{"id":170223,"date":"2010-11-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010"},"modified":"2014-12-11T22:42:17","modified_gmt":"2014-12-11T17:12:17","slug":"sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 16\"' DAY or-* NOVEMBER, \nBEFORE '  3\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. vEI\u00a73\u00bbLJ>GOP\u00a3'Ti;1fxv-.F.;%Z{:_',3:\\I\\ii)'A--.V f  \n\nWRIT PETITION NO.26679\/2010:\"~(fS%VI:C.t%5C')V\"'  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1.\n\nBoth are Wat\"Sajjehoisabali\ufb01.T'  .\nDodderi Hobii, _ '  ' \"\n\nSri Butharaju\n\nS\/o late Sri Thimmappaiah,  .\n\n@ Thimmanna,  J\nAged about 45 years.\n\nLakshmamma \n\nD\/0 Sri ThimrT_jap;?;Eai_ahv,::'--'  \n\n@ Thimmanbriayy  T\" \n\nAged about --'w'..17ii.)\/'15?i3rs2\".' '  '\n\nMadhugiri Taiuiz,\n\nI \"{ By S rjj  ari sh, \"Ad~\\x.._.). \u00ab\n\n'ANL>j:W*   * '\n\nGu.rL;\u00a73rasaT\u00a7!i'j  'V\n\nS\/0'-4\u00abChi_kka.ra'ngappa\n\n Aged about 15 years.\n\n.{_'T\u00bbi\"3'io'TrL1\"LT..iA Ranganatha\nS\/0 Chikkarangappa\n\n'  Aged about 13 years.\n\n...PETITIONERS\n\n\n\nRespondents No. 2 and 3 are minors<\/pre>\n
Represented by their natural guardian mother
\nSmt.Bhagyamma.\n<\/p>\n
3. Thimmakka
\nW\/o late Rangashamaiah
\nAged about 70 years.\n<\/p>\n
4. Govindappa
\nS\/o late Rangashamaiah
\nAged about 51 years.\n<\/p>\n
5. Mudlappa
\nS\/o late Rangashamavian
\nAged about 45 years.\n<\/p>\n
6. Rajanna   ‘
\nS\/o late Rang..a\u00absha-mai\u00e9ah _,
\nAged about_V4:-Q yyears..g   <\/p>\n
7. Mudlappa  ‘:\n<\/p>\n
S\/o Biit’n’annga;; _ —  -.\n<\/p>\n
Aged about 63~.’vya_a”i*s.\n<\/p>\n
8. B.Govindd.appya A  A
\nS\/o late B13-thavnna-__ V
\nAged’ about 615 “years.”\n<\/p>\n
” All “arer\/’atl Sajjehosahalli
\n A Doddgeiriy Hoblgi’;\n<\/p>\n
‘— ‘Ma-d hug i’i’-i_TalL:. k”.\n<\/p>\n
K    …RESPONE)ENTS<\/p>\n
 {Eiy M\/s.C.V”R:C\u00a7opala Swamy & Associates, Advs. for R9)<\/p>\n
it This ixvrit petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of<\/p>\n
thefjonstitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated
\n_j~.___”O’S.Ci8.2010, passed on I.A.No.11 filed under Section 151 of
\nA  ‘Cl?Ciin R.A.i\\\u00a3o.l6S\/2005, on the file of Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) at<\/p>\n
Madugiri, vide Annexure-A and consequently allow
\napplication I.A.No.11 filed under section 151 of CFC.\u00bb in<\/p>\n
R.A.\u00a7\\io.16S\/2005, on the file of Civil Judge (Sr._4E)n;~)u_4i~at<\/p>\n
Madugirl on the facts and circumstance of the case.___ – .V  <\/p>\n
This petition coming on for preliminary hefairirigoinf <\/p>\n
group this day, the Court made the following:  <\/p>\n
QRDER<\/p>\n
Respondents 1 & 2 havefiied R.VA-.l\\lo.165[IZOQ.S_HiVn_.’3the <\/p>\n
Court of Civil Judge (Sr. E)lvn.,)’i\ufb01a,dhu_giri’,”qljestioivning the
\ndecree dated 21.10.2005′  :.:.tfd.s..alsl;;.ii16\/1999 by the
\nCivil Judge (Jr. Dix\/n.,)  ‘&””l.’..hA:e=:V’~.{petitioners are
\nrespondents   petitioners had
\nfiled LA   Vfrjecall the order dated
\n29.10.2002; so .theWrnarking of documents,<\/p>\n
other than  along with LA No.8 filed<\/p>\n
by the appellants. V-.The”‘appli<:.ation has been dismissed on the<\/p>\n
"vegrovundvn'"that'.L:'thecourtmcannot sit as appellate authority to<\/p>\n
 passed on 29.10.2009 and the course open<\/p>\n
 theta-pp|ig_:a'ntA.:"l's to question the order before the appellate<\/p>\n
\/"\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4. The appellate court having ordered that the<\/p>\n
documents produced aiong with I.As No.6 & 7′ <\/p>\n
considered along with main, has committed<\/p>\n
impropriety and iilegality in permitting the=–d:ovcu’ments.,,u<\/p>\n
produced aiong with I.As No.6 8: 7 to:’\u00bb.\u00a7:ie :rnaa.rl<ed,_.'wh'en'"it"-hAas;_*\u00e9<\/p>\n
allowed I.A No.8, which had withV'it.._onlyi'four
\nNo.8 having been allowed, at  the "to-ur:v.jdocuments
\nproduced therein could  __on record and
\ncould not have been._permi:tted._to evidence. I.A
\nNo.8 being  committed
\nthe error, ought  mistake, which is
\napparent  ti\\.;e'V"'i~,'\u00ab_'et;orcl,VVVsince the orders passed<\/p>\n
on I.As No.6' 8_L7,,is'to\u00e9co'nsici'er'"them along with the main.<\/p>\n
 E__Eve_n o'tAh'e\u00abrw.i_se, clause (a), (aa) & (b) of sub–ruie<\/p>\n
V(".1.)'of"Rugie.__27;'urider Order 41 CPC refers to three different<\/p>\n
 _gsitua'ti.o'n~s. VTiiV\u00e9–;'Vpower of appeliate court to pass order<\/p>\n
'th.ereunde..rV"V.,.isV4 iimited. For exercising the jurisdiction<\/p>\n
atl4th.ereu'ln"d,er,the appeiiate court must arrive at a finding that<\/p>\n
"i~..,_on'e [or the other conditions enumerated thereunder is<\/p>\n
E-\n<\/p>\n
, .\n<\/p>\n
satisfied. A good reason must also be shown as to why the<\/p>\n
evidence sought to be produced in the appeal <\/p>\n
produced in the trial court.\n<\/p>\n
6. The conditions precedentfor a’pp_|icati;c <\/p>\n
(aa) of sub~ru|e (1) of Rule 27VundeAr’\u00ab.__Order 4liV’..’ie”di’fferentd’~<\/p>\n
from that of clauses (a) &   the=.in’sta’nt'””case,
\nindisputably clauses (a) &r(l:)x) ofp.R’uie”c_247V(‘1.)._or t\u00a7r’d’er*”\u00a5i1 have
\nno application i.e., in sol\ufb02lfar  7 & 8 are
\nconsidered. The permission for
\nproduction of  i:t..;wo’u|d be for them to
\nshow  Rule 27(1) (aa) are<\/p>\n
satisfied.\n<\/p>\n
7.;=~ In uthe_”‘case’ of STATE OF GUJARAT VS.<\/p>\n
“V:l\\’1.AFlEVi\\\u00a3’D’i\u00a7liil?\u00a7Lfi$?Ii’l_R PA’ii’sHoTTAMBHA1 DESAI, reported in<\/p>\n
2oois”(9i)l’ been held as follows:<\/p>\n
V1.0.   the appellate court has the power to allow
\na d’oVeument to be produced and a witness to be
\np A’ examii\ufb01ed under Order 41. Rule 27 CPC, the requirement
\nl ‘~_lloi’–t’i1e said Court must be limited to those cases where it<\/p>\n
found it necessary to obtain such evidence for enabling it<\/p>\n
‘i:\n<\/p>\n
to pronounce judgment. This provision did not entitle the<\/p>\n
appellate court to let in fresh evidence at the appellate<\/p>\n
stage where even without such evidence it can prenotiiace<\/p>\n
judgment. in the case. it does not entitle tire <\/p>\n
court to let in fresh evidence only for the of’ <\/p>\n
pronouncement of judgment in alpartictiiar way_:”‘– _   ‘V<\/p>\n
8. In the case of,e’i~l4_._.i<AlVlV)3.E,_ifX';'-'i  me if.<\/p>\n
ANOTHER vs. AYYASAMY AND Alll'lO.:l*_HEi2, iepeeee  (2001)
\n7 scc 503, it has been  oreei 41 Rule
\n27 have not been enpgrafteid patch up the
\nweak points in    omission in the
\ncourt of appeal   any lacunae or gaps in<\/p>\n
evidence     <\/p>\n
9. 1n.._the” KUMAR AND ANOTHER vs.<\/p>\n
‘…i%>.APAl\\il’ii:’;’l mo Oi;HERVS__,___preported in ILR 2010 Kar 3864, with<\/p>\n
 to tine -riourjse of action to be followed by the court<\/p>\n
when:’cl.a’i:ns%fe.r in additional evidence is putforth, it<\/p>\n
 has been  “ale follows:\n<\/p>\n
it  ” ‘*’Tl’l\u20ac Courts shall have to be cautious and must always<\/p>\n
it ‘..d’ac.t5With great circumspection in dealing with the claims<\/p>\n
K   for letting in additional evidence par\ufb01cularly, in the form<\/p>\n
*” t’<\/p>\n
illegality. When the mistake was brought to its notice, more<\/p>\n
particularly the order being contrary to the orders passeu’.;_’o.q_<\/p>\n
Z{.As 6 & 7, the court below ought to have recalle.C\u00a7_:\u00ab.itS”libyfiifir–..___”.<\/p>\n
as the error is apparent on the face of the recoruk” <\/p>\n
it may.\n<\/p>\n
1:. The marking of dvoc’u.n1ents..lllproposedetgow..’3be%<\/p>\n
produced along with i.As 6 & 7 beil:n’g:_contrary\u00ab\u00abtothe? orders
\npassed on I.As 6 & 7, the prxayeri is meritorious.<\/p>\n
In the said view of the matter, Ijpassg”tbe.’f_ovlg:|”(\u00a7ldii’ng:\n<\/p>\n
     V.\n<\/p>\n
Thezgjbwrit the impugned order
\nstands quas”ned’.t  supra, being meritorious,<\/p>\n
stands a|!–o.wed.u”\n<\/p>\n
Iticl\u00e9\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16″‘ DAY or-* NOVEMBER, BEFORE ‘ 3 THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. vEI\u00a73\u00bbLJ>GOP\u00a3’Ti;1fxv-.F.;%Z{:_’,3:\\I\\ii)’A–.V f WRIT PETITION NO.26679\/2010:”~(fS%VI:C.t%5C’)V”‘ BETWEEN: 1. Both are Wat”Sajjehoisabali\ufb01.T’ . Dodderi Hobii, _ ‘ ‘ ” Sri […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-170223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-11T17:12:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-11T17:12:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1039,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-11T17:12:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-11T17:12:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-11T17:12:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010"},"wordCount":1039,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010","name":"Sri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-11T17:12:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-butharaju-vs-guruprasad-on-16-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Butharaju vs Guruprasad on 16 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=170223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170223\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=170223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=170223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=170223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}