{"id":171831,"date":"2008-11-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008"},"modified":"2015-02-25T20:16:54","modified_gmt":"2015-02-25T14:46:54","slug":"gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH mum' 01:' KARNA'rAKA-I 'f ~ \nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD4':      \nDATED THIS THE 2541* DAY_0Fn;ova;'.\"N1';\u00a7E}\u00a7\u00a2\u00bb%:\u00e96a s_V\u00a2.  V\n\nBEFORE'\n\nTHE HON'BLE Mriazgsrx\u00e9ia \u00a7;.w..N:;AT  \n\n \n\nQIQMINALAPETETIGN 1.zs1ci;'7_4\u00a7%s',:;2;oo8\n\nCRIMINAL 13ETrr1;\u00a7:N-.Nuj42Sz2\u00a7Q3_ \n\nBETWEEN:    \n\ncRL.p.N0.?\ufb01%.1?&gt;f:1\\'    \n\n1.\n\nco' \n\n    _--\ns\/e.shivappa :3   \nAge:\u00a331 \n\n. Gulappav \" \n\n &lt;5. Shivapfya. _ \n\n._A&#039;gc:;S2 grgars, \n\n[ &quot;Ra_vi,._ \u00a7\u00a7&#039;;f\u00a7u3.appa Dandin\n-.1\u00a7.g\u00a2:&#039;30&#039;;Y\u00a2&amp;I $;&quot;O&lt;:c:S&#039;tudcnt.\n\n. \n<\/pre>\n<p>S\/&#8217; Q-Mudakappa Dandin<\/p>\n<p>jAge:2.6 years, Occzstudcnt.<\/p>\n<p>.&#8217; &#8211;h4 \u00a7lhaningappa @ Maning<br \/>\n&#8216;E S\/anshivappa Dandin,<\/p>\n<p>All are R] o.Ka11ur village<br \/>\nTq. av. Dism\ufb02hazwad.\n<\/p>\n<p>(By Sn K.L.Pat11,, Adv.)<\/p>\n<p>AND:\n<\/p>\n<p>The State of Kaxnataka _ _<\/p>\n<p>By Police Station &#8216; _V<br \/>\nRep. by tate Public Pxosccuto\ufb01\u00e9, &#8211;.<br \/>\nDhazwad.  _ &#8221;  _ &#8230;f\u20acc-spondent<br \/>\n(By Sri Anand   _<\/p>\n<p>This cr1mma&#8217;v &#8216; 1 is\u00e9  &#8211;[_= ugqder section 439<br \/>\nCr.P.C. pray*in.g tg_&gt; emerge&#8217; thc:\u00a7n(:\u00ab..;1_a4:_titio1r;\u00a3;i:~$\/accused No.1 to<br \/>\n5 on bail  PC-S. iC&#8217;1&#8217;imc7&#8242; NO;C36{2008 which is change<\/p>\n<p>shected fqro\ufb01&#8217;_ei3;:g}3 pamgihahie my 3,143, 147, 148, 302 r\/w.<br \/>\n149 IPC ii&#8221;:  N034\/\u20ac28.03 the  of the Fast Court No.1,<\/p>\n<p>CRL.P.BiO,47498l&#8217;2\u00bb(-}\u00a7'{.&#8217;\u00a73::.\\&#8217;: <\/p>\n<p>Vit17;.ai_ &#8216;k &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>A  Ag\u20ac::23&#8243;3%ea:&#8221;ml 0cc:Agn&#8217;cu1ture<br \/>\n &#8216; R&#8217;io,Ka_1lur ViHa_&#8217;gc<br \/>\n Tq. {)ist;'{)_h.3i\u00a7:sz;sa:\u00a3f;. &#8230;PetEt:ioner<\/p>\n<p>(E&#8217;53r._:.&#8217;\u00a3*sriV_\u00a3~{~. Adv.)<\/p>\n<p> AND: &#8221; 1<\/p>\n<p> Th,&#8217;t;\u00a73tatc of Kammaka<br \/>\n&#8220;By Cg Police Station<\/p>\n<p>Rep. by State Public Prosecutor<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;&#8221;Dhanvad. &#8230;Respondcnt<\/p>\n<p>(By Sri Anand K\ufb02avalgimath, HCGP)<\/p>\n<p>   V&#8217; .__<\/p>\n<p>This criminal petition is \ufb01led under .em1,:i'(&#8216;&gt;n_&#8221;&#8211;.439<br \/>\nCr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner} -&#8216;.-_r,_;iie_<br \/>\nbail in Gadag P.S. Crime No.26\/2008 wh;&#8217;reI1.ie. Charge *<br \/>\nsheeted for offences punishable u\/5.143, 14-7*,v\u00ab1:4:8,&#8221;&#8217;30i3 I\/_w.&#8221; u b<br \/>\n149 IPC in s.(:. No.54\/08 on thev\ufb01lge orithc Fast r&#8217; o1tiers_;&#8221;&#8216;Vt&#8217;Ef;ie :(la$&#8217;f,  the &#8216; ;<br \/>\nCourt made the following:  &#8221; . V _    &#8216;V &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>    E  <\/p>\n<p>The petitieanezs  Nos. 1 to 5 in<br \/>\nS.C.No.54[     punishable under<\/p>\n<p>Sections 143,e7:%i:ze, 1%:\u00a23&#8242;,1V:\u00a7ti~2  149 me.<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;T116  the intervening night of<\/p>\n<p>3\/   to have committed murder of<\/p>\n<p> It__&#8230;i.Sv alleged that there was ?\/previous<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; e\ufb01emi!y&#8221;be*&amp;&#8217;een the family members of deceased and the<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; .3.  711; is the ease of prosecution during the intervening<\/p>\n<p> of 3\/4.2.2008, the deceased was keeping Watch of<\/p>\n<p>   of bengal game in his land. At that time, petitzionem<\/p>\n<p>and accused No.7&#8217; armed with deadly weapons, assaulteti<br \/>\ny\\; (3:\n<\/p>\n<p>and lance the deceased. On the renewing day;<br \/>\nbrother of deceased namely Channabasappa leeiifntj V&#8217;<br \/>\noccurrence and saw the dead bo\u00a2eyo&#8217;\u00a2frm;\u00a2\u00a7s\u00a2\u00a7:<br \/>\ncomplaint against petitionerg<br \/>\ntheir involvement. The    the V<br \/>\ninfoxma\ufb01on volunteered. by  I,  6, stones<\/p>\n<p>and iron rods were recovered;   \u00ab}<\/p>\n<p>4. I h;;.ve;,  = appearing for<br \/>\npetitioners&#8221;  and I have heen<\/p>\n<p>taken     <\/p>\n<p>6. The   petitioners would submit that<\/p>\n<p>goetifionefs&#8217;-\u00bba;fe&#8217;1invo1ved on suspicion. The statement of<\/p>\n<p>.  _  E:} 7e  &#8211;~ Moulasab is highly inczedibie. He<\/p>\n<p>  witnessed the alleged occurrence under<br \/>\nA  _em}_er of darmess. His statement does not disclose<\/p>\n<p>the  of light under which he was able to identiijz the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; x  Though he is alleged to have witnessed the<\/p>\n<p>occurrence, he had not informed the brother of the<\/p>\n<p>deceased, soon after the occurrence. His name does not<\/p>\n<p>N C  \u00a3:}M__\u00a3,__,.\u00a7_i__\\<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01nd place in the F.i.R. His statement under &#8220;:51<\/p>\n<p>Cr.P.C. was recorded on 55.2.2008.<\/p>\n<p>The learned Counsei   <\/p>\n<p>of Mylara G-owda that he had s\u00a7e;;;%~z2ae ac\u00e9ix\ufb01\u00e9fd \u00ab&#8217;= *&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>weapons of assault were re&#8217;t:; m:&#8221;&#8216;:&#8217;ng in&#8217;   is  higbty<\/p>\n<p>improbable.\n<\/p>\n<p>The \ufb01ngeppnntsgs aacusgg found in the<br \/>\nliquor bottlcf:     g\ufb01\u00e9iffitri\u00e9ncc. Themforc, his<br \/>\nprescncc   is con\ufb01xmad.\n<\/p>\n<p>tags  material collected durm&#8217; g<br \/>\nthe  gf  not su\ufb01cicnt to establish primal<\/p>\n<p>  They are the members of the same<\/p>\n<p>  ih\u00e9gtfom, they are entitled to release on bail<\/p>\n<p>  6.   ed Government Advocate would submit<\/p>\n<p> tl;1at&#8221;s!:.\u00e9k1:t::;r:zvcnts of Mouiasab and Mylara Gowda would prima<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; :~ * \u00abestablish involvement of petitioners. The weapons of<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   were recovered on the infonna\ufb01on volunteered by<\/p>\n<p>We ~l;vv&#8217;\u00a3i3&#8243;&#8221;L&lt;\u00ab\u00abe:A].:&#8230;.\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>petitioners in Cr1.P.No.7425\/ 2003 and the &quot;in<\/p>\n<p>CrI.P.No.&#039;7498\/ 2093.\n<\/p>\n<p>7&#8242;. On careful consixzlera\ufb01oga  <\/p>\n<p>11\/S. 173(5) Cr.P.C., I am of the  &#8220;p;\u00a7\u00a7secutio\u00a7:<\/p>\n<p>not made out prime facie._v&#8217;tage  1  fox?&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>o\ufb01enccs aiieged against thcmAfoeAihc&#8217;fp_11oefi\ufb01g ._neas;&gt;ns:<\/p>\n<p>a) The   the intervening<br \/>\nnight gf  statement of<br \/>\n    seen the accused<br \/>\n weapons, prima<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  Con\ufb01dence.\n<\/p>\n<p> of CW-10 Moulasab is not<br \/>\n. _V 4j&#8217;:41&#8243;s.1&#8242;.,_\u00ab_:v.VtA\u00a3=.-&#8217;12!.rv.&#8221;  statement. He did not inform<br \/>\n Vithe to the complainant. His name does<br \/>\n\u00ab V&#8217; 3  _  place in F.I.R. f-Iis statement was recorded<br \/>\nV  His statement does not disclose the<br \/>\n ..  &#8216;;$f0\u00a31&#8217;\u00a5Y26 of light under which he was able to identify<br \/>\n the accused.\n<\/p>\n<p>V &#8212;  The statement of Mylara Growda to the effect that all<\/p>\n<p>the accused armed with deadly weapons were<\/p>\n<p>rcturning in a group to the village <\/p>\n<p>am. on 4.2.2008 prima facic,<br \/>\ncon\ufb01dence.  &#8216;  V. &#8216;V 4&#8217; &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>:3) During the course of<br \/>\nseized a liquor   c&gt;f<br \/>\noccurrence     of<br \/>\naccused No#&#8217;?;&#8217;  &#8221; . 1\u00a7m\u00a7encc of accused<br \/>\nNo.7 &#8216;pea;    con\ufb01rmed.\n<\/p>\n<p>c)   that some<\/p>\n<p>    between the family<br \/>\n~- y\u00e9ars prior to the date of<br \/>\n  fcmotc.\n<\/p>\n<p>  1;). \\;i\u00a2W\u00ab.Qf___\u00abthe above, on the basis of ztcavezy of<\/p>\n<p>\u00bb ;stq;1e:3:_ aad: i:*Qn rods on the infaztmation said to have been<\/p>\n<p>   the petitioners in Cr1.P.No.7425\/ 2003 and<\/p>\n<p>tl\ufb02\u00e9  in Crl.P.No.&#8217;7498\/2008, it is not possible to<\/p>\n<p>3   &#8216;Ahmad  there exists a prima facic case against pctifiauionexs<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8220;&#8216;. fdr&#8217;\u00e91legcd o\ufb01&#8217;ences. The situation of pcti\ufb01oncrs \ufb02eeing away<\/p>\n<p> &#8221; ~  justice and tampering with prosecution Witnesses could<\/p>\n<p>be avoided by imposing suitable conditions. \/QJ<\/p>\n<p>9. Therefore, petitions are accepted.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioners in Cr1.P. No.742if&#8221;&gt;__\/  &#8216;V L.   V&#8217; &#8216;\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Crl. P. No.7498\/ 2003 are m1eased:b\ufb01ba\ufb02A_.s:ubjec t   <\/p>\n<p>conditions:\n<\/p>\n<p>1) The petitioners s1:ial1,_:\u00e9x\u00a2cuf\u00e9 Vhondgj f.Vq:ir V:\u00a7;&#8221;&#8216;s;Vt&#8217;1m of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.5O,O00\/-V   Sill\ufb02ti\ufb02s fer<br \/>\nthe like sum\n<\/p>\n<p>2) The pgg\ufb01giontgr\u00e9  or tamper with<br \/>\n   ._<br \/>\n  attend the Court.<\/p>\n<pre>\nSd\/-\u00bb\nJudge\n\n '.       ..... .. 'V\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008 Author: N.Ananda IN THE HIGH mum&#8217; 01:&#8217; KARNA&#8217;rAKA-I &#8216;f ~ CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD4&#8242;: DATED THIS THE 2541* DAY_0Fn;ova;&#8217;.&#8221;N1&#8242;;\u00a7E}\u00a7\u00a2\u00bb%:\u00e96a s_V\u00a2. V BEFORE&#8217; THE HON&#8217;BLE Mriazgsrx\u00e9ia \u00a7;.w..N:;AT QIQMINALAPETETIGN 1.zs1ci;&#8217;7_4\u00a7%s&#8217;,:;2;oo8 CRIMINAL 13ETrr1;\u00a7:N-.Nuj42Sz2\u00a7Q3_ BETWEEN: cRL.p.N0.?\ufb01%.1?&gt;f:1\\&#8217; 1. co&#8217; _&#8211; s\/e.shivappa :3 Age:\u00a331 . Gulappav &#8221; &lt;5. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-171831","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-25T14:46:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-25T14:46:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":929,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-25T14:46:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-25T14:46:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-25T14:46:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008"},"wordCount":929,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008","name":"Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-25T14:46:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gundappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gundappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171831","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=171831"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171831\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=171831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=171831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=171831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}