{"id":175164,"date":"2009-04-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009"},"modified":"2017-08-02T11:08:45","modified_gmt":"2017-08-02T05:38:45","slug":"amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Amarappa S\/O Karabasappa … vs Shri Shekhappa S\/O Karabasappa … on 20 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Amarappa S\/O Karabasappa … vs Shri Shekhappa S\/O Karabasappa … on 20 April, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n
-1-\n\nin THE HIGH ccum' as KARNATAKA \n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 20\"' DAY oa:+.,axPRIL.,;_' iitiicisy\u00e9-'.';,\u00bb  \"\n\nBEFORE\n\nma HOIWBLE MR. JUSTI\u00a7EV_JAWAi?  \n\n \n\nEEEEEEI\n\n1 AMAaAPPA_j     I  \nS\/0 KAR\ufb01\u00e9;BA$\ufb011P?A-_SHfsiAN\u20ac\u00abAUTfi.......\u00a7\nAGED \u00a2.aouT~57 YEA.as.,  \nocc: 8:Js1';N'Ess'~    \nR\/(3 HATALAGE_RI NAKA    \nm.:.::\u00a7'\u00a7E?\u20acSIDN\"'\n* % I;aLus;Assn 13:57: exams\n\n3 - k'%T k%c:\u00e9\ufb01\u00a7$zaR;\u00e9;KAm'\n\nA  S{O;.\ufb01\\F*i\u00a3\u00a7?'{APPF\\ SHIVANGUTTI\n;5sGED \"543-\u20ac}UT 36 YEARS\n\u20ac3\"Cf2% BUSIRESS\n\n*  u .  R\/G' H.\u20ac\\TAL\ufb01xGERI NAKA\n\"  TALUK Ab\u00e9ti mgr: megs\n\n\"    suazsn\n\nSK') AMARAPPA SHNANGUTTI\nAGED ABOUT 34 YEARS\nGCC: BUSINESS\n\n\n\nR\/'O HATALAGERI NAKA\nTALIJK AN!) DIST: GADAG\nFRAKASH\n\nSIG AMARAPPA SHIVANGUTTI\nAGEE3 ABOUT 32 YEARS\n\nOCC: BUSINESS\n\nR\/'Q HATALAGERI NAKA\nTALUK AND DIST: GADAG\n\nMANJUNATH  \n\n5\/0 AMARAPPA SHIVANGUTIT V\nAGED ABQUT 30 '(EARS  .  \nGCC:BUSINESSW.. jj~ ;   \nRm HATALAGERI mm   _  \nTALUK AN9_e-151*:   = '\n\nsi:\u00abz?T3A3AvA=amEwwA  \nwin vssaarekm i.v\u00a7ERAawA KARKSGUDAR\n Aam gmsur 35 YEARS,\n'rfacg: Busmess\n\nF{;*Q:'CfG P\u00a7Si7\u00a7.N\u00a7 BAKERS\n\nL V' * ._1:~12usTRIAz_ AREA\n= . Hi-iGS?ET\n\n\u00a7\u00a7S'?RICT: BELLARY, REP. BY G.P.A.Hf.3i.DER\ni'-'ET'ITIOP4Ei-'1 $40.1, SR1.A.K.SHNANA$U'\"f\"TI.\n\n349\/\n\n\n\nii}.\n\n11.\n\n_ _5 '{$R.Cm\u00a3\u00a7\ufb01 NOT CL\ufb01s.i\ufb01ED).\n\nEMT NEELAWWA\n\nWi\ufb01 \"TDTAPPA J01?\n\nAGED A391}? 55 YEARS\nGCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK\nRf\ufb01 NEAR ARUNA TALKIES\nP & T QUARTER$\nDAVANAGERE\n\nDIST: BELLARY\n\nSM? GIRIEAWWA 1 v A_ \nW\/D AMARAPFA SHIVANGUTTI  .. \nAGED ABOUT 58 YEARS' 4' \nGCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,\n\nRIO HATALGERI NAKA  \n\nGADAG TALUK\n\nMST: GAQAG\n\nSM? Gf3URAMMA   '   \nWm mmaasapvszsmv teeumt  \n\n!:gGED-- ABc3m_ 'eo 'arghag %\nocc: .f'\u00a7<3USEif\u00a7{JLiD;_WQ;.f{K\nRi0=.HATAi;GERI :s;A:~<A\n1"ALUI<Z-.&"GISTR\u00a3CT:"G-AQAG\n\n PETITIONERS\n\n % as?' sa:%;'%%3.A\u20acA:E~.Ai\u00bb:r\u00a7Ex.:<.\n\n  Pe*r*m:.:::s: comm; cm ma PRELIMINARY\n\n % \u00a7f--;EAAR:re<a misssav, THE ccsusrr MADE THE mL:.ow:aaG:\n\n~~:\u00a7rti:\u00a7e 226 of the Carzstituti\ufb01n af 211613 is invaked ta\n\n'  \u00e9\ufb01\u00e9aii the \u00e9f\ufb01\u00e9i" Anjnexure-K date\u00e9 18.9.20(3? gassed by\n\n'   \ufb01ze triai Cmzrt in Ex\u00e9cistio\ufb01 Petitiem mizaizaaz.\n\n\n\nP"\n"am\n\n2. ""\u00a3'i":e matter \u00e9s iisted fer ccmsiderirzg the\nawpiicatien rncrved by the respondents fer vacatin\u00a7.._bthe<\/pre>\n
mterim crder cf stay” granted.\n<\/p>\n
3. Considering the rzarrew cameras; ‘i\ufb01_i:th!j\u00a7uv.:\u00a7\u00a7%\u00a7ic\u00a7\u00a7<'j<\/p>\n
\ufb01he issu\u00e9 caui\u00e9 be circumscribe\u00e9, 'Im\ufb01\u00e9've. <\/p>\n
an merits.\n<\/p>\n
4. Centextuai facts “:\u00a7v~&ai f\ufb01at’ ‘th\u00e9:  i2\u00e9fifi\u00e9\ufb01ers <\/p>\n
herain and the respan\ufb01arnts SVE\u00e9’Tek\ufb01\u00e9;\u00a75V;\u00a7a._andA!sii’r:\u00a7\u00e9:p;\u00b0:a wire<\/p>\n
were parties in 0.S.\ufb013a’.’i\u00a7.2Vi\u00a7;L\u00a735?}V s_1::::_\u00abL:V~.:?=1*-.f.a\u00a7e_c! in decree af<\/p>\n
partiti\u00e9n  ‘\ufb01re same was the subject<\/p>\n
matter in”‘ap_;3evaiVV”ia_”4’R’FA.:’\u00a7ia;42Gi1994. As wis\ufb01am dawned<\/p>\n
 i’i\u00a5i’}v~\ufb01Ti.EIV”!’i,’, they \u00e9ntvefgd into a cemgzrarnise an\u00e9 in terms ef<\/p>\n
 ..a\ufb01..r\u00a7_-em\u00a7\ufb01i,__tha aippeai was disposed of on 1??.2.3.99S.<\/p>\n
;’\u00e9,rff:::?\u00bbz*raisVi’4.iai:.%?as*i’:::’iivs terms, one was, the paitianers harem<\/p>\n
 sha\ufb01i p\u00e9y E5″ the 1*’ respondent herein and one Ningappa<\/p>\n
  (:=es*-,.;\u00ab>’e:v?:Vsder:t $13.2) a sum sf Rupea ten fakhs each. That<\/p>\n
1AA::\u00a7%\ufb01?bramis\u00e9 dame has reached \ufb01naiity, Te enferce \ufb01\ufb01\u00e9 af<\/p>\n
 ‘Ewe terms ef the decree Le. fer yayment of Rtmees tan<\/p>\n
iakhs, we resw\ufb01dentsidacree h\u00e9iders \ufb02ied exatutier;<\/p>\n
M\/1<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
izroceecii\ufb01gs in Executio\ufb01 case :~ses.11oi2o92 1sa_m 2′,M:j.LkIt<\/p>\n
was seri\u00e9usiy resisted by the saetitienerg.:’_:’i’\ufb01t\u00e9r;—.:\ufb01iif_<\/p>\n
acrnte\ufb01\u00e9ina tinat Saar: after ccmprer\ufb01ise was”‘ariier\u00e9\u00e9i irfV:t\u00a2’3;,” ‘~ <\/p>\n
they {wad in carnaziiance therete, :’i;fan 3f\u00e9-,\u00a7r\u00a7\u00e9x’i._.:6.ht*e”i3’\u00a7a’__V<\/p>\n
fe\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01n\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01t 10 mats of ian\u00e9,\ufb01:i*si;h a c’;e:d%\ufb01irra= <\/p>\n
eunuch ta meet the xfaiue o’f i\u00a5..;j_;se\u00a7s i\u00e9jkh\ufb01g due try’
\nthem. The 15′ resj:a;’::\u00a7_\u00a7i1;i\u00a7;n\u00e9\u00a7  “holder in
\nExecution N\ufb01.11Q\/’20DZ,~–F\u00e9S:\u00a75t\u00e9E\ufb02&\u00e9Zf1\u00e9\u00ab’S%i#\u00a7.i\ufb01fnte\ufb01ii\ufb01fx of the
\npetitieners__Qr%: cf the 10 zaiots
\ngiven w\ufb01gv   aii, he couid realise
\nRuae\u00e9fg  sita, ieavina baia\ufb01ce sf
\nRupees Sevi\u00e9n vi:aidA’:?.\u00a7:\u00ab.  E\u00a7\u00a7”‘– a:_\u00a7<"\u00e9'\u00a7:utian petiticr: was \ufb02ied unciar<\/p>\n
thagjn\ufb01zrszisiot;us"\u00bbaf_C\u00a7i'd\u00e9i'  Ruie 11 cf CPC, fer recavery of<\/p>\n
"a.;fg*2e3Lini':H.W Simiiariv, Nir:gap;:a–de<:ree hcvi\ufb01er in<\/p>\n
 V5:-a\u00a2\ufb01t'i'$i*:_..f\u00a7\u00a2wA\u00a7';$8\/92 aiso resisted the cbjettiens raised by<\/p>\n
th\u00e9"–1pe%;it\u00a7s%\u00a7\u00e9%s herein whc: were judarnent debters in his<\/p>\n
3   amtitioii; s<\/p>\n
5. The petitianers\/judgment debtars in reiteratian<\/p>\n
of the said canterxtien, \ufb02ia\ufb01 an amaiitatiarz under S\u00e9ctierr<\/p>\n
-7-<\/span><\/p>\n
47 cf CFC, reeuatina the triad Court te recer\u00e9 fu\ufb01<\/p>\n
satisfaction of the \u00e9ecree er iii the aIterr:etive,__ ta<\/p>\n
determine the vaiue of the piets, which accerdine \ufb01e’<\/p>\n
was werth Rs.1,00,0G0;’– each. The triei C\u00ab:a’;;:jrtV:?\u00a7%e:j\u00a7.=\u00a7\u00a5:tei:i_-\u00e9”<\/p>\n
such cententier: by career dated ;iG’;’\u00e9\u00ab.–2\u00a3\u00a76~%$, <\/p>\n
the ccmtentior: of the detree ho.i1\u00e9e2?’,A.A_iis}hic}i _ \u00a7r:.<\/p>\n
petiticm is marked as Ai%br:e\u00a7m\u00a7e~\ufb01’ Varrd_T:the”‘L’<\/p>\n
aispiication \ufb02ied under;1–Szecti\ufb01:’i”‘*’:D?_;’*5?”-ih\u00e9  A\ufb01fi\u00e9ve\ufb01<\/p>\n
as; it, the writ petitim’1 er*;e_e_’V-:ere;”V\u00a3:e\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7*Ve*\u00a7’\u00a7h2s cm: in Writ<\/p>\n
Petiticw\ufb01 ?\u00e9e.73.33f2–9G6;:”\n<\/p>\n
5;}.  ‘e:\ufb01{\ufb01sieerina the reasens assiened by<\/p>\n
the triai iiiadgief-e..i=–ej\u00e9::tV’i\u00a7Lie amiriicatien \ufb02ied Linear Sectier:<\/p>\n
 :3?  ..hei\ufb01 f\ufb01’ai’Vne case was made ant ta interfere<\/p>\n
  ens? thus, the writ action faiiee by the<\/p>\n
ef\u00e9e?  Ceurt (fated 22.8.2666. Therea\ufb01er, the<\/p>\n
 exe::\u00a7’iieEu wee taken ta \ufb01ie and rsraceeded with.<\/p>\n
 7. The jueernent debters centinued to resist the<\/p>\n
 “””e’;c:eeu\ufb01e”r; case. The Executing Ceurt, after hearing the<\/p>\n
eraumeree Bff\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01, eassm the impugned czrder cm<\/p>\n
..g,
\n18.9.2867, rejecting aii contentiens of the j;\u00a7d\u00a73ie\ufb01t<\/p>\n
debt\ufb01rs\/netitieraers and has ordered iss’%_}ii’\u00e9\ufb01c57e:i \u00ab~:__;  <\/p>\n
attachment warrant against whi;h,__this1.w’rit Ii’\u00a7\u00e9i:ifio–n \u00e9isu ‘*~ <\/p>\n
\ufb02ied.\n<\/p>\n
8. Beth si\u00e9es are’ no__t <\/p>\n
arm enforcement af the c’;cmp:_’_{ih@i$e..;ie\ufb01fe\u00e9; w\ufb01ich, one<\/p>\n
cf the conditiens is un\u00e9’*e\u00a7\u20ac”exa$cu\u20aci;i’c\u00a7\u00a71′;~..j:  <\/p>\n
9. Be:=tf1.V.S;i’\u00a3.\u00a7e_s ;%aaiiai::[: *::f;at3J%%1\u00a7\u00a7.%.*\u00bb*.a-‘=4 V’ N0.-420\/94 wa3<\/p>\n
\u00e9isgac\u00e9a\u00e9 –_  atceiati\ufb01a the terms of
\nCC)\u00a7’\ufb01\u00a7i’m’\ufb01’i’S\u00a7a\ufb01i’\u00e9\ufb01.*\ufb01i U\u00bb\u00a7\u00a7if1 l5Y the judamant debtcrs am’<\/p>\n
\ufb01eirf\u00e9\u00e9 haideti~.._ Seve:rai terms have been agreed apcm<\/p>\n
i::;&3:v%’n:(s\u00a2e\u00a7i?::A..%:E’fuAeT\u00ab~..g;;;ar*:ive:s and ma cf it is at item 213.9 under<\/p>\n
wi’\u00a7’\u00a7r,’;\u00a7'[:A “f’iA’:\u00bb’\u00a7;”\u00a7_’v_ii_’_Lit’:2V\u00a3.;{“:}ir’:..’!ei”:’!: debterss, ii’! consideration ef the ather<\/p>\n
taf\ufb01zs air\u00e9\ufb01vfzcii\u00e9itians cf the compromise, agreed to pay<\/p>\n
V.   x’1iz:g:g_ee\u00a7”‘1:.\ufb01e21 iakhs is each af the rwspandents in the appeai<\/p>\n
 ‘{‘ d”ec%ee hoiders before the executing cccurt}. The 1″<\/p>\n
 “”‘?\u00e95p\u00a2ndentidacree haider has initiated execution<\/p>\n
prtsceedinas ta r\u00e9cav\u00e9r a sum sf Rupaas tar: iakhs from the<\/p>\n
-9-<\/span><\/p>\n
judcment debtars, anf\u00e9rcina the termg arm conditions<\/p>\n
inccrpbrated at item ncn\ufb01 cf the compromise petition’.<\/p>\n
16. L23 med cmmsei for  4′   _<\/p>\n
zjetiticners\/judgment ciebtcrs woui\u00e9 carzte~*:rc\ufb01j:j.V,  –\u00ab<\/p>\n
ciients have corsmiied with the \u00a7’.’-A_v3if.’i -.t;3;’.’\u00a7’E”i(“.:i’\u00a7\u00a7f\u00e9.’v4?.’.!'”\u00a7fI’\u00e9’::V\ufb01\u00e9%f1\u00a7’:’<\/p>\n
transferred unto the 15* resp<ir:g_ient4de_\u00a7\u00a2'i'ee  izie\ufb01fs <\/p>\n
cf iarz\u00e9 vaiued at more than rL;baf\u00e9s.:en "i'a–5~:_V}f:'s' ':(rtJ ;::e$ me
\niak\ufb01 per pint). He '  \u00a7.2A'f\u00e9:':~.!jsjfs\u00bb,:.Az""\u00ab.%c_vf th\u00e9 "land was
\neffected in E2t3\u00a5'$;1_ai'tCE ta. %$f. tff\u00e9i.pvc\ufb01mnrcmise and<\/p>\n
thereftgivf\u00e9gjv \u00e9T&'\u00a7';*e\u00a2  c:I1a.i.\u00a7ir*i" has \ufb02eet': fuiiy saiisfie\u00e9.
\nThis isz"sq\u00e9rio\u00a3:s%y";:iiS\u00a35{1t\u00a7;:i\u00ab.'by the 1" respondentfciecree<\/p>\n
\u00a3*:ci\ufb01e.:ri an \u00a7'\ufb01'a_:\u00a7rafnisA\u00e9 {\ufb01at the vaiu\u00e9 $1' each \ufb01ifit is cniy<\/p>\n
 ,.%_,gs;'3.\ufb01,\u20ac3\ufb02\ufb01i:…andH\u00e9\ufb01"'t?:Vat caicuiation, he cauici rec\ufb01ver anly<\/p>\n
i%L;_i$'\u00e9\u00e9$ "t,fir4.\u00e9$T.:vii\u00e9gkhs, ieavin\ufb01 a baiarace cf Rupees seven<\/p>\n
i\u00e9ic\ufb01s and':ifg.\u00a3e}rest therecm. Thus, he justifies initiaticn cf<\/p>\n
exectsiig\ufb01 precee\u00e9irra\ufb01 ta recever the amount \u00e9etaiied in<\/p>\n
   'V'.A'ii*3\u00a3\u00a7' f\u00e9;}\u20acE\u20aci..\u00a5'ti\u00a7f1i"l Detiiicn.<\/p>\n
11. At this aia\ufb01e, it is neticed the triai court, an the<\/p>\n
appficatian \ufb02ied by the judmr\ufb01ent debtcwra un\u00e9er Seciien<\/p>\n
\u00e9k\ufb01w<\/p>\n
..1Q-\n<\/p>\n
47, CFC, resisting the executicm on the ereund aforesaid,<\/p>\n
heard both siees and by order eeted 10.4.2066, <\/p>\n
the epeiicetien. The said enter was cheiietzae\u00e9<\/p>\n
court in W.P.?33?;’06, but tints ceurt rejected,:tie.e’ee:iti4e Ev: _ <\/p>\n
erder \u00e9ete\ufb01 22.8.2006. ‘Thus, thgere\ufb02iis’ee”.di’\u00a7;:e.te.ue\u00a7\u00a7the}<\/p>\n
\u00a53C:ii’:’i that the erder teassed _I2y’_ thethtei <\/p>\n
objeetiens teiew by the judqt:5’e\u00a7f:_t’debte}’e_ i\ufb01thettiexeeution V<\/p>\n
preceedings has reached\ufb01nr\u00e9ilttyifgi.Q\u00a7\u00a7;i;pite ttne saw erder,
\njueqment eebtors cenAt_i:tued1.’ttseit-‘\u00ab~.tet–eetiess e\ufb01ert and<\/p>\n
Git\ufb01e again seue\u00e9ut’va:ff?.ertei\u00a7\u00a7ry”wtt\u00a7t\ufb01etetffnine the ‘value of<\/p>\n
the seed t:*anete:tsfe.\u00a7mtiteititvhe’ decree homers.<\/p>\n
_.:2,  v.ieafi*:e7\ufb01””‘u triei judge, censiderine the<\/p>\n
“V”‘*v..erc\u00e9i.{i1tez\u00e9ts’v\u00abzeevet*z\ufb01e:i;V has: passed the tmeuaned Greer,<\/p>\n
  t\u00a7:f;\u00a7:”e.e\u00a7eV\u00a7’r\u00a7t”rej:e;tine aii ebjecticms. Therefere, it has te be<\/p>\n
iieiettzet. ttteieresent writ petitien being an the same cause<\/p>\n
 of atttee, is mieeenceived and I do eat \ufb02ee any tenabie<\/p>\n
 to eetertain this writ eetitien eaeitzet the imeuaeed<\/p>\n
.   eteer which is virtuaiiy of the same nature as was teetee<\/p>\n
by this court in \\+’v’.P. }’337;’G6. Ttse impugned etder eaesm<\/p>\n
-11-<\/span><\/p>\n
an 33.9.2802 therefcrre, canrmt suncaisfuily be qxs\u00e9sfitgti\u00e9azj<\/p>\n
by th\u00e9 judgment \u00e9abtars. \ufb02unsaquentiy, ti1e–~.4i:\u00a2\u00a7irit..:;i:}\u00a7iit:a::\u00e9.1f:*’ <\/p>\n
must faii.\n<\/p>\n
13. Hawevar, at this..st\u00a7ca,”‘it__ I\u00a7 not%ei’e;:? i;’f1at:i’; <\/p>\n
Judame-.r:t debtcara ha\u00e9 fiied   d\ufb01i .-faaasai of
\nRFAA20\/94 requesti\u00a7;s_\u00a7’j~– f:”‘\u00a7E;_\u00a7  “{:n’ul”tH ts retard
\nadjustme\ufb01t;’fuii Asatisfac;tiV::\u00a7i3:..Vof  Undaubtediy,
\nthe sai\ufb01 pr\u00a7\u20ac\u00a73\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7;%z;\u00a3\u00a2js\ufb01efv;’ “{ir’;\u00a7\u00e9fv.’\u00a7\ufb01e…;\u00a7g,3V;S;\u00a2n3 5,: awe,-
\nXXE Ruia  debtars, an their
\nawn  t\u00a7\u00a7V”‘V\u00a7\u00a7_a’ve h\ufb01fvhdrawn the said petition
\nunder ‘1i’Ir’:g”ii=r;r;:”:\u00b0a_.s’$.AA%L:a’:A:’:’b*-\u00bb”the came cauid be urged by<\/p>\n
them \u00a7nLA.th\u00e9e\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7ec\ufb01tioi*r z\u00e9\ufb01ircee\u00e9inas imitated by the decree<\/p>\n
hoVi'<\u00a3v5I\u00a7r\u00e9}\u00a7f "The 1% "" Pespondentidecree hoider dam not<\/p>\n
  ;\/\u00a7aw$;;i;iev:V'iia,\u00a7:sVf'a:a}tizai iacsitiarz.<\/p>\n
  'i' i1av& taken the View that in View cf \ufb01nality<\/p>\n
K fay-:;.n\u00e9 "bee\ufb01 given ta the er\ufb01er gassed by the \u00e9xecutina<\/p>\n
 aaainsi the objezztierss ta tha execution nreceediraqs,<\/p>\n
 The present writ petiticm \u00e9ces mt survive. But we carmet<\/p>\n
igmre the reiief avaiiable tab the judgment debters uncier<\/p>\n
gw<\/p>\n
-12-<\/span><\/p>\n
the ‘srovisicans cf Order XX: Ruie 2, CFC w\ufb01ich envif\u00e9\u00e9zga<\/p>\n
that “The judgment debtar (or any <\/p>\n
\ufb01ecoma surety for the judgment  x K  <\/p>\n
infamr the court of stick payme\ufb01t &\u00e9\u20aciusirs\u00a71.\u00a7eag$,;<\/p>\n
app\ufb01r to the wart to tssm; av \ufb01eyfim    L\u00bb<\/p>\n
\ufb01oiafer to Show cause, an  fa”  the V’<\/p>\n
cmirt, why such  ‘V\u00e9\ufb01lj\u00e9f\ufb01tntenfvg\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9lvuld not
\nbe reearcied \u00a7.’5’g \u20ac’&i\u00b0ii\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7;:’  of such
\nnative, fire  !: \u00a7;12ldcgr:.i’aiis\ufb01 cause why the
\n\ufb01ayment {if  “\ufb01at be recorded as
\n  T’    recar\ufb01 the same<\/p>\n
   ”\n<\/p>\n
 h Frgg\ufb01  ian\ufb01\ufb01’a\ufb01\u00a7___9f:the previsian, it is dear that Ruie 2<\/p>\n
\u00bb ;\u00a7\u00e9stu%avE\u00a3\u00e9$*:i.j5;:\u00bb\u00a2_r”tunitv is the ju\u00e9amerxt debtor to appiy ta<\/p>\n
H has pamse\ufb01 the decreeiexecutim court ta<\/p>\n
 ree\ufb01ir\ufb01 \ufb01c\u00e9j\ufb01gtment at first satisfactierz af tha decree. In the<\/p>\n
  i’r:sta;u’rst “‘case, the decree hcider dces net dispute that in<\/p>\n
;\u00a7\u00a3#\u00a7izance ta the terms and cenditians cf carr:1:>rem\u00a3se<\/p>\n
 m i.m\u00e9er executicm, he has received 10 mats cf sand. The<\/p>\n
3%\/’<\/p>\n
-13-<\/span><\/p>\n
unlit dispute is about its value. Judgment de\ufb01tcars cq\ufb01tend<\/p>\n
the vaiue cf each phat is suf\ufb01cient ta discharge <\/p>\n
of rupees ten {aims and there is no\u00bb reasar:  K <\/p>\n
be deprived tha opportunity  <\/p>\n
cimte\ufb01tierz.\n<\/p>\n
15. Keepina t\u00a71is\u00a7tj:  ieglrr\ufb01\u00e9hd far the
\ndecree hcidar was a\u00e9k\u00e9g:5.ijja\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9”‘*\u00e9L’v’;_\u00a7tmoric statement
\nabcmt the va%uc;_GfV_[the isa’nz-\u00a71.iL’;H’;e’  the value of
\neach pint wak:\u00a7%%s;$j;3a,a5j;:z\u00a7%\u00a7khd%%%}*;\u00a2:Rs.1;9a,om;~ as urgeci
\nby   B2_1{ E\u00e9V$ces net dispute that his
\nciierm:  *h iaveV  of land swan after the<\/p>\n
com;1r_umis\u00e9”zi_\u00e9cre\u00e9, ‘fha9i”}11eans, as an the date cf \ufb01ling af<\/p>\n
 ~–v.,ex\u00e9~:i\u00a31ti.an ::gtiti\u00a7’\ufb01fth’\u00e9 value cf the ian\u00e9 had escalated. Ir:<\/p>\n
S’u’;\u00e9\ufb01’ and circumstanca, a detailed enquiry’<\/p>\n
=m;:a be’f:\u00a7::e\u00abssary, firstiy for ascertainment cf the value<\/p>\n
at ti1&_ \u00a7a:’z\ufb01 which ceuid be dene way in a detaiied<\/p>\n
“* ‘._cVr\u00a7fiA\u00e9e\ufb01i\ufb01as \u20acC!t’3t&mi3\u00a53?.&d under em: XXI R322 2, CFC.<\/p>\n
‘   judgment d\u00e9atara, even theuah initiated such action,<\/p>\n
but apaeear ta have withdrawn the proceedin\ufb01 in Misc.<\/p>\n
K\u00bb<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
-14.-\n<\/p>\n
we and have iaraded themseiva into the<\/p>\n
iaredicament. Be that 33 it may, if the vaiue  <\/p>\n
mere than Rs.3B,\ufb010G;’- err iess tha;f:\u00bb.Rs_.41,0{:’,\ufb01i3\u20aci’;I’_*j,\ufb01\u00e9tiiitht\u00e9j ” <\/p>\n
decree haiders cannet avoid acce5:1;nt\u00a71i*:g*t’fdr._t’h\u00a7”‘ v’ia5i;:2f’1tsf:<\/p>\n
the iand which they have’\u00e9t:’ta_inet3t;t- Th_a:*\u00e9\u00a71fd:jgg.,.VV;;1..’3<\/p>\n
interest of justice, it gs nec\u00e9t”sj:a%rytt%\u00bbLth\u00e9t “:g’i’,1V.:’E! \ufb01zdament
\nd\u00e9bt\u00e9f\ufb01 be given an  the prcceediraas
\nan Misc.81’99 ta  enabi\u00e9   tfsttztbstantiate their
\nccmtenticen    gait ‘ ti\u00e9f\u00e9rmine after natice
\nto   5 \ufb01nding whether the
\nadjustment  t’hv\u00e9ii’c:iai*m cf the decree heiders and
\nthat’: ta   ta be the bat caurs\u00e9 that<\/p>\n
cauit\ufb01t t3e.faiiox\u00e9i\u00aba\u00a7iV:\u00a7Vt: ttfe circumstances at the cam.
\n   the resuit, E sarocee\u00e9 ta 93% the faii\ufb01wina<\/p>\n
 .R–\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7\u00e9vi’s\u00a7sue\u00e9 is \ufb01isseived.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘A  ‘\ufb01e writ betitien is dismissed, but iiberty is given ta<\/p>\n
“‘thFe”\u00a7udame::t debtcrs ta revive their Miscwaneeus Case<\/p>\n
 “”‘f\u00a5it:.8\/1999 and er: such appii\u00e9atiets being: mated by the<\/p>\n
judarrzerzt debter, tha ttiai Court is directe\u00e9 ta issue rmtice<\/p>\n
-15-<\/span><\/p>\n
to the decree imiders ta respond to the armmds urged in
\nthe apbiicatierx and after enquiry, as is centempiatw,<\/p>\n
reccr\u00e9 the payme\ufb01t \ufb01r?’ adjustment am? certify the  if<\/p>\n
true. Tm such decision is taken, further ;3raf:ae$;;\u00a3:f’\u00a7j\ufb01s <\/p>\n
Executian Petititm Na.11Gi20\u20acv2 shaii stand st;a%ye7dfk;F%% ‘%s”i-u\u00e9k<\/p>\n
triai Cam is directed ts dispcsf\u00e9 Wri\ufb01f’:: f*’\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7i:e\u00a7i1$t’:\ufb01\u00e9ii;’3._;\ufb01gs\u00e9’<\/p>\n
No.8i19?:9 as extae\u00e9itieusiypas r\u00a74\u00e9:ss i’%3ie arid%..ig’\u00e9ithiv\ufb01- f’ik\u00e9<\/p>\n
cuter iimii: \ufb01f twe months fr\u00e9F1′:.:fi*:e \u00e9afi-.’=.’::\u00e9t”AJ\u00e94;~”ec\u00e9”:\u00a7\u00a7VVV::af the V<\/p>\n
cosy cf this easier.<\/p>\n
\n\n            Sd\/_,_\n _      . . Judge\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Amarappa S\/O Karabasappa … vs Shri Shekhappa S\/O Karabasappa … on 20 April, 2009 Author: Jawad Rahim -1- in THE HIGH ccum’ as KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 20″‘ DAY oa:+.,axPRIL.,;_’ iitiicisy\u00e9-‘.’;,\u00bb ” BEFORE ma HOIWBLE MR. JUSTI\u00a7EV_JAWAi? EEEEEEI 1 AMAaAPPA_j I S\/0 KAR\ufb01\u00e9;BA$\ufb011P?A-_SHfsiAN\u20ac\u00abAUTfi…….\u00a7 AGED \u00a2.aouT~57 YEA.as., occ: 8:Js1′;N’Ess’~ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-175164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAmarappa S\/O Karabasappa ... vs Shri Shekhappa S\/O Karabasappa ... on 20 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Amarappa S\/O Karabasappa ... vs Shri Shekhappa S\/O Karabasappa ... on 20 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-02T05:38:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Amarappa S\\\/O Karabasappa … vs Shri Shekhappa S\\\/O Karabasappa … on 20 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-02T05:38:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":2180,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Amarappa S\\\/O Karabasappa ... vs Shri Shekhappa S\\\/O Karabasappa ... on 20 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-02T05:38:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Amarappa S\\\/O Karabasappa … vs Shri Shekhappa S\\\/O Karabasappa … on 20 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Amarappa S\/O Karabasappa ... vs Shri Shekhappa S\/O Karabasappa ... on 20 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Amarappa S\/O Karabasappa ... vs Shri Shekhappa S\/O Karabasappa ... on 20 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-02T05:38:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Amarappa S\/O Karabasappa … vs Shri Shekhappa S\/O Karabasappa … on 20 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-02T05:38:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009"},"wordCount":2180,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009","name":"Amarappa S\/O Karabasappa ... vs Shri Shekhappa S\/O Karabasappa ... on 20 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-02T05:38:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amarappa-so-karabasappa-vs-shri-shekhappa-so-karabasappa-on-20-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Amarappa S\/O Karabasappa … vs Shri Shekhappa S\/O Karabasappa … on 20 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175164"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175164\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}