{"id":169722,"date":"2008-10-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008"},"modified":"2018-04-17T00:21:02","modified_gmt":"2018-04-16T18:51:02","slug":"sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n
   \n\nLiv!-1 LUURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH  OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CC\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA  \n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA  V  \n\nDATED THIS m1; 21st DAY OF oc'ro3g*+1V\u00a7:--.i2oos  % O 1\n\nBEFORE;\"\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A..::T J.GImJA:;  \n\nWRIT PETITION N{3.1O2\u00b02V?u:27:[2{5O*?'f(SViI).'\u00a7;$)\nBetween:  VA  \n\nS1:'i.VeerannaJoiad,  '\n\nS \/ o.Devanaga\u00a72\u00a73'a._VJo1a\u00a21, 1. \n\nAged about  - V   \nOcc:    \n{Store Kc(:pser}.K;U.:  \"  \n\nD.B., S};1Vb--IO:)'iv.i.$i{)n,1\"}V ' _  _\nI~IuH1na'bad., 'D.ist2:i:<:t_' 'Bid'a.;j.' *--- ._ ' - . . . PETFIONER\n\n(By \u00a73'f*i_gG;VCi\ufb01\u00a7gas:f1etti,\n. _ Sri\u00a7i"?,R.Biradar,f Advs.)\n\n OO1.*mjs..ta:e bjmamataka,\n\n"By*its Secretary to Government\nDtzparfm-ezit of Urban Development\n\n M.s..Bu;1dmg, Ba:{1ga1ore--560 GO 1.\n\n    MaI1a.g'ng {)i,1*ect0r,\n\n._  Urban Water\nSupply and Drainage Bsard,\n\n " - 'Jalabhavasrx, Bannerghatta Road,\n\nBTM Layout, 15* Stage,\nEangalore.\n\n\n\nMil\n\n. \u00bb..,~..-mu ur mnmxwunlsn Niki?!  OF KARNATAKA FHGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CC\n\n-2-\n\n3. The Executive Engineer,\nK.U.W.S. 85 D.B.,\nDivision O\ufb01ioe, Guibarga,\nDistrict Gulbarga.\n\n(By SI'i.S.S.KummaI1, AGA,  \nSI'i.H.(3.Shivaramu, Adv. Vfor\u00bb R2 &"R3)f_q  '\n\nThis writ: petition is filed mieermcieg 322:3 \n\n227 of the Constitution of I1":L(_ii\u00a3}__WitI"1'a prayer \nthe order dated 27. 12.2004  'tiy  R2 vide\nAxmexme 'J' and order dated V3._I:.'Q5;2Q05 passedviby the\nR1 vide Axmexure ']\\\u20ac_"~-and' orde: e'd':3.ted 30.11.2006\npassed by the R2 vide A'm3exu1fei-.'N   "  _\n\nThis w1'it4_';)etitio1'i""eV\u00a7;;;r;v_;"nA gjakioiri  preltmmary' '\nhearing in  "this""day,V'i:he..._\u20ac3ourt made the\nfollowing: o   "   O\n\n'E'he"pe4ti?\u00e9oi1ei4   the impugneci orders\n\nV passegi "by tiie"  Authority as Well as the\n\n  f\u00abAi::\u00a3i:ie1oI'ity terminating his services on the\n\ngame o:li1iis--:\u00a7:snduct.\n\n2."  matter arises in the following manner:\n\n a  the relevant point of time, the petitioner was\n\n  as Second Division Assistant in the\n\n  -erespondent-Boa1'd. The 31*' respondent, pursuant to his<\/pre>\n
letter dated 10*-*3 May 2002 addressed to the 2″<\/p>\n
EH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CO_UR1_\u00a7’ OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA I-HGR COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CC<\/p>\n
mis-conduct cemmitted by the peiiitioner, accepted the<\/p>\n
Eriquiry Report and has terminated the services of the<\/p>\n
petitioner. It appears questioniiig the penalty ” <\/p>\n
the petitioner filed an appeal to the 18′  <\/p>\n
lat respondent has conferred T_ <\/p>\n
the Disciplinary Authority. Hence, tI1is’petiti0fLVV..  it it; <\/p>\n
4. Mr.i.R.Birada1f,.– _ieamedVVV:..e:o1j13sel i \u00e9pepearfng for
\nthe petitioner submits   of the
\nDisciplinary Aigtticifity  setaaside on the
\nground of ”   natural justice. He
\nwas at  as on the date
\nand he liifaiiteti ievidence, it was denied to<\/p>\n
him. Hence}  _ ‘enti_re””‘iproeeedi11gs cuiminating in<\/p>\n
 &iS\ufb02\u00bb;\ufb01ee21i”v  .. He further submits that the
\n  is dis–pmportionate to the 11118\u00bb
\n  conti:_.1_et. _.~i*it_3A4\u00a7’E'{A}iVI’t.\u00a71(f:}C’ submits that the evidence does not<\/p>\n
” ” -Teiseloee that the misconduct is gmved.<\/p>\n
 5. I have given my anxious consideration to the<\/p>\n
‘4″Vvsii’bmissione ef the learned cezmsei appeaxing for the<\/p>\n
parties.\n<\/p>\n
an a uuuni ur I\\nrmIAIAIu~\\ MIG!-1  OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA \u00a7”IlG|-E COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CC<\/p>\n
6. The scope of judicial review by this Court under
\nArticle 226 of the Constitution of India has
\nand again stated that is very limited  _
\nunless it is pointed out that th(‘:.IJ'{;M    the  ” ” ‘V
\nprinciples of natural justice  {lies  7-I:
\nprovision has not been CoII1p”lii(f4:\u00a3;1.,.VtI}i;s’
\nanti upset the order  not othioiwisef The  Court
\nin the case of R.s.saim\ufb01_o egg. is P} ab and
\nother    ruied that
\nWhat is essexitieiw   :iefvi(3.ence to prove the
\ngziit. It  <\/p>\n
‘Before   \ufb01rst contention of<\/p>\n
the ag\ufb01peilsmi’  want of material to<\/p>\n
establish theV””cha1V*s?\u20ac, and of non-application<\/p>\n
_  :?iind,.._Lve teiiiiihave to bear in mind the<\/p>\n
  V  Court while exercising wry}
\n” .  not reverse a finding of the
\n“enq:g&i:zg ctuthority an the ground that the<\/p>\n
 .. VoLevic\u00a3e’nce adduced before it is insu\ufb01zcient. 0\u00b0<\/p>\n
 r  is some evidence to reasonabiy
\nsupport the conclusion of the enquinlng
\nauthority, it is not the \ufb01mction of the Cour:
\nto review the evidence and to arrive at its<\/p>\n
own independent \ufb01nding. The enquiring<\/p>\n
an COURT OF KARNATAKA I-HG!-I COl}R7f OF KARNATAKA I-HGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH CO<\/p>\n
authority S the solejuclge of the fact so long
\nas there is some legal evidence to
\nsubstantiate the finding and the  <\/p>\n
or reiiability of the evidence is not a matten. f ”<\/p>\n
which can be permitted to be  <\/p>\n
before the Court in writ proceedings. “”    VV ‘<\/p>\n
7. In fact it is to be noticed that 1:11;; prc\u00a7efAfeq*nire’dVeV ‘<\/p>\n
in a domestic enquiry is pre\ufb012:.:T1Tciero1.1s”‘
\nand not proof beyond vfeasonee:1e:ve*: fieepieg this
\nprinciple in mind,’ one  e\u00a7eetei:\u00a7e’–~whether the
\nconten\ufb01on of   denied an
\nopportunity V.   and the enquiry<\/p>\n
report  cf that.\n<\/p>\n
8. It  1;VhatO’w}*1e–1i the matter Was set down for<\/p>\n
-“‘~e:fzqt1if_*\u00a7!,  O\ufb01ieer as well as the<\/p>\n
V’deii:iq11ei1tfs  2 were present. One more Witness on<\/p>\n
be.11a_].OfOof ‘i\ufb01lanagement was examined ae P.W.5 and<\/p>\n
‘E;-LP6  marked. The Presenting Officer Ciosed his
\n   Both the deiinquents were questioned as to
\nK  they propose to do. Both of them sought time.<\/p>\n
  .4’:.”}’hey were akso asked to report on the next date if, they<\/p>\n
have any defence. The matter was adjeumed to<\/p>\n
JI<\/p>\n
. -..vu-u vr AAKNMIAIU-1 NEG!-I  OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA H!GH CO<\/p>\n
-10-<\/span><\/p>\n
Annexure ‘J’ would disclose that the entire evidence and<\/p>\n
the reply has been considered by the Discipiiqaxy<\/p>\n
Authority alzd they haci no option but to _<\/p>\n
penalty of dismissal.\n<\/p>\n
11. This takes us to the  <\/p>\n
Whether the penalty i}iI}pGS6d.eiS4_’COI\ufb01H’1VE\u00a7i3.S1}I”E\u00a7t’\u00a7T3  V.<\/p>\n
misdemeanor committed by    is no
\ndoubt; true that the is\u00bb azieereetble to
\njudicial review ashas  Apex Court
\nin the Case 91:   oflndia and
\nothers : But however,
\nthere isiaa  would be that it should<\/p>\n
certainiy    of the Court to hold that<\/p>\n
 the   is\u00e9inot ccmnmensurate and must be<\/p>\n
V.  Court akso in case of Blue Ram<\/p>\n
V\/’e’;”%se\u00a2:te*%’a,\u20ac  Pr-ads}: reported in AIR 1983<\/p>\n
 gsc 4S4,  hem as under:\n<\/p>\n
     equally true that the penalty imposed<\/p>\n
‘\ufb02iust be  e with the gravity of
\nI the misconduct and that any penalty
\ndisproportionate to the gravity of the<\/p>\n
x K’
\n\u00a7:\u00ab;><\/p>\n
an MUUKE Ur KAKNAIAKA HIGH COIJRT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CC<\/p>\n
-11..\n<\/p>\n
misconduct wouzd be violative of Article 14<\/p>\n
cf the Constitution ‘<\/p>\n
12. Having regard to the misdemeanor _
\nby the petitioner inasmuch as when he  _
\nwith the respondent, he was responsib\u00e9ie   it ”
\nof the material, which went missing. if
\nreview is permissible if it  Giexereetist
\nsome fallacy in the decision  andinot in
\nthe decision itself. I do   is any fa\ufb02acy
\nin the decisior3.VV’heiitever, what is
\nsigni\ufb01cant     is certainly
\ndispmpoi\ufb01onate {:3 ‘she  Consequently,
\nthe disoiissal’   to. be altered to one of
\ncomp1il_soI3tV’}\u00a7ef1ce, the following order:<\/p>\n
  ‘\u00a2i\ufb01’euaed in part<\/p>\n
     recorded by the authorities
\nV  mis-conduct stands con\ufb01rmed.\n<\/p>\n
 .. __.(e}..’Tf1e penalty of dismissal is altered to one of<\/p>\n
compulsory re\ufb01rement.\n<\/p>\n
o’<\/p>\n
Q\/7.”\n<\/p>\n
my I-u\\.I\\JI\\I vr xv-\\nw.mAI\\A rslu-H  OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CO<\/p>\n
-33-<\/span><\/p>\n
(d) If any benefit flows from compuisory
\nretirement, the petitioner shall be entitied for<\/p>\n
the same.\n<\/p>\n
13. Mr.S.S.Kumman, xeamed ”\n<\/p>\n
Government Advocate appearing for T(3Sp0I)g{1(iffI–\u00a7:i.   is’   O <\/p>\n
permitted to file memo of appeararrgee O_ <\/p>\n
  judge<\/p>\n
SP8<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008 Author: Ajit J Gunjal Liv!-1 LUURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CC IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA V DATED THIS m1; 21st […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-169722","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-16T18:51:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-16T18:51:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1007,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-16T18:51:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-16T18:51:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-16T18:51:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008"},"wordCount":1007,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008","name":"Sri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-16T18:51:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veeranna-jolad-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-21-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Veeranna Jolad vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169722","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=169722"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169722\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=169722"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=169722"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=169722"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}