{"id":170776,"date":"2008-09-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008"},"modified":"2015-03-11T14:43:51","modified_gmt":"2015-03-11T09:13:51","slug":"sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p> TU?v%%&lt;vR%<br \/>\n j?-\u00a70:\u00a7V\u00a7\u00a7}&#039;:\u00a7f?A, HCG?)<\/p>\n<p> % 1aE;.EAsE&#039;i:&quot;He PET&#039;\u00a3TIQ?\\iER. on BAIL. m c.c. 1399,\/as<br \/>\n i&#039;i\ufb01_R:ME ;x;e.\u00a75;&#039;a::s3) &lt;3? New ExTE:~:swN 9.5., Tum-:i.:a, ms:<br \/>\n,.&quot;i7}-\u00a5EL~-FILE 9; ms AD\u20ac)L.CIX!Ii. JUQGE {SR;.9!&#039;\u00e9.} &amp; cam,<br \/>\n&#039;= TU&#039;\u00a7&#039;4\u00a7(_\u00a7.;R, WHICH is REGESTERED F-&#039;QR THE GFFENCE<br \/>\n~&#039;.&#039;.&#8211;PU\u00a7\u00e9ISi&#8211;%A8LE ugs 392,1:-*rc.<\/p>\n<p>  Tiiis cetitien gaming can for arders this \ufb02ay, the court ma\ufb01a<br \/>\nA \u00bb gthe feiiewing<\/p>\n<p>E<br \/>\n34 &#8216;mi HEGH cove: as KARNATAKA AT 8A?\u00a7GALf}?&lt;E :&#039;-.:&quot;&#039;~.<\/p>\n<pre>\nsacrea THIS THE 5'?\" BAY Gt'-\" SEPTEMBER .-'\/\/\":E:20\u00a7    .' ~\nBEFQRE    k%  \n<\/pre>\n<p>THE i-\u00a7QE&#8217;~\u00a3&#8217;8i_E MR. zusnca %3\u00a3:\\:*i%;?&#8221;%?3&#8242;{AR;\u00e9;r\u00e9\u00a7%T&#8221;&#8216;\u00a7&amp;,&#8217;%%<br \/>\nSE&#8217;\u00a5WEE?~i :   %&amp; &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>RANEITHA &#8221; &#8216;<br \/>\nSIG Cf\u00a7-\u00e9i-\u00e9IE(\u00a7&lt;.&#039;\u00a3a?~&#039;1ARI<br \/>\nmm 19 vzgass .  &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>QM&#8221;: S1.5?&#8217;\u00a3;&#8217;s.f.:&#8217;*=:\u00abF.,.3}\u00a3 CLUE-3<br \/>\nQKSHME &#8216;?\u00e9AR\ufb01\u00abi&#8217;31\u00a54HA :E}(TE_&#8217;:3*\u00a7&#8221;_.S&gt;S(3?&#8217;\u00a7 <\/p>\n<p>zvsasagz R0-.A E&#8217;:v&#8221;&#8221;~~..    <\/p>\n<pre>\n\u00a7s'3\\?\u00a7_\u00a7f5~;L{3.?&lt;-E % \n\ny     PETITIGNER\n(av sea 3 S2. H;m;mA:41,%%Aav.\u00a7 %\n\nANS:\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>\u00a75&#8243;i&#8217;Af3&#8217;E 15$&#8217;1&#8217;v-.\u00a7\u00a7E%z&#8217;\u00bb}&#8221;E\ufb01T&#8217;EE\\.\u00a7S1Cv:&#8221;~\u00e9<br \/>\n3 &#8216;:20 am: s*m&#8221;r:c&amp;r\u00e9&amp; \u00ab<br \/>\n RESPONQENT<\/p>\n<p>cazmmaa \u00a3&gt;\u00e9frI%&#8217;%:m IS men WS 439, came. PRAYMG TO<\/p>\n<p>6\/$57\/v<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><br \/>\nQ\ufb01i<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner is ranked as 2*&#8221; accused&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>f~ic.\u00a75fQ$ are the fife sf New Extehsicn   H<\/p>\n<p>Tumkur, regigterec\u00e9 fer&#8217; the sfferace 3\u00a72\ufb01&#8217;\u00a3$h&#8217;a!&#8221;3 !\u00a3;:_u:*:d\u00e9\u00a7E\u00ab$Vf\u00a7\u00a7f:t\u00e9\u00e9nvL&#8217;E<\/p>\n<p>392, I.P.C..\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The setitk:-net is in jud%ci\u00e9iL&#8217;L\u00bb\u00a7;\u00a7i:\u00a7.t\u00a7dy&#8221;ar\u00a7\u00e9*::\u00e9*ee?\u00e9f%\u00e9V%r: he<\/p>\n<p>has mz\u00e9ved this getitian v2:?::&#8217;:*:\u00a7Aer S&#8217;\u00e9&#8217;ir\u00a7f:iV&#8217;::%i.._\u00abi1s&#8217; 3\u00b0&#8217;\u00a2.3,. \u20acr.?}C. <\/p>\n<p>3,  State %4:a\u00absv__:mtf\u00a7i\u00e9\u20ac.:f~ \u00e9\u00e9iiaw&#8217;c\u00a7.u%:f\u00e9rJ:i\u00a7.v'&#8221;\u00e9&#8217;\u00a7:pase baii.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. %i\u00a7we&#8217;g;er\u00a7;\u00bbv  5\u00a7}a&#8211;3r:e\u00bb  r%\u00a7.-::if&#8221;\u00a7.c\u00a7=$aVf{i*:&#8217; \u00e9iV&#8217;d E\ufb01lifi\ufb01\u00e9f for the<br \/>\ni\u00a33E&#8217;Eif\u00a7G\u00a73E\u00a7&#8217;__i\u00a7\u00a7&#8221;2_\u20ac&#8221;\u00a7:&#8221;,\u00a7E\u00a5;f:f\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01\u00e9\u00a7 &#8216;  ;E e::;a;;f_:%s:\u00e9d Ad\u00e9i. 3?? ta urea<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7rc:ur:\u00e9s7__er_a\u00a7iy &#8220;a:&#8217;;r5 =t6\u00ab \u00e9vss\u00a7;=3t the cam&#8217;? $2&#8242;: maier\u00e9ai<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7mFermati\u00a7n;&#8217;&#8211;  *<\/p>\n<p>__._5&#8242;. ,_{&#8216;f%&#8217;ia:A.r&#8217;:at2.2?;&#8217;*&#8221;&#8216;;.~_,ggaiieia\ufb01atiosi against the petiticmer is that<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01iarzjun\u00e9aiai&#8217;: aierzg with his wife were<\/p>\n<p>r:\u00e9\u00a7u&#8217;e&#8221;%&#8211;&#8216;z_\u00a7\u00a7:\u00a7V&#8221;\u00e9&#8217;\u00a7er&#8217;~:jr&#8217;:\u00e9&#8217;\u00e9king \u00a7Li?&#8217;C?&#8217;e3$$$ in the iccai market in<\/p>\n<p>V .*\u00a7&#8221;umi\u00a3i:r, ~-.;%&#8217;\u00a7t'&lt;:\u00a7%m\u00a7t 5.35 am. when mass were waikinc near<\/p>\n<p> ::;isjg_\u00a2g5gl&#039;E2:u\u00a7 csrrspiex, it is aiiaged twe zaersons riding a two<\/p>\n<p> ~_w\u00a7:.e}\u00e9$e:r came near them on 10*&quot; Crass, T.P.Kaiiasam Row<\/p>\n<p>3314\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\nand srzatcha\u00e9 the @356 \ufb01\u00e9\ufb01kia\u00e9\u00e9 wam by \u00a3333 wife W&amp;\u00a7\u00a7h\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;1\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>25 grams wcrth Rs.2S,\u00a3_}GG;&#8217;-a They then \ufb01\u00e9fi.<\/p>\n<p>5, Theua\u00e9i the irscident $3 sai\u00e9 ta have <\/p>\n<p>:1\u00a7,4,2G:38, the campiairram&#8221;; arz\u00e9 vi\u00e9tim did_.V::&#8221;\u00a2 \u20ac.:.:?:.i;:\u00e9v\u00e9.e  Tt\u00e9i<\/p>\n<p>repcri the matter tiii :3.5,2oas  a;a:&#8217;r::\u00a2i\u00bb;\u00ab%}aa\u00a7AL%%%ak%s:f\u00a5\ufb01:T:::\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>revert E3 \ufb02ied. The petitisner _aim1 {;..A\u00a7%\u00e9\u00a7th at3 ei::Ah\u00e9i&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>Evianjunatha came ta be arr\u00e9sii\u00e9d on &#8216;3.\u20ac\u00a7,#-&#8216;h.&#8217;V};-GG \u00a7:_ ti1e <\/p>\n<p>wiica, i.j\u00a5&#8217;\u00a5\ufb01\u00a7i.\u00a5\u00a7tE\u00e9iY, ncf &#8216;if; c\u00a2\u00abii&#8217;?\u00a7ie\u00a7f;t\u00a7\u00a7j\u00a7:%V&#8217;\u00bb&#8221;&#8216;%*.i\u00a7f:h isiif\u00e9sii\u00e9aiien $f<\/p>\n<p>izhe inci\ufb01erzt if: aijesiiers, ise:&#8217;ai;&#8217;u\u00a7re[\u00a7ar\u00e9 r}::L{&#8216;3\u00a7Vf4;::aa8 there was<\/p>\n<p>219 reseif %\u00e9T::&#8217;\u00a9.ij&#8217;%;,335%:&#8221;r::r\ufb01i:a%ree&#8217;:\u00e9\u00e9&#8217;at&#8217;fi1a soiica stafi\u00e9n.<\/p>\n<p>5: i_&amp;a]:in\u00a7e:\ufb01 cams\u00e9i f:$&#8221;&#8216;r,t&#8221;&#8216;r&#8217;:\u00e9 petitioner, painting cut thege<\/p>\n<p>:i:*:L;:&#8217;f:s&#8221;ia;*\u00a7:&amp;s,&#8221;\u00bbg\ufb01hvfeniis tf\ufb01at the petiiicnars have been<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7;\u00a7?\u00e9*::r\u00a7:i:;a,te\u00e9 in the C35-E is Ennecani. &#8216;\u00a7&#8221;ir&#8221;:ere is<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9\u00a75:3:uie\u00a3\u00a7%&#8221;\u00ab\u00ab.irf\u00a7_oEfe\u00e9svery ax any materiai avaiiaime with t\ufb01e<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;m*\u20ac2$&#8217;&amp;c2.\u00e9%.\u00a7T0&#8217;rs-. t\u00a7&#8217;: shew ms irsveivemerst in the {:\u00a5&#8217;\u00a7?&#8217;\u00a5&#8221;&#8216;f\u00e9 in<\/p>\n<p> ?2   warned A\u00e9di. S9? was aged ta furnish irzf\u00e9armatien<\/p>\n<p>T &#8216;ta? ta im\u00e9\u00e9if&#8217; what cirgum\u00e9tasmes the geiitieners were<\/p>\n<p>V U arrest\u00e9\u00e9 er: 39,4,2C:@8 aad arrai\ufb01ne\u00e9 as accused herein&#8221; Ha<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00e9iii\u00e9fe\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01 his Erza\u00e9iiity ta gin paint any such mat&amp;riai&#8217;:&#8217;a}f\u00a7.\u00a7h.e<\/p>\n<p>gr\u00e9uad \ufb01at their wrzcer\ufb01e\u00e9 cfficars have mt rna\ufb01a va:.\u00a7Vav\u00e9\u00a7&#8217;a%b;i&#8217; a&#8211;T &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>frsa recer\u00e9g, H\u00e9wever, \ufb01e $23b:&#8217;:1it\u00a7;~&#8217;v:i&#8217;2.a.t  svi,\u00e9s?g:4Ii\u00a2i:;\u00bbf&#8217;i&#8217;:v,.&#8217;_j&#8217;;t%&#8217;:;e:t.V V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;agtiticerzer am another were arrest\u00e9if&#8217;Vce%{ _3i3.\u00ab\u00a2&#8217;;;2C\u00a7Q3&#8242;,va:icEV&#8217;L_:t%3;\u00e9y*: _<\/p>\n<p>gave veiuntary statement \u00a5ea:\u00a3\u00a7:ii;:..;&#8217;:o \u00a5&#8217;E 5\u00a2.:%&#8217;3_&#8217;_&#8217;ef\u00e9!&#8217;T&#8217;y: \u20acgf&#8221;a &#8216;r:&#8221;2=a;i:caia &#8221; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>autra an\ufb01 ma\ufb01a? cycie. V  _<\/p>\n<p>3. The matefia! an   ccsnfi\ufb01ence at<br \/>\nthis jurzcture tie.j\u00a7&lt;:ce\u00a7t:&quot;Vif&#039;;&#039;a_%} dl;:i:r\u00ab\u00e9\u00a7;gV i.\u00e9&#039;itii\u00e9.}&#039;%&#039;\u00a7&#039;iir2ati2*:q materiai<br \/>\nagairs\ufb01t ihE\u00a7~\u00a7\u00a7t%.\u00a7i\u00a7\u00a7\u00abi\u00a7\u20acE\u00a75\u00e99\u00a7~\u00a7$;  the prcsecuticn<br \/>\nhas :6  t_a \u00e9\u00a7t%biish the charge \ufb01urirza<br \/>\ntriai. 3&#039;-&#039;vx0A&#039;;_:tE*:&amp;V  a persan in \u00e9etentiarz,<\/p>\n<p>&#039;:3:*;ies5. 3 pri\u00e9%1&#039;aV_:Vfa:.i\u20ace :: a$\u00e97 is mad\u00e9 gut, it wii\u00e9 he unjust is<\/p>\n<p> &#039; &quot;x*:Ee;\u00a7&#039;1;i.i}\u00e9 irtne a\u00a2t:ti\u00a7h\u00e9r&quot;&#039;\u00e9f his iiherty.<\/p>\n<p>I \u00a7..    F\u00e9 .rf&quot;&#039;i,\u00a7%_\u00e9\u00e9jeiisons state\u00e9 a\ufb01ave, the pet\u00e9tiar: i-3 aiicwed.<\/p>\n<p> _ Tf:e&quot;&quot;r:etif\u00a7;i\u00e9;:iL\u00e9?A\u00a7s reiease-d an tmii wbject is the fciiowirza<\/p>\n<p>K &#039; &quot;  &#039; *  : &#039;~:::fn\ufb01_ \u00e9ti .\u00e9r:\u00abs::\n<\/p>\n<p>   7:) He sha\ufb01 execute a bcnd for RS.2S,i.&#8217;iG\ufb01\/- with twe<\/p>\n<p>safeties far&#8217; the iike sum to the satisfacticm cf the<\/p>\n<p>triai mart;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2) He shak mark hi$ attandance once in <\/p>\n<p>befere the juris\u00e9ictienai poiice betweg\ufb01  _<\/p>\n<p>and 7,00 pm. tiii c\u00e9mmencement c1fVtr.i&#8217;faj\u00a7;,v &#8216; * &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>3) He \ufb01haii net ieave the juri:\u00a7\u00e9\u00a5\u00a7t\u00a7\u00e9r:..v\u00e9*f_ f~i-;ew:_&#8217;:$:iz\u00a7e_:a**:$Va&#8217;i\u00a7%i&#8217;\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>arm? _  . ._  ..\n<\/p>\n<p>4) He shaii net temp\u00e9r v\u00e9it\ufb01&#8217; ;*:_zfes\u00aba}:::t\u00ab_i7\u00e9r2&#8242;: mvgteriai our<br \/>\n{Jrevaii upon th\u00e9.:gitne\u00e9\u00e9\u00a73{&#8220;;;y:&#8217;a.::&#8217;v me\u00e9\ufb01sg&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Petite Statie\ufb01, Tumkur, v~ii&#8217;th\u00e9:;t&#8221;xpraae&#8217;. b&amp;r::1is\u00a7i\u00aba\ufb01&#8217;\u00a7v._<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008 Author: Jawad Rahim TU?v%%&lt;vR% j?-\u00a70:\u00a7V\u00a7\u00a7}&#039;:\u00a7f?A, HCG?) % 1aE;.EAsE&#039;i:&quot;He PET&#039;\u00a3TIQ?\\iER. on BAIL. m c.c. 1399,\/as i&#039;i\ufb01_R:ME ;x;e.\u00a75;&#039;a::s3) &lt;3? New ExTE:~:swN 9.5., Tum-:i.:a, ms: ,.&quot;i7}-\u00a5EL~-FILE 9; ms AD\u20ac)L.CIX!Ii. JUQGE {SR;.9!&#039;\u00e9.} &amp; cam, &#039;= TU&#039;\u00a7&#039;4\u00a7(_\u00a7.;R, WHICH is REGESTERED F-&#039;QR THE GFFENCE ~&#039;.&#039;.&#8211;PU\u00a7\u00e9ISi&#8211;%A8LE ugs 392,1:-*rc. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-170776","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-11T09:13:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-11T09:13:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":981,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-11T09:13:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-11T09:13:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-11T09:13:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008"},"wordCount":981,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008","name":"Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-11T09:13:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ranjitha-vs-state-by-new-extension-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Ranjitha vs State By New Extension on 5 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170776","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=170776"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170776\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=170776"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=170776"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=170776"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}