{"id":173941,"date":"2011-08-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011"},"modified":"2018-05-04T08:12:54","modified_gmt":"2018-05-04T02:42:54","slug":"mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                          Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n                             File\u00a0No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000202\u00adSM\n                     Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19)\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0hearing                         :                                    3\u00a0August\u00a02011\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0decision                        :                                    3\u00a0August\u00a02011\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0                  :   Shri\u00a0B\u00a0R\u00a0Beedu\n                                            8,\u00a0Ramalinga\u00a0Nagar,\n                                            Bharathi\u00a0Park,\u00a05th\u00a0Cross\u00a0Road,\n                                            Coimbatore\u00a0-\u00a0641\u00a0011.\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0          :   CPIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Commission,\n                                            Satarkta\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0G\u00a0P\u00a0O\u00a0Complex,\n                                            Block\u00a0A,\u00a0INA,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0-\u00a0110\u00a0023.\n\n\n        The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0person.\n\n        On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0were\u00a0present:\u00ad<\/pre>\n<pre>        (i)     Shri\u00a0R.C.\u00a0Dhankar,\u00a0Director,\n        (ii)    Shri\u00a0P.\u00a0Sarkar,\u00a0SO\n\n\n\nChief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner                  :      Shri\u00a0Satyananda\u00a0Mishra\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>2.      We \u00a0 heard \u00a0 this \u00a0 case \u00a0 through \u00a0 video \u00a0 conferencing. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>present \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 Coimbatore \u00a0 studio \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 NIC \u00a0 while \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents \u00a0 were\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>present\u00a0in\u00a0our\u00a0chamber.\u00a0We\u00a0heard\u00a0their\u00a0submissions.<\/p>\n<p>3.      The \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 had \u00a0 sought \u00a0 the \u00a0 copies \u00a0 of \u00a0 documents \u00a0 along \u00a0 with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>enclosures\u00a0through\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0CBEC\u00a0had\u00a0explained\u00a0the\u00a0position\u00a0that\u00a0laid\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CVC\u00a0to\u00a0issue\u00a0the\u00a0advice\u00a0in\u00a0their\u00a0office\u00a0memorandum\u00a0number\u00a0067\/CEX\/061\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>59638\u00a0dated\u00a015\u00a0June\u00a02007\u00a0as\u00a0also\u00a0the\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0file\u00a0notings\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>disposal\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0reference\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0CBEC.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO\u00a0declined\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0by\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000202\u00adSM<br \/>\n claiming\u00a0exemption\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a08(1)\u00a0(h)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0(RTI)\u00a0Act\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>after \u00a0 consulting \u00a0 the \u00a0 CBEC \u00a0 as \u00a0 a \u00a0 third \u00a0 party. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 had\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>endorsed\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a04.     The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0although\u00a0the\u00a0proceedings\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Appellant \u00a0 himself \u00a0 had \u00a0 since \u00a0 been \u00a0 completed, \u00a0 the \u00a0 proceedings \u00a0 against \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>remaining\u00a0 employees\u00a0 who\u00a0 had \u00a0 been\u00a0 chargesheeted \u00a0 in \u00a0 connection \u00a0 with \u00a0 this\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>case\u00a0were\u00a0still\u00a0pending\u00a0and,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0the\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0entire\u00a0details\u00a0as\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>sought \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 could \u00a0 adversely \u00a0 affect \u00a0 the \u00a0 pending \u00a0 enquiry \u00a0 and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>apprehension\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0offenders.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0other\u00a0hand,\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0proceedings\u00a0pending\u00a0against\u00a0him\u00a0were\u00a0now\u00a0complete\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>second\u00a0stage\u00a0advice\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CVC,\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0penalised.\u00a0He\u00a0wanted\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0information\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0disclosed.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0argued\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>since\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0involved\u00a0a\u00a0large\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0employees\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>documents \u00a0 received \u00a0 from \u00a0 the \u00a0 CBEC \u00a0 had \u00a0 common \u00a0 references \u00a0 to \u00a0 all \u00a0 those\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>employees,\u00a0distinguishing\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0rest\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>of\u00a0the\u00a0cases\u00a0might\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0possible.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.      We\u00a0carefully\u00a0considered\u00a0the\u00a0facts\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0as\u00a0well\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>made \u00a0 during \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing. \u00a0 Since \u00a0 the \u00a0 disciplinary \u00a0 proceedings \u00a0 against \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Appellant\u00a0 have\u00a0 concluded\u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 advice\u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 CVC,\u00a0 we\u00a0 do \u00a0 not\u00a0 see\u00a0 any\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>reason\u00a0why\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0documents\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0disclosed\u00a0now.\u00a0Even\u00a0if\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>communications \u00a0 from \u00a0 the \u00a0 CBEC \u00a0 would \u00a0 contain \u00a0 some \u00a0 references \u00a0 to \u00a0 other\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>employees,\u00a0 it \u00a0 would\u00a0 hardly\u00a0 matter\u00a0 now\u00a0 that\u00a0 the \u00a0 CVC\u00a0 has\u00a0 already\u00a0 given \u00a0 its\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>advice\u00a0in\u00a0relation\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0Therefore,\u00a0we\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0within\u00a010\u00a0working\u00a0days\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0the\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0desired\u00a0documents.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nCIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000202\u00adSM\n<\/p>\n<p> 6.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0off\u00a0accordingly.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>7.       Copies\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0parties.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                               (Satyananda\u00a0Mishra)<br \/>\n                                                             Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>         Authenticated \u00a0 true \u00a0 copy. \u00a0 \u00a0 Additional \u00a0 copies \u00a0 of \u00a0 orders \u00a0 shall \u00a0 be \u00a0 supplied \u00a0 against\u00a0<br \/>\napplication \u00a0 and \u00a0 payment \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 charges \u00a0 prescribed \u00a0 under \u00a0 the \u00a0 Act \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 of \u00a0 this\u00a0<br \/>\nCommission.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                              (Vijay\u00a0Bhalla)<br \/>\n                                                                                         Deputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000202\u00adSM\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000202\u00adSM Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19) Date\u00a0of\u00a0hearing : 3\u00a0August\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0decision : 3\u00a0August\u00a02011 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0 : Shri\u00a0B\u00a0R\u00a0Beedu 8,\u00a0Ramalinga\u00a0Nagar, Bharathi\u00a0Park,\u00a05th\u00a0Cross\u00a0Road, Coimbatore\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0641\u00a0011. Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0 : CPIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Commission, Satarkta\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0G\u00a0P\u00a0O\u00a0Complex, Block\u00a0A,\u00a0INA,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0110\u00a0023. The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0person. On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0were\u00a0present:\u00ad (i) Shri\u00a0R.C.\u00a0Dhankar,\u00a0Director, (ii) Shri\u00a0P.\u00a0Sarkar,\u00a0SO Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner : Shri\u00a0Satyananda\u00a0Mishra 2. We \u00a0 heard \u00a0 this \u00a0 case \u00a0 through \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-173941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-04T02:42:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-04T02:42:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":456,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-04T02:42:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-04T02:42:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-04T02:42:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011"},"wordCount":456,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011","name":"Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-04T02:42:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-b-r-beedu-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. B R Beedu vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=173941"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173941\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=173941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=173941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=173941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}