{"id":175387,"date":"2010-10-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010"},"modified":"2019-03-09T02:40:08","modified_gmt":"2019-03-08T21:10:08","slug":"benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 876 of 2009()\n\n\n1. BENNY.K.V, S\/O.VARGHESE,KONICKAL HOUSE,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. AMAL SIBI,S\/O.SIBI, AGED 7 YEARS,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. AMMAL @ AMMU, D\/O.SIBI, AGED 2 YEARS,\n\n3. SIBI.K.V,S\/O.VARGHESE,KONICKAL HOUSE,\n\n4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,KERALA STATE ROAD\n\n5. M.V.SKARIA,MANDOTHIL HOUSE,ONNUKAL.PO,\n\n6. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD,\n\n7. MR.RAMESHAN,S\/O.NARAYANAN,THURVACKAL\n\n8. KURIACHEN, S\/O.VARKEY,ERAPPIL HOUSE,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SMT.LEELAMMA GEORGE ABRAHAM\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.VARGHESE JOHN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :19\/10\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n            A.K.BASHEER &amp; P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n          =~=~=~=~==~=~=~=~==~=~=~=~==~=~=~=~==\n                   M.A.C.A. No. 876 of 2009\n          =~=~=~=~==~=~=~=~==~=~=~=~==~=~=~=~==\n        Dated this the 19th day of October, 2010\n\n                          JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Appellant is the respondent No.2 in O.P.(MV) No. 839<\/p>\n<p>of 2004 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,<\/p>\n<p>Thodupuzha. In this appeal he challenges the judgment and<\/p>\n<p>award of the Tribunal dated January 25, 2008 awarding a<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.3,60,000 against respondents 1, 2 and 5<\/p>\n<p>in the O.P. for the loss caused to the claimants on account<\/p>\n<p>of death of one Jessi Sibi in a motor accident.<\/p>\n<p>      2. Claimants are the two minor children and husband<\/p>\n<p>of deceased Jessi Sibi. The accident happened on May 16,<\/p>\n<p>2004 at about 12 O&#8217; Clock in the noon while deceased was<\/p>\n<p>travelling in car bearing registration No.KET\/5621 along<\/p>\n<p>Kochi &#8211; Madurai National Highway. When they reached at<\/p>\n<p>Thonnioka in Iykkaranadu Village a K.S..R.T.C. bus bearing<\/p>\n<p>registration No.KL.15\/1903 hit on the rear side of the car,<\/p>\n<p>as a result of which, respondent No.2 who was driving the<\/p>\n<p>car lost control and the car hit an auto-rickshaw bearing<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 876\/2009                  2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>registration No.KL-7A\/9348. She sustained serious injuries<\/p>\n<p>and succumbed to the injuries sustained while undergoing<\/p>\n<p>treatment in the hospital. Alleging negligence against the<\/p>\n<p>driver of the above three vehicles, the claimants filed the<\/p>\n<p>O.P. before the Tribunal claiming a compensation of Rs.6<\/p>\n<p>lakhs.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. Respondent No.1 in the O.P. is the Managing<\/p>\n<p>Director of the K.S.R.T.C. and respondent No.2 is the<\/p>\n<p>owner-cum-driver of the offending car. Respondent No.4 in<\/p>\n<p>the O.P. is the insurer of the car and auto-rickshaw involved<\/p>\n<p>in the accident and respondent No.3 is the owner of the<\/p>\n<p>auto-rickshaw. Respondent Nos.5 and 6 in the O.P. are the<\/p>\n<p>driver of the bus and driver of the auto-rickshaw<\/p>\n<p>respectively.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4. Respondents Nos.1, 3 and 6 in the O.P. remained<\/p>\n<p>absent before the Tribunal. Respondent No.2 filed a written<\/p>\n<p>statement admitting the accident but attributed negligence<\/p>\n<p>to the driver of the K.S.R.T.C. bus. Respondent No.5 driver<\/p>\n<p>of the K.S.R.T.C. bus filed a written statement admitting the<\/p>\n<p>accident but attributed negligence on the part of the driver<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 876\/2009                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of the car. Respondent No.4 Insurance Company admitted<\/p>\n<p>the policy of the vehicles.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5. This petition was jointly tried along with another<\/p>\n<p>O.P. filed by the injured daughter of the deceased and a<\/p>\n<p>common award was passed. PWs.1 and 2 were examined<\/p>\n<p>and Exts.A1 to A18 were marked on the side of the<\/p>\n<p>claimants. RW1 was examined and Exts.B1 and B2 were<\/p>\n<p>marked on the side of the respondents. On an appreciation<\/p>\n<p>of the evidence, the Tribunal found that the accident<\/p>\n<p>occurred due to negligence of respondents 5 and 2 in the<\/p>\n<p>O.P., drivers of K.S.R.T.C. bus and car respectively, and<\/p>\n<p>awarded a compensation of Rs.3,60,000\/- with interest at<\/p>\n<p>the rate of 8% p.a. from the date of petition till realization<\/p>\n<p>and    proportionate    cost.   The   Tribunal    exonerated<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.4 Insurance Company from the liability as<\/p>\n<p>the policy issued to the offending car was an Act only policy<\/p>\n<p>and that therefore the risk of passengers in the car were not<\/p>\n<p>covered by the said policy. Respondent No.2, the owner-<\/p>\n<p>cum-driver of the car, has come up in appeal challenging<\/p>\n<p>the said finding of the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 876\/2009                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      6. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the third respondents 1 to 3\/claimants<\/p>\n<p>and that of the Insurance Company.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7. The following points arise for consideration:-<\/p>\n<p>      1) Whether the finding of the Tribunal that<br \/>\n          respondent No.2, driver of the car, and<br \/>\n          respondent No.5, driver of the K.S.R.T.C.<br \/>\n          bus, are equally negligent in causing the<br \/>\n          accident can be sustained?\n<\/p>\n<p>       2) Whether the finding of the Tribunal that the<br \/>\n          risk of the passengers in the car is not<br \/>\n          covered    by  the    policy   and   thereby<br \/>\n          exonerating the Insurance Company can be<br \/>\n          sustained?\n<\/p>\n<p>      8. The Tribunal found that the accident occurred due<\/p>\n<p>to negligence of the drivers of the bus and the car i.e.,<\/p>\n<p>respondents 5 and 2 respectively. At the time of the<\/p>\n<p>accident the car was overtaking the auto-rickshaw. The<\/p>\n<p>K.S.R.T.C. bus hit the car from behind and the car hit the<\/p>\n<p>auto-rickshaw. The place of incident is a curve. The F.I.R.<\/p>\n<p>was registered against the driver of the bus, but the charge<\/p>\n<p>was laid against the driver of the car. Taking into<\/p>\n<p>consideration all these aspects, we are of the view that the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal is perfectly justified in holding that the accident<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 876\/2009                  5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>occurred due to negligence of drivers of the car as well as<\/p>\n<p>that of the bus and making them liable at the ratio of 50 :<\/p>\n<p>50.<\/p>\n<p>       9. The next question to be considered is whether the<\/p>\n<p>risk of the passengers travelling in the car is covered by the<\/p>\n<p>policy. Admittedly the policy issued was an Act only policy,<\/p>\n<p>which does not cover the risk of the passengers in the<\/p>\n<p>vehicle. Therefore, the Tribunal is perfectly justified in<\/p>\n<p>exonerating respondent No.4 Insurance company. For all<\/p>\n<p>these reasons we find no merit in the appeal and the same<\/p>\n<p>is liable to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>       In the result, the appeal is dismissed. No cost.<\/p>\n<p>                                          A.K.BASHEER,<br \/>\n                                          JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                          P.Q. BARKATH ALI,<br \/>\n                                          JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>mn<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 876 of 2009() 1. BENNY.K.V, S\/O.VARGHESE,KONICKAL HOUSE, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. AMAL SIBI,S\/O.SIBI, AGED 7 YEARS, &#8230; Respondent 2. AMMAL @ AMMU, D\/O.SIBI, AGED 2 YEARS, 3. SIBI.K.V,S\/O.VARGHESE,KONICKAL HOUSE, 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,KERALA STATE ROAD [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-175387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-08T21:10:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-08T21:10:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":866,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-08T21:10:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-08T21:10:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-08T21:10:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010"},"wordCount":866,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010","name":"Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-08T21:10:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/benny-k-v-vs-amal-sibi-on-19-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Benny.K.V vs Amal Sibi on 19 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175387\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}