{"id":17131,"date":"2010-07-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010"},"modified":"2015-03-27T20:28:54","modified_gmt":"2015-03-27T14:58:54","slug":"s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 61 of 2005(C)\n\n\n1. S.ANANDAVALLY AMMA, AGED 53 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. R.REJITHLAL, AGED 37 YEARS,\n3. R.SUJITH, AGED 23 YEARS, S\/O.LATE\n4. AMMUKUTTY AMMA P.AMMU AMMA, AGED 77\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. BAIJU SIMON, S\/O.ANTONY, EARESSERIL\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. VARGHESE, S\/O.VARKEY, CHIRAKKAL HOUSE,\n\n3. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.KRISHNAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :29\/07\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n              A.K. BASHEER &amp; P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n\n           ------------------------------------------------------\n\n                          M.A.C.A. 61 of 2005\n\n           ------------------------------------------------------\n\n                          Dated: JULY 29, 2010\n\n                              JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>      One Ramachandran Nair, a Sorting Assistant in Railway Mail<\/p>\n<p>Service at Ernakulam, died in a motor accident that occurred on July<\/p>\n<p>3, 1998 at 6.30 a.m. at Aroor Church Junction.                The accident<\/p>\n<p>happened while he was about to get into            a private bus bearing<\/p>\n<p>Regn.No.KL-7\/K-6498, and before he could fully step into the bus, 1st<\/p>\n<p>respondent, conductor of the bus, gave double bell and the driver of<\/p>\n<p>the bus took the bus forward, as a result of which he fell down and<\/p>\n<p>sustained   serious injuries.    He succumbed to the injuries sustained<\/p>\n<p>while undergoing treatment in the hospital on July 5, 1998.<\/p>\n<p>      2.   The claimants who are the wife,         children and mother of<\/p>\n<p>the deceased filed the OP before the Tribunal under Sec.166 of the<\/p>\n<p>Motor Vehicles Act, claiming a compensation of Rs.16 lakhs alleging<\/p>\n<p>negligence against the 1st respondent, conductor of the offending bus.<\/p>\n<p>Respondents 1 and 2, the conductor and the owner of the offending<\/p>\n<p>bus, remained absent before the Tribunal.       Respondent No.3, insurer<\/p>\n<p>of the offending bus, filed a written statement admitting the policy, but<\/p>\n<p>contended that the accident occurred due to negligence of the<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A. 61 of 2005<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>deceased.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.      PWs.1 and 2 were examined and Exts.A1 to A10 were<\/p>\n<p>marked on the side of the claimants before the Tribunal. On the side<\/p>\n<p>of the contesting 3rd respondent, Ext.B1 was marked.               On an<\/p>\n<p>appreciation of evidence the Tribunal awarded a total compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.4,68,000\/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date<\/p>\n<p>of petition till realisation and also a cost of Rs.4500\/-. The claimants<\/p>\n<p>have now come up in appeal challenging the quantum of compensation<\/p>\n<p>awarded by the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4. Heard counsel for the appellants\/claimants and the Insurance<\/p>\n<p>Company.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5.    The accident is not disputed.      The finding of the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>that the accident occurred due to the negligence on the part of the 1st<\/p>\n<p>respondent is not challenged in this appeal.          Therefore the only<\/p>\n<p>question which arises for consideration is whether the claimant is<\/p>\n<p>entitled to any enhanced compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.      The break up of the compensation amount awarded is as<\/p>\n<p>under:\n<\/p>\n<pre>loss of dependency                                Rs.4,32,000\/-\n\nloss of consortium, love and affection etc.           15,000\/-\n\nmedical expenses                                      13,000\/-\n\nfuneral expenses                                       3,000\/-\n\npain and sufferings                                    5000\/-\n\nM.A.C.A. 61 of 2005\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  3<\/span>\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>      7.    Counsel for the appellant sought enhancement of the<\/p>\n<p>compensation for the loss of dependency.        The Tribunal took the<\/p>\n<p>monthly income of the deceased as Rs.6000\/-, which comes to<\/p>\n<p>Rs.72000\/- per annum.         After deducting 1\/3rd for his personal<\/p>\n<p>expenses, Rs.48,000\/- was taken as his annual contribution to his<\/p>\n<p>family.        Adopting a multiplier of 9, the Tribunal awarded<\/p>\n<p>Rs.4,32,000\/- for the loss of dependency. Ext.A7 salary certificate of<\/p>\n<p>the deceased shows that he was drawing a salary of Rs.8377\/-.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore the Tribunal is perfectly justified in taking his monthly<\/p>\n<p>income as Rs.6000\/-. The Tribunal took the multiplier as 9 only. As<\/p>\n<p>the deceased was aged 51 at the time of the accident, we feel that a<\/p>\n<p>multiplier of 11 would be reasonable in this case. Thus calculated, for<\/p>\n<p>the disability caused the claimants are entitled to a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.5,28,000\/- for loss of dependency. Thus the claimants are entitled<\/p>\n<p>to an additional compensation of Rs.96,000\/- on this count.<\/p>\n<p>      8.    The Tribunal awarded Rs.5000\/- for pain and suffering<\/p>\n<p>endured by the deceased.      In the circumstances of the case we feel<\/p>\n<p>that a compensation of Rs.15,000\/- would be reasonable on this count.<\/p>\n<p>Thus the claimants are entitled to an additional compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.10,000\/- on this count.      As regards the compensation awarded<\/p>\n<p>under other heads, we find the same to be reasonable and therefore<\/p>\n<p>we are not disturbing the same.\n<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A. 61 of 2005<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      9. Thus the claimants are entitled to an additional compensation<\/p>\n<p>of Rs.1,06,000\/-.     The Tribunal awarded interest only @ 6% per<\/p>\n<p>annum, which is very low.    The claimants are entitled to interest @<\/p>\n<p>7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realisation on the<\/p>\n<p>compensation already awarded and on the enhanced compensation<\/p>\n<p>and proportionate cost. The 3rd respondent being the insurer of the<\/p>\n<p>offending vehicle shall deposit the amount before the Tribunal within<\/p>\n<p>two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The<\/p>\n<p>award of the Tribunal is modified to the above extent.<\/p>\n<p>      The appeal is disposed of as found above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                         P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>mt\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 61 of 2005(C) 1. S.ANANDAVALLY AMMA, AGED 53 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner 2. R.REJITHLAL, AGED 37 YEARS, 3. R.SUJITH, AGED 23 YEARS, S\/O.LATE 4. AMMUKUTTY AMMA P.AMMU AMMA, AGED 77 Vs 1. BAIJU SIMON, S\/O.ANTONY, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-27T14:58:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-27T14:58:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":714,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010\",\"name\":\"S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-27T14:58:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-27T14:58:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-27T14:58:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010"},"wordCount":714,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010","name":"S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-27T14:58:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anandavally-amma-vs-baiju-simon-on-29-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S.Anandavally Amma vs Baiju Simon on 29 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17131"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17131\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}