{"id":17309,"date":"2010-09-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010"},"modified":"2015-07-16T11:34:44","modified_gmt":"2015-07-16T06:04:44","slug":"hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 22\"\" DAY OF SEPTEMBER. 2010\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE ~ V.\n\nMiscellaneous First Appeal No. 1 1028  _  \n\nBetween\n\nHasanabba,\n\nAged 59 years.\n\nS \/ O Marnu Beary.\nPadil House, Maripalla,\nPudu Grarna, '  \u00ab.\nBantwal Taluk. ' A A    _\n\n._    Appellant\n\n(By   pz'$;c1om\" * \n\n1. V'-.'_I'he Secretary,   -- .\nKannada D.eveOlo_p'n1nt Authority,\nVidhana \"Soi1di1.a}'---- '\n_ _Banga1ore_\u00a7--.  V' \"\n\n EK-arnatak\"a Government Ins. Department,\n_1VIo'tQ_r\"~B_ranch, Bangalore.\n\nHRe'prese'nted by its Branch Manager.\n\n3.' pp Shivanna Gowda,\n\n-S\/0. Thimrne Gowda.\n\nH.N. Pur Road,\n\nAttur Taluk,\n\nHassan.\n\n Respondents<\/pre>\n<p>[By Sri.Nasrul1a Khan, HCGP for $1.1 8: R2,<br \/>\nnotice to R3 is dispensed with)<\/p>\n<p>Q.\n<\/p>\n<p>This MFA is filed U\/ S 173(1) of MV Act against the<br \/>\njudgment and award dated: 09.03.2007 passed in MVC<br \/>\ni\\lo.992\/2004 on the \ufb01le of 1 Additional District Judge,<br \/>\nMember, MACT, Dakshina Kannada, Manga1ore,&#8217;,partIy<br \/>\nallowing the claim petition for compensat;ionf&#8221;&#8211;\u00ab.a&#8217;nd<br \/>\nseeking enhancement of compensation.   1&#8242; 5 <\/p>\n<p>This appeal coming on for -, <\/p>\n<p>the Court, delivered the followinglill&#8217;  1 A <\/p>\n<p>Junamn\ufb01thg<\/p>\n<p>This appeal is byE&#8221;&#8221;r.ithehV&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>enhancement of com&#8221;pensatio&#8217;nr.t,:&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>2. Heard. &#8216;.w.'[v&#8221;he appeal  and with the<br \/>\nconsent oft Clcunsel for the parties, it<\/p>\n<p>is taken_lVg&#8217;p.c  <\/p>\n<p>3. Briefgpfacts&#8217;df.the.__c&#8217;ase are:<\/p>\n<p> ~ That   when the claimant was riding<\/p>\n<p>   bicycle  Parangipet to Maripalla side near<\/p>\n<p> _  house at Parangipet on NH 48 a car<\/p>\n<p>bearing registration No. KA 01\/ GA 136 came in a rash<\/p>\n<p> is and negligent manner and dashed against his bicycle,<\/p>\n<p> asda result he fell down and sustained injuries. Hence,<\/p>\n<p> he \ufb02ied a claim petition before MACT, Mangalore<\/p>\n<p>seeking compensation of Rs.3,00,000\/&#8211; and the<br \/>\n6?.\n<\/p>\n<p>t  -A A evnhanced,<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.28,000\/&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>with interest at 6% p.a.<\/p>\n<p>4. As there is no dispute regarding occur&#8217;rer1_&#8221;ce&#8221;*.of<\/p>\n<p>accident, negligence and liability of the  <\/p>\n<p>offending vehicle the only point   florid&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>consideration is:\n<\/p>\n<p>Whether the cornp&#8217;en_sation&#8217;awardeti by<br \/>\nthe Tribunal is'&#8221;jut_st and &#8216;reasonable ordoes it<br \/>\ncall for enhancement?  iv &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>5. After hearing   appearing for<br \/>\nthe parties  and award of the<br \/>\n&#8220;cf  llx\u00e9iew-&#8220;Vthat the compensation<br \/>\nawarded  not just and reasonable, it<br \/>\nis on  therefore it is deserved to be<\/p>\n<p>H &#8221;   certi\ufb01cate Ex. P 6 the claimant has<\/p>\n<p>sustained the following injuries.<\/p>\n<p>N1) Swelling (L) thigh, (L) calf with<br \/>\nFracture hip bone [inferior Ramus}<\/p>\n<p>ii] Pain abdomen.\n<\/p>\n<p>The injury No.1 is described as grievous in nature.<\/p>\n<p> l<\/p>\n<p>Injuries sustained by him are also evident from<br \/>\ndischarge summary Ex. P 7, case sheet Ex. P 22 and<\/p>\n<p>supported by oral evidence of the claimant van\u00a5d&#8217;\u00bba.the<\/p>\n<p>doctor examined as PWS 1 and 2 <\/p>\n<p>Bischarge summary Ex. P 7 shows he &#8216;adlrnittedll <\/p>\n<p>Unity Health Complex, <\/p>\n<p>2.3.2004. Operation wasll_t:l.onedtol&#8217;i1is  <\/p>\n<p>doctor has not stated anyth_ing..about theidisability.<\/p>\n<p>7. Considering the   Rs.l5,000\/&#8211;<br \/>\nawarded by&#8221;   and suffering is<br \/>\non the   to be enhanced by<br \/>\nanotherl 1 award Rs.25,000\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>under &#8216;thishead&#8217;. {f n &#8220;&#8216; -._ 2&#8217; &#8221; <\/p>\n<p> 2 fire claimant has produced medical bills for<\/p>\n<p> The Tribunal has awarded only<\/p>\n<p>.&#8217;r\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7s;10,&#8217;O.l(l0__\/liltowarcis medical and incidental expenses,<\/p>\n<p>which:. is on the lower side and I award Rs.15,OOO\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>2&#8243; V.  this head.\n<\/p>\n<p> 9. Considering the year of accident, age of the<\/p>\n<p>claimant and his occupation the income assessed by<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01g<\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal at Rs.3,000\/&#8211; p.m. is just and proper.<br \/>\nNature of injuries suggests that he must have been<\/p>\n<p>under treatment and rest at ieast for a period v(V.)il&#8217;7&#8217;_th.I.&#8217;\u20ac\u20ac<\/p>\n<p>years and 1 award Rs.9,000\/&#8211; towards 1oss;&#8221;&#8216;of&#8217;&#8211;.&#8217;i&#8217;nr_::orrie*\u00ab_<\/p>\n<p>during laid up period.\n<\/p>\n<p>10. The doctor has not:state4d__ <\/p>\n<p>disability. Therefore he is not:entit1ed&#8212;- for~.Cnornp\u00e9ewnsationiwV<\/p>\n<p>towards loss of futui~i:g~.,incorrie&#8217;.&#8221;&#8216; eonsidering the<br \/>\nfact that he has  head and an<br \/>\namount of   he has to<br \/>\nundergo    same Rs.10,000\/~&#8211; is<\/p>\n<p>awarded towi!ardVs&#8217; \u00a51oss4V.of_ amenities.<\/p>\n<p>11. Thuusaitheii eiai,m&#8217;arit is entitled for the following<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;~  cc)ni.perisation:'&#8221;&#8221;  &#8230;.. .. e<\/p>\n<p>i  _  Pa&#8211;in and suffering Rs. 25,000\/&#8211;<br \/>\n Me&#8217;dica1 &amp; incidental<br \/>\n..&#8221;s.&#8217;i__E&#8217;;ixpenses Rs. 15,000\/&#8211;<br \/>\n3] &#8220;V  Loss of income<br \/>\nV  During treatment period Rs. 9,000 \/ &#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>4) Loss of amenities Rs. 10,000\/~<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;..-..n.o&#8211;&#8230;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Total Rs. 59.000]-\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;.-.&#8212;&#8211;m&#8230;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>12. Accordingly the appeal is allowed in part. The<br \/>\njudgment and award of the Tribunal is modi\ufb01ed to the<br \/>\nextend stated hereinabove. The ciairnant is entitled for<\/p>\n<p>total compensation of Rs.59,000\/&#8211; as Vv.ag;ai.nst<\/p>\n<p>Rs.28,000\/~ awarded by the Tribunal with  _<\/p>\n<p>6% p.a. on the enhanced compepnVsation&#8221;of&#8211;&#8216;\u00bb <\/p>\n<p>from the date of claim peti\u00e9tiorna ..til41&#8217;\u00bb_hthe&#8221; &#8216;date <\/p>\n<p>realisation.\n<\/p>\n<p>13. The Insurance Compangfis directed to  thed<\/p>\n<p>enhanced compensation  ii&#8217;it.erest&#8217;VV&#8221;t\\7sriVthin two<br \/>\nmonths from the date  copy of this<\/p>\n<p>judgtnent&#8217;   is&#8221; ordered to be reieased in<br \/>\nfavour   Out of the enhanced<\/p>\n<p>coiiqperisation  with proportionate interest is<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  invested in FD. in the name of the<\/p>\n<p> nationalised or scheduled bank for a<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01g.\n<\/p>\n<p>period of three years and remaining amount is ordered<\/p>\n<p>to be released in favour of the ciaimant.<\/p>\n<p>N0 order as to Cost.\n<\/p>\n<p>Vb\/&#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010 Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22&#8243;&#8221; DAY OF SEPTEMBER. 2010 BEFORE THE HON&#8217; BLE MR. JUSTICE ~ V. Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 1 1028 _ Between Hasanabba, Aged 59 years. S \/ O Marnu [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-16T06:04:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-16T06:04:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":752,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-16T06:04:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-16T06:04:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-16T06:04:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010"},"wordCount":752,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010","name":"Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-16T06:04:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hasanabba-vs-the-secretary-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hasanabba vs The Secretary on 22 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17309"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17309\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}