{"id":169805,"date":"2010-01-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010"},"modified":"2017-09-16T16:24:22","modified_gmt":"2017-09-16T10:54:22","slug":"manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Rajasthan High Court &#8211; Jodhpur<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                               1\n\n       S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.262\/2010\n                  Manoj Kumar Garg\n                           vs\n                  LIC of India &amp; Ors.\n\nDATE OF ORDER : 11.1.2010\n\n            HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>Mr.Manoj Bhandari, for the the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>     The petitioner is aggrieved against the transfer order<\/p>\n<p>dated 26th Dec, 2009      by which he has been transferred<\/p>\n<p>from Ganganagar office to Nawa City in Kuchaman City.<\/p>\n<p>     The   contention    of   the   learned   counsel   for   the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is that all it has been done only because of the<\/p>\n<p>malafides which is clear from the voluminous documentary<\/p>\n<p>evidence which is placed on record by the petitioner. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was not supplied with certain documents in spite<\/p>\n<p>of the several representations. Even the petitioner lodged a<\/p>\n<p>criminal complaint      wherein documents were summoned<\/p>\n<p>and against which order, a revision petition was filed and<\/p>\n<p>that revision petition was also dismissed.       The petitioner<\/p>\n<p>then was harassed while giving some absolutely wrong<\/p>\n<p>objections and copy of these communications have been<\/p>\n<p>placed on record by the petitioner. It is submitted that while<\/p>\n<p>working at particular place, the petitioner has developed a<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>team and there is financial limit within which he has to<\/p>\n<p>maintain the expenses so as to benefit the LIC and because<\/p>\n<p>of the transfer he will have to develop a new team for which<\/p>\n<p>he may have to incur huge expenses and if petitioner will<\/p>\n<p>not be able to maintain the expenses limit then even his<\/p>\n<p>services can be terminated.       It is also submitted that<\/p>\n<p>petitioner&#8217;s agents have also been threatened so they may<\/p>\n<p>detach from the petitioner.    The petitioner has placed on<\/p>\n<p>record copy of one of the complaint submitted by one<\/p>\n<p>Shyam Lal which was submitted to the Central Vigilance<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner     alleging certain serious allegations against<\/p>\n<p>the Branch Managers and Assistant Administrative Officer.<\/p>\n<p>In view of the above, according to learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, the order dated 26.12.2009 is passed absolutely<\/p>\n<p>malafiedly and that limit is to the extent that ultimately, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner&#8217;s services may be terminated.<\/p>\n<p>     Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the<\/p>\n<p>judgment of the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court delivered in the<\/p>\n<p>case of Arvind Dattatraya Dhande Vs. State of Maharashtra<\/p>\n<p>&amp; Ors reported in (1997) 6 SCC 169 wherein the Hon&#8217;ble<\/p>\n<p>Supreme Court set aside the transfer order and passed the<\/p>\n<p>stricture against the action of the State Government with<\/p>\n<p>direction to the Chief Secretary of the State to take<\/p>\n<p>appropriate action against the person responsible.<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     Learned counsel for the petitioner also relied upon<\/p>\n<p>the judgment of this court delivered in the case of Narpat<\/p>\n<p>Singh Rajpurohit Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 1991<\/p>\n<p>WLR (Vol.1) 136 in support of his contention that the<\/p>\n<p>transfer order can be quashed when a case of malafide is<\/p>\n<p>made out.\n<\/p>\n<p>     I considered the submissions of learned counsel for<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner and perused the facts of the case. It appears<\/p>\n<p>that petitioner had no good relations with his employer and<\/p>\n<p>it ultimately resulted into lodging of criminal cases wherein<\/p>\n<p>certain orders were passed and, thereafter, the revision<\/p>\n<p>petition was filed.   From the order passed by the criminal<\/p>\n<p>court on 24th June, 2006 it appears that criminal complaint<\/p>\n<p>was lodged under Sections 409, 420, 425, 467 and 468 IPC.<\/p>\n<p>It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner after taking<\/p>\n<p>instruction from the petitioner that said complaint is<\/p>\n<p>pending in the court below.\n<\/p>\n<p>     It will be appropriate to consider the judgments relied<\/p>\n<p>upon by learned counsel for the petitioner delivered in the<\/p>\n<p>cases of (i) Arvind Dattatraya Dhande (supra). In the said<\/p>\n<p>case, the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court after considering the facts<\/p>\n<p>of the case observed that ln view of the unimpeachable and<\/p>\n<p>eloquent testimony of the performance of the duties, it will<\/p>\n<p>be obvious that the transfer is not in public interest but is a<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>case of victimisation of a honest officer at the behest of the<\/p>\n<p>aggrieved complainants carrying on the business in liquor<\/p>\n<p>and toddy. Here in this case, the criminal complaints are<\/p>\n<p>pending, which have been lodged by the petitioner as stated<\/p>\n<p>by learned counsel for the petitioner. There are serious<\/p>\n<p>allegations and counter allegations and at this stage, it<\/p>\n<p>cannot be said that the petitioner is being victimized by<\/p>\n<p>issuing   this   transfer   order   dated   26.12.2009.    Simply<\/p>\n<p>because one employee has raised a complaint against the<\/p>\n<p>employer or has lodged several complaints against the<\/p>\n<p>employer    or    has initiated criminal cases against          the<\/p>\n<p>employer itself cannot be made to become any sealed<\/p>\n<p>against any order of transfer of an employee. It is true that<\/p>\n<p>malafides   can    be   gathered    from    the   facts   and   the<\/p>\n<p>surrounding circumstances, but in this case, I do not find<\/p>\n<p>that any case of malafide has been made out because the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner may have developed an impression that because<\/p>\n<p>of this reason of his lodging criminal complaints he has been<\/p>\n<p>transferred. So far as the contention of learned counsel for<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner that petitioner will have to develop a new<\/p>\n<p>team of his agents to achieve the target          by keeping the<\/p>\n<p>limit of expenses is concerned, that is the duty of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner if so is provided by the guidelines.<\/p>\n<p>     At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>vehemently submitted that for Development Officer of the<\/p>\n<p>LIC, Special Rules have been framed under Rule 17 of the<\/p>\n<p>LIC of India Development Officers (Revision of Certain<\/p>\n<p>Terms and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2009.                In these<\/p>\n<p>Rules, there is no provision providing for transfer of<\/p>\n<p>Development Officer and, therefore, the general rule under<\/p>\n<p>the LIC of India (Staff) Regulations, 1960 providing power<\/p>\n<p>of transfer cannot be invoked for transfer of Development<\/p>\n<p>Officer.    Learned   counsel       for   the   petitioner    further<\/p>\n<p>submitted that in these rules, various provisions have been<\/p>\n<p>made including providing for termination of services of<\/p>\n<p>Development Officer in certain cases as provided under Rule<\/p>\n<p>8 of the Rules of 2009 as well as providing rules providing<\/p>\n<p>table of expense limit.\n<\/p>\n<p>     According to learned counsel for the petitioner after<\/p>\n<p>coming into force of the Rules of 2009, the general Rules of<\/p>\n<p>1960 cannot be invoked.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The Rules of 2009 very specifically provides &#8220;revision<\/p>\n<p>of certain terms and conditions of service&#8221;. These rules are<\/p>\n<p>not exhaustive rules and these Rules of 2009 are only<\/p>\n<p>making revision of certain terms and condition of service of<\/p>\n<p>Development Officer. In the Rules of 2009 no provision for<\/p>\n<p>transfer by the employer is there and that power is under<\/p>\n<p>the Rules of 1960 then Rules of 2009 are not in conflict of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                           6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            Rules of 1960. Otherwise also, the Rules of 2009 is not in<\/p>\n<p>            conflict with the general rules because the Rules of 2009<\/p>\n<p>            are framed for the purpose covered under the rules and are<\/p>\n<p>            not taking away the powers given in the General Rules once<\/p>\n<p>            the subjects which are not covered under Rules of 2009. In<\/p>\n<p>            view of the above reasons so far as power of employer to<\/p>\n<p>            transfer an employee specifically given in Rules of 1960<\/p>\n<p>            shall remain intact.\n<\/p>\n<p>                 In view of the above, the writ petition of the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>            is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                 (PRAKASH TATIA),J.\n<\/p>\n<p>cpgoyal\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court &#8211; Jodhpur Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010 1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.262\/2010 Manoj Kumar Garg vs LIC of India &amp; Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 11.1.2010 HON&#8217;BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr.Manoj Bhandari, for the the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-169805","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-rajasthan-high-court-jodhpur"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-16T10:54:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-16T10:54:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1148,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-16T10:54:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-16T10:54:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-16T10:54:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010"},"wordCount":1148,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010","name":"Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-16T10:54:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manoj-kumar-garg-vs-life-insurance-corp-of-india-ors-on-11-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Manoj Kumar Garg vs Life Insurance Corp. Of India &amp; Ors on 11 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169805","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=169805"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169805\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=169805"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=169805"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=169805"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}