{"id":170227,"date":"2009-02-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009"},"modified":"2017-02-04T01:58:31","modified_gmt":"2017-02-03T20:28:31","slug":"the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n
194 THE} tilt}!-i SOUR!' 01*' l:-B;v';i\\2A:3;g3:<ga'i?E:V_AV:  \n\nM.F.A.N().9*2?4i 20i}vs{imi)'T\n\nI:$\u00a3i3'i'Wii'.E'}1'~l:\n\n'rm; MANAGING iJ1m::c:1m':_K:3mjj<: " \nC.EN'l'i\u20acAL (.)l+'Fl{.3i:\u00a7, K H Rom),   \nSHANTHINAGAR   '\nBANGALORE ..    I    \nREF. BY CHiE\u00a7_\u00a7'L\u00a7\u00a5;W_.0.FFiCiER _  " \nNl33i<.R'i'C.. ' '      \n\n APPELLANI'\n(By Sri  .13:  B1~12\u00a7R2.~;*1'\u00a7i'T'2gL3T:s(\u00a7}3:~:, ADV.)\n\n.&_b1\u00a3J_;_\n\n 1 ._""~A D:'f\u20ac.AVEif'.i'i\u00abV.. ..... \n\n,  sir} mzvamnxawa\n 1. .AGEajAB"oUT 24 YEARS\n R\/.0....A;~.Ii\u00a3::;i*:'HAPU\u00a72A ViLLACiE\nA '-~*'rARH<:;::R\u00a7 TALUK,\n NOW RQMT YAGATI VILLAGE\nATAND 903?, YAGAT1 HOBLI,\n\u00bb KADUR TALUK\n" *  _c:H11<MAGALu:~\u00bb: L)lS'l'HlC'l'.\n\n "SIr~iiVAPU'l'Hi<Air"PA (3rADHU(SrlNAMU'I'I'A\n3 AGES ABC! UT 4? YHEAHS\n\nl{SR'I'{j BUS DRIVER\n\nYALEBURGA DEPOT\n\nKGPPALA DViSIC)N\n\nKUPPAL DISTRICI' \ufb01l.5S BEARING\nNi) KA--37[ it 186\n\n FEESPONDENTS\n\n\n\n*rm:.~; MFA mm) U\/S 173(1) or NW AC1' A:;\u00a7A:;us*:'\nTHE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:20.12.2GO?j"\u00a7?\u00a5\u00a73SE}D\nIN MVC NO.116f'.3f)06 0N THE 1211.5; OF <::1v:1L_'v.Ju;:";a_3\u00a3::\n\n(SR.{)N.) 65 MEMBER, mm, KADUR, Afu%;\u00a5A11?:}--m\u00bb.::J:"----;a \nCOMPENSATION op Rs.1,62,5a0;~ WETH I1s:frER1t\u00ab;s*r  6'%=__ \n\nPA. FROM THE DATE OF PE3Tf'I'IQN..T1LL I\u00a7EPC\u00a7;'3':I'_I'. V'\n\nThia appeal com'1ngVon ff}:  \n\ncourt delivered the foHc~wiH[g:_V\n\nThis  is    the\nqua\u00e9ntmnj;    passed by the\nMACS' at  xv; \/ 20%.\n\n2.  '}".h\u00e9:    c\ufb02f the case are that (rm\n\n23.5.2UO\u20ac5" p.m., the first respundent was\n\n   ti1 @"'appc1iant's bus bearing N.J<.A~3'?\/F-\n\n    to tmppal to attend Air Fox\ufb01e interview\n\n\u00e9\u20ac__u1\u00a7.oppa'j;:E-.V.'I':he driver of the buss drove the bus in a rash\n\n and izeg\ufb01gent maimar near Kalyani Factory near Kappa}\n\n '3'_Q\u00a7\u00a7%.r: Within the jurisdiction of Munirabad Police\n\n  _ __\u00a73tatioI1 and iost mama} and dashed against the tipper\n\niarry bearing No.KA-35\/5167 Whiclite. was parked an the\nieft: side 01' the road from behind. As a result of which\n\nthe iirst respondent sustained ixxjuxies. 'l'hereafter he<\/pre>\n
\/9:\/,.\n<\/p>\n
was taker: to District Hospital, Koppai, where he was an<\/p>\n
inpa\ufb02ent fer a day and shifted to Nan}appa <\/p>\n
Shimoga, and admitted as an inpatient  1 ”<\/p>\n
ts 25.5.2006 and 27.5.2006 re\u00bb’311.–5.2<\u00a7oe"."j'3\u00a7,;-1{<:;$1'.sht:..\u00a2 V'<\/p>\n
took follow up treatment.  t\u00bbfi'3,at~ . he  ._<\/p>\n
suffered permanent disabilitgrt\u00e9en aeee11.nt.ef  in V<\/p>\n
the accident, he  ttz\u00e9"\n<\/p>\n
compensatioll on vari01’1s.s.heaVds.:’V<\/p>\n
3. 013 recei7{.\u00e9tVL:V1″0\u00a7\u00b0 txleiiee 2  Tribunal, the
\nappeliant  appeared and \ufb01led
\ntheir _V istatement denying the
\na\ufb02egatiori-s_n1ade  petition and contending<\/p>\n
that drive1’w…ef ttte appellant bus was in no way<\/p>\n
 \u00bbI\u00a7eg\u00a7gent.sca1gt1t dismissal of the claim petition.<\/p>\n
4;. h  thsiiasis of the above pleadings, the Tribtmai<\/p>\n
 i’ramedVLjzeV fe\ufb02owing issues far its consideration:<\/p>\n
At ‘T *\u00ab_.i) Whether the petitioner proves that on
\nAt 23.5.2006 at about 5.00 pm. when he Was
\ntraveiling in the :~;s1~<*re bus bearing Ne.i<.A-
\n3'?\/F3186, at that time respondent No.1<\/p>\n
being the driver of the said bus drove the<\/p>\n
\/9<\/p>\n
same in . rash and negligent manner with
\nexcessive speed near Kaiyani b'e.eto_r\u00a7f* in
\nKoppel and he dashed the bus to the<\/p>\n
Lorry bearing Ne.1-\u00a7A~3E,i\/5167 \u00ab' _
\nwhich was parked on the left sjdeef 'the um-a".c\u00a7–.T  ' <\/p>\n
and thereby caused t:i1e'att<:icf=.ez1?t."e:i1V:1'ci  me'<\/p>\n
that the petitioner     A<\/p>\n
ii) Whether p6titi0Iif#?:.I.””-is V.e1-f1.i:ii:\u00a3e_’e’_:  ‘V<\/p>\n
compensation fren1.ife$pe1_1dentsV_No,,i and 2?<\/p>\n
If so, at wI1ai”rate’?  .v ” ‘\n<\/p>\n
iii)  er  V” ‘V\n<\/p>\n
5.     HtV:’he petitioner examined
\nhimseifiee PW1  liamath as PW2 and<\/p>\n
got 1;12n_\u20aci(ed4.V  P324, while the respondents<\/p>\n
  31} anjfwevidexxee. b’urti1er h’2xs.C–1 to G’?<\/p>\n
A  thmugh the Court Commiseioner.<\/p>\n
  \ufb01ne basis of the material on record, the<\/p>\n
A  awarded compensation of i<Is.1,f)2,6{)U\/– with<\/p>\n
  ifjiterest at 6'?\/o p.a. from the date of claim petitien till<\/p>\n
 deposit. Being aggrieved by the said quantum of<\/p>\n
f4\/w<\/p>\n
compensation, the corporation has preferred this<\/p>\n
appeal.\n<\/p>\n
‘”I’. 1 have heard the iearned counsel for. K  <\/p>\n
3. 1:; is submitted on behaif o:&m&\u00bb,app6;1a:g\u00a2 _tnej<\/p>\n
triimnal was not justi:3ea&Aj””in  a;*aum oi’=. <\/p>\n
Rs.(:lU_.U0{)\/- on the ;~-hiead of_ and
\nRs.E>5,U()0\/-  {he bills
\nproduced    “l'{s.58,U00\/-and
\nfurther tJL\u00a5.\u00e9V  “(Hill the other \ufb01eads
\nare Q12”  reduction in the<\/p>\n
appeal.  . %V<\/p>\n
9.,  ‘V  to the abeve submission, the only<\/p>\n
\u00bb \ufb013,’iS(‘:S for my conaaideration is, as to whether<\/p>\n
   award passed by the tribtrnal reqtxires<\/p>\n
 zi1’iif,c:I”‘EE1’e11ce.\n<\/p>\n
\u00ab’  From the material on rectxrd, it is seen that the<\/p>\n
first reapondent had sustained deep lacerated wound<\/p>\n
over right 16′: and fracture of right tibia and fibula in<\/p>\n
middle third and that he was an i11–patie3:1t and that he<\/p>\n
4%,<\/p>\n
took foliow up tmamlent. The first respondent was<\/p>\n
working as an itliectrician and hliectrical Supervisor-and<\/p>\n
getting an income of Ks.\u20ac),UOU\/– p.m. k\u00ab’11I’tt1<f;3{'_<\/p>\n
let in the evidence of PW}! 1)r.Un1esh Kamatii wikz\ufb01u M<\/p>\n
stated that the first responde11t'"'Vor1\u00ab   <\/p>\n
irac' ture of both bones of the   <\/p>\n
disability to an extent of 7.59m; the   '1'he
\ntribunal on the basis"  }1\u00a7'\u20acii\ufb01\u00a7f::*i.%i;f; :< 511'rec<–)V1V'\u20aci Viawardeci
\ncoztapemaatjon ofks. 1,b2,5\u00a3iQ   heads:<\/p>\n
i}PaiI1a;\u00a21Ci':3iifIi=:I4\u00a7'I1gs–~.'*': Ti-is. 30,000,!\u00bb<\/p>\n
    : Rs. 65,000]-\n<\/p>\n
iii}’C9nveya;1.C\u00e9V,’ v\u00a7xH:{a~\u00bbnOu\ufb02shment
\nattentiant charge\ufb01 : Rs. 15,000\/–<\/p>\n
 ‘~;i.v)i;t2ss of  earning capacity : Rs. 48,000] ~<\/p>\n
 .V:11:ner1ities 2 Ks. 5,000\/~<\/p>\n
. ”   <51? during treatment
\n'  : Rs. 9,000\/–\n<\/p>\n
Totaix Rs. 1,623,000 \/ –\n<\/p>\n
  11;’ Considering the fact that the first rmpondent was<\/p>\n
  ” v\u00e9orking as an Electrical Supervisor and was said to be<\/p>\n
earriing a sum cf k-\u20acs.6,00U\/-, on the basis of i:3x.i\u00ab’– 10<\/p>\n
though psmduced showing the net salary of the first<\/p>\n
%\/\u00ab<\/p>\n
reepondent at Ks.4,\u00a3”>52\/ ~, asseesed the monthly income<\/p>\n
of the 1″1:rst respondent at Hs.3_.U{)0\/ –onlj\u00a7i”<\/p>\n
accordingly, awarded i<s.48,\u00a3:\u00bb{)U\/ –to-wards    <\/p>\n
earning capacity. Since there r1iai?e"  <\/p>\n
and other injuries, a sum of Ks.'13.Q.u\u00a7l0 <\/p>\n
on the head of pain and suffe\ufb01ng whieh*-iit\u00e9 my lliiiew is V'<\/p>\n
not umeasonable.  awalfd of l'<s._.A15,U{5Uf"–'l towards
\nconveyance and other  cannot also
\nbe considered llilrlreasori\u00e9zble the fact that<\/p>\n
he was .    up treatment.\n<\/p>\n
12. ‘Medical  “i<Is.f\u00bb9,688\/ – were produced.<\/p>\n
13. 5- –Havi:4l’ig'”l.:he evidence of the doctor PW2<\/p>\n
 ” ‘th”e..1\ufb02;imel of\ufb01urgery, there were implants in the<\/p>\n
    ”  note of the fact that some amount<\/p>\n
x\u00e9ozgld for removal of the implants, though<\/p>\n
 _1″_t;e ee\ufb01ial medical bills amotmted to l:5,{)00[– by taking Into<\/p>\n
consideration the future medical expenses as no<\/p>\n
separate award was made on that head. Hem;-e, no<\/p>\n
\/2<\/p>\n
interference is; called for on that account. As far as 1033<\/p>\n
of amenities is concerned, 1 \ufb01nd that there ”<\/p>\n
fractures on tee right ieg and only   .<\/p>\n
awarded and the total cempensation\u00e9    ” ”<\/p>\n
Rs. 1,E>i.\u00bb2,\u20ac>U{)\/~. The gievance of the  <\/p>\n
the appellant that the tote}.\u00a7:o1;1peii:*~ati91:1T”..9;\u00a7c\u00a5arded3 is
\nexcessive cannot be  1131 ‘my  award<\/p>\n
amount. does not can foi’  _<\/p>\n
13. For thei:   not find any
\njustifiable  ta   the judment and
\naward     .t_’ribunal. Under the<\/p>\n
cneumetanees, ’tile   rejected.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘~    \u20ac:II10u\u00a7.it’i;=1..depositis ciirecteti to be transferred<\/p>\n
 ‘  tea. Vti \u00a38   -. _<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Iudg\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009 Author: B.V.Nagarathna 194 THE} tilt}!-i SOUR!’ 01*’ l:-B;v’;i\\2A:3;g3:<ga'i?E:V_AV: M.F.A.N().9*2?4i 20i}vs{imi)'T I:$\u00a3i3'i'Wii'.E'}1'~l: 'rm; MANAGING iJ1m::c:1m':_K:3mjj<: " C.EN'l'i\u20acAL (.)l+'Fl{.3i:\u00a7, K H Rom), SHANTHINAGAR ' BANGALORE .. I REF. BY CHiE\u00a7_\u00a7'L\u00a7\u00a5;W_.0.FFiCiER _ " Nl33i<.R'i'C.. ' ' APPELLANI' (By Sri .13: B1~12\u00a7R2.~;*1'\u00a7i'T'2gL3T:s(\u00a7}3:~:, ADV.) .&_b1\u00a3J_;_ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-170227","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-03T20:28:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-03T20:28:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":946,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009\",\"name\":\"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-03T20:28:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-03T20:28:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-03T20:28:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009"},"wordCount":946,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009","name":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-03T20:28:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-a-d-naveen-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs A D Naveen on 25 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170227","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=170227"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170227\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=170227"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=170227"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=170227"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}