{"id":175024,"date":"2010-05-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010"},"modified":"2017-09-27T17:29:50","modified_gmt":"2017-09-27T11:59:50","slug":"ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"M\/S.St.Jude’S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S.St.Jude’S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP.No. 266 of 2010()\n\n\n\n1. M\/S.ST.JUDE'S ENTERPRISE\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. T.A.ANTONY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K)\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :27\/05\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                   THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.\n            ====================================\n                      C.R.P. No.266 of 2010\n            ====================================\n               Dated this the 27th  day of May, 2010\n\n                             O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
      This revision is in challenge of the common order passed by<\/p>\n
learned Principal Sub Judge, Kottayam on I.A. Nos.5039 and 5041<\/p>\n
of 2008 whereby ex parte decree passed in favour of petitioner<\/p>\n
was set aside after condoning the delay of 1073 days.      Learned<\/p>\n
counsel for petitioner contends that the order is erroneous and<\/p>\n
overlooking the factual situation which emerged in the case.<\/p>\n
According to the      learned counsel there was due service of<\/p>\n
summons on respondents as provided under Order V Rule 15 of<\/p>\n
the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, “the Code”) in that, notice<\/p>\n
was served on       mother of respondent No.1.       It is also the<\/p>\n
contention of learned counsel that the very fact that in the<\/p>\n
application to condone delay, delay right from the date of ex parte<\/p>\n
order of decree is sought to be           explained   indicate that<\/p>\n
respondents were aware of the ex parte decree then itself.<\/p>\n
      2.    Petitioner    sued    respondents    for  recovery   of<\/p>\n
Rs.6,21,338\/- allegedly due from the respondents as per a Chitty in<\/p>\n
which respondent No.1 had subscribed to 20 tickets. Respondents<\/p>\n
filed application to set aside the ex parte decree and to condone<\/p>\n
C.R.P. No.266 of 2010
\n                                  -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
the delay of 1073 days stating that respondent No.1 was in the<\/p>\n
United Kingdom during the relevant time, summons was not<\/p>\n
served on him and that he had no information about the case or<\/p>\n
ex parte decree. Respondent No.2 is a cine actor and claimed<\/p>\n
that he is permanently residing in Bangalore and had not received<\/p>\n
summons in the case.        It was only on 12.10.2008 when P.W.1,<\/p>\n
Power of Attorney of respondents noticed affixture of notice in the<\/p>\n
E.P., in the property of respondents that he learnt about the ex<\/p>\n
parte decree which was conveyed to the respondents. Thereon<\/p>\n
they filed the applications.     Power of Attorney holder gave<\/p>\n
evidence as P.W.1 and stated to the case of respondents. Exhibit<\/p>\n
A1 is the Power of Attorney.     That document was executed in<\/p>\n
United Kingdom. Learned Sub Judge observed from Ext.A1 that<\/p>\n
the said document indicated that during the time summons was<\/p>\n
attempted to be served on respondent No.1 he was in the United<\/p>\n
Kingdom.\n<\/p>\n
      3.    It is true that going by the records as submitted by<\/p>\n
learned counsel summons on respondent No.1 was served through<\/p>\n
his mother and it has satisfied requirements of Order V Rule 15 of<\/p>\n
the Code.     But fact remained that during the relevant time<\/p>\n
respondent No.1 was in United Kingdom.           Evidence is that<\/p>\n
respondent No.2 was permanently residing at Bangalore.          No<\/p>\n
C.R.P. No.266 of 2010
\n                                  -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
contra evidence is given by the petitioner.      Learned Sub Judge<\/p>\n
noticed that      suit notice issued by the petitioner to the<\/p>\n
respondents was returned undelivered which also indicated that<\/p>\n
respondents were not available in the address stated in the notice<\/p>\n
(and in the plaint). These circumstances were taken into account<\/p>\n
by the     learned Sub Judge to hold that on the facts and<\/p>\n
circumstances of the case sufficient cause is made out and that<\/p>\n
discretion has to be exercised in favour of respondents. The fact<\/p>\n
that Rs.6,21,338\/- is claimed     from the respondents was also<\/p>\n
taken note of by the learned Sub Judge.\n<\/p>\n
      4.    According to the learned counsel respondents had<\/p>\n
even tried to negotiate with the petitioner before institution of the<\/p>\n
suit which also indicate that they were very much aware of<\/p>\n
institution of the suit.\n<\/p>\n
      5.    Court below found that respondents have made out<\/p>\n
sufficient cause and exercised discretion in favour of respondents<\/p>\n
in the matter of condoning delay and setting aside the ex parte<\/p>\n
decree. Question is whether this Court should interfere with that<\/p>\n
finding and the discretion exercised by learned Sub Judge. This<\/p>\n
Court in revision is not sitting in appeal over the decision of the<\/p>\n
court below. It is only when there is patent illegality or perversity<\/p>\n
committed by the court below which required correction          that<\/p>\n
C.R.P. No.266 of 2010
\n                                   -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
revisional court should interfere.        Revisional jurisdiction is<\/p>\n
supervisory in character to rectify patent mistakes or illegality<\/p>\n
committed by the court below. In this case I do not find any such<\/p>\n
patent illegality or perversity in the order of     the court below<\/p>\n
holding     that sufficient cause is made out and exercising<\/p>\n
discretion in favour of respondents giving them an opportunity to<\/p>\n
contest the plaint claim of Rs.6,21,338\/- with future interest and<\/p>\n
costs. In Sreedhara Kurup v. Mickel (1968 KLT 599) this<\/p>\n
Court has laid down the principles which the subordinate courts<\/p>\n
have to bear in mind while considering such applications. Parties<\/p>\n
should be given an opportunity to contest the case on merit<\/p>\n
unless they are guilty of any contumacious conduct.          Having<\/p>\n
regard to the circumstances of the case and the principles laid<\/p>\n
down in the above decision I do not find reason to interfere with<\/p>\n
the impugned order. But I direct the learned Principal Sub Judge<\/p>\n
to expedite the trial and disposal of the case.<\/p>\n
      Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with the above direction.<\/p>\n
                              THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n
vsv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court M\/S.St.Jude’S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP.No. 266 of 2010() 1. M\/S.ST.JUDE’S ENTERPRISE … Petitioner Vs 1. T.A.ANTONY … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon’ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH Dated :27\/05\/2010 O R D E […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-175024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S.St.Jude'S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S.St.Jude'S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-27T11:59:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S.St.Jude’S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-27T11:59:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":849,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S.St.Jude'S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-27T11:59:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S.St.Jude’S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S.St.Jude'S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S.St.Jude'S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-27T11:59:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S.St.Jude’S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-27T11:59:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010"},"wordCount":849,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010","name":"M\/S.St.Jude'S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-27T11:59:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-st-judes-enterprise-vs-t-a-antony-on-27-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S.St.Jude’S Enterprise vs T.A.Antony on 27 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175024\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}