  the  limits  of Tada Police  Station,  the  fourth<\/p>\n
respondent herein, the investigation has to be done by the fourth<\/p>\n
respondent, the fourth respondent has already taken a stand  that<\/p>\n
since  the offence pertains to Crime No.1888 of 2007 the  further<\/p>\n
investigation  should be only conducted by the  third  respondent<\/p>\n
and  the  entire  C.D.  File has already been  forwarded  to  the<\/p>\n
Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu.  According to the learned<\/p>\n
counsel,  in  such  circumstances, unless  the  investigation  is<\/p>\n
entrusted  to  the  Central  Bureau of  Investigation,  there  is<\/p>\n
absolutely   no  possibility  for  carrying  out  any  meaningful<\/p>\n
investigation  in  the  case and the real culprits  will  not  be<\/p>\n
brought to book and the petitioner will not get any justice.<\/p>\n
       7.   Learned  Government  Advocate  (Criminal  Side)   for<\/p>\n
respondents 1 to 3 submitted that since the body has  been  found<\/p>\n
within  the  limits  of the fourth respondent  the  investigation<\/p>\n
should be conducted only by the fourth respondent in Crime No.100<\/p>\n
of 2007.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      8.  Learned counsel for Central Bureau of Investigation for<\/p>\n
the  fifth respondent submitted if a direction is issued by  this<\/p>\n
Court directing the Central Bureau of Investigation to take  over<\/p>\n
the investigation the same will be complied with.<\/p>\n
      9.  I have carefully considered the submissions made by the<\/p>\n
learned  counsel  on  either side and perused  the  materials  on<\/p>\n
record.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      10.  As is seen from the materials available on record  and<\/p>\n
from  the  submissions  made  by  the  learned  counsel  for  the<\/p>\n
petitioner though the petitioner had lodged a complaint as  early<\/p>\n
as on 27.07.2007 before the third respondent and subsequently the<\/p>\n
fourth  respondent has also registered a case in Crime No.100  of<\/p>\n
2007  and  had  carried out the investigation to some  extent  no<\/p>\n
effective steps seem to have been taken so far to trace  the  car<\/p>\n
belonging to the petitioner’s husband and to collect the  details<\/p>\n
pertaining to the calls made and received through mobile No.98407<\/p>\n
16531  belonging  to  the  petitioner’s  husband  and  the  third<\/p>\n
respondent has taken a stand that the case should be investigated<\/p>\n
by  the  fourth respondent and the fourth respondent has taken  a<\/p>\n
stand   that  the  case  should  be  investigated  by  the  third<\/p>\n
respondent  and  in fact the Director General of  Police,  Andhra<\/p>\n
Pradesh,  Hyderabad, has forwarded the entire case file  and  the<\/p>\n
C.D.  file  relating  to Crime No.100 of  2007  to  the  Director<\/p>\n
General  of  Police,  Tamil  Nadu.  In  such  circumstances,  the<\/p>\n
petitioner is caught up in the procedural angle between the third<\/p>\n
and  fourth  respondents.  As rightly contended  by  the  learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the petitioner, in such circumstances, the petitioner<\/p>\n
may  not get real justice and no meaningful investigation can  be<\/p>\n
expected  either  from the third respondent or  from  the  fourth<\/p>\n
respondent.  Further, since the case is inter-state crime it  may<\/p>\n
not  be  feasible for either the third respondent or  the  fourth<\/p>\n
respondent  to  effectively investigate the case  and  since  the<\/p>\n
investigation has to be carried out both in Tamil Nadu and Andhra<\/p>\n
Pradesh, if the investigation is entrusted to the Central  Bureau<\/p>\n
of   Investigation,  it  will  be  easier  for  that  Agency   to<\/p>\n
investigate the matter effectively.  Therefore in the  considered<\/p>\n
view of this Court in the interest of justice it will be just and<\/p>\n
proper to entrust the investigation in this matter to the Central<\/p>\n
Bureau of Investigation.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      11.  Accordingly, the above criminal original  petition  is<\/p>\n
allowed and the investigation in Crime No.1888 of 2007 pending on<\/p>\n
the file of the third respondent and Crime No.100 of 2007 pending<\/p>\n
on  the file of the fourth respondent are transferred to the file<\/p>\n
of  the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), New Delhi – 1, for<\/p>\n
further investigation and filing of final report.  Respondents  3<\/p>\n
and  4  are  hereby  directed to send  the  entire  case  records<\/p>\n
relating  to   Crime No.1888 of 2007 and Crime  No.100  of  2007,<\/p>\n
respectively, to the Director of Central Bureau of Investigation,<\/p>\n
New  Delhi – 1, within a week from the date of receipt of a  copy<\/p>\n
of   this  order  to  enable  the  Director,  Central  Bureau  of<\/p>\n
Investigation,  to  nominate a competent officer  to  investigate<\/p>\n
into the said cases.\n<\/p>\n
srk<\/p>\n
To<\/p>\n
1. \tThe Commissioner of Police
\n    \tGreater Chennai
\n    \tEgmore
\n\tChennai 8.\n<\/p>\n
2. \tThe Deputy Commissioner of Police (Law & Order)
\n    \tT.Nagar Police Station
\n    \tT.Nagar
\n\tChennai 17.\n<\/p>\n
3. \tThe Sub Inspector of Police (Law & Order)
\n    \tR-7 K.K.Nagar Police Station
\n    \tK.K.Nagar
\n\tChennai 78.\n<\/p>\n
4. \tThe Station House Officer
\n    \tTada Police Station
\n    \tNellore District
\n\tAndhra Pradesh.\n<\/p>\n
5. \tThe Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)
\n    \tNew Delhi 1.\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Madras High Court Tmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.11.2007 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. MOHAN RAM Criminal Original Petition No.29087 of 2007 Tmt.J.Jayashree ..Petitioner Vs 1. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Egmore Chennai […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-169300","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nTmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-21T22:36:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Tmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-21T22:36:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1571,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007\",\"name\":\"Tmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-21T22:36:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-21T22:36:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Tmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007","datePublished":"2007-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-21T22:36:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007"},"wordCount":1571,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007","name":"Tmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-21T22:36:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tmt-j-jayashree-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-on-13-november-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tmt.J.Jayashree vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 November, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169300","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=169300"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169300\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=169300"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=169300"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=169300"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}