{"id":173770,"date":"2010-09-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010"},"modified":"2015-07-06T01:14:57","modified_gmt":"2015-07-05T19:44:57","slug":"smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil And H.S.Kempanna<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE ZSRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010\n\n \n\n:PRE}SENT:\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE N.K.PATIL&lt; L\n\nAND\n\nTHE HbN&#039;BLE MR.JUS&#039;I&#039;I_C.E\u00bbH.S.,KEh7il519\u00a7.7\u00a7T1\\?&quot;A&#039;_&#039;  \n\nM.F.A.N0. 83840? 2095 tMV1&#039;   \n\nBetween:\n\n1. Smt. A.nuradha.1\\\/i.S.S\nAged 51 years. V  \nW\/0. Late D.K.AI1jan\u00ab._ \n\n2. Master  A\nAged&quot; 25--.ye+f1rs,&quot;:f:.;  &quot;  \nS\/oi. Late D;.K._.fA:ojAa1?..MV \n\n3. 1\\\/Iaste:v}&#039;i.A.V.iVe&#039;la.:&#039;;--   \nAged 15-years, ._ A ._ S \nS,\/0. Latel1&quot;).,K.&#039;AnjaVn.\n * 4. l&#039;SmtE.&quot;tDe&quot;Vamma,\n &#039;Aged 9.5*y_e&#039;ar__s,\n Late  Kenehegowda,\nA Reporte_d..dead.\nIflowefvrerdby oversight Tribunal has\nshown her name in cause title by\n. over, sight.\nto &quot; * LRs of A4 as already on record\nx as appellant No. I to 3.\n\n 3&quot;&#039; Appellant is mi 1&#039; being\nrepresented by &#039; other and\n,3 &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&quot;n&#039;&#039;&#039;mmM&#039;Mm\u00bb&#039;w\n\nI\nI\n6-\n\n\n\nnatural guardian lsi Appellant.\n\nAll R\/at.No.808, 2nd Cross,\nH.R.B.R Layout, 18&#039; Block.\nBanaswadi,\nBangalore-560 043.\n\n(By Sri. O. Mahesh, Advocate)\nAnd:\n\nThe Managing Director,\nK.S.R.T.C. Depot, \nShanthinagar,\nK.H. Road,   A\nBangalore--56O O27.  p  V pp \n_.     ...... ..Respondent<\/pre>\n<p>(By Sri.  &#8216;<br \/>\n &#8216; &#8216; &#8216; &#8216;    &#8216;I U<br \/>\nThis MFA. is Vfiled.4_U-\/Vs. 173(1) of MV Act against the<br \/>\njudgment and awaid dated: 31.03.2005 passed in MVC No.<br \/>\n3089\/1995&#8243;on the&#8212;.\ufb01le &#8220;&#8211;:)_f&#8221;the VI Addl. SC] and IVIACT,<br \/>\nBangalore,&#8217; {SCCH&#8211; .02}, &#8220;partly allowing the claim petition for<br \/>\ncompensation ._and*seek1r1g enhancement of compensation<\/p>\n<p> With\u00abiCnte&#8221;rest at 1&#8242;?-_&#8217;\u00bb%___1_&#8217;-_&#8217;_.A.<\/p>\n<p>  .A. coming on for Hearing this day,<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;lPAvT_IaL~ J&#8230;_dfel1vered the following:<\/p>\n<p>:JUDG MENT:\n<\/p>\n<p> appeal filed by the claimants is arising out<\/p>\n<p>V impugned judgment and award dated<\/p>\n<p>  3&amp;1;\/03\/2005 passed in MVC No.3089\/1995 on the file<\/p>\n<p>%.\u00bb;&#8230;&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>If<\/p>\n<p>3% pa, from the date of petition till its deposit. ~-\u00abBeing<\/p>\n<p>aggrieved by the finding of the Tribunai that <\/p>\n<p>10% contributory negligence on the   <\/p>\n<p>deceased and dis&#8211;satisfied Wiith&#8221;&#8216;   <\/p>\n<p>compensation, the appellants i\u00e9fhave <\/p>\n<p>appeal seeking appropriate <\/p>\n<p>4. We have  by<br \/>\nthe appeilants in  appeal and<br \/>\nheard the    ifor respondent-\n<\/p>\n<p>Corporaticggi  _   ,<\/p>\n<p> by the appeliants<br \/>\nin thistappetalt  Tribunal has erred in not<\/p>\n<p>awarding reasonable compensation towards loss of<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;:&#8217;dep&#8217;er1d&#8217;ency&#8217;\u00ab._and conventional heads and also failed to<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;ta1\u00a7.e.into&#8217;..,con&#8217;sideration that, if the deceased was alive<\/p>\n<p>he &#8216;&#8221;&#8221;&#8212;-mig:htv&#8221;&#8221;have getting additional increments and<\/p>\n<p> eipr-emotions and other benefits in his service as per the<\/p>\n<p>  iaw laid down by the Apex Court and this Court in hosts<\/p>\n<p>T  judgment and therefore, the impugned judgment and<\/p>\n<p>%W<\/p>\n<p>\/&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>X 12 X 11) instead of ?6,84,000\/&#8211; awarded by the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal and accordingly, it is awarded.<\/p>\n<p>9. The Tribunal has erred in not awarding  *<\/p>\n<p>compensation under conventional__heads andVl&#8221;th:erefore, it it<\/p>\n<p>needs to be modi\ufb01ed. Having r;&#8217;t.~..ga1&#8242;:&#8221;._j1e xto lithe <\/p>\n<p>circumstances of the case, we&#8221;&#8216;&#8211;award&#8217;v~a surnt. of.:._i?1.5.\u00a70O0\/&#8211; = &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>towards loss of consortium, a_:lsum,of \u20ac.l&#8217;G,f):QO\/w.} towards<br \/>\nloss of estate, a sum of  loss of love and<br \/>\naffection and a sum of   &#8220;transportation and<\/p>\n<p>funeral expenses.;5&#8217; _. . &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>10.    contributory negligence<br \/>\nat 10%, on  deceased is concerned, the<\/p>\n<p>same cannot be sustained and it is liable to be set aside<\/p>\n<p> A. for_t&#8217;he reason&#8217;tI1at..,&#8230;_.it could be seen from the materials<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;aylai1abIe:&#8221;o;rit.  that, bus has hit the motor cycle in<\/p>\n<p>bumper and the same is not in dispute.<\/p>\n<p> is also not in dispute that, driver of the bus<\/p>\n<p>A &#8220;ll light the cigarette instead of driving the vehicle<\/p>\n<p> and caused the said ac\ufb01ent and therefore, the said<\/p>\n<p>J MM<br \/>\n1&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>accident was solely due to the negligent driving by,\u00bb the<\/p>\n<p>driver of the bus, as he is not supposed <\/p>\n<p>Cigarette while driving the bus as per  <\/p>\n<p>conditions of the Corporation. <\/p>\n<p>has not been looked into or eonlside-red <\/p>\n<p>by the Tribunal while fixing  negligence<br \/>\nat 10% on the part ofthe &#8216;Further,  is clear<br \/>\nfrom the contents of jvarid the sketch<br \/>\nthat, two    right side.\n<\/p>\n<p>Having   thelrilatter, we are of the<br \/>\nconsidereld    has erred in fixing<br \/>\nthe  at 10% on the part of the<\/p>\n<p>deceased. anld&#8217;-.ti1&#8217;e&#8217;l&#8217; is liable to be set aside and<\/p>\n<p> it is set aside, fixing the entire liability on<\/p>\n<p>the&#8217;-lrespozndenft\u00bbCorporation<\/p>\n<p>  Having regard to the facts and circumstances<\/p>\n<p>it it it   the case as stated above, the impugned judgment and<\/p>\n<p>award&#8217; passed by the Tribunal is liable to be modi\ufb01ed.<\/p>\n<p>\/$1..\n<\/p>\n<p>[O<\/p>\n<p>The total Compensation payable comes to ?10,87-,-356\/-<\/p>\n<p>and the break&#8211; up is as follows:<\/p>\n<p>Towards Loss of dependency ______m<\/p>\n<p>Towards loss of consortium _&#8211; &#8221; &#8220;1v~5,:jOOG\/&#8211; <\/p>\n<p>Towards loss of estate :,j.LO,.0&#8217;O0\/-&#8216;   &#8216;d<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\n? .\n<\/p>\n<p>Towards loss of love and affection   &#8216; &#8216;Sf.  2O_,OO_O\/&#8211;&#8220;~=<br \/>\n: .3 &#8216;<br \/>\n?\n<\/p>\n<p>Towards transportation and. fune1&#8243;a.IA X.<\/p>\n<p>T  &#8216;-\n<\/p>\n<p>expenses &#8221; T&#8217; r <\/p>\n<p>Total t&#8217; 1VO;&#8217;8&#8217;t7-;35\u20ac;\/-W<\/p>\n<p>12. Accordingly,  appellants is<br \/>\nallowed in p.\u00a7%1+{:i;\ufb02Dl1d &#8216;i&#8217;;:&#8221;&#8216;,&#8221;i&#8217;1\u20ac;:b  and award<br \/>\npassed by .3089\/1995 is hereby<br \/>\nmodified,&#8221;&#8216;1i:\u00abtii}:y,g#\u00a7    on the Corporation<br \/>\nand  of ?lO,87,356\/&#8211; instead of<\/p>\n<p>%&#8217;6,5l_.60O awarhded.  the Tribunal. The enhanced<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;  ppcoinjpenpsation cornesto ?-4,35\/756\/&#8211;. The interest is awarded<\/p>\n<p> at(_3%_  :.ii&#8217;oni&#8211;.the date of the petition till its realisation on<\/p>\n<p>thejtotal&#8217;compensation of Rs.10,87,356\/- instead of 30\/0<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; V  awarded by the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>   Corporation is directed to deposit the enhanced<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  compensation within a period of four weeks from the date of<\/p>\n<p>it receipt of a copy of this judgment and award with interest at<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab_M_#___m_,W,&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>10,215,356;-e&#8221;&#8221;7&#8217;f&#8221;_f H<\/p>\n<p>1]<\/p>\n<p>6% p.a., from the date of petition till its realisationen the<\/p>\n<p>total compensation awarded.\n<\/p>\n<p>Out of the enhanced compensation of   <\/p>\n<p>a sum of ?3,00,000\/&#8211; with prop0&#8217;rti0nate  <\/p>\n<p>be invested in the Fixed Dep0sitA:&#8217;\u00abVi_rr-arry <\/p>\n<p>Scheduled Bank, in the namrejsr. the &#8216;appe11a::1\u00a3t&#8221;r\u00bbr5.&#8217;1 for a h&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>period of five years  reneewahletttfbryyancthefftve years<br \/>\nwith liberty to her to   accrued on it,<br \/>\nperiodically.  x &#8216;t u  <\/p>\n<p>The   Rs.1,35,756\/- with<br \/>\nprop0rti01&#8217;1at.e:&#8217;ihterest  \u00ab&#8217;be&#8221;&#8221;reI\u00a3eased in favour of the<br \/>\nappellaht 1&#8217;Jcs.&#8217; V   &#8220;proportion, immediateiy, on<br \/>\ndeposit by utthel <\/p>\n<p>.. \u00abflaouffice is dir&#8217;ecte_dA to draw the award, accordingly.<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-~<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\u00bb<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010 Author: N.K.Patil And H.S.Kempanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE ZSRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010 :PRE}SENT: THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE N.K.PATIL&lt; L AND THE HbN&#039;BLE MR.JUS&#039;I&#039;I_C.E\u00bbH.S.,KEh7il519\u00a7.7\u00a7T1\\?&quot;A&#039;_&#039; M.F.A.N0. 83840? 2095 tMV1&#039; Between: 1. Smt. A.nuradha.1\\\/i.S.S Aged [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-173770","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-05T19:44:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-05T19:44:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":850,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-05T19:44:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-05T19:44:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-05T19:44:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010"},"wordCount":850,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010","name":"Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-05T19:44:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-anuradha-m-s-s-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Anuradha M S S vs The Managing Director on 23 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173770","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=173770"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173770\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=173770"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=173770"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=173770"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}