{"id":174890,"date":"2008-03-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008"},"modified":"2014-12-31T00:50:55","modified_gmt":"2014-12-30T19:20:55","slug":"yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Yallappa S\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Yallappa S\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.K.Patil<\/div>\n
IN E HIG COURT OF NAT AT B GA ORE W PNO. 9\/ 0\n1\n\nIN THE HIGH COUKT CF K'i\\RI\"ii\\T\ufb01KI'\\ A? ElAN'GAi..ITJFiE. \n\nDATED nus mm 318? DA'! on mncu. ages] ~ \";,:_\n\nasmne _   \nTHE HON'BL'E MR. JUSTICE 'N.\u00bbK.PATiVL'_VV'4\" -{ %\n\nBETWEEN: _ \nYALLAPPA SIO MUMSHAMAPPA \u00b0  %'\n\nw vas. we MARiKUPPA%a\nROBERTSONPET HOBL! _  '_\nBANGARPET TALLJK  ~\nKOLAR DiSTR|CT\n\n   _ _ _ V_ ..~,:i5\u00e9r+TioNER\n(By 3:: ; N Y GUf2'U.I-'5RAK}\u00a7S_tVi. Ar.fm$\u00ab:;\u00a7.TE___; j; , \" V' \nANT): 1     ' \" \n\n1  \"\" \"     H\nBYIETS SECRETARY.' REVEIWE .DEF'T.,\nM.-SL'.%U!LD!N\ufb01. LIR.  \\!E..EZ|_3.H.!\nBANG-AVLGRE-1  ' * \n\n2 THE LAND~.TRIi3uNAL  '\n:sAN:3ARPE':*-To' '\n'azameanper \nKama Dasir.\n\n    '_ '\u00b0eENxATAR.\u00a7M;3PPA SIO YALLAPPA\n\n\" \"~$IN\u00a2E 'tiac\u00e9a\u00e9en av HIS LR AND WlFE\n\nMAJOR, RIO MARIKUPPAM\n' _ T ROBERTSONPET HOBLI\n' L 1- BANGARPET TALUK\n\nV . sun.) \"\"\"sMT.'THumMAKb<A W10 LATE VENKATARAMAPPA\n\n  BZDLAR DISTRICT\n\n   wiuNrv'AMMAw" MUNi'fALLAPPA\n\nIN THE HIGH coum" OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE w.PNc..:8199I2oa3\n\nvmrr PETITION 30.18199.   \n\n\\\\ 2*\u00bb\n\n\n\nIN THE \ufb02IGH \u00a7QUEi' OE KAR_f_N\u00a7,TAEA AT EANGALORE W.P.No. 18199f2Q03\n\n2\n\n4(A) SRINIVASAPPA @ SEENAPPA\nS10 LA1'E MUNIYALLAPPA, MAJOR\nRIC) KALLiKf)I5PA VILLAGE\nBANGARPET TC}. KOLAR DISTRICT\n\n(By aw; ASHA M. KUMBARAGERIMATH, HCGPFQR R153.  "   * ' 4'\nR3 AND 4 SERVED )  '   = -  '-\n\niii\n\nTHE CONSTiTUTif)N CF l'NT)lA F'RAYlNu,TO QUASH ViD.'-3 ANAL G DT.\n24.2.2003 BYR2AS ILLEGAL.   '  \n\n. mus wan PETITION com. bu my gamma, Tl-tlS"DAY. THE\n\nQQURT MADE THE FOLLO'."!!NGi'-- ~ . .\n\nVNo.TRB I 2532 I 70\npassed by vide Annexure G as the\n\nsamejs 'iflegala andvwithtduti jurisdiction, has preeen.ed the\n\n  deceased third respondent Sri.<\/pre>\n
L -‘\\]enltatererj1appa, now represented by legal
\nI  and wife  Thimmakka, resident .-..~:=
\n .p.””‘.avu1a3’iedt’r355am, Robertson pet Hobii, Bangarpet Taluk,<\/p>\n
 ‘  W l.l.(plar District, hd \ufb01led an a\/r\/nended application in Ferm
\nA<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.l8l 993003<\/p>\n
 Reset\u00e9atoezstiet’ L <\/p>\n
runs wart PETITION us FlLEDtJl\u00a5l’DER ART:c:LEe  \ufb01tND”22?”jOF<\/p>\n
INTH IGCURTOFKNT T GLO W..o.8903<\/p>\n
No.7 for registration of occupancy rights in respectjof.<\/p>\n
land in Sy.Nos.77l1, 77\/2, 3313, 5511, 37\/1,  <\/p>\n
and ..5!–.. measuring ….., ‘Al, 05, m, 14, 13,96 an.-‘H34<\/p>\n
guntae respectively measuring tOt:a:’l|yI:-E:”.::V<\/p>\n
guntes or 02 acres 20 guntaeaituateiiiet. 1Niariktipparn Vi<\/p>\n
Village, Robertson pet Hobli.   hd<\/p>\n
unis -u g : _.I;: _. —- — ‘<\/p>\n
u fa. consider<\/p>\n
COM<\/p>\n
II!
\n.:- “_r~ff<\/p>\n
Bangarpet, in view] of thgeeariiIer.:or\u00e9i’erVVofrernand passed<\/p>\n
by this Ccur:i:;”  tyoiaijeigriatter afresh and to<\/p>\n
‘ID<\/p>\n
or
\nin
\n‘ID
\n13<\/span>
\n1:)
\n1::\n<\/p>\n
:2
\nll}<\/p>\n
a\ufb01crdingV”‘opportunVit3r’ in pursuance of the<\/p>\n
direction   thieA’Coiirt in earlier round of litigation,<\/p>\n
I-‘i’V1v.V’n1atte”ri:’Wac itaken\ufb02  the second respondent for<\/p>\n
  _rmpc’ndent’– Tribunal, Bengarpet has proceeded to<\/p>\n
 without conducting proper enquiry and<\/p>\n
considering the relevant material available on file<\/p>\n
 …..ll
\n8 WBII<\/p>\n
.._L…..\n<\/p>\n
e the e ry f’ und in the record of rights and has
\n\/<\/p>\n
z\u00e9-:_._.\n<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No. 181992003<\/p>\n
THE HIG COU K A TE G L . . 0 9! 003
\n4<\/span><\/p>\n
even gone to the extent of registering the occupancy<\/p>\n
rights in respect of Sy.No.85I3 measuring <\/p>\n
‘vs
\nI BVGH F<\/p>\n
not \ufb01led any application in Fonjn  <\/p>\n
. said land. Further, it is thearcase’-ofy’  <\/p>\n
Land Tribunal has categodcallgreccrdedafincling while<\/p>\n
name of the oizendorgctlthe  been recorded<\/p>\n
in khate\u00a2Yla’r’\u00a7-,\u00ab\u00ab..;\u00a7cld’i}1n\u00ab.Ig.;;;i~._gqltit?ator’s column and except<\/p>\n
that, the vendort\ufb01ggthepeiitioner was cuitivting the said<\/p>\n
landas on 13″ March ‘l But, on the basis of the oral<\/p>\n
  _etaternent..of one “”  Krishnappa to the effect that, the<\/p>\n
was culti-{rating the said lands with Sri. Muniyeilappa<\/p>\n
 ~ eince”30 to 40 years, the Land Tribunal came to the<\/p>\n
 conclusion that, the applicant, late Sri. Venlcataramappa<\/p>\n
must ue: cuukv<\/p>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.l8l99l2D03<\/p>\n
dmmeed 9’-if reepcnden =uen\u00bb*!?\u00a7\u00a2!..!g?i.:jhe :\u00ab;.=.e, <\/p>\n
i’NmH G CO T F T T (3 L0 . ._ 0 18 99f200
\n5<\/span><\/p>\n
occupancy rights can be registered in his favour. when<\/p>\n
the Land Tribunal has categorically recordedee-” <\/p>\n
that, the name of petitioner has been   the”  <\/p>\n
.431.-\n<\/p>\n
record of r”‘hte ‘e on 1 ‘ March 1974,:-ttie cie,t’e._o’n <\/p>\n
all the tenanted land vested’ in_GoQernment,:<\/p>\n
accepting the oral evidence adduced_V_by “a eeneigntiouring
\nland owner, one V    Son of<\/p>\n
1.<\/p>\n
1univeni<"r"ppa_,=hs   rights in<\/p>\n
E,<\/p>\n
favour of third vre'.:iV-'4;:go'r:d,e_r_ii:~.._herein _without conducting
\nproper enqaxiryfiihentt, ooritpigiing  the re!e.e.n..<\/p>\n
pr-vieioree "  the""e4.Leno.._f'%-forrne 'ct and Ruies.<\/p>\n
Therefore, being, :Vegorievied by the same, petitioner<\/p>\n
 * \u00ab.hAereirrt\u00b0* err neceeeiteted to present the instant writ<\/p>\n
'petiti_o"n. ti\u00e9\ufb01ekingvigappropriete reliefs, as etete.-'1.' supra.<\/p>\n
 r  hear" Sri. Nagarej eiong with Sri. Guru<\/p>\n
 ' " —  Prelgasiiv  ii'<\/p>\n
A      After careful evaluation of the entire' material<\/p>\n
Ifjaveilable on record, includi.<\/p>\n
cg the crder ooesed by m<\/p>\n
\/':\u00b0___<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
IN THE It-HG!-I COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.N.0. 18199\/2003<\/p>\n
 that, an therwc<\/p>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KAg\ufb02_AT&A AT EANGALOQE \ufb02.B.[;lQ. l\u00a719\u00a7!\/2003
\n6<\/span><\/p>\n
Land Tribunal, Bengarpet, it is manifest on the <\/p>\n
I-L.\n<\/p>\n
th\ufb01 33316 that, Lin: :3 ‘ [Id luupuiuu ‘II i’la$’*._tI’\u00a7V35_I!3D\u00bb._._ .<\/p>\n
beyond the scope and purview of the ,re|event’ ;\u00a7mv:eso;;s  it ”<\/p>\n
of the Kernetaka Land Reforms Act enfd’~ de\ufb01es; <\/p>\n
in serious miscarriage of in
\nr’spcnd”t, without cenduc\ufb01ngiiiehplfoper’ encuiry strict
\ncompliance with Rule  of  Rules and
\nwithout complisng of  issued by this
\n..-o..-rt, he-  ‘i\u00a7rpugned order. As a
\nmatter  ‘:55    learned counsel for
\npetitioner’, ‘point No.2, the Land Tribunal
\nhespysgpeori\ufb01ceiilyiireferred  intemel page 11 ink page 83<\/p>\n
-..-3<\/p>\n
iipetiiicnerh;ei:s’At;jeen recorded. The oniy reason -assigned<\/p>\n
V for  of occupancy rights in favour of deceased<\/p>\n
 \u00abrespondent is that, the iege! reprmente\ufb01ve-.;. c. we<\/p>\n
‘  ind ownr have not produced any other substantive<\/p>\n
14″ rneterial except the RTC extracts and have not examined<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
\/4,
\n\/'”‘”–*<\/p>\n
 THE In H :3. mm’ or K Arm Amm A.-_ ssueneoee W\u00a2l5,Nc..18199l2003<\/p>\n
.;.am.- a. vw.-. – –..–u-u.–. — —<\/p>\n
G CO TOP N T T GALO N0. 8′ 9 003
\n7<\/span><\/p>\n
any independent witnesses, to substantiate their <\/p>\n
that, they are the earlier owners of the lands  %<\/p>\n
es en 1″ Memh. ‘i9?4 -== entail’; ‘- en the  ‘send in ”<\/p>\n
;u.! 1,: V<\/p>\n
the record of rights has a preeurnptiiue “{I:i”i.f__li&3’_’\u00ab<\/p>\n
Section 133 of the Kernataka Laxndi’Referrns’}Ket;:..,_:Vit   *<\/p>\n
not the case of Land Ti_’_ibunai said in<\/p>\n
‘Ilia manna J-In en;\n<\/p>\n
3 [la<\/p>\n
.1 – …1-“.;_.\u00a7.\u00a2 .u..3-  -4 ed”<\/p>\n
l.II I In ul Iu V Iluul I V<\/p>\n
T ‘gm  withem a y
\nauthorizetion.      given much
\nimportance;  by the adjacent
\nland ewner,  ef ML.n1.enka..eppe<\/p>\n
th’t, the third had cuitivated the iand under<\/p>\n
Sri. Muniye’i’ieppa,eineeh3t) to 40 years. It is signi\ufb01cant<\/p>\n
 ate ‘itdte1.”ehereA’  it is stated that, the land was<\/p>\n
h\u00ab–e.t!,.-.Z~..e1.’ve’d..bt,! “thi:’d reependent since 30 to 49 yeam, but<\/p>\n
under \\\u00a7:het\u00a7’~’eapacity he was cultivating the said land,<\/p>\n
 .it,.:wheti1eVr”as a tenant or not and the mode of lease held<\/p>\n
  ‘bQ”th’ird respondent are all not coming ferth frem the<\/p>\n
|l.l’_l.l_ _<\/p>\n
riburaei. vmeut verifying<\/p>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT 0:? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.Ne.l8i99l2003<\/p>\n
—-.–n.-ualiunnu ‘uI|l| Illnnnnsnn 1A.:-nun:-hl\\_’E| I-Uses I Alli’ Trihll\ufb02\ufb01l hlh\ufb01
\nI 9! UH all LIIUEIG uapuleta, IJIE L\ufb02llu Illllllll\ufb02l.-‘.._’|lCa<\/p>\n
slipped into n error in registering the ocoupeney_’inV<\/p>\n
favour of the deceased third  K <\/p>\n
represent<\/p>\n
— –_<\/p>\n
He .1.’ third rspondertttdily “it wee <\/p>\n
the Land Tribunal to have reoordede  heady<\/p>\n
to under what capacity the  {late Sri.
\nVenkataramappa  sinoe 30 to 40<\/p>\n
-me-‘== The Lend Trib-we <\/p>\n
J\u00e9 I3. II<\/p>\n
evidence __    owner, without<\/p>\n
ve\ufb01fyivngti  third respondent was<\/p>\n
cul\ufb01veting4’theV:’viend:ee’tehe’nt as on 1*’ March 1974 and<\/p>\n
………….r..i.’ .1. __r;;.. .|….’a.L,,-‘..|. ..|…n…. …L….. 4.1…. l_……| ……4…..| ..
\nII II U! [\ufb01t] [JIIIVJI-‘I. ._Lll I (Jill , WIIUII HIE [GNU V I. U Ill
\n   l’ies…,r.:eroceeded to passed the impugned<\/p>\n
   3l’here is no \ufb01nding recorded by the Land<\/p>\n
  order e- t. whether the lend in eeeetion is<\/p>\n
 Avestectgin Government as on 15’ ivlarch 1974. Further,<\/p>\n
x”V’r.._’enother error oomn’iitted by the Land Tribunal in passing<\/p>\n
d ~ – the impugned order is that, in-the preamble portion of the<\/p>\n
\/g-\n<\/p>\n
\/{:7\/______.\n<\/p>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT EANGAL ‘ RTE WP.’ o.I81-991700<\/p>\n
IN EH! COUR OF NA A G R .P._.1 99H]
\n9<\/span><\/p>\n
order, it can be seen that, the deceased third respondent<\/p>\n
has not \ufb01led the application seeking regietre\ufb01cn’: ” <\/p>\n
In wan<\/p>\n
eeoupency righ\ufb01 m leepxt of S*’.i~ic.35!.  Q4   <\/p>\n
guntee, but the Land tribunal has:proe.ee?ded._.tc <\/p>\n
occupancy rights in respect ef_’the ee’id’V’euNe)i” <\/p>\n
Therefore: on going thrcugh al%l._thjeee._aepecte..l__iteian be<\/p>\n
1],<\/p>\n
conciuded mt, ther<\/p>\n
is theprtfffriierfeii\u00e9fti\u00e9n of “ti-ad cm
\nthe part of the impugned
\n\u00b0”d\u00b0” i” 35  #51i*?’i?’*i\ufb01i\u00a7’\u00a3A”t3l\u00a7\u00a7l’\u00a7-lhinto”consideration the
\ngrcund  eria! e eilabie en \ufb01lei
\nit has erder. Therefore, it proves<\/p>\n
beyondall reaeoneblel’doiibte that. the Land Tribunal has<\/p>\n
ill’noti ll:veri:aedll%carefuiiy the Form No.7 \ufb01led by. third<\/p>\n
 . which  numbers, what is the extent of the lands,<\/p>\n
_Therefore, it is manifest on the face of the order<\/p>\n
    by Land Tribunal that, the Land Tribunal has<\/p>\n
1′ committed a grave error reeuiting in eerioue rnieeer”=ie\u00a7e<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
\/%:~__.___.\n<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT op KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.PNo. I81 9912003<\/p>\n
of justice and in totai non compiiance of the mandatory<\/p>\n
provisions of the Land. Reforms Act  3<\/p>\n
particularly Rule 17 of the Land Reforms  ”  <\/p>\n
Section 34 of the Land Revenue Act Thar-“atcr : <\/p>\n
of non conduct of proper enquiry_.and”for’*not   it<\/p>\n
proper order in pursuance of this
\nCourt in earlier round ct”li\ufb01gationsuaszjf\ufb01ttte’considered
\nView that, at anystretcii’  Fpugned.
\norder passeidr   Land Tribunal
\ncannot  is liable to be set
\naside.\n<\/p>\n
 Havinglregardto’ the facts and circumstances<\/p>\n
 “of’\ufb01$e’*case,v. as  above, the writ petition filed by<\/p>\n
petitioner’  dvisposed of as follows:<\/p>\n
If  – …..: .. ‘ ‘…. 4’.’……I .. …. ‘.1. .. .’
\n‘ .11.. the WM? pufifiuu m’uu by pufifru\ufb01uf IS<\/p>\n
 t I %_ elicited in part;\n<\/p>\n
II] The order passed by second<\/p>\n
.respondent— Land Tribunal, Bangarpet dated<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
IN THE HIGH comm’ or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.l 8| oiiizocia<\/p>\n
IN {LEE EIQH COQBJ QB QELJATAEA AT \u00a7ANQAI_,\ufb01 \ufb02.E.\ufb02o. $1221. 3903
\nll<\/p>\n
24″‘ February 2003 bearing No.TRB: 2532.-70% <\/p>\n
on the file of the Land Tribunal, Bangafpsl; A’ <\/p>\n
Kola! Distnfct is ..s.-s-by ss. ssids ssd.:’ji\u00e9is’\u00ab~.:: 4.<\/p>\n
matter stands ramittad back i’?    vi’ 4  ‘A<\/p>\n
Bangarpet, for reconsidiiraiion ‘afrssh_ and-[_fs
\ntake ap_propn’ste decisian_..inj \u00bbvscsg:dsncs.._9V!lF.I
\nlaw, in strict csn1piisnss’~  i’%i5ie,ii~?V of ” a<\/p>\n
Land Refnrnfis._   34 of<\/p>\n
the meeeeeeeesee: ieeeidiepose of the<\/p>\n
same” as exgss ,:’t’;’!.2uL-‘..ly as pass.-…s, susr<\/p>\n
sf\ufb01irding’ eeeeeeei  to petitioner and<\/p>\n
\/Fs\ufb02ondsnise – T3  \ufb01nd 4 or their legal<\/p>\n
 V’  – _ “l:ri\u00e9presa?ntsti\\iss;””ss expeditiously as possible,<\/p>\n
A”‘maffer’-.lA\u00ab7″hss been pending adjudication<\/p>\n
 .. ,  the patties since several decades. ,-<\/p>\n
lly Further petitioner is ,t_M_annitte._d in<\/p>\n
sabmii his w’rFt’f’n su”r”ni’sion, aiong with the –
\n\/7<\/p>\n
\/____#.\n<\/p>\n
IN THE. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No. I81 99f2’003<\/p>\n
IN TH I COURT OF TA L WP. 991′ 0<\/p>\n
connected documents before the second
\nrespondent — Land Tribunal, within a  “<\/p>\n
\nof fear -.-.’e=-*- -“M<\/p>\n
copy of this order. ‘ 1 _ ‘<\/p>\n
IV] Further,      it
\nBon_o,rpot is heroby difoctsd ‘to .W~t.eihi
\nw\ufb01don submission    and
\nproceed     the
\ndirection’    referred<\/p>\n
nhnmi
\nIuaufvcvuan .V V -‘<\/p>\n
IN THE HIGH comrr on KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.18l99i1003<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Yallappa S\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008 Author: N.K.Patil IN E HIG COURT OF NAT AT B GA ORE W PNO. 9\/ 0 1 IN THE HIGH COUKT CF K’i\\RI”ii\\T\ufb01KI’\\ A? ElAN’GAi..ITJFiE. DATED nus mm 318? DA’! on mncu. ages] ~ “;,:_ asmne _ THE HON’BL’E MR. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-174890","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nYallappa S\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yallappa S\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-30T19:20:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Yallappa S\\\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-30T19:20:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1718,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Yallappa S\\\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-30T19:20:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yallappa S\\\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yallappa S\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yallappa S\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-30T19:20:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Yallappa S\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-30T19:20:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008"},"wordCount":1718,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008","name":"Yallappa S\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-30T19:20:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yallappa-so-munishamappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-31-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yallappa S\/O Munishamappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174890\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}