{"id":174198,"date":"2009-12-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009"},"modified":"2017-08-15T17:29:50","modified_gmt":"2017-08-15T11:59:50","slug":"shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                         CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                           Appeal No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2008\/01227 dated 11.7.2008\n                             Right to Information Act 2005 - Section 19\n\n\nAppellant        -          Shri V. K. Agarwal\nRespondent           -      High Court of Delhi\n                                  Decision announced: 17.12.2009\n\n\nFacts<\/pre>\n<p>:\n<\/p>\n<p>         By an application of 24.12.07 Shri V. K. Agarwal of Shiv Nagar, Delhi<br \/>\napplied to the Jt. Registrar (Estt) &amp; CPIO High Court of Delhi seeking the<br \/>\nfollowing information:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;1.   Details about the Monitoring Committee members with their<br \/>\n               addresses, as constituted recently in respect of initiating<br \/>\n               disciplinary action against the Judges of Delhi Courts and<br \/>\n               Tribunals.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         2.    Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan has been filing false<br \/>\n               affidavits in the High Court \/ Tribunal. Kindly provide the<br \/>\n               method, manner and procedure under which, such false<br \/>\n               affidavits could be dealt with effectively.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>         To this Shri V. K. Agarwal initially received a response on 4.2.08 informing<br \/>\nhim that the fee of Rs. 10\/- was deficient as per Delhi High Court (Right to<br \/>\nInformation) Rules, 2006. He then submitted on 14.2.08 a further fee of Rs. 40\/-.<br \/>\nUpon this PIO Shri J. N. Kalra responded on 11.3.08 refusing the information<br \/>\nsought as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;1.   The information sought by you is confidential and not in any<br \/>\n               way related to you and is in the form of a roving and fishing<br \/>\n               inquiry. The information sought for cannot be provided in<br \/>\n               terms of Rule 4(iv) and Rule 5(b) of Delhi High Court (Right<br \/>\n               to Information) Rules, 2006.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         2.    The Forum of RTI Act is not meant for handing out legal<br \/>\n               opinion. The information sought for in question No. 2 of the<br \/>\n               application is a legal opinion and not &#8220;information&#8221; within the<br \/>\n               meaning of the expression used in the law and rules.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                  1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>        Aggrieved Shri Agarwal moved an appeal before Shri Kalam Singh,<br \/>\nRegistrar (Admn) on 22.5.08 on the following grounds:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;1.   The documents demanded do not fall within the purview of<br \/>\n             any of the sections of prohibited nature and these are<br \/>\n             ordinary documents i.e. for the people in general.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       2.    Larger public interest is a clean and transparent life in the<br \/>\n             judicial system.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       3.    Monitoring Committee its members their addresses etc. are<br \/>\n             a public policy.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       4.    Truthfulness in judiciary as well as before judiciary by the<br \/>\n             litigants is a published policy in the Indian judicial System<br \/>\n             and its disclosure stands for the lager public interest and<br \/>\n             none of the information demanded fall within the preview of<br \/>\n             sec. 8, 11 and all such sections of RTI Act.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       Upon this Appellate Authority Shri Kamal Singh in his order of 26.5.08<br \/>\nfound as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;I have heard the appellant. The appellant contended that Kendriya<br \/>\n       Vidyalaya Sanghathan is filing false affidavits and the Judges of the<br \/>\n       Central Administrative Tribunal are not taking any action against<br \/>\n       them. Therefore, he wanted to make a complaint to the members<br \/>\n       of Monitoring Committee against the Judges of Central<br \/>\n       Administrative Tribunal. The appellant further contended that he<br \/>\n       should be informed the method, manner and procedure under<br \/>\n       which filing of such false affidavits could be dealt with. The<br \/>\n       contention is in the form of seeking advice or legal opinion to tackle<br \/>\n       the problem of filing false affidavit. If Kendriya Vidyalaya is filing<br \/>\n       false affidavits, the appellant may take appropriate legal remedy<br \/>\n       available to him. Public Information Officer and\/or Appellate<br \/>\n       Authority are not competent to advise on such issues.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       In his prayer before us in his second appeal Shri Agarwal has pleaded as<br \/>\nfollows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;a)   Order to supply the correct information immediately<br \/>\n             absolutely free of cost.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       b)    Action against PIO be initiated for late supply of<br \/>\n             information.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       c)    Impose a penalty as per act \/ rules i.e. Rs. 250\/- per day<br \/>\n             till the date the proper and authentic information is<br \/>\n             supplied.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       d)    Any other in favour of appellant as against respondents<br \/>\n             as deemed fit.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         2<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>        e)     Justice should be awarded to appellant.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       The appeal was heard on 17.12.2009. The following are present:<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       Respondents<br \/>\n            Shri Rajiv Bansal, Counsel for DHC<br \/>\n            Shri Gurcharan Singh, Asstt. Registrar<br \/>\n            Shri Sanjay Prakash Gupta, AOJ<br \/>\n            Shri Divyaranjan Gouda, JJA<\/p>\n<p>       Although appellant Sh. V. K. Agarwal had been informed by Notice dated<br \/>\n1.12.2009 regarding the hearing, he has opted not to be present. Learned<br \/>\nCounsel for respondents Shri Rajiv Bansal submitted that in fact there is no such<br \/>\nMonitoring Committee regarding which appellant Shri Agarwal has sought<br \/>\ninformation. However, he submitted that this information could not be provided at<br \/>\nthe initial stage because it was excluded from disclosure under the Delhi High<br \/>\nCourt (Right to Information) Rules, 2006 under Rule 4(4) &amp; 5(b), which rules have<br \/>\nsubsequently been withdrawn in consequence of the advice of Central<br \/>\nInformation Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>                            DECISION NOTICE<\/p>\n<p>       The first question of Shri V. K. Agarwal in his application of 24.12.08 is<br \/>\ndecidedly a request for information. The reason why it was refused in the first<br \/>\ninstance has been explained by the learned Counsel for respondents. However,<br \/>\nthe actual information in this regard is that there is no such Monitoring Committee<br \/>\nwith regard to which details had been sought, information that is now disclosed.<br \/>\nOn the other hand, equally clearly the question at Sr. No. 2 is a request for<br \/>\nadvice, which, as held by the CPIO, cannot be treated as &#8220;Advice&#8221; under Sec.<br \/>\n2(f) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, as such advice, unless it is maintained<br \/>\nin material form by a public authority, cannot be treated as information.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The only issue that remains is whether the CPIO has defaulted in<br \/>\nresponding to an application of 24.12.07 only on 4.2.08.          In this case the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         3<\/span><br \/>\n application had been submitted without adequate fee.         It was, therefore, not<br \/>\nmandatory in law for the CPIO to respond. On the other hand u\/s 6 of the RTI<br \/>\nAct a Public Information Officer is expected to &#8220;render all reasonable assistance<br \/>\nto the person making a request&#8221;.       Although this proviso to section 6 refers<br \/>\nspecifically to a person who cannot make the request in writing, the spirit of the<br \/>\nAct is that the CPIO assist a person seeking information under the RTI Act 2005.<br \/>\nFor this reason, it would be in the spirit of the Act if, when an application is<br \/>\nreceived without the requisite fee, the applicant is advised forthwith regarding the<br \/>\ndeficiency to enable him to rectify this. In this case appellant Shri Agarwal had<br \/>\nbeen too ready so to do. We have been assured by learned Counsel that this is<br \/>\nnow the practice in the Delhi High Court. This appeal is thus allowed in part, and<br \/>\nthe information disclosable now provided as above. There will be no cost.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Announced in the hearing. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to<br \/>\nthe parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Wajahat Habibullah)<br \/>\nChief Information Commissioner<br \/>\n17.12.2009<\/p>\n<p>Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against<br \/>\napplication and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO<br \/>\nof this Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Pankaj Shreyaskar)<br \/>\nJoint Registrar<br \/>\n17.12.2009<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         4<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2008\/01227 dated 11.7.2008 Right to Information Act 2005 &#8211; Section 19 Appellant &#8211; Shri V. K. Agarwal Respondent &#8211; High Court of Delhi Decision announced: 17.12.2009 Facts : By an application of 24.12.07 Shri V. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-174198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-15T11:59:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-15T11:59:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1087,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-15T11:59:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-15T11:59:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-15T11:59:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009"},"wordCount":1087,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009","name":"Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-15T11:59:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-v-k-agarwal-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri V. K. Agarwal vs High Court Of Delhi on 17 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174198"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174198\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}