{"id":173577,"date":"2010-05-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010"},"modified":"2017-04-15T03:47:24","modified_gmt":"2017-04-14T22:17:24","slug":"rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S.R.Brahmbhatt,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCR.MA\/2257\/2010\t 1\/ 6\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nMISC.APPLICATION No. 2257 of 2010\n \n\nWith\n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nAPPEAL No. 778 of 2010\n \n\n \n \n======================================\n \n\nRAMESHBHAI\nTRIBHOVANBHAI PATEL - Applicant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nVIPINCHANDRA\nK SHAH - PROP OF JAYVEER ART PRINTERS &amp; 1 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n====================================== \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nMANISH J PATEL for Applicant(s) : 1, \nNone for Respondent(s) :\n1, \nMR RC KODEKAR, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) :\n2, \n======================================\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 10\/05\/2010 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>1.\tHeard<br \/>\nlearned advocate Shri M.J. Patel, learned advocate appearing for the<br \/>\napplicant-appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tThe<br \/>\napplicant, original complainant in Criminal Case No. 4252 of 2008<br \/>\n(New) and Criminal Case No. 1285 of 2005 (Old) registered  in the<br \/>\nCourt of Metropolitan Magistrate, N.I.Act, Court No.2, Ahmedabad, has<br \/>\napproached this Court challenging the order of acquittal dated<br \/>\n8.1.2010 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate acquitting the accused<br \/>\nrespondent  hereinabove of the charge of committing the offence<br \/>\npunishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,<br \/>\n1881(hereinafter referred to as  the N.I. Act  for the sake of<br \/>\nbrevity).\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tThe<br \/>\nfacts in brief leading to filing this application for seeking leave<br \/>\nto appeal deserve to be set out as under:\n<\/p>\n<p>3.1\tIt<br \/>\nwas the case of the complainant before the Court that the complainant<br \/>\nis a Tax Consultant and original accused was owning a firm under the<br \/>\nname and style of Jaiveer Art Printers and is in printing business.<br \/>\nThey are known to each other. The complainant advanced various<br \/>\namounts of money from the year 1998 to 2002 totaling to Rs.4,25,000\/-<br \/>\nwithout any interest to the accused on account of friendly<br \/>\nrelationship between the two. The complainant used to obtain<br \/>\nPromissory Notes while advancing the amounts as stated hereinabove to<br \/>\nthe accused and on demanding the money accused issued cheque dated<br \/>\n15th June, 2005 bearing number No.047649 for Rs.4,25,000\/-<br \/>\nand on presentation of the same, it was returned with endorsement<br \/>\n opening balance insufficient  on 18.6.2005. On 27.6.2005<br \/>\nstatutory notice came to be issued through his advocate, which was<br \/>\nreplied vaguely by the accused and as the money was not paid within<br \/>\nthe time limit, the complaint was presented for action against the<br \/>\naccused-respondent under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. On 27.7.2005,<br \/>\nthe Court after taking evidence and appreciating the same, came to<br \/>\nthe conclusion that the accused was successful in rebutting the<br \/>\npresumption with regard to the liability and complainant could not<br \/>\nestablish his case in respect of the cheque being issued against the<br \/>\ndischarge of the said legal liability of acquitting the accused under<br \/>\nSection 138 of the N.I. Act vide its order dated 8.1.2010 in Criminal<br \/>\nCase No.4252 of 2008 (New) and Criminal Case No. 1285 of 2005 (Old).\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\tBeing<br \/>\naggrieved and dissatisfied with the order of acquittal, the<br \/>\napplicant-appellant (original complainant) hereinabove has preferred<br \/>\nthis application under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,<br \/>\n1973 seeking leave to appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\tShri<br \/>\nM.J.Patel, learned advocate appearing for the complainant invited<br \/>\nthis Court&#8217;s attention to the order impugned and submitted that the<br \/>\ndocumentary evidence enlisted thereunder includes copy of the<br \/>\nincome-tax return at Exh.19 and balance-sheet at Exh.18. These<br \/>\ndocuments should have been accepted to be valid documents as these<br \/>\nevidences indicate the debts and the issuance of the cheque for<br \/>\ndischarging the same. The Court has patently erred in not<br \/>\nappreciating these documents in its true perspective and hence the<br \/>\norder of acquittal deserves to be quashed and set aside. Shri Patel,<br \/>\nlearned advocate appearing for the applicant hereinabove further<br \/>\nsubmitted that non-furnishing of copy of the reply to the notice<br \/>\nissued by the complainant and non-production of the Promissory Notes<br \/>\ncould not have been factors weighing against the applicant as<br \/>\notherwise. The applicant had established its case with regard to debt<br \/>\nin question by producing income-tax return and the balance-sheet.<br \/>\nShri Patel further submitted that accused could not be said to have<br \/>\nrebutted the presumption which, the Court is otherwise required to<br \/>\ndraw under section 139 of the N.I. Act.  The presumption is in favour<br \/>\nof the complainant and against the accused who is the drawer of the<br \/>\ncheque, when the cheque is said to have been signed by the drawer i.e<br \/>\nthe accused hereinabove. He further submitted that, therefore, the<br \/>\norder of acquittal needs to be quashed and aside and leave,<br \/>\ntherefore, may be granted for filing the appeal challenging the order<br \/>\nof acquittal.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\tThis<br \/>\nCourt is unable to accept the submission of Shri Patel for granting<br \/>\nleave for laying appeal challenging the order of acquittal for the<br \/>\nfollowing reasons, namely:-\n<\/p>\n<p>6.1.\tThe<br \/>\ncomplainant in his complaint consistently admitted that as and when<br \/>\nhe had advanced money on account of friendly relationship with the<br \/>\naccused, he had been careful in obtaining Promissory Notes at all the<br \/>\ntime. In his cross-examination also in answer to the question that<br \/>\nwhether he had taken Promissory Note, he was ready and willing to<br \/>\nproduce those Promissory Note as and when required. The complainant<br \/>\nhas also indicated in his cross-examination that the entire sum of<br \/>\nRs.4,25,000\/- i.e, the cheque amount had been advanced over the<br \/>\nperiod of time from 1998 to 2002 or thereafter but he has not<br \/>\nproduced any Promissory Note and he has also admitted in his<br \/>\ncross-examination that it is his practice to return the Promissory<br \/>\nNote to the author of the note as and when the author returns back<br \/>\nthe money. This admission coupled with the fact that non-availability<br \/>\nof the Promissory Note by the complainant are sufficient to indicate<br \/>\nthat the complainant did not have those notes and the defence put up<br \/>\nby the accused is believable and acceptable.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.2.\tIt<br \/>\nis also important to note that the Court has recorded its finding<br \/>\nwith regard to the complainant failing in establishing the writing of<br \/>\nthe cheque by the accused. The  complainant has, in answer to the<br \/>\nquestion during the cross-examination, said that he recognized only<br \/>\nthe signature of the accused but does not recognize the hand writing<br \/>\nof the accused. The advocate for the accused in the cross-examination<br \/>\ncategorically made suggestion with regard to issuance of blank cheque<br \/>\ntowards security in the year 1998. The complainant has not cared to<br \/>\nproduce reply issued by the accused to the complainant nor has he<br \/>\ncared to indicate any substance of the reply. The entire question<br \/>\nwith regard to reply is said to be brushed aside by merely referring<br \/>\nto   vague reply  coming forward by the accused. The trial Court<br \/>\nafter relying upon the ratio laid down in the case of  <a href=\"\/doc\/673245\/\">Krishna<br \/>\nJanardhan Bhat vs. Dattatraya G. Hegde<\/a> reported in 2008 Criminal Law<br \/>\nJournal 1172 came to the conclusion that the offence cannot be said<br \/>\nto have been proved beyond doubt and acquitted the accused-respondent<br \/>\nhereinabove of the charge of committing the offence punishable under<br \/>\nSection 138 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.\tThis<br \/>\nCourt,  would, naturally, be very slow in interfering with the  order<br \/>\nof acquittal, unless and until it is established by the<br \/>\napplicant-appellant that sustaining the order of acquittal would<br \/>\nresult into miscarriage of justice.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\tIn<br \/>\nview of the aforesaid discussion, this Court is amply persuaded to<br \/>\nhold that sustaining of the order of acquittal would in any case not<br \/>\namount to resulting in miscarriage of justice. Therefore, the order<br \/>\nof acquittal calls for no interference and the application deserves<br \/>\nto be rejected. Accordingly, the application is rejected.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.\tIn<br \/>\nview of the order passed in the above Criminal Miscellaneous<br \/>\nApplication, the appeal is also required to be disposed of.<br \/>\nAccordingly, the appeal disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p>(S.\n<\/p>\n<p>R. Brahmbhatt, J. )<\/p>\n<p>sudhir<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010 Author: S.R.Brahmbhatt,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CR.MA\/2257\/2010 1\/ 6 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 2257 of 2010 With CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 778 of 2010 ====================================== RAMESHBHAI TRIBHOVANBHAI PATEL &#8211; Applicant(s) Versus VIPINCHANDRA K SHAH &#8211; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-173577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-14T22:17:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-14T22:17:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1173,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010\",\"name\":\"Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-14T22:17:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-14T22:17:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-14T22:17:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010"},"wordCount":1173,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010","name":"Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-14T22:17:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshbhai-vs-vipinchandra-on-10-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rameshbhai vs Vipinchandra on 10 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=173577"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173577\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=173577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=173577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=173577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}