{"id":172226,"date":"2010-09-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010"},"modified":"2016-06-12T18:59:58","modified_gmt":"2016-06-12T13:29:58","slug":"bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Bihar Minorities\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Patna High Court – Orders<\/div>\n
Bihar Minorities\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010<\/div>\n
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n                             CWJC No.7139 of 2004\n                        BIHAR MINORITIES\/AIDED PR.TEAC\n                                    Versus\n                           THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS\n                                 -----------\n<\/pre>\n
12   28.09.2010                This writ application has been filed<\/p>\n
                  in a representative capacity by the President<\/p>\n
                  of    Bihar    Minorities\/Aided             Primary    Teachers<\/p>\n
                  Association. The grievance of the petitioner<\/p>\n
                  Association         is     that    though       the     5th       Pay<\/p>\n
                  Revision      was    introduced        in    respect     of       the<\/p>\n
                  teachers of the Minority Institutions in the<\/p>\n
                  State with effect from 01.04.1989, its actual<\/p>\n
                  monetary benefits have been allowed to them<\/p>\n
                  with effect from 01.04.1993 only. It is an<\/p>\n
                  admitted position that this was done pursuant<\/p>\n
                  to a resolution of the Government contained<\/p>\n
                  in    memo    no.    3268      dated    05.11.1993.          It    is<\/p>\n
                  submitted that similarly the 6th Pay Revision<\/p>\n
                  has    been        introduced      in       respect     of        the<\/p>\n
                  teachers      of    the     Minority     Institutions         with<\/p>\n
                  effect       from    01.04.1997,         but    its    monetary<\/p>\n
                  benefits are being given to the teachers with<\/p>\n
                  effect       from    01.07.2005         only,    whereas          the<\/p>\n
                  teacher      of     other      Aided    Schools       have    been<\/p>\n
                  allowed      monetary       benefits     with     effect      from<\/p>\n
                  01.04.1989               and       01.04.1997             itself
\n                       2<\/span><\/p>\n
respectively.\n<\/p>\n
             The     submissions         of     learned      counsel<\/p>\n
for the petitioners are to fold, namely, (i)<\/p>\n
as     per     the        Government       decision         notified<\/p>\n
through letter no.1848 dated 19.04.1978, the<\/p>\n
teachers        and         non-teaching          employees         of<\/p>\n
Minority Institutions were to be treated at<\/p>\n
par with that of taken over Primary Schools<\/p>\n
in     the     matters       of     pay       scales,       Dearness<\/p>\n
Allowance and, (ii) This Court by a judgment<\/p>\n
rendered on 19.09.1997 in CWJC no. 5336 of<\/p>\n
1996 had already quashed the said part of the<\/p>\n
resolution dated 05.11.1993, by which it was<\/p>\n
held    that       teachers       and     other       employees     of<\/p>\n
Aided         Primary\/Middle              Schools           including<\/p>\n
Minority       schools         shall       be     entitled         for<\/p>\n
monetary       benefits        only       with        effect       from<\/p>\n
01.04.1993.          This    Court      also     held       that   the<\/p>\n
petitioners          and     other        similarly         situated<\/p>\n
teachers            and        employees               of      Aided<\/p>\n
Primary\/Middle             Schools        are     entitled          for<\/p>\n
revision of pay scale of which fixation is to<\/p>\n
be     made    with        effect       from    01.01.1986         and<\/p>\n
arrears of salary is to be paid with effect<\/p>\n
from 01.03.1989. He submits that the part of<\/p>\n
the     said    resolution,          which       is    the     sheet-
\n                    3<\/span><\/p>\n
anchor    of    the    case    of     the       respondents           for<\/p>\n
this   discrimination,          stands          already         quashed<\/p>\n
and,     therefore,            teachers              of      Minority<\/p>\n
Institutions      represented             by    the       Association<\/p>\n
are    also     entitled       for        payment          of        their<\/p>\n
arrears with effect from 01.03.1989.<\/p>\n
          The    findings       of        the    learned         Single<\/p>\n
Judge passed in the said judgment is fit to<\/p>\n
be reproduced, which is as under:-<\/p>\n
                              “I set aside the portion of the
\n                   impugned resolution dated 5.11.1993,
\n                   by which it has been ordered to pay
\n                   monetary benefits to the teachers and
\n                   other       employees        of     Aided
\n                   Primary\/Middle Schools with effect
\n                   from 01.04.1993.        I hold that the
\n                   petitioners     and    others    similarly
\n                   situated teachers and employees of
\n                   Aided Primary\/Middle Schools are
\n                   entitled for revision of pay scale of
\n                   which fixation is to be made with
\n                   effect from 01.01.1986 and arrears of
\n                   salary is to be made with effect from
\n                   01.03.1989.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
          The     above       findings          of    the       learned<\/p>\n
Single    Judge       shows    that        the       part       of    the<\/p>\n
resolution       dated        05.11.1993             treating          the<\/p>\n
teachers of Aided Primary\/Middle Schools, as<\/p>\n
well     as    that     of     the         Minority         Schools,<\/p>\n
differently       from        the     teachers             of        other<\/p>\n
Nationalized       Schools          was        quashed      by       this<\/p>\n
Court. It is also clear that the findings of
\n                    4<\/span><\/p>\n
the learned Single Judge are in rem and not<\/p>\n
in personem. Therefore, the same has to be<\/p>\n
applied in the cases of teachers and other<\/p>\n
employees     of     all      the    Aided     Primary\/Middle<\/p>\n
Schools of the State.\n<\/p>\n
              Learned         counsel     for      the        State<\/p>\n
submits that, in this judgment, the case of<\/p>\n
the    Minority        Aided        Institutions       was     not<\/p>\n
considered.     But,         to   this   Court    it     appears<\/p>\n
that if the teachers and other employees of<\/p>\n
Aided Primary\/Middle Schools were held to be<\/p>\n
entitled for the said benefit, there can be<\/p>\n
no    rationale        for    not     extending       the     said<\/p>\n
benefit to the teachers and other employees<\/p>\n
of Aided Minority Primary\/Middle Schools. It<\/p>\n
is    true    that      under        Article     14      of    the<\/p>\n
Constitution two different groups of persons<\/p>\n
or two groups of Institutions can be treated<\/p>\n
differently and policy decisions can be taken<\/p>\n
in    their     respect           differently.        But      this<\/p>\n
differential treatment must be based on some<\/p>\n
rationale.      If       the        respondents        fail      to<\/p>\n
establish      the      rationale        or      reasons        for<\/p>\n
treating two similarly situated Institutions<\/p>\n
differently, the act of the State shall be<\/p>\n
clearly      violative         of    Article     14      of    the
\n                      5<\/span><\/p>\n
Constitution.        This    is     also   clear     that      the<\/p>\n
offending part of the said resolution dated<\/p>\n
05.11.1993 which included both Minority Aided<\/p>\n
Schools      and     other     Aided       Schools,          stands<\/p>\n
quashed. Therefore, the State has to satisfy<\/p>\n
this Court as to why the said offending part<\/p>\n
of    the   said     resolution      can    be    treated        as<\/p>\n
operative         against    the     teachers      and       other<\/p>\n
employees     of     Aided     Minority      Primary\/Middle<\/p>\n
Schools. This requires a deeper analysis of<\/p>\n
the matter and consideration of the issue at<\/p>\n
the highest level of the Government.<\/p>\n
            Therefore,         learned           G.A.-V         is<\/p>\n
requested to call a meeting of the officials<\/p>\n
of    the   Department        and    discuss      the     matter<\/p>\n
along with them in the light of this order of<\/p>\n
the    Court.      After     due    deliberation         a     firm<\/p>\n
decision shall be taken by the Department,<\/p>\n
which shall be produced in this case through<\/p>\n
an appropriate counter affidavit, personally<\/p>\n
sworn by the Principal Secretary of the Human<\/p>\n
Resources Development Department.<\/p>\n
            For    convenience       of    learned       G.A.-V,<\/p>\n
let a copy of this order be served in his<\/p>\n
office. Learned G.A.-V is requested to ensure<\/p>\n
that the meeting is held and the appropriate
\n                           6<\/span><\/p>\n
          counter    affidavit   sworn   by   the   Principal<\/p>\n
          Secretary of the Human Resources Development<\/p>\n
          Department is filed in the case within two<\/p>\n
          weeks.\n<\/p>\n
                    Put up on 12th of October, 2010 within<\/p>\n
          first five cases.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Arvind\/                       ( J. N. Singh, J.)\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Patna High Court – Orders Bihar Minorities\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7139 of 2004 BIHAR MINORITIES\/AIDED PR.TEAC Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ———– 12 28.09.2010 This writ application has been filed in a representative capacity by […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-172226","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court-orders"],"yoast_head":"\nBihar Minorities\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bihar Minorities\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-12T13:29:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bihar Minorities\\\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-12T13:29:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":921,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court - Orders\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Bihar Minorities\\\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-12T13:29:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bihar Minorities\\\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bihar Minorities\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bihar Minorities\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-12T13:29:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bihar Minorities\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-12T13:29:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010"},"wordCount":921,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court - Orders"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010","name":"Bihar Minorities\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-12T13:29:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bihar-minoritiesaided-pr-teac-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bihar Minorities\/Aided Pr.Teac vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172226","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=172226"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172226\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=172226"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=172226"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=172226"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}