{"id":170044,"date":"2009-12-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009"},"modified":"2018-08-07T14:16:38","modified_gmt":"2018-08-07T08:46:38","slug":"shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At &#8230; on 17 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At &#8230; on 17 December, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                     CHANDIGARH\n\n                               Civil Writ Petition No.12174 of 2008\n                               Date of decision:17.12.2009\n\n\nShamsher Singh, Superintendent (Retd.), Punjab and Haryana High\nCourt.                                             ...Petitioner\n\n                               Versus\n\nHigh Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh and others.\n                                                       ...Respondents\n\n\n\nCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN\n                     ----\n\nPresent:    Mr. Ashu M. Punchhi, Advocate, for the petitioner.\n\n            Mr. R.N. Raina, Advocate, for respondent No.1.\n\n                               ----\n\n1.    Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the\n      judgment ? Yes.\n2.    To be referred to the reporters or not ? Yes.\n3.    Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? Yes.\n                                ----\n\nK.Kannan, J. (Oral)\n<\/pre>\n<p>1.          The petitioner, who was working as a Superintendent<\/p>\n<p>Grade-1 on the establishment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana,<\/p>\n<p>was retired prematurely on attaining the age of superannuation w.e.f.<\/p>\n<p>05.10.2003. On a plea for re-consideration of the decision, by the order<\/p>\n<p>of the then Hon&#8217;ble the Chief Justice, the order of compulsory retirement<\/p>\n<p>was recalled by order dated 24.04.2006 and he was permitted to rejoin<\/p>\n<p>the establishment. By a subsequent proceeding on 22.02.2007, it was<\/p>\n<p>ordered that the intervening period from 05.10.2003 when he was<\/p>\n<p>compulsory retired to 25.04.2006, when he actually rejoined the service<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No.12174 of 2008                           -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>pursuant to the order made by the Court, the whole period would be<\/p>\n<p>treated as &#8220;period spent on duty for all purposes and intents and that he<\/p>\n<p>would be paid full pay and allowances&#8221; for the said period.<\/p>\n<p>2.          It is an admitted fact that at the time when the writ petition<\/p>\n<p>was filed, he was superannuated on 31.10.2006 and his prayer was that<\/p>\n<p>he should be treated as having been promoted to the post of Assistant<\/p>\n<p>Registrar on the date when his junior was promoted and the said aspect<\/p>\n<p>was to be taken into account for the purpose of calculation of pension<\/p>\n<p>payable on the basis of increased emoluments that could have availed to<\/p>\n<p>him. A representation had been made in that regard by the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>which was rejected by 22.08.2006.       The submission of the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel appearing for the petitioner is that when the Hon&#8217;ble Chief<\/p>\n<p>Justice passed an order stating that the period between the first order of<\/p>\n<p>premature retirement and the recall of the order, was to be taken as<\/p>\n<p>period spent on duty for all purposes and intents, it should be taken as a<\/p>\n<p>necessary incident that he was also entitled to be considered as promoted<\/p>\n<p>from the date when his junior was promoted. The contest to this plea on<\/p>\n<p>behalf of the respondents is that as per the High Court Establishment<\/p>\n<p>(Appointment and Conditions of Services) Rules,1973, Rule 24 provides<\/p>\n<p>that promotion in the High Court establishment from one grade to the<\/p>\n<p>next higher grade one shall, except in cases where competitive<\/p>\n<p>examination is prescribed, be by selection and no one shall have a right<\/p>\n<p>to claim promotion merely on the basis of seniority. According to the<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel appearing for the respondents that even prior to the<\/p>\n<p>period when he was compulsory retired, he had been denied promotion<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No.12174 of 2008                           -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>for some adverse remarks against him and subsequently when promotion<\/p>\n<p>was made on 1st January, 2001, respondents 2 to 6 had been placed above<\/p>\n<p>him and the petitioner cannot therefore assume that he was entitled to<\/p>\n<p>the promotion post as of right for making the calculation for the pension<\/p>\n<p>payable. It was the further contention on behalf of the respondents that<\/p>\n<p>the post of Assistant Registrar, which was the promotion post shall be<\/p>\n<p>filled up as per Rule 18(4) from out of the Superintendents Grade-I, who<\/p>\n<p>were graduates and have experience of working as such (emphasis mine)<\/p>\n<p>for a period of three years. The contention therefore was that when the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was reinstated on 24.04.2006, the calculation of 3 years period<\/p>\n<p>would not avail to him for promotion because he had not actually worked<\/p>\n<p>as such Superintendent Grade-I for the requisite number of years. The<\/p>\n<p>treatment of the period spent on duty, according to the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>for the respondents, would avail only for the purpose of full pay and<\/p>\n<p>allowances, which was granted to him and he could not treat himself as<\/p>\n<p>actually having worked in such a post.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.          The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relies on a<\/p>\n<p>decision of the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in Union of India and others<\/p>\n<p>Versus K.B.Rajoria-(2003) 3 Supreme Court Cases 562 , that dealt with<\/p>\n<p>the case where a person, who had been wrongly denied the post<\/p>\n<p>originally and who later obtained the post, sought for consideration for a<\/p>\n<p>further promotion on the ground that the relevant rules provided for two<\/p>\n<p>years regular service on the feeder cadre and he having been offered that<\/p>\n<p>post, he was entitled to treat such period of two years as being in<\/p>\n<p>regular service. The Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court was actually dealing with<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No.12174 of 2008                           -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the case of rule that allowed for a promotion for a person having two<\/p>\n<p>years &#8220;regular service&#8221; as available also to the person who had been<\/p>\n<p>originally denied and later brought in after a successful challenge. The<\/p>\n<p>decision was again rendered in the context of what a regular service<\/p>\n<p>meant and the Court reasoned that notional promotion which was granted<\/p>\n<p>could not be treated as irregular. The Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court therefore<\/p>\n<p>held that such a notional promotion given to a person to make aright the<\/p>\n<p>wrong that had been done by supersession must be taken as period spent<\/p>\n<p>on regular service.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.          This case makes reference and distinguishes yet another<\/p>\n<p>decision of its earlier ruling in Union of India and others Versus<\/p>\n<p>M.Bhaskar and others-(1996) 4 Supreme Court Cases 416.               The<\/p>\n<p>decision of the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in the above case is instructive in<\/p>\n<p>one way, for it deals with the situation more akin to the position that<\/p>\n<p>obtains before us now. In the said judgment, the Court dealt with the<\/p>\n<p>case of eligibility for promotion to a higher post a condition of<\/p>\n<p>completion of two years experience in the next lower grade. The Court<\/p>\n<p>found that in a case where the rules provides for relevant experience in a<\/p>\n<p>lower grade but where he could not have gained experience prior to the<\/p>\n<p>date when he had joined pursuant to an order, the mere fact of his<\/p>\n<p>promotion in a lower grade that was made notionally could not be taken<\/p>\n<p>to mean that he started gaining experience from that day, because for<\/p>\n<p>gaining experience, one has to work. Notional promotions, the Hon&#8217;ble<\/p>\n<p>Supreme Court held, were given to take care of some injustice inter alia<\/p>\n<p>because some juniors had come to be promoted earlier and a person who<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No.12174 of 2008                              -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>is promoted to a higher grade could not gain experience from the date of<\/p>\n<p>notional promotion.     In this case, the relevant rule talks about the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;experience as such for a period of 3 years&#8221;, but the such experience, he<\/p>\n<p>did not have and all that the office order issued pursuant to the direction<\/p>\n<p>of the Hon&#8217;ble Chief Justice was that he was entitled to the monetary<\/p>\n<p>benefits and was to be treated as period spent on duty for all purposes<\/p>\n<p>and intents. In the present context, it could be counted as service for the<\/p>\n<p>purpose of reckoning the pension but it cannot, by any stretch of<\/p>\n<p>imagination be understood as providing to the petitioner an experience<\/p>\n<p>which the rules required. Rejection of his representation, in my view,<\/p>\n<p>therefore, accords with the relevant rules and there is no scope for<\/p>\n<p>affording to the petitioner the relief which he seeks in the writ petition.<\/p>\n<p>5.           The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be<\/p>\n<p>however no directions as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                           (K.KANNAN)<br \/>\n                                                              JUDGE<br \/>\n17.12.2009<br \/>\nsanjeev\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At &#8230; on 17 December, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12174 of 2008 Date of decision:17.12.2009 Shamsher Singh, Superintendent (Retd.), Punjab and Haryana High Court. &#8230;Petitioner Versus High Court of Punjab and Haryana at [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-170044","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At ... on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At ... on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-07T08:46:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At &#8230; on 17 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-07T08:46:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1211,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At ... on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-07T08:46:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At &#8230; on 17 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At ... on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At ... on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-07T08:46:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At &#8230; on 17 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-07T08:46:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009"},"wordCount":1211,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009","name":"Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At ... on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-07T08:46:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shamsher-singh-vs-high-court-of-punjab-and-haryana-at-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shamsher Singh vs High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At &#8230; on 17 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170044","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=170044"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170044\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=170044"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=170044"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=170044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}