{"id":171474,"date":"2009-12-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009"},"modified":"2018-08-08T23:17:02","modified_gmt":"2018-08-08T17:47:02","slug":"p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 33397 of 2009(T)\n\n\n1. P.K.USMAN, MANAGING PARTNER, P.K. &amp; SONS\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. CORPORATION OF CALICUT,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN\n\n Dated :18\/12\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n         THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.\n\n  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n\n            W.P.(C).No.33397 of 2009-T\n\n  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n\n     Dated this the 18th day of December, 2009.\n\n                     JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>                                         &#8220;CR&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> Is the Secretary of a Municipality empowered to<\/p>\n<p> issue   permission,  transferring   a  development<\/p>\n<p> permit or a building permit in part and allowing<\/p>\n<p> the commencement or continuation of the work<\/p>\n<p> following such transfer?\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>1.The  petitioner   obtained   a  development   and<\/p>\n<p> building  permit.  Later,   respondents  2  and 3<\/p>\n<p> purchased a portion of the land involved in that<\/p>\n<p> permit and the semi-finished structures standing<\/p>\n<p> thereon, with the right to continue to build that<\/p>\n<p> portion. The Secretary of the first respondent<\/p>\n<p> Corporation issued Ext.P8 taking the view that<\/p>\n<p> the permit cannot be transferred in part. Hence,<\/p>\n<p> this writ petition.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC33397\/09            -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2.Rule   21  of   the Kerala   Municipality Building<\/p>\n<p> Rules,    1999,  hereinafter   referred to  as  the<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;KMBR&#8221;, deals with intimation regarding transfer<\/p>\n<p> of plots. Sub-rule 1 thereof provides that every<\/p>\n<p> person holding development or building permit<\/p>\n<p> shall, unless the work has been executed in full<\/p>\n<p> and      development  or     occupancy   certificate<\/p>\n<p> obtained, inform the Secretary, every transfer of<\/p>\n<p> the whole or part of any property involved in the<\/p>\n<p> permit together with the name and address of the<\/p>\n<p> transferee and his intention to transfer, or<\/p>\n<p> otherwise, the permit. This provision itself is<\/p>\n<p> sufficient intrinsic tool, by way of statutory<\/p>\n<p> material, to hold that there is no prohibition<\/p>\n<p> for transfer of a part only, of any property<\/p>\n<p> involved in a development or building permit. All<\/p>\n<p> that is required is that the transfer of the<\/p>\n<p> property, whether in whole or in part, has to be<\/p>\n<p> intimated to the Secretary. The transferor shall<\/p>\n<p> also intimate to the Secretary his intention to<\/p>\n<p> transfer the permit or not. Therefore, this sub-<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC33397\/09           -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p> rule itself is sufficient indicator of the fact<\/p>\n<p> that there is no embargo for the owner of the<\/p>\n<p> land under development, or the building under<\/p>\n<p> construction, to transfer only a part of it. Such<\/p>\n<p> transfer does not require the permission of the<\/p>\n<p> Secretary. The transfer is to be intimated to the<\/p>\n<p> Secretary.   If   the     transferor informs  the<\/p>\n<p> Secretary   of his  intention     to transfer the<\/p>\n<p> permit, he essentially informs his consent for<\/p>\n<p> the transfer, following which the Secretary can<\/p>\n<p> proceed with any request for transfer of the<\/p>\n<p> permit on such basis.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.Sub-rule 2 of Rule 21 provides that every person<\/p>\n<p> in whose favour any property is transferred along<\/p>\n<p> with a development or building permit shall,<\/p>\n<p> before commencing or continuing the work, obtain<\/p>\n<p> permit    of the   Secretary    in  writing. This<\/p>\n<p> provision specifically amplifies the fact that<\/p>\n<p> the    rules envisage    that  the  Secretary can<\/p>\n<p> recognize transfer of the property, however that,<\/p>\n<p> the transferee shall not commence or continue the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC33397\/09             -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p> work without obtaining permit of the Secretary.<\/p>\n<p>4.Sub-rule 4 of Rule 21 provides that, if convinced<\/p>\n<p> that the transfer will not in any way badly<\/p>\n<p> affect    the   development    or  construction,  the<\/p>\n<p> Secretary    shall  issue     permission in   writing,<\/p>\n<p> transferring     the   permit     and   allowing  the<\/p>\n<p> commencement or continuation of the work. The<\/p>\n<p> said    sub   rule  prescribes     15  days  for  the<\/p>\n<p> Secretary to issue the permission from the date<\/p>\n<p> of receipt of the request for it.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.The conjoint effect of sub-rules 1 and 4 of Rule<\/p>\n<p> 21   is   that  the  holder     of  a  development or<\/p>\n<p> building    permit  is   entitled    to transfer  the<\/p>\n<p> property involved in the permit either in whole,<\/p>\n<p> or in part, and the Secretary is empowered to<\/p>\n<p> issue     permission transferring     the  permit  in<\/p>\n<p> accordance with such transfer, if convinced that<\/p>\n<p> the transfer will not, in any way, badly affect<\/p>\n<p> the development or construction. Therefore, if<\/p>\n<p> there is severance of the property in relation to<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC33397\/09            -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p> which the development or building permit was<\/p>\n<p> originally issued, the transfer of the portion of<\/p>\n<p> the    permit  can   be     effected in   favour of<\/p>\n<p> transferee, to facilitate further construction.<\/p>\n<p> But, this could be only made depending on, and<\/p>\n<p> fully in terms with, the lay out as approved in<\/p>\n<p> relation to the original permit and licence. By<\/p>\n<p> virtue of sub rule 2 of Rule 21 of KMBR, such<\/p>\n<p> application can be considered by the Secretary<\/p>\n<p> and permit that the Secretary would issue in<\/p>\n<p> terms of Rule 21(2) is a permit to continue the<\/p>\n<p> work in terms of the approved lay out and the<\/p>\n<p> building     permit\/development     permit   already<\/p>\n<p> granted.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6.The issue in hand can be looked at from a<\/p>\n<p> different angle also. Even if it were that the<\/p>\n<p> original grantee of the development or building<\/p>\n<p> permit completes the construction, there is no<\/p>\n<p> law which prohibits the transfer of the whole or<\/p>\n<p> a part of the completed building. Therefore, it<\/p>\n<p> would be unreasonable to say that such transfer<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC33397\/09           -: 6 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p> cannot be made before the completion. The very<\/p>\n<p> provision   in  Rule    21(1),  casting  statutory<\/p>\n<p> responsibility on the transferor to inform, by<\/p>\n<p> itself provides the statutory clue that transfer<\/p>\n<p> before completion is not forbidden. Logically,<\/p>\n<p> therefore, even in cases where the work is yet to<\/p>\n<p> be executed in full, the grantee of the licence<\/p>\n<p> is entitled to transfer any part of the property<\/p>\n<p> in relation to which the permit is granted and<\/p>\n<p> also to express his intention; thereby meaning,<\/p>\n<p> consent, to transfer the permit. Such transfer of<\/p>\n<p> the permit shall be in terms of the order of the<\/p>\n<p> Secretary   in consonance    with Rule  21(2)  in<\/p>\n<p> relation to the portion of the property covered<\/p>\n<p> by the transfer without, in any manner, impairing<\/p>\n<p> the lay out fixed originally, in relation to the<\/p>\n<p> development   or  building    permit,  as   issued<\/p>\n<p> initially to the transferor.\n<\/p>\n<p> In   the  light of  what    is stated  above,  the<\/p>\n<p> impugned Ext.P8 order taking the view that there<\/p>\n<p> cannot be a partial transfer of permit is quashed<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC33397\/09          -: 7 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p> and the first respondent is directed to take up<\/p>\n<p> the   request of  the   petitioner and  that  the<\/p>\n<p> respondents 2 and 3 may make, for transfer of the<\/p>\n<p> portion of Ext.P7 development\/building permit in<\/p>\n<p> terms of what is stated above. Let this be done<\/p>\n<p> within a period of two weeks from the date of<\/p>\n<p> receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition<\/p>\n<p> ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                       THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,<br \/>\n                                   JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sha\/0601<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 33397 of 2009(T) 1. P.K.USMAN, MANAGING PARTNER, P.K. &amp; SONS &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. CORPORATION OF CALICUT, &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI (SR.) For Respondent :SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN Dated [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-171474","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-08T17:47:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-08T17:47:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":988,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009\",\"name\":\"P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-08T17:47:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-08T17:47:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-08T17:47:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009"},"wordCount":988,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009","name":"P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-08T17:47:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-usman-vs-corporation-of-calicut-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.K.Usman vs Corporation Of Calicut on 18 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=171474"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171474\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=171474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=171474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=171474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}