{"id":171336,"date":"2010-05-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010"},"modified":"2015-07-11T15:18:39","modified_gmt":"2015-07-11T09:48:39","slug":"mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                          Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                                                  CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000542\n                                                                                      Dated\u00a0May\u00a024,\u00a02010\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                             :    Shri\u00a0Sajjan\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Verma\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority                      :    Bharat\u00a0Wagon\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Engg.\u00a0Co.\u00a0Ltd\n\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.14.9.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Bharat\u00a0Wagon\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Engg.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Co.\u00a0 Ltd. \u00a0 \u00a0 He \u00a0 requested \u00a0 for\u00a0 information \u00a0 against \u00a06 \u00a0points\u00a0including\u00a0 all\u00a0applicable \u00a0 rules,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       notifications, \u00a0 guidelines \u00a0 towards \u00a0 reservation \u00a0 to \u00a0 SC\/ST\/OBC\/PH, \u00a0 ladies \u00a0 etc. \u00a0 Shri\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       P.Panjiyar\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a012.10.09\u00a0denying\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a05\u00a0u\/s\u00a08(1)(e)\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       8(1)(j)\u00a0while\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0remaining\u00a0points\u00a0are\u00a0ambiguous\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       and\u00a0not\u00a0specific.\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.26.10.09\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0reiterating\u00a0his\u00a0request\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0Shri\u00a0B.K.Thakur,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a011.12.09\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0appeal\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0CPIO\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       is\u00a0accepted \u00a0in\u00a0part\u00a0 except \u00a0for\u00a0 point \u00a05.\u00a0 \u00a0He \u00a0directed\u00a0the \u00a0CPIO\u00a0 to\u00a0 provide\u00a0the \u00a0certified\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       copies\u00a0of\u00a0relevant\u00a0documents\u00a0except\u00a0against\u00a0\u00a0S.No.5\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant.\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed \u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.2.2.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0missing\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       information.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.     The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       for\u00a0May\u00a0\u00a024,\u00a02010.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.     Respondents\u00a0were\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.<\/p>\n<p>4.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.<br \/>\n Decision<\/p>\n<p>5.    The\u00a0Commission\u00a0received\u00a0a\u00a0rejoinder\u00a0dt.13.5.10\u00a0from\u00a0Shri\u00a0P.Panjiyar,\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0after\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      the \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 had \u00a0 passed \u00a0 his \u00a0 orders \u00a0 on \u00a0 11.12.09 \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 case \u00a0 of \u00a0 both \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      Appellant\u00a0 \u00a0and\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0Hari\u00a0Kishor\u00a0Prasad,\u00a0directing\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      with\u00a0some\u00a0exception.\u00a0Both\u00a0letters\u00a0 \u00a0were\u00a0received\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0date\u00a0 \u00a0with\u00a0consecutive\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      dispatch\u00a0numbers\u00a0marked\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0were\u00a0mistakenly\u00a0filed\u00a0without\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      placing\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0before\u00a0him.\u00a0\u00a0As\u00a0a\u00a0consequence,\u00a0subsequent\u00a0action\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0taken\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      in\u00a0time\u00a0and\u00a0this\u00a0fact\u00a0was\u00a0submitted\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0course\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0held\u00a0on\u00a010.5.10.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      After\u00a0knowing\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0facts,\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0furnished\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a06.5.10\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      and\u00a0as\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0aware\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0had\u00a0also\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0before\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      CIC,\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0discussed\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0course\u00a0of\u00a0hearing\u00a0on\u00a010.5.10\u00a0itself.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      Further, \u00a0 as \u00a0 directed \u00a0 during \u00a0 the \u00a0 course \u00a0 of \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 on \u00a0 10.5.10, \u00a0 the \u00a0 individual \u00a0 marks\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      awarded\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0interviewer\u00a0after\u00a0concealing\u00a0their\u00a0identity\u00a0is\u00a0being\u00a0collected\u00a0for\u00a0furnishing\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      the\u00a0same\u00a0to\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0Appellants\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0earliest.\u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0further\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      employee\u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0whose\u00a0negligence\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0lapses\u00a0had\u00a0occurred,\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0strictly\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      warned\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0very\u00a0cautious\u00a0and\u00a0alert\u00a0to\u00a0avoid\u00a0recurrence\u00a0of\u00a0such\u00a0lapses\u00a0in\u00a0future.<\/p>\n<p>6.    The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a01,\u00a02\u00a0and\u00a05\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      were\u00a0not\u00a0provided.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7.    The \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 after \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 the \u00a0 submissions \u00a0 made \u00a0 directs \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 to \u00a0 provide \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      missing \u00a0 information \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 information \u00a0 should \u00a0 reach \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 by\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      24.6.10\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a01.7.10.<\/p>\n<p>8.    The\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0showcause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0a\u00a0penalty\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.250\/\u00ad\u00a0per\u00a0day\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      imposed \u00a0 upon \u00a0 him \u00a0 for \u00a0 not \u00a0 furnishing \u00a0 the \u00a0 reply \u00a0 within \u00a0 the \u00a0 mandatory \u00a0 period. \u00a0 The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      information\u00a0to\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a025\u00a0June,\u00a02010.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>9.    The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                       Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.      Shri\u00a0Sajjan\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Verma<br \/>\n        Accounts\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Asstt.\n<\/p>\n<p>        EC\u00a0No.11097<br \/>\n        Bharat\u00a0Wagon\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Engg.\u00a0Co.\u00a0Ltd<br \/>\n        Muzaffarpur\u00a0Unit<br \/>\n        Muzaffarpur\u00a0842\u00a0001<\/p>\n<p>2.      The\u00a0PIO<br \/>\n        Bharat\u00a0Wagon\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Engg.\u00a0Co.\u00a0Ltd<br \/>\n        &#8216;C&#8217;\u00a0Block,\u00a05th\u00a0Floor<br \/>\n        Mauryalok\u00a0Complex<br \/>\n        Dak\u00a0Bungalow\u00a0Road<br \/>\n        Patna<\/p>\n<p>3.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n        Bharat\u00a0Wagon\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Engg.\u00a0Co.\u00a0Ltd<br \/>\n        &#8216;C&#8217;\u00a0Block,\u00a05th\u00a0Floor<br \/>\n        Mauryalok\u00a0Complex<br \/>\n        Dak\u00a0Bungalow\u00a0Road<br \/>\n        Patna<\/p>\n<p>4.      Officer\u00a0incharge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n<p>5.      Press\u00a0E\u00a0Group,\u00a0CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000542 Dated\u00a0May\u00a024,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Shri\u00a0Sajjan\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Verma Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority : Bharat\u00a0Wagon\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Engg.\u00a0Co.\u00a0Ltd Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.14.9.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Bharat\u00a0Wagon\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Engg.\u00a0 Co.\u00a0 Ltd. \u00a0 \u00a0 He \u00a0 requested \u00a0 for\u00a0 information \u00a0 against \u00a06 \u00a0points\u00a0including\u00a0 all\u00a0applicable \u00a0 rules,\u00a0 notifications, \u00a0 guidelines \u00a0 towards \u00a0 reservation \u00a0 to \u00a0 SC\/ST\/OBC\/PH, \u00a0 ladies [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-171336","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-11T09:48:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-11T09:48:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":574,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-11T09:48:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-11T09:48:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-11T09:48:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010"},"wordCount":574,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010","name":"Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-11T09:48:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sajjan-kumarverma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Sajjan Kumarverma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171336","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=171336"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171336\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=171336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=171336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=171336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}