{"id":169381,"date":"2008-11-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008"},"modified":"2017-08-26T10:36:57","modified_gmt":"2017-08-26T05:06:57","slug":"aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Aasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur<\/div>\n
Aasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008<\/div>\n
                              1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN\n\n                        AT JODHPUR\n\n                     J U D G M E N T\n\n\n   Aasin Khan & others        Vs.     State of Rajasthan\n\n         D.B.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.406\/2003\n    against the judgment dt.26.3.2003 passed by\n        the Addl.Sessions Judge (FT), Jalore,\n            in Sessions Case No.18\/2002.\n\n\n   Date of Judgment:                           Nov.11, 2008\n\n\n                        P R E S E N T\n\n           HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA\n        HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DEO NARAYAN THANVI\n\n\n\n   Mr.Dhirendra Singh, for accused appellants.\n   Mr.V.R.Mehta, Public Prosecutor.\n\n\n\n   BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE THANVI J.)<\/pre>\n
   1.    This is an appeal against the judgment of the<\/p>\n
   learned   Addl.Sessions   Judge   (F.T.),    Jalore,   dated<\/p>\n
   26.3.2003, whereby all the five accused appellants
\n                           2<\/span><\/p>\n
Aasin Khan, Shakur Khan, Teke Khan, Smt.Bhima and<\/p>\n
Amare Khan were convicted under various offences of<\/p>\n
the Indian Penal Code as under:\n<\/p>\n
(1) ACCUSED APPELLANT AASIN KHAN:\n<\/p>\n
U\/Sec.148 IPC:     One year’s R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                   Rs.500\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo six months’ S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/Sec.302 IPC:     Life imprisonment alongwith a fine
\n                   of Rs.1000\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo one year’s S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/Sec.324 IPC:     One year’s R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                   Rs.500\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo six months’ S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/s.323\/149 IPC:   Six months’ R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                   Rs.100\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo one month’s S.I.\n<\/p>\n
(2) ACCUSED APPELLANT SHAKUR KHAN:\n<\/p>\n
U\/Sec.148 IPC:     One year’s R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                   Rs.500\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo six months’ S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/s.302\/149 IPC:   Life imprisonment alongwith a fine
\n                   of Rs.1000\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo one year’s S.I.\n<\/p>\n
                           3<\/span><\/p>\n
U\/s.324\/149 IPC:   One year’s R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                   Rs.500\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo six months’ S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/Sec.323 IPC:     Six months’ R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                   Rs.100\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo one month’s S.I.\n<\/p>\n
(3) ACCUSED APPELLANT TEKE KHAN:\n<\/p>\n
U\/Sec.148 IPC:     One year’s R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                   Rs.500\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo six months’ S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/s.302\/149 IPC:   Life imprisonment alongwith a fine
\n                   of Rs.1000\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo one year’s S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/s.324\/149 IPC:   One year’s R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                   Rs.500\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo six months’ S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/Sec.323 IPC:     Six months’ R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                   Rs.100\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo one month’s S.I.\n<\/p>\n
(4) ACCUSED APPELLANT SMT.BHIMA:\n<\/p>\n
U\/Sec.148 IPC:     One year’s R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                   Rs.500\/- & in default, to further
\n                   undergo six months’ S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/s.302\/149 IPC:   Life imprisonment alongwith a fine
\n                            4<\/span><\/p>\n
                    of Rs.1000\/- & in default, to further
\n                    undergo one year’s S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/s.324\/149 IPC:    One year’s R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                    Rs.500\/- & in default, to further
\n                    undergo six months’ S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/Sec.323 IPC:      Six months’ R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                    Rs.100\/- & in default, to further
\n                    undergo one month’s S.I.\n<\/p>\n
(5) ACCUSED APPELLANT AMARE KHAN:\n<\/p>\n
U\/Sec.148 IPC:      One year’s R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                    Rs.500\/- & in default, to further
\n                    undergo six months’ S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/s.302\/149 IPC:    Life imprisonment alongwith a fine
\n                    of Rs.1000\/- & in default, to further
\n                    undergo one year’s S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/s.324\/149 IPC:    One year’s R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                    Rs.500\/- & in default, to further
\n                    undergo six months’ S.I.\n<\/p>\n
U\/Sec.323 IPC:      Six months’ R.I. alongwith a fine of
\n                    Rs.100\/- & in default, to further
\n                    undergo one month’s S.I.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.   Brief facts leading to this appeal are that Sikandar<\/p>\n
Khan (PW 11) lodged a written report Ex.P.32 at Police<\/p>\n
Station, Bagra, Distt. Jalore on 5.7.2002 alleging
\n                             5<\/span><\/p>\n
therein that when he alongwith his family members<\/p>\n
were sitting in their khatedari well, accused Shakur<\/p>\n
Khan, Aasin Khan, Amare Khan, Shere Khan, their<\/p>\n
mother and two other ladies, came in their field and<\/p>\n
accused Aasin Khan inflicted head blow on his father Ali<\/p>\n
Khan with axe, Shakur Khan inflicted injury on the<\/p>\n
hand of his mother Indra with iron rod and Amare Khan<\/p>\n
and other ladies inflicted injuries on his wife and<\/p>\n
daughter and Sheru Khan inflicted blows with kicks &<\/p>\n
lathi. Upon seeing his father died, he rushed to the<\/p>\n
police station. Upon this report, the police registered a<\/p>\n
case and after investigation, all the accused were<\/p>\n
challaned for the offences u\/ss.147, 148, 302, 324 and<\/p>\n
323\/149 IPC before the Court of learned Judicial<\/p>\n
Magistrate, who committed the case to the court of<\/p>\n
Sessions. Learned trial Judge heard the arguments on<\/p>\n
charge and framed charges for the offences u\/ss.148,<\/p>\n
302 or in alternative 302\/149, 324 or in alternative<\/p>\n
324\/149 and 323 or in alternative 323\/149 IPC. All the<\/p>\n
accused appellants pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
\n                                 6<\/span><\/p>\n
The    prosecution   examined             21   witnesses.     The<\/p>\n
statements of the accused were recorded u\/s.313<\/p>\n
CrPC. They produced 5 witnesses in their defence.<\/p>\n
After hearing the arguments, the learned trial Judge<\/p>\n
convicted the accused appellants as above, against<\/p>\n
which this appeal has been preferred. During pendency<\/p>\n
of the appeal, accused Teke Khan died and proceedings<\/p>\n
against him were consequently abated vide order<\/p>\n
dt.18.5.06.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.    Learned   counsel   for       the    appellants   has   not<\/p>\n
disputed the incident but his sole argument is that in<\/p>\n
this case, it was the complainant party, which first<\/p>\n
entered into the field of accused and in exercise of<\/p>\n
right of private defence, accused Aasin Khan is said to<\/p>\n
have inflicted axe blow on the head of deceased Ali<\/p>\n
Khan, where he died. According to him, there is no role<\/p>\n
of other accused appellants, except giving kicks and<\/p>\n
inflicting lathi blows. He further submits that there was<\/p>\n
no question of formation of unlawful assembly so as to
\n                            7<\/span><\/p>\n
convict them for the offence u\/s.148 IPC or any other<\/p>\n
section of the Indian Penal Code with the aid of Section<\/p>\n
149 IPC.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.   Per   contra,   learned   Public   Prosecutor   has<\/p>\n
supported the judgment of the learned trial Court and<\/p>\n
has urged to dismiss this appeal.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5.   We have re-appreciated the evidence on record. It<\/p>\n
is an admitted position that the incident took place in<\/p>\n
the field of accused party and the site plan proved by<\/p>\n
the prosecution is Ex.P.2 in which mark `X’ is shown to<\/p>\n
be place of incident being situated in Khasra No.61 &<\/p>\n
the field of complainant party has been marked at<\/p>\n
place `C’ being Khasra No.53. The fields marked `A’,<\/p>\n
`B’ & `D’ are of neighbourers. The portion marked `E<\/p>\n
to F’ and `G to H’ is the sign of cultivating the field<\/p>\n
from the tractor. The description of the site plan has<\/p>\n
been given in Crime Details Form marked Ex.P.1 in<\/p>\n
which it has been stated that mark `X’ being Khasra
\n                            8<\/span><\/p>\n
No.61 has come in the share of accused appellant Teke<\/p>\n
Khan, who has now died, in partition. It is also<\/p>\n
admitted position that cross cases were registered vide<\/p>\n
Ex.D.1 but the police has given the Final Report in the<\/p>\n
matter. When from the site plan Ex.P.1, the field<\/p>\n
Khasra No.61 is in the share of accused appellant Teke<\/p>\n
Khan, then the presence of rest of the accused<\/p>\n
appellants, who are family members of Teke Khan<\/p>\n
cannot be said to be unlawful so as to bring the case<\/p>\n
under the category of formation of unlawful assembly.<\/p>\n
It is true that axe blow has been inflicted by accused<\/p>\n
appellant Aasin Khan and these two blows on the scalp<\/p>\n
and chest of deceased Ali Khan, as per the version of<\/p>\n
Dr.Vallabh Bhandari (PW 15), who conducted the post<\/p>\n
mortem report vide Ex.P.34, were the cause of death.<\/p>\n
A separate report has also been given to this effect<\/p>\n
which is Ex.P.35. The same is the statement of<\/p>\n
Dr.R.C.Chouhan, who was the member of the Medical<\/p>\n
Board, which conducted the post mortem. When the<\/p>\n
cause of death is axe blows, then it is to be seen as to
\n                              9<\/span><\/p>\n
who is the author of these blows. In this regard,<\/p>\n
Sikandar Khan (PW 11), who is the son of deceased,<\/p>\n
has said that the disputed field was jointly cultivated<\/p>\n
by them. When his father went to the accused as to<\/p>\n
why they were cultivating the joint field, then accused<\/p>\n
Aasin Khan came on the spot and told that how they<\/p>\n
were demanding their share and thereupon, he inflicted<\/p>\n
axe blows on the head of his father and rest of the<\/p>\n
accused, who were having lathis in their hands and<\/p>\n
Smt.Bhima, who was having no weapon in her hand,<\/p>\n
inflicted blows. When his wife and mother came to<\/p>\n
intervene, accused Aasin Khan also inflicted axe blows<\/p>\n
on them. Accused Shakur Khan inflicted lathi blow on<\/p>\n
his wife. On hearing the cries, he went on the spot and<\/p>\n
seeing the incident, he left for the police station.<\/p>\n
6.   Smt.Indra (PW 12), wife of deceased, is also an<\/p>\n
injured   witness.   While    stating   about   the    joint<\/p>\n
possession of his husband and accused party over the<\/p>\n
field, she has deposed that accused Aasin Khan came
\n                             10<\/span><\/p>\n
with tractor and started cultivation. When her husband<\/p>\n
intervened, he inflicted axe blow on her husband. Rest<\/p>\n
of the accused also inflicted lathi blows. When she<\/p>\n
alongwith her daughter in law went to interfere,<\/p>\n
accused Aasin Khan inflicted axe blow on her.<\/p>\n
7.   Smt.Sukhi (PW 13) is also an injured witness. She<\/p>\n
has also stated the same version.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
8.   Ms.Apiya (PW 14) is also eye witness of the<\/p>\n
incident. Her statement is also on the same line.<\/p>\n
9.   If the evidence of these four witnesses is looked<\/p>\n
into in the light of the statement of the investigating<\/p>\n
officer Mahendra Singh (PW 21), it is clear from the<\/p>\n
last line of his cross examination that as per his<\/p>\n
investigation, he found that except accused Aasin Khan<\/p>\n
and Shakur Khan, rest of the accused inflicted blows<\/p>\n
with fists and slaps only and, therefore, lathis could not<\/p>\n
be recovered. Though the recovery of lathi has been
\n                                11<\/span><\/p>\n
shown from Shakur Khan vide Ex.P.12 but the cause of<\/p>\n
death, as per the post mortem report Ex.P.34 &<\/p>\n
Ex.P.35, is the injuries on chest and head, which are<\/p>\n
shown in the injury report, Ex.P.18, which have been<\/p>\n
caused by sharp edged weapon. Ofcourse lathi cannot<\/p>\n
be said to be a sharp edged weapon, therefore, it<\/p>\n
cannot be said that these injuries were caused by<\/p>\n
Shakur Khan by lathi on the person of deceased Ali<\/p>\n
Khan. These injuries are the result of axe blows, which<\/p>\n
was in the hands of accused Aasin Khan and the same<\/p>\n
has also been recovered from him.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
10. From the above evidence, it can safely be arrived<\/p>\n
at the conclusion that the author of the injuries on the<\/p>\n
chest and head    on the person of deceased Ali Khan<\/p>\n
was accused appellant Aasin Khan for which he can be<\/p>\n
conclusively   held   liable        for   committing   culpable<\/p>\n
homicide. Since unlawful assembly has not been<\/p>\n
established and accused were sitting in their field as<\/p>\n
per the site plan Ex.P.1 and dispute arose with regard
\n                             12<\/span><\/p>\n
to cultivation of the field by tractor, the only conclusion<\/p>\n
which can be arrived-at is that all the accused acted in<\/p>\n
exercise of right of private defence including the<\/p>\n
accused appellant Aasin Khan. When a person acts in<\/p>\n
exercise of right of private defence & exceeds his right<\/p>\n
by causing death of another, then it is a case of<\/p>\n
culpable homicide not amounting to murder punishable<\/p>\n
under Section 304 part I IPC, being a case of<\/p>\n
Exception-2 defined under Section 300 IPC. Therefore,<\/p>\n
in our view, the act of the accused appellant Aasin<\/p>\n
Khan is covered under Section 304 part I IPC. So far as<\/p>\n
rest of the accused are concerned, they have inflicted<\/p>\n
injuries with slaps and fists and accused Shakur Khan<\/p>\n
by lathi, which is alleged to have been recovered from<\/p>\n
him. Smt.Indra (PW 12) & Smt.Sukhi (PW 13) are the<\/p>\n
injured witnesses and their injuries are simple in<\/p>\n
nature, caused by blunt weapon as per their injury<\/p>\n
reports Ex.P.16 and Ex.P.17 respectively. Therefore,<\/p>\n
the act of the rest of the three accused falls under<\/p>\n
Section 323 IPC and they can be held liable for that
\n                             13<\/span><\/p>\n
offence only.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
11. Consequently, while allowing this appeal in part,<\/p>\n
we alter the judgment dt.26.3.2003 passed by the<\/p>\n
Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.), Jalore as under:<\/p>\n
(i)    Accused appellant Aasin Khan is convicted only for<\/p>\n
the offence under Section 304 part I IPC instead of<\/p>\n
Section 302 IPC and is sentenced to the period already<\/p>\n
undergone, which is about seven years, with a fine of<\/p>\n
Rs.1000\/- & in default, to further undergo one year’s<\/p>\n
S.I. However, he is acquitted for the rest of the<\/p>\n
offences i.e. under Sections 148, 324 and 323\/149 IPC.<\/p>\n
He is in jail, he be released forthwith, if not required in<\/p>\n
any other case, on depositing of fine.<\/p>\n
(ii)   Accused appellants Shakur Khan, Smt.Bhima and<\/p>\n
Amare Khan are convicted for the offence u\/s.323 IPC<\/p>\n
only and they are sentenced to the period already<\/p>\n
undergone, which is about five months, with a fine of
\n                            14<\/span><\/p>\n
Rs.100\/- & in default, to further undergo one month’s<\/p>\n
S.I. However, they are acquitted for the rest of the<\/p>\n
offences i.e. u\/ss.148, 302\/149 and 324\/149 IPC.<\/p>\n
(DEO NARAYAN THANVI), J.            (A.M.KAPADIA), J.<\/p>\n
RANKAWAT JK, PS\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur Aasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR J U D G M E N T Aasin Khan & others Vs. State of Rajasthan D.B.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.406\/2003 against the judgment dt.26.3.2003 passed by the Addl.Sessions Judge (FT), […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-169381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-rajasthan-high-court-jodhpur"],"yoast_head":"\nAasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Aasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-26T05:06:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Aasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-26T05:06:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2152,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Aasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-26T05:06:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Aasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Aasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Aasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-26T05:06:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Aasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-26T05:06:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008"},"wordCount":2152,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008","name":"Aasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-26T05:06:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aasin-khan-ors-vs-state-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Aasin Khan & Ors vs State on 11 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=169381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169381\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=169381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=169381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=169381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}