{"id":171879,"date":"2007-12-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-12-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007"},"modified":"2016-04-20T18:21:14","modified_gmt":"2016-04-20T12:51:14","slug":"panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007","title":{"rendered":"Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan &#8230; vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil &#8230; on 18 December, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan &#8230; vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil &#8230; on 18 December, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP No. 126 of 2001(F)\n\n\n\n1. PANAKKADAN VEETTIL KRISHNAN NAMBIAR\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. KAKKOTAKATH MEETHALE PURAYIL IBRAHIM\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.A.RAMADASAN\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\n\n Dated :18\/12\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                                                     K.T. SANKARAN, J.\n\n                           ...................................................................................\n\n                                               C.R.P.  No.  126  OF  2001\n\n                           ...................................................................................\n\n                                        Dated this the 18th December, 2007\n\n\n\n\n                                                            O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>           S.M.P.No.347 of 1987 on the file of the Land Tribunal, Taliparamba  was initiated<\/p>\n<p>showing     Krishnan   Nambiar     as   the   cultivating   tenant   (A   party)   and     Narayanan<\/p>\n<p>Namboodiripad     as   the     land   owner   (   B   party).     The   Land   Tribunal   passed   an   order<\/p>\n<p>dated 23.12.1987 ordering   assignment of the right,   title and interest of the landowner<\/p>\n<p>in favour  of the cultivating tenant  in respect of one acre of land in R.S.No. 116\/1A1 of<\/p>\n<p>Chuzhali amsom  and desom.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>           2.     Challenging   the   order   of   the   Land   Tribunal,   the   first   respondent   herein,<\/p>\n<p>namely,   Ibrahim filed A.A.No. 548 of 1997  before the Appellate Authority.  Before the<\/p>\n<p>Appellate Authority, it was contended  by  Ibrahim  that  himself   and  his brother    Hamza<\/p>\n<p>had obtained purchase certificate in respect of an extent of 2 acres of land in R.S.No.<\/p>\n<p>116\/1A1   as   per   the   order   in   S.M.P.No.295   of   1986   on   the   file   of   the   Land   Tribunal,<\/p>\n<p>Taliparamba.     Therefore,   according   to     Ibrahim,     the   order   in   favour   of   Krishnan<\/p>\n<p>Nambiar  in S.M.P.No. 347 of 1987 was not legal and proper.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>           3.  Since there was no  contest before the Land Tribunal,  the Land Tribunal did<\/p>\n<p>not   pass   an   order     considering     the   merits   of   the   contentions   put   forward   by   the<\/p>\n<p>cultivating tenant.  When a third party files  an appeal against such an order, and there<\/p>\n<p>is serious contest between the parties in respect of title and possession, normally, the<\/p>\n<p>Appellate   Authority   would   remit   the   matter     to   the     Land   Tribunal   affording   an<\/p>\n<p>opportunity to both the parties to adduce evidence.   Instead of doing so, the Appellate<\/p>\n<p>Authority held that after the assignment of an extent of 2 acres  in favour of Ibrahim and<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.  No.  126  OF  2001<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                         2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Hamza , the petitioner in the S.M.P., namely, Krishnan Nambiar, who  is said to be the<\/p>\n<p>manager   of   Jenmi,   fraudulently   obtained   an   order     in   his   favour.         This   finding   is<\/p>\n<p>unsustainable.    Without  considering  the evidence  and   without ascertaining  the  actual<\/p>\n<p>possession  and identity of the land, the Appellate Authority was not justified in holding<\/p>\n<p>that     Ibrahim   and   Hamza     are   the   real     cultivating   tenants   in   respect   of   the   land   in<\/p>\n<p>question, only on the basis that they had obtained  purchase certificate earlier.   This is<\/p>\n<p>a dispute which is to be considered on the merits, after affording opportunity to both the<\/p>\n<p>parties   to   produce   documents   and   to   adduce   evidence.       This   is     also   a   matter   for<\/p>\n<p>proper  verification by the authorized officer. Payment of revenue and payment of rent to<\/p>\n<p>the   Jenmi   and   other   facts   and   circumstances   of   the   case,   are   all   matters   to   be<\/p>\n<p>considered   in   a   case   of   rival   claims   by   two   sets   of   persons.     Only   on   the   basis   that<\/p>\n<p>Ibrahim   and   Hamza     got   purchase   certificate   earlier,   the   Appellate   Authority   was   not<\/p>\n<p>justified in holding  that Krishnan Nambiar  was not entitled to  assignment and that the<\/p>\n<p>Land  Tribunal passed the order erroneously.  In the judgment passed by the Appellate<\/p>\n<p>Authority, it is  stated thus:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;Another point to be noted is that the present respondent has not filed<\/p>\n<p>         any   appeal   against   the   Ext.A1   order   so   far   and   that   means   the<\/p>\n<p>         assignment of the land in favour of the appellants is admitted by the first<\/p>\n<p>         respondent.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>         4.     It   is   submitted   by   the   learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner   that     Krishnan<\/p>\n<p>Nambiar filed  an appeal against the order in S.M.P.No. 295 of 1986 with an application<\/p>\n<p>for   condonation   of   delay.     The   appellate   authority   had   allowed   that   application.<\/p>\n<p>Challenging  that  order,  the   legal  representatives  of   Ibrahim  filed     Writ  Petition   (C)No.<\/p>\n<p>15957 of 2006.  That Writ Petition was dismissed on 23.01.2007.  That means the order<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.  No.  126  OF  2001<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                        3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>in S.M.P.No. 295 of 1986 has not become final and the appeal filed  against that order<\/p>\n<p>is pending before the Appellate Authority.   Even otherwise, the order in S.M.P.No. 295<\/p>\n<p>of 1986 is not binding on Krishnan Nambiar, as he is not a party to that proceeding.<\/p>\n<p>         5.  In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the Appeal<\/p>\n<p>against S.M.P.No.   347 of 1987 also should be considered   by the Appellate Authority<\/p>\n<p>on   the   merits   afresh   ,   after   affording   an   opportunity   to   both   the   parties   to   adduce<\/p>\n<p>evidence and to produce documents.  I am not remanding the case to the Land Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>since     several   Land   Tribunals   have   been   abolished   and     it   would   be   difficult   for   the<\/p>\n<p>parties    to  appear  before  the   Land   Tribunal  in  these  circumstances.         The   Appellate<\/p>\n<p>Authority having  all the powers of the Land Tribunal, shall afford  an opportunity to both<\/p>\n<p>the  parties   to   adduce   evidence   and   to   produce   documents.   If   the   Appeal   against   the<\/p>\n<p>order in S.M.P.No. 295 of 1986 is pending before the Appellate Authority,   A.A.No. 548<\/p>\n<p>of   1997   and     the   appeal   arising   out   of   S.M.P.   No.   295   of   1986   shall   be   disposed   of<\/p>\n<p>together by the Appellate Auhority.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         The   Civil   Revision   Petition   is   accordingly   allowed   .       The   judgment   of   the<\/p>\n<p>Appellate Authority is set aside,   The matter is remanded to the Appellate Authority for<\/p>\n<p>fresh  disposal in the manner indicated above.  No order as to costs.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                     K.T. SANKARAN,<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                             JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>lk<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan &#8230; vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil &#8230; on 18 December, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP No. 126 of 2001(F) 1. PANAKKADAN VEETTIL KRISHNAN NAMBIAR &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. KAKKOTAKATH MEETHALE PURAYIL IBRAHIM &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.T.A.RAMADASAN For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-171879","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan ... vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil ... on 18 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan ... vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil ... on 18 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-20T12:51:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan &#8230; vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil &#8230; on 18 December, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-20T12:51:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007\"},\"wordCount\":846,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007\",\"name\":\"Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan ... vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil ... on 18 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-20T12:51:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan &#8230; vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil &#8230; on 18 December, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan ... vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil ... on 18 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan ... vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil ... on 18 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-20T12:51:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan &#8230; vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil &#8230; on 18 December, 2007","datePublished":"2007-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-20T12:51:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007"},"wordCount":846,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007","name":"Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan ... vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil ... on 18 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-20T12:51:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panakkadan-veettil-krishnan-vs-kakkotakath-meethale-purayil-on-18-december-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Panakkadan Veettil Krishnan &#8230; vs Kakkotakath Meethale Purayil &#8230; on 18 December, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171879","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=171879"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171879\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=171879"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=171879"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=171879"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}