{"id":173126,"date":"2009-10-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009"},"modified":"2017-09-09T07:57:44","modified_gmt":"2017-09-09T02:27:44","slug":"naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPAEN.AS:'V1    O *\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n'A 131A\n\nNAVEEN CHANDRA\n\nS\/O SRIDHAR POQJARI  if\n\nDATED THIS THE 12\" DAY OF OCTOBER 2009,-.__\n\nWRIT PETITION NO. 2SS71\u00bb29S7'5\/200:3   E\n\nAGED ABOUT 38'YEARS_  1. \n\nYODANANDA   _ \nS \/O SRIDHAR PGOJARI:\n\nAGED A\":_3O;:tfI 5.5     A V\n\nB,3+LA_RA1i1?I1*-:;.._'.  ' ._ '\nW\/O YOOANANDA, '-\n\nAGED ABQIJT50' ;\n\n O\n\n, S\/O SRIDHAR POOJARJ\n~  AGED AEGUf1f 43 YEARS\n\n  M_O~HA3V1MAO MUJEEB\n_- * S_\/'Q  USMAN\n-  AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS\n\nALL  R\/AT KUVETHYAR HOUSE\n\nJ\n\n.'INDABETTU VILLAGE BANGADY POST\n\n\n\nBELTHANAGADI TALUK\n\nDAKSHINA KANNADA-- 574 214  PETITIONERS\n\n[BY SRI VINOD KUMAR AND SRI KIRAN KUMAR, ADVs);j\\\n\nAND:\n\n1\n\nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA\nDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE;\nM.S. BUILDING \nDR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI. _\nBANGALORE ' \nR\/P BY ITS SECRETARY \"\n\nTHE DEPUTY COI\u00a2I4MISS:O'I\u00a7IERi.._ \nDAKSHINA KANNADA DIS_TR1CT'--   'I \nOFFICE OF THE DEPUTY .COMM.1SS;I0_NER\nPANDESHVI\/%.RA, IAANSALORE \" '\nTHE    ..  . \nOFFICE OLRTHE T_  ASILDARI \nBFELTHAINAGADI TALIJK  \nDAKSI-II1'\u00a3iA I:ANIx:ADA DIST  RESPONDENTS\n(BY SR1. R \n\n':'i\"\"i'--I ESE v\u00a7IRIT'PETITIOI\\IsAee FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226\n\n I_&amp;  OF THE C'ONSTI'}'U'1'ION OF INDIA. WITH A PRAYER\n  'QUASII 'THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R3. DTD 7.10.09,\n PR'GDUCED~A'1\".ANNEX~A.\n\nA \"-u'.'T*-_'~5f .. WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY\n\n HEARING. THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:\n\n3\n\nas\u00bb\n'n\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Sri R.Kurnar, learned Government Advocate to<\/p>\n<p>accept notice and file memo of appearance <\/p>\n<p>period of four weeks from today.<\/p>\n<p>2. The petitioners are before  <\/p>\n<p>for issue of writ of certiorari  dated<br \/>\n7 . 10.2009 which is irrlp_&#8217;ugne_dwa_ti <\/p>\n<p>3. The  that petitioners<br \/>\nNo.1 to    occupation and<br \/>\ncultivation rnade applications seeking<br \/>\nregularisation applications are yet to be<\/p>\n<p>considered. Itdisvlalso contended that the lands of the<\/p>\n<p>other two petitioners are also included in the notice and<\/p>\n<p> had been provided to them before<\/p>\n<p>directing &#8220;the eviction from the land in question. The<\/p>\n<p>A  petitioners also refer to an earlier proceedings when an<\/p>\n<p>i<\/p>\n<p>gu-\n<\/p>\n<p>0%<\/p>\n<p>endorsement was issued without proper opportunity<\/p>\n<p>and the same had been challenged by the third<\/p>\n<p>petitioner before the Assistant Cornrnissioner&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;7&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Assistant Commissioner by order dated  <\/p>\n<p>set aside the endorsement. \/vThe&#8221;&#8216;gri&#8217;eva;nc&#8217;e<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is, despite the same the&#8221;-land the <\/p>\n<p>petitioner is also indicated in &#8216;V&#8221;thV:e\u00bbimpugned fnoticedddated 0<\/p>\n<p>7.102009 and the  to the other<br \/>\npetitioners. It is  even though<br \/>\nthe same ;.a&#8221;:&#8217;;noti:cei,&#8221;thsfoperative portion<br \/>\nwould  anudorder has been passed<br \/>\ndirecting ___&#8217;to_&#8221;&#8216;d\\raeate from the land in<br \/>\nquestion eviction is also indicated.<\/p>\n<p>Hence it is conterrcled that the action is without<\/p>\n<p>.0  the principles of natural justice and it is<\/p>\n<p>  that the Tahsildar has no jurisdiction to<\/p>\n<p>issue SV'&#8221;i!..&#8217;1C.1&#8243;1&#8243; order.<\/p>\n<p>i<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;1:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4. The learned Government Advocate would<\/p>\n<p>indicate that though the operative portion ind1c&#8217;ates ___so,<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner had been provided opportunity arid<\/p>\n<p>they have not vacated, the present  0&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>issued. With regard to the c1air&#8217;nMn1ade..&amp;reg\u00e9irdingvthe&#8217;-.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>application being filed seeking&#8217;, r&#8217;egu1aris_ation. 00<\/p>\n<p>ieamed Government Advocatavvould  it the<br \/>\nveracity of such statern_ent\u00ab&#8221;dandriythe-._ppende&#8217;ncy of the<\/p>\n<p>applications would have to  as such, at<\/p>\n<p>this stage, no&#8221;r\u00a33i&#8217;i,e3i&#8217; can biii  petitioners.<\/p>\n<p>ES&#8217;.  the rival contentions, it is to<br \/>\nbe statedthat    true that the veracity of the<\/p>\n<p>pendency of theptatpplications for regularisation and the<\/p>\n<p> the same is to be veri\ufb01ed by the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;However, the notice dated 7.10.2009 does<\/p>\n<p>notfindicate that the action has been initiated taking<\/p>\n<p>  note ofsuch disposal and after providing opportunity to<\/p>\n<p>3!<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\ufb02u<br \/>\n5!<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners. Though the said order is classified as<\/p>\n<p>notice, as rightly pointed out by the learned Counsetfor<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner, it indicates that an order of evicti.onh.&#8221;ha&#8217;s&#8217;4<\/p>\n<p>been passed. Hence, at this stage, if the  V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>rival contentions is adverted to,Cthe&#8221;sa_me  vaffect\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>the parties and even otherwise it is not desirable s&#8217;ine_e&#8217;~_<\/p>\n<p>the respondents themselves  not yet into a<br \/>\nfinding of fact with   of&#8217; possession of<br \/>\nthe petitioners after <\/p>\n<p>6. pppp H   operative portion of the<br \/>\n as the directing the<br \/>\npetitiontersjgt  the lands in question stands<\/p>\n<p>quashed for the_g&#8217;p&#8217;res&#8217;ent with a direction that the order<\/p>\n<p>   will be treated as a show cause notice<\/p>\n<p>  t&#8217;he&#8221;_&#8221;_v\u00bbpe~t.itioners would have the opportunity of<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;forth their contention before the third<\/p>\n<p>2 .. respondent including the contention with regard to the<\/p>\n<p>J<\/p>\n<p>gon-\n<\/p>\n<p>44&#8242;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPAEN.AS:&#8217;V1 O * BETWEEN: &#8216;A 131A NAVEEN CHANDRA S\/O SRIDHAR POQJARI if DATED THIS THE 12&#8243; DAY OF OCTOBER 2009,-.__ WRIT PETITION NO. 2SS71\u00bb29S7&#8217;5\/200:3 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-173126","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-09T02:27:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-09T02:27:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":517,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-09T02:27:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-09T02:27:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-09T02:27:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009"},"wordCount":517,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009","name":"Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-09T02:27:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naveen-chandra-vs-the-state-of-karantaka-on-12-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Naveen Chandra vs The State Of Karantaka on 12 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173126","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=173126"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173126\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=173126"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=173126"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=173126"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}