{"id":173308,"date":"2008-03-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008"},"modified":"2019-03-30T21:24:58","modified_gmt":"2019-03-30T15:54:58","slug":"manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Manjunath S\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Manjunath S\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA \n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTIC E..A.N# vi-:}mJeePA\u00abLA.cac\u00a7wbAHkT T\n\nDATED THIS THE 18TH\/JDAY40F.\"MAR\u00a2.H; 29\u00a733  A\" A\n\nBEI5OR\u00a35_A_A T = 'T\n\nWRIT PETLTLQH AN.d.A'139\"\u00ab5u4Zi.O!35A(C-DFCPC)\n\nMANJUNATH:-SIG-\u00a7P'ASAB'iE.Ni5'i:'.v'\" \nAGE':  YEARS DGC: -.AGRv:uLTunE\nR,\/0 CHIMMAD T \n\n::'TAL{'3AM'KHAN.DfI\"$01.;  '\n\nTmpsw 356A LVi<QT; .. \n\n SA.'9sGA\u00e9i3A 5;\/ ()\u00ab\u00a7.'I{{F?1S%*iHl\\VlHAPPA LENDI\n= AGE:"42..YEARE5A__0\u20ac3Ci AGRICULTURE\n"R\/O'-C.HIMMAD._  \n\n HTT1.'A'.. JAMKTJAHLIT 533 301\n\n#3151' BAGALKOT\n\nvvT.CHAAl\\VI{) "WWA w\/0 KALLAPPA LENDI\n\nAH-'3E:' 42 ':'Er"aRS 0-CC: AGRICULFJRE\n\n ,,'R,(ocHIMMAo\n\nTllllll IHII\n\n.. Ts':iL~JH|V!h\ufb01HIVDi 53? 331\n\n  ' 'MST BAGALKOT\n\n" (ET sax. SACHIN S MAGADUM, ADV.)\n\n V. H AND :\n\n1\n\nBADASHA S\/O USAMAN MULLA\nAGE: 52 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE\nR\/0 RAMPUR\n\nTAL JAMKHANDI 58? 391\n\nDIST BAGALKOT\n\n\n\nNJ\n\nIndl'\n\nTAL JAMKHANDI 537 301    .\nDiST BAGALKOT  \n\nMALIK s\/0 USAMANMLJLLA   \nAGE: 42 YEAS 0CC:AGRICULTURE\u00bb_   \nR\/0 RAMPUR   "   % \n\nTAL JAMKHANDI 537 301  \n\nDIST BAGALKi)T..\u00e9 * '  \n\nRAMAPPA s\/o sI5%DAm'; pA:%%sm.\u00abJ: \nAGE! 52 YEARSVOCC:  "\nR\/O ,CH1M'MAEj! % . % -  %  %\nT.'-'aLiJAH'i\u00a7~<":-i.#'~.-%'9I 529.2 391'  *\n\nE}IST_4BAGA\u00a7KOT .__ " \n\nAoium S\/0:'SiDAD'AP:PA. s~ ALaHAv1\nAGE: 50 veaasjacc: AG'RICUi_'i"u'RE\nR'\/'(J cmmmao    \n\n . TAL J"AM'i{HANE1I":."~.3'i~ 301\n\n'A915: BAG\ufb01aLKOT--~ '\n\n PAuRAPPA"S\/C')  sionAPPA PALBHAVI\nAGE: 4'3~'!.EARS OCCI AGRICULTURE\n\n- ~ Sii\u00a7P.ISH!5.IL\n\n Rio CHIMMAD\n\n%   k~.mkL%3AMKHANo1 587 301\n- 'D-IS'!._\ufb01sAGALKQT\n\n5,19 SIEJDAPPA PALBHAV1\nAGE: 46 YEARS occ: AGRICULTURE\n\n2 -:<,-'0 CHIMMAD\n\nTAL JAMKHANDI 587 301\n\nGIST EAGALKGT\n\nERSIKPIKRAFPA SIT! SIDDAFPA F'AL'\u00e9'aHA'v'I\nAGE: 44 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE\n\nR\/'0 CHIMNEY)\n\nTAL JAMKHANDI 587 301\n\nDIST BAGALKOT\n\n RESPONDENTS\n\n\n\n(or SR1. MRUTYUNJAYA TATA BANGI FOR R4-oft fg   \n\nTHIS WRIT PETITIIQN is men. maize. An  it\nI\n\n226 AND 227 OF TH CONS11TUTIi N C35\nRe R\n\n'G nnnczu -rm: ER QATEB n a pan nncgg\ufb02\nRI\n\npi\\i)..3& JMFC.\n\n\\.\u00a2un-ml nu. u.u..su-yu rr\\-.1\n\nIN OS.N0.9\/04 ON HE F1':';E"--'L)F CIVIL JUDGE '(V\n\nRABKAV -"Ai'iH' i' i' 1' VIBE Atii%'iiE}{URE\u00abE'.~-- .  _ \n\nThis petition:*'ooming"'oij*tor_prei'irn'inai\u00a7 hearing B\ngroup, the Court made the follo'wi'n.g':~. _\n\n  no   an i A .   \n\n(Jr.Dn.:V,). i3en_hatti',  i'i_i'ecl  writ petition questioning\nthe iegel*itt'{;of_'VA3the\u00ab..o'rti.\u00a7r. dated 8.9.2006 passed on I.A.2\ntherein'. _   "  t  i\n\n   H?eard.....ieerned counsel appearing for the parties\n\n'  " --vandv4:pei'used the record of the writ petition.\n\n ' Facts<\/pre>\n
 which can be gathered from the record ere:<\/p>\n
 is  thetithe petitioners had \ufb02ied 0.5.9\/2004 against the<\/p>\n
 respondents herein, for judgment and decree of<\/p>\n
declaration, permanent injunction and other incidental<\/p>\n
reliefs. The suit has been contested by the defendants.<\/p>\n
Based n the pleadings, issues were framed by th trial<\/p>\n
wuu –u — — -.._
\n‘K .\n<\/p>\n
r Q.\n<\/p>\n
A..PRf'<*fING
\nIt<\/p>\n
had filed I.A.2 under Order_2,3__Ruie"1'(;'\u00a7ji"_i*!iiii:: 151 <\/p>\n
permit them to withdraw th'e\u00e9su,'ita,3ivitii. Vte..Aiiistitute*~e 5<\/p>\n
fresh suit in respect ofthe eubjiect niatte_r:4.ofVthevhsnit, on
\nthe same causeof actio_nL':-..jfne_vappiiceti:on iivas opposed by<\/p>\n
he de.endeete bxffiipieg t\u00a7he!r"–eteten1ent of objections. The<\/p>\n
the__pe.ytie\u00a7;_._b,\u00bbv  jc_tated"'\u00a7.9.2006, has aiiowed the<\/p>\n
appiicatiutnooiniparigipennittina the plaintiffs to withdraw the<\/p>\n
7__sui_t–eVe'i"itot_:irnei'n.tei.na–b|'e, but denying them the liberty to<\/p>\n
fiIe_fresh"euit.'on earne or similar cause of action.<\/p>\n
 4.h”Lee–rn’ed counsel am-‘learinii for the Detitionersi<\/p>\n
 [reliance on the decision in the case of D.P.<\/p>\n
sH.tanA, v. BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE AND<\/a><\/p>\n
0 .. :{?THERS, reported in AIR 2001 Kar. 401, contended that, it<\/p>\n
application into two parts vi2., withdrewai and ii’oert” to fiie<\/p>\n
‘1<\/p>\n
fresh suit. Learned counsel contended that either the<\/p>\n
application should have been ailonred as It is by granting<\/p>\n
\\\/<\/p>\n
\/,.\n<\/p>\n
IF!<\/p>\n
or the application should have been”‘di\u00absa~!i’oi~l9gdv~,.<\/p>\n
upon which, the piaintiffe Wotiid  <\/p>\n
l’l’<\/p>\n
prosecution of thesuit. Learned couinssei-at\u00bboo.nten~.:ie.d’the’<\/p>\n
the trial Court has committed iiie’ga’i’ity in\u00bbVe.\\\u00a7e.roisiri’g.”thVe’v_<\/p>\n
jurisdiction and in passing  <\/p>\n
5. Per contra, iee_r’ne’d..t:oun:aeiV’A.iio’r.Vthe responded’-3
\ncontended *_-the:;o’iaintiffoV”had_Vfaiiedu to make out any<\/p>\n
material  anemia seek the relief which was<\/p>\n
preyved”tfor;’in’ i;e.2 azddhencettttiie trial Court was justified<\/p>\n
in riaa\u00e9i\ufb01\ufb01 .ti~;ea..%t:*:}piig’n’ed order. Learned counsel<\/p>\n
aiternatiiveiyv suiiriti\ufb01edi-~’ithat, if this writ pa… ion were to be<\/p>\n
.aWji’i:o\\\u00a2;.ed,,V%1then'”the.._suit shouid be directed to he proceeded
\nP<\/p>\n
‘  froni..4t;hefatage at which the impugned order was asseci.<\/p>\n
r.__v’6.a’AAFter ‘nearing the teeth” co-unset and perusing<\/p>\n
 .. Vttthe’irecord,the point that arises for my consideration is,<\/p>\n
” ‘\u00bb1”–‘.Jirhether the trial Court has committed iliegaiity in passing<\/p>\n
the impugned order?” \\<\/p>\n
‘\/<\/p>\n
\/’ .\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7. In I.A.2, the petitioners had stated<\/p>\n
time of filing the suit, due to..oyersio’ht,V.–‘j,tlhey\u00e9eihadul’i <\/p>\n
mentioned wrong boundaries in stream:  <\/p>\n
property, in the plaint pleadings at  and-L’<\/p>\n
further in para 9 of, the ,o|ai.nt’;.<\/p>\n
stated the cause of actiaa  \u00ab\u00bbsyersig’ht. It was
\naiso pointed out__by  have been
\nsold to  VJ.”.’iV2;0O4, which was not
\nnoticed__w_he.ri::”tlte_ meson 13.1.2004 and hence
\ndefendants  not necessary parties. In the
\nobjections’ regarding sale of the suit<\/p>\n
nrnifiea 1.: ha: ;iar.;….i=.;.+. M.-. 1 1-\u00bb. 2 An 9: 1 mm: ha: an
\n H’ ” -“VT’I\u00e9””‘i “vli U” f V” I-uninniu\ufb01i-ll-l’I’<\/p>\n
“W III-fir<\/p>\n
. been _cieni–er:i<–., Be not as it may.<\/p>\n
 trial Court, in my view, has committed<\/p>\n
…epaiit\\_','-', in s<\/p>\n
 .gra'nting permission to withdraw the suit but not granting<\/p>\n
'  the liberty, sought for. A similar question had come up for<\/p>\n
consideration in the case of D.P. SHARMA (Supra), wherein<\/p>\n
the Division Bench of this Court, has held as follows:
\nN\/.\n<\/p>\n
\/ .. .\n<\/p>\n
‘-Ah<\/p>\n
“9. Now iei: us advert to the above tw–e’.deoisiene._. .<\/p>\n
cited before us by Sri. Datar.\n<\/p>\n
19. In the first deeisioat reperted d
\nKant LJ 154 : (AIR 1975-.Ke’_n’t..*10″1\u00bb)_
\nsiagie Jaage af _.t_his ‘ Fa<\/p>\n
;i’i–\n<\/p>\n
th ”\n<\/p>\n
II
\nhereunder:\n<\/p>\n
“The Court ought eith_er.toV._\u00bbreject’~as a viihoie an
\napplication .’u’nder:” O23, V”R.1(2),V”‘C}P.C. to
\nwitttdret.-\u00ab.1 the’*–se!t gperjmisston to file fresh
\nsuit on the samepcajuse’ of._aetzion_’_. or grant it as
\nw’noie.=- it C\ufb01’\ufb01’ii\ufb01f’ sp5.it-_uav_the~.v”a-ppticatian and
\ngrant ‘apart of It a.nd’4reje_ct the remaining.”<\/p>\n
  se\u00a7;o’n’e_v1’::tieeision, the acting Chief
\nu 2-ti e~:.of i-iirr*rac’i1ai._i?rad,3ash High Court in paras
\n.–….r- gas ‘are:\n<\/p>\n
L:\n<\/p>\n
“s: t:\n<\/p>\n
 V
\nQ’ LI<\/p>\n
1.’?!<\/p>\n
5″th’erwt., …_ .. .d as hereunder (at page<\/p>\n
.~=
\n.u:gg~-,  _ r<\/p>\n
if   where a piaintiff makes a<\/p>\n
prayer forfwlthcirawai of the suit with liberty to<\/p>\n
 ”  fiiefresh suit. in respect of the subject-matter
\n  ef the soit–,~the Court can permit the withdrawai
\n, rpfthe<\/p>\n
.  sutig. “–..J’_.t cannot refuse that liberty to the plaintiff<\/p>\n
 \u00ab “~on\u00bbjits own.\n<\/p>\n
suit ceupied with the ttberty te file a fresh<\/p>\n
If the Court feeis that, in the<\/p>\n
.’c’ciIif*.*i.Irnstances, brought before it, permission to<\/p>\n
withdraw the suit should not be granted, it can<\/p>\n
 refuse the prayer by rejecting the application. It<\/p>\n
is not open to the Court to split up the prayer
\nr\ufb01ade by the piairutiff by atlowtng the w!tht.|r:-.\\.n.-e!
\nof the suit and refusing the liberty to institute a
\nfresh suit in respect of the-same subject-matter.
\n(See Wazir Singh Chheia Biaka Baba Muiangah
\nShah v. Hidayat Shah’ Shrida, AIR 1967 Pun]
\n4″” Devtdes Tulsirern Brijwanl v, Cornrnr._.<\/p>\n
3336a Municipal corpn., AIR\\1974 Born 39 and<\/p>\n
‘\/_..\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
i <\/p>\n
I-I .\n<\/p>\n
 I\ufb02l.  g l _<\/p>\n
Radha brishna v. State of Rajasthan, ‘V
\nRaj 131 (DB).\n<\/p>\n
1:. p
\nI e .\n<\/p>\n
6. The impugned orolergof the.’  =s.:i_
\nJudge Is unsustainable for lie-vnas.exercis.ed_”V.’\n<\/p>\n
-51191.9-a-H hr ‘L–in<\/p>\n
ltl ..\n<\/p>\n
JLlll3Ulct;\ufb01\ufb01 Whifh hi”:  \ufb01\ufb01nli-. I
\nIt deserves to be and is set aside.” . ‘<\/p>\n
ti<\/p>\n
12. We respectfully ag_re’e,to,what was held by
\nthis Court as wei’l~..as the High ‘Court of i’-‘llnnachal
\nPretiesh in the “eh-‘o.se_ teto oiesieiens. we also
\naccept the above -1arguvrnent~.._a’df\\jeneed by Sri.
\nDatar. That we”d’e,.f’\ufb01rstl”y’, fo’.:r\ufb01Reie 1 of 0.23
\nmakesitaalbundantiy.’ciearjthat fit the Court is
\nsatis\ufb01ed t1;_h_a_i_: the s_uit_;rrijt:.st ran by reason of
\nsorriie f_erVm’ai’-~..d,efei;t_ “ot_i’cha~t there are sufficient
\ngrounds Fer a\u00a3Ip’wing’- the plaintiff to institute a
\nisteit re:-s th’eg”sehjei:t–metter of e suit or e
\n\\_par_t– tl’i\u00e9i’geqf;. git’-._ri1ay* grant permission to the
\n‘piaintiff.to.”with.ci’raw\u00bb the suit with liberty to
\ninstitute a fresh suit on such terms as it thinks<\/p>\n
fit e’nd’vsecond-l_y;~~–that for the writ proceedings
\n__”the provisions in C.P.C. are made applicable<\/p>\n
‘  tinder the’wrl–tA rules.\n<\/p>\n
 _ “13.  that view of the matter, we are of the
\n. seaside:-ea view that the impugned order passed
\nby”th_e*’ learned single Judge is liable to be set
\naside’ and that the matter has to be remitted to<\/p>\n
~ him for passing appropriate order in the matter.”<\/p>\n
9. In my view, the matter herein, is squarely<\/p>\n
 -wlcovered by the aforesaid pronouncement of this Court.<\/p>\n
Following the some it has to be held that the trial court<\/p>\n
;—— w<\/p>\n
\\,.\n<\/p>\n
x<\/p>\n
has committed iilegailty, which is apparentehgdt”h’e:ece1._.;ne<\/p>\n
impugned order cannot be sustained’.<\/p>\n
10. if the suit has_erry’ f’ rrrie’i..d.
\nrectified, since the trial  sLiit”*h_a’cir ico&inlein\u00a2ea,
\napplication for amehdmerittttcoiilld’hate iaeen ‘filed, instead
\nof I.A.2. By vperusinog  that the prayer<\/p>\n
sought for,””g:ennot he–:.V~’igrented;…__3T$ there is scope for<\/p>\n
moitipiie_i.;;_4″‘of”i’iti\u00ab,;Ietii;siri’;’hi-ierice; the trial Court is not
\njustifiedi*.iia\u00a7si’ogj”t.h’e ire?-‘ii’\u00a7.?vned order. Since liberty is
\nnotheino grehted;vi.th’e.\u00e9tpiaintiffs 1’ petitioners should have<\/p>\n
the opbortunitvlltotiirosecute the suit \ufb02ied by them, if<\/p>\n
V-‘ir.r\ufb01ea;essery i5y””**arnendment of piaint, which shall be<\/p>\n
V “softer the defendants are afforded with and<\/p>\n
t’  of hearing. In the said view of the matter, the<\/p>\n
Inthe result, the writ petition is allowed and the
\nimneerred order is set aside. The trial Court is directed to<\/p>\n
restore G.3.9;’2G9.4 to its fiie and proceed for disposal of<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
It<\/p>\n
the observations mac:\n<\/p>\n
e hereinaiggv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Manjunath S\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTIC E..A.N# vi-:}mJeePA\u00abLA.cac\u00a7wbAHkT T DATED THIS THE 18TH\/JDAY40F.”MAR\u00a2.H; 29\u00a733 A” A BEI5OR\u00a35_A_A T = ‘T WRIT PETLTLQH AN.d.A’139″\u00ab5u4Zi.O!35A(C-DFCPC) MANJUNATH:-SIG-\u00a7P’ASAB’iE.Ni5’i:’.v'” AGE’: YEARS DGC: -.AGRv:uLTunE R,\/0 CHIMMAD T ::’TAL{‘3AM’KHAN.DfI”$01.; […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-173308","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nManjunath S\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Manjunath S\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-30T15:54:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Manjunath S\\\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\\\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-30T15:54:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1388,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Manjunath S\\\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\\\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-30T15:54:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Manjunath S\\\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\\\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Manjunath S\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Manjunath S\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-30T15:54:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Manjunath S\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-30T15:54:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008"},"wordCount":1388,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008","name":"Manjunath S\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-30T15:54:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-so-appasab-lendi-vs-badasha-so-usaman-mulla-on-18-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Manjunath S\/O Appasab Lendi vs Badasha S\/O Usaman Mulla on 18 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=173308"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173308\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=173308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=173308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=173308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}