{"id":172746,"date":"2008-10-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008"},"modified":"2018-10-15T06:38:56","modified_gmt":"2018-10-15T01:08:56","slug":"state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>Regular Second Appeal No. 21 of 2008 (O&amp;M)                   -1-\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH\n\n\n                           Regular Second Appeal No. 21 of 2008 (O&amp;M)\n\n                             Date of Order: 03.10.2008\n\nState of Haryana and others\n                                                                ...Appellants\n\n                                   Versus\n\nSmt. Parwati Devi and another\n\n                                                             ..Respondents<\/pre>\n<p>CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA<\/p>\n<p>Present: Mr. Lekh Raj Nandal, AAG, Haryana,<br \/>\n         for the appellants.\n<\/p>\n<p>          Mr. Pardeep Salath, Advocate<br \/>\n          for respondent no.1.\n<\/p>\n<p>RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral).\n<\/p>\n<p>C.M.No.66-C of 2008<\/p>\n<p>          Prayer in this application is for condonation of delay of 47 days in<\/p>\n<p>filing the appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>          Heard counsel for the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>          For the reasons stated in the application and as the delay is<\/p>\n<p>neither malafide nor grossly negligent, the delay of 47 days in filing the<\/p>\n<p>appeal is condoned.\n<\/p>\n<p>R.S.A.No.21 of 2008<\/p>\n<p>          The State of Haryana, challenges the judgment and decree dated<\/p>\n<p>20.08.2007, passed by the District Judge, Narnaul, accepting the appeal,<\/p>\n<p>setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court and as a<\/p>\n<p>result decreeing the suit filed by the respondent.<\/p>\n<p>          One Chhaju Ram was appointed as a Patwari in the year 1945-<\/p>\n<p>46 and passed away while in service on 26.06.1958. The State of Haryana<\/p>\n<p>issued instructions dated 19.03.1981 titled as &#8220;Liberalisation of Pensionary<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Regular Second Appeal No. 21 of 2008 (O&amp;M)                    -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>benefits on the recommendations of Pay Commission&#8221;.                 The above<\/p>\n<p>instructions, granted pension to widows\/families of employees who had<\/p>\n<p>retired before 01.07.1964 when the family pension scheme was not in<\/p>\n<p>force. In view of these instructions, Smt. Parwati Devi-respondent No.1<\/p>\n<p>made a representation to the Deputy Commissioner, Narnaul, but her claim<\/p>\n<p>for family pension was rejected, compelling her to file a suit.<\/p>\n<p>           The State of Haryana opposed the prayer in the suit by stating<\/p>\n<p>that she was not entitled to pensionary benefits as there were no<\/p>\n<p>instructions vide which the family members of deceased employee who<\/p>\n<p>died in the year 1958 would be entitled to receive family pension.<\/p>\n<p>           On the basis of the pleadings, the trial court framed the following<\/p>\n<p>issues:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>             1.      Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the family pension on<\/p>\n<p>                     the grounds mentioned in the suit? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             2.      Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief claimed in<\/p>\n<p>                     the suit?OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             3.      Whether the plaintiff has no cause of action to file the<\/p>\n<p>                     suit?OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             4.      Whether the suit is time barred?OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             5.       Whether the civil Court has no jurisdiction to try and<\/p>\n<p>                     entertain the present suit?OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             6.      Relief.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>           The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narnaul, dismissed the suit<\/p>\n<p>primarily on the ground that it was filed 45 years after the death of Chhaju<\/p>\n<p>Ram and as on the date of Chhaju Ram&#8217;s demise, there was no provision<\/p>\n<p>in the rules providing, for grant of family pension.<\/p>\n<p>           Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree, the respondent filed<\/p>\n<p>an appeal. The District Judge, Narnaul, accepted the appeal, reversed the<\/p>\n<p>judgment and decree passed by the trial court and decreed the suit by<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Regular Second Appeal No. 21 of 2008 (O&amp;M)                     -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>placing reliance upon the instructions issued by the State of Haryana on<\/p>\n<p>19.03.1981 granting the benefit of family pension to widows\/families of<\/p>\n<p>employees, who had retired before 01.07.1964, when the family pension<\/p>\n<p>scheme was not in force.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Counsel for the appellants submits that the suit was filed 45<\/p>\n<p>years after the demise of Chhaju Ram and, therefore the trial Court, rightly<\/p>\n<p>dismissed it as barred by time. The first appellate Court committed an<\/p>\n<p>error of jurisdiction in decreeing the suit, as in the year 1958, there was no<\/p>\n<p>scheme for grant of family pension.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, submits that the<\/p>\n<p>right to claim family pension was conferred for the first time, vide<\/p>\n<p>instructions dated 19.03.1981. The respondent&#8217;s prayer for grant of family<\/p>\n<p>pension under these instructions, was rejected and, therefore, the suit was<\/p>\n<p>not barred by limitation. It is further submitted that the right to receive a<\/p>\n<p>pension is a recurring cause of action and, therefore, a plea of limitation in<\/p>\n<p>cases relating to pension is not available to the State.<\/p>\n<p>            I have heard counsel for the parties and perused the impugned<\/p>\n<p>judgments.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Chhaju Ram, the respondent&#8217;s husband passed away on<\/p>\n<p>26.06.1958, while working as a Patwari.          On this date, the relevant<\/p>\n<p>instructions did not provide for grant of family pension to the family<\/p>\n<p>members or the widow of a deceased employee. However, on 19.03.1981,<\/p>\n<p>Secretary     to   Government,   Haryana,     Finance      Department   issued<\/p>\n<p>instructions titled as &#8220;Liberalisation of Pensionary benefits on the<\/p>\n<p>recommendations of Pay Commission&#8221;. A relevant extract thereof reads as<\/p>\n<p>follows:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;A minimum pension of Rs.125\/- p.m. may also be allowed to the<\/p>\n<p>            widows\/families of the employees who may not have opted for<\/p>\n<p>            the Family Pension Scheme 1964 or who had retired before 1st<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Regular Second Appeal No. 21 of 2008 (O&amp;M)                  -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>          July, 1964, when the family pension scheme was not in force.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>          The right of widows\/families of the employees who had retired<\/p>\n<p>before 01.07.1964 to receive family pension was conferred for the first<\/p>\n<p>time,pursuant to these instructions. The appellants have failed to place on<\/p>\n<p>record any instructions\/rules or regulations modifying these instructions or<\/p>\n<p>withdrawing them. As these instructions are in force and the respondent is<\/p>\n<p>entitled to benefit thereunder, the first appellate Court did not commit any<\/p>\n<p>error in accepting the appeal, reversing the judgment passed by the trial<\/p>\n<p>Court and decreeing the suit. The right to apply for family pension was<\/p>\n<p>conferred, for the first time, on 19.03.1981. The right to claim a pension is<\/p>\n<p>a recurring cause of action, the suit, therefore, was not barred by time<\/p>\n<p>          In view of what has been stated herein above, no question of law<\/p>\n<p>muchless a substantial question of law arrises for consideration. The<\/p>\n<p>appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>October 03, 2008                                  (RAJIVE BHALLA)\nnt                                                     JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008 Regular Second Appeal No. 21 of 2008 (O&amp;M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 21 of 2008 (O&amp;M) Date of Order: 03.10.2008 State of Haryana and others &#8230;Appellants [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-172746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-15T01:08:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-15T01:08:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":932,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008\",\"name\":\"State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-15T01:08:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-15T01:08:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-15T01:08:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008"},"wordCount":932,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008","name":"State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-15T01:08:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-smt-parwati-devi-and-another-on-3-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Haryana And Others vs Smt. Parwati Devi And Another on 3 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=172746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=172746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=172746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=172746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}