{"id":173821,"date":"2009-12-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009"},"modified":"2019-02-18T09:05:50","modified_gmt":"2019-02-18T03:35:50","slug":"the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills &#8230; vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills &#8230; vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>C.W.P. No.8239 of 1989 (O&amp;M)                              -1-\n\n  IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB\n          AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                             C.W.P. No.8239 of 1989 (O&amp;M)\n                             Date of Decision: 18.12.2009\n\nThe Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd., Nawashahr\n                                           ....Petitioner\n                           Versus\nSh. Hardev Singh and another                    ....Respondents<\/pre>\n<p>Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate<br \/>\n         for the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>         Mr. Deepak Sibbal, Advocate<br \/>\n         for respondent No.1.\n<\/p>\n<p>CORAM:HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN<\/p>\n<p>1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the<br \/>\n    judgment ? No\n<\/p>\n<p>2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No\n<\/p>\n<p>                               -.-\n<\/p>\n<p>K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)<\/p>\n<p>C.M. No.16554 of 2009<\/p>\n<p>          Application is allowed as prayed for.\n<\/p>\n<p>C.M. No.16555 of 2009<\/p>\n<p>          Application is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>          Delay of 84 days in filing the application for recalling of<\/p>\n<p>the order is delayed.\n<\/p>\n<p>C.M. No.16556 of 2009<\/p>\n<p>          For the reasons stated in the application, the order of<\/p>\n<p>dismissal, which was made on 14.07.2009 for default of<\/p>\n<p>appearance, is recalled.    The case is taken up for hearing on<\/p>\n<p>merits.\n<\/p>\n<p>          C.M. stands disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.W.P. No.8239 of 1989 (O&amp;M)                              -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>C.W.P. No.8239 of 1989<\/p>\n<p>1.       The award under challenge is a direction for<\/p>\n<p>reinstatement to a workman in a Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd.<\/p>\n<p>The management had served two separate charge-sheets on the<\/p>\n<p>workman for alleged misconduct that resulted in financial losses<\/p>\n<p>to the management. One of a shortall in the cane purchased and<\/p>\n<p>two, a surprise visit yielding to unearthing a deliberate omission<\/p>\n<p>to make entries in the bill prchi.      The result of the enquiry<\/p>\n<p>purported to be proof of the misconduct and the management<\/p>\n<p>went ahead with an order of termination.             This order of<\/p>\n<p>termination was challenged through a reference to a Labour Court<\/p>\n<p>where the Labour Court had framed several issues that included<\/p>\n<p>whether the enquiry was fair and proper. The Labour Court had,<\/p>\n<p>after obtaining the statement of claim filed by the parties, directed<\/p>\n<p>to come up for evidence only on Issue No.1 namely whether the<\/p>\n<p>enquiry relied on by the management was fair and proper on<\/p>\n<p>19.02.1986. It appears that the case had been adjourned to several<\/p>\n<p>dates and on 15.05.1987, the Court directed the respondent to<\/p>\n<p>produce its entire evidence on own responsibility. After letting in<\/p>\n<p>the evidence, written arguments were filed where the management<\/p>\n<p>had stated that they should be granted an opportunity to let in<\/p>\n<p>evidence on other issues if a finding was recorded that the enquiry<\/p>\n<p>had not been fair and proper. The Labour Court, however, while<\/p>\n<p>passing the impugned award found that the enquiry was not fair<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.W.P. No.8239 of 1989 (O&amp;M)                             -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and proper and he had also given his finding on other issues. It is<\/p>\n<p>not possible to discern from the award as to whether the counsel<\/p>\n<p>had been specifically apprised of the fact that the award would be<\/p>\n<p>delivered on all the issues. Indeed, the Labour Court could not<\/p>\n<p>have undertaken such an exercise and could not have answered its<\/p>\n<p>findings on other issues without affording to the management an<\/p>\n<p>opportunity to lead evidence on other issues and particularly<\/p>\n<p>giving an opportunity to prove the misconduct if it chose to give<\/p>\n<p>evidence before the Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.       The issue as to how and under what circumstance the<\/p>\n<p>permission to let in evidence for proof of misconduct had been<\/p>\n<p>dealt with by the Consitution Bench of Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in<\/p>\n<p>Karnataka State Road Transport Corpn. Vs. Lakshmidevamma<\/p>\n<p>(2001) 5 SCC 433. The procedure laid down refers to the fact<\/p>\n<p>that the management shall seek for such an option in its written<\/p>\n<p>statement or it may arise in a case where the Labour Court itself<\/p>\n<p>frames a preliminary issue and directs the parties to lead evidence<\/p>\n<p>only on such issue. By an implication, it would mean that the<\/p>\n<p>issues are still open as regards the other issues. The Hon&#8217;ble<\/p>\n<p>Supreme Court held that the Labour Court may in its discretion<\/p>\n<p>provide for such an option notwithstanding the fact that the<\/p>\n<p>management did not seek for such specific option. In this case,<\/p>\n<p>the Court when it directed evidence be let in only on one issue<\/p>\n<p>namely Issue No.1, it could not have delivered an award on all<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.W.P. No.8239 of 1989 (O&amp;M)                            -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>other issues without putting it to the managment whether they<\/p>\n<p>wanted to lead any evidence on other issues. The award in so far<\/p>\n<p>as it gives a finding on all issues without giving the opportunity<\/p>\n<p>to the management to prove the misconduct before the Labour<\/p>\n<p>Court was unjustified.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.       The direction for reinstatement, however, has become<\/p>\n<p>over the period of time, meaningless, in view of the subsequent<\/p>\n<p>events that have taken place when the workman was reinstated<\/p>\n<p>and he was also superannuated. The admitted position does not go<\/p>\n<p>beyond that and it is not known whether the workman was given<\/p>\n<p>the wages on a regular scale of pay or whether he had been<\/p>\n<p>allowed only the benefit of what was in another way possible for<\/p>\n<p>drawing the benefits under Section 17-B of the Industrial<\/p>\n<p>Disputes Act. The issue turns on whether the workman should be<\/p>\n<p>granted the back wages for the period when he was terminated<\/p>\n<p>from service pursuant to a departmental enquiry on 17.12.982 and<\/p>\n<p>when he was reinstated in service by virtue of the award dated<\/p>\n<p>22.12.1987.   I do not think the matter should go for a fresh<\/p>\n<p>adjudication after 20 years, for the workman had the benefit of<\/p>\n<p>reinstatement on an award, which I have held to be not validly<\/p>\n<p>passed. If the workman had not been put a regular scale of pay<\/p>\n<p>but he was merely afforded last drawn wages under Section 17-B<\/p>\n<p>of the Industrial Disputes Act, I direct that the management shall<\/p>\n<p>pay the wages on the regular scale of a person working in his<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.W.P. No.8239 of 1989 (O&amp;M)                              -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>cadre. However, if the wages have been paid to the workman as a<\/p>\n<p>regular employee, nothing remains to be done. He shall also be<\/p>\n<p>entitled to all terminal benefits.   The workman shall not be<\/p>\n<p>entitled to any back wages during the period when he did not give<\/p>\n<p>his services to the Society.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.       The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms<\/p>\n<p>taking note of the subsequent events as well. No costs.<\/p>\n<p>                                               (K. KANNAN)<br \/>\n                                                 JUDGE<br \/>\nDecember 18, 2009<br \/>\nPankaj*\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills &#8230; vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009 C.W.P. No.8239 of 1989 (O&amp;M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.8239 of 1989 (O&amp;M) Date of Decision: 18.12.2009 The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd., Nawashahr &#8230;.Petitioner [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-173821","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills ... vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills ... vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-18T03:35:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills &#8230; vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-18T03:35:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1038,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009\",\"name\":\"The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills ... vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-18T03:35:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills &#8230; vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills ... vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills ... vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-18T03:35:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills &#8230; vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-18T03:35:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009"},"wordCount":1038,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009","name":"The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills ... vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-18T03:35:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-doaba-cooperative-sugar-mills-vs-sh-hardev-singh-and-another-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills &#8230; vs Sh. Hardev Singh And Another on 18 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173821","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=173821"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173821\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=173821"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=173821"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=173821"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}