{"id":173197,"date":"2009-10-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009"},"modified":"2017-02-25T22:17:24","modified_gmt":"2017-02-25T16:47:24","slug":"p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 988 of 2001()\n\n\n\n1. P.A. ABDUL SALAM\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. M. ASSIS\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.TOM JOSE\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.SEBASTIAN THOMAS MICHEAL\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :13\/10\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                            P.Q.BARKATH ALI, J.\n                        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                            Crl.R.P.No. 988 OF 2001\n                    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                    Dated this the 13th day of October, 2009\n\n                                      ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The revision petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.1074\/1995 of<\/p>\n<p>Judicial    First Class Magistrate Court, Kochi and appellant in<\/p>\n<p>Crl.Appeal No. 325\/2000 of Sessions Court, Ernakulam. The revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner    was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable<\/p>\n<p>Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a<\/p>\n<p>period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 3000\/-, in default, to<\/p>\n<p>undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of two months by the<\/p>\n<p>trial court. On appeal, his conviction under Section 138 of the<\/p>\n<p>Negotiable Instruments Act was confirmed, but sentence was modified<\/p>\n<p>to the effect that he was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for<\/p>\n<p>five days and to pay compensation of Rs. 56,000\/-, in default, to<\/p>\n<p>undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months. The lower<\/p>\n<p>appellate court has directed payment of Rs. 53,000\/- out of the<\/p>\n<p>compensation to the complainant. Now the accused has come up in<\/p>\n<p>revision challenging his conviction and sentence.<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.988\/01            Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>       2.    The case of the revision first respondent\/complainant as<\/p>\n<p>testified by him as PW1 and as detailed in the complaint before the trial<\/p>\n<p>court was that the accused borrowed Rs. 50,000\/- from the complainant<\/p>\n<p>and to discharge that liability, he issued the cheque &#8211; Ext.P1 dated<\/p>\n<p>09\/09\/1995 drawn on South Indian Bank Ltd which when presented<\/p>\n<p>for collection through Nedungadi Bank Ltd, Mattanchery branch was<\/p>\n<p>returned dishonoured for want of sufficiency of funds in the account of<\/p>\n<p>the accused in the bank and that inspite of the notice &#8211; Ext.P4, the<\/p>\n<p>accused did not repay the amount which is an offence punishable<\/p>\n<p>under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.<\/p>\n<p>       3.    The learned Magistrate on receipt of the complaint recorded<\/p>\n<p>the sworn statement of the complainant PW1 and took cognizance of<\/p>\n<p>the case. The accused\/revision petitioner on appearance before the trial<\/p>\n<p>court pleaded not guilty to the charge under Section 138 of the<\/p>\n<p>Negotiable Instruments Act. PWs 1 and 2 were examined and Exts.P1<\/p>\n<p>to P8 were marked on the side of the complainant before the trial court.<\/p>\n<p>When questioned under Section 313 Cr.P.C., the accused denied the<\/p>\n<p>entire transaction. On the side of the accused, DWs 1 and 2 were<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.988\/01              Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>examined and Ext.D1 was marked.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.     The learned Magistrate on an appreciation of the evidence<\/p>\n<p>found the revision petitioner guilty of the offence punishable under<\/p>\n<p>Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, convicted him<\/p>\n<p>thereunder and sentenced him as aforesaid. The lower appellate court<\/p>\n<p>confirmed his conviction and modified the sentence as aforesaid. The<\/p>\n<p>accused has come up in revision challenging his conviction and<\/p>\n<p>sentence.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5.     The following points arise for consideration :<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                  1)   Whether the conviction of the revision<\/p>\n<p>            petitioner under   Section 138 of the Negotiable<\/p>\n<p>            Instruments Act by the trial court which is confirmed<\/p>\n<p>            in appeal can be sustained ?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<pre>                  2)   Whether     the   sentence   imposed    is\n\n            excessive or unduly harsh ?\n\n      Point No.1\n\n<\/pre>\n<blockquote><p>      6.       On the side of the complainant PWs 1 and 2 were<\/p>\n<p>examined and Exts.P1 to P8 were marked before the trial court. PW1<\/p>\n<p>is the complainant. PWs 2 is the Managers of the bank. PW1 testified<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.988\/01              Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>before the trial court in terms of the complaint . I have gone through<\/p>\n<p>the evidence of PW1. I         find no suspicious inconsistencies or<\/p>\n<p>discrepancies in his evidence so as to discredit his evidence. Further<\/p>\n<p>his evidence is supported by Exts.P1 to P8.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>      7.     The revision petitioner\/accused denied his signature in<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1. But DW1, the Assistant Director, FSL Thiruvananthapuram<\/p>\n<p>has examined his signature in Ext.P1 in detail       with the admitted<\/p>\n<p>signatures of the accused and found that both were in the same<\/p>\n<p>handwriting. Therefore, the version of the accused that he has not<\/p>\n<p>issued the cheque &#8211; Ext.P1 cannot be accepted.       No other point is<\/p>\n<p>argued before me. Therefore, I am inclined to confirm the conviction<\/p>\n<p>of the revision petitioner\/accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable<\/p>\n<p>Instruments Act which is confirmed in appeal by the lower appellate<\/p>\n<p>court .\n<\/p>\n<p>             Point No.2<\/p>\n<p>      8.     As regards the sentence, the trial court imposed rigorous<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000\/-, in<\/p>\n<p>default, to undergo simple imprisonment for two months. The lower<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.988\/01              Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>appellate court modified the sentence to the effect that he is sentenced<\/p>\n<p>to undergo simple imprisonment for five days and to pay compensation<\/p>\n<p>of Rs. 56,000\/-. The transaction is of the year 1995. Further the<\/p>\n<p>accused is now aged about 50. Taking into consideration all these<\/p>\n<p>aspects, I feel that a sentence of imprisonment till the rising of court<\/p>\n<p>and a fine of Rs.56,000\/- would meed the ends of justice.<\/p>\n<p>      In the result, the revision petition is allowed in part.      The<\/p>\n<p>conviction of the revision petitioner under Section 138 of the<\/p>\n<p>Negotiable Instruments Act by the trial court which is confirmed in<\/p>\n<p>appeal is upheld.     The revision petitioner\/accused is sentenced to<\/p>\n<p>undergo simple imprisonment till the rising of court and to pay a fine<\/p>\n<p>of Rs. 56,000\/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a<\/p>\n<p>further period of three months.       Out of the fine amount realised,<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 53,000\/- shall be paid to complainant as compensation as provided<\/p>\n<p>under Section 357(1) Cr.P.C.      Rs. 35000\/- deposited by the revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner before the trial court shall be adjusted towards the fine<\/p>\n<p>amount. His bail bonds are cancelled.          Revision petitioner shall<\/p>\n<p>surrender before the trial court on or before 30-10-2009 to receive the<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.988\/01             Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>sentence. Counsel for the revision petitioner submits that wife of the<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner is undergoing treatment for cancer. Hence four<\/p>\n<p>month&#8217;s time is granted for payment of fine.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                               P.Q.BARKATH ALI<br \/>\n                                                       JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sv.\n<\/p>\n<pre>Crl.R.P.No.988\/01    Page numbers\n\nCrl.R.P.No.988\/01    Page numbers\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 988 of 2001() 1. P.A. ABDUL SALAM &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. M. ASSIS &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.TOM JOSE For Respondent :SRI.SEBASTIAN THOMAS MICHEAL The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI Dated :13\/10\/2009 O [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-173197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-25T16:47:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-25T16:47:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":945,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009\",\"name\":\"P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-25T16:47:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-25T16:47:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-25T16:47:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009"},"wordCount":945,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009","name":"P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-25T16:47:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-a-abdul-salam-vs-m-assis-on-13-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.A. Abdul Salam vs M. Assis on 13 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=173197"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173197\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=173197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=173197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=173197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}