{"id":175710,"date":"2009-07-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009"},"modified":"2015-04-13T01:32:25","modified_gmt":"2015-04-12T20:02:25","slug":"sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri.Ningayya S\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri.Ningayya S\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
\": 2 \nIN THE HIGH COURT op' KARNATAKA AT BANG. j\u00a7'.-\u00a2;)I2_ .\u20ac\n\nDATED THIS THE 13*}: DAY op JULY' f\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9   .\n\nPRESENT' _\n\nTHE HGNBLE MR. RD. ::):NA\u00bb13<A\u00a7;AN; C:ei_iEei\u00ab*;IU"fsf1?\u00a7c;%:_A'\n\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR.J{i'sfi\u00a7:cE v;'G.'$A_:B :Hm;T\nWRIT;\u00a7PP\u00a7Ez5;I, g\u00e9.\u20ac5.:'1.2%\u00a7\u00a7;g;f0o9 H N\nBETWEEN;    'V   "\n\n1  sRI.Tr\u00e9.INGA?\u00a5A."'\u00abV.,_ .\n Sm UD;3'x'S..\u00a5_ RANGA*:AH'\n*.')c:\u00bb:: A@R1cjuLm1"<<1S*r\nR; 912' THWPUR VILLAGE,\n KAS2*J3fawH(f)B'LI \n FQUBEITALUKV\n ,_ r1fL;zxej1i<;UR mist-'i'R; KVVEMPAIM\nsimzrj mm BY ms ms\n{A} ~f7.':(}BI)A KEMPAIAI\u00bb;\n.. 3\/0 KEMPANNAJAIAH\n'=--o(:(: AGRICULTURISF\nR] OF THEPPUR VILLAGE\nKASABA HGBLI, GU88! TALUK\n'i'UME{UR DIS'\u00a5'R\u00a7C'I'\n\nBKEHANDRAIAH\n\nS] O KEMPANANJAIAH\nGCC AGRICULTURXST\nE] OF THIPPUR VILLAGE-\n\n\n\nKASABA HOBLI,   \nGU33: TALUK : '\nTUMKUR I}iSi'R\u00a7C'}\"\n\n3 SHIVANNA \n\n3\/0 SOMASAH  \n\nR\/OFTHEPPUR VILLAGE\"-._ --\n\nKASABA Ho3I..~1',.__  * '\n\n(}UBBi'I'ALUK   _ ._ \n\nTUMKUR D:s'rR:c.';*'  \n\n4 KEMPAMMA \u00a2 I    \n\nSINCE Diem) 8?? HER LES \" \n\nA} si1:>'aAmz;.A     *\n\nD\/Q. KEF\u20ac\u00a2_IPAMMA'~v.\"_' ', \" \n\n 0cC\";\u00a7sfm ICULTUR1sT --\n R; OF TH\u00a7PPUR VI_L\"L~AC}E\n'K,ASABA..H'QVBLf,\"  \nGU.Ij3B{ TALUK \" \n TUMi{.uRI:';zs'\u00a7\":RzCr .....APPELLAm's\n\n  \u00e9  Sri :\"}.\"}&R Af$3\u00a7N\"I3EESWARA )\n\n WATE Oi? KARNATAKA\n VREPRESENTEQ BY ITS SECRETARY\n* V'-RELIGIGUS AND CHARITAELE\n~ V ENDOWMENTS,\n'M S B{;;m1NG\nvI9HA1~\u00e9A VEEDH:\nBANGALQRE-02\n\n:22 THE COMMISSIONER HINER} RELIGIOUS\nANS CHARFFABLE ENDGWMENTS,\nGHAMARAJPET,\n\nBANGALORE'.\n\n\n\n3 POOJAIAH  _\nS\/O NANJAIAH  \"\nSINCE DEAD BY ms LRS   . ~\nA)VENKA'1'ALAKSHMAMMA?__ '\nw\/0 POOJAIAH, * '\n\nAGED 65 YEARS\n000 ARCHAKA OF . \nUDASALAM=i\\\/\u00a3&\u00ab\"I\u00a7}EV1  -A  \n\nB) SIBDAMMA  ._  .\n\nD\/C) POQ_JAIAH_...  %  V\n\nDCCAiT\u20ac--C}I%AK    \n\nUBAS;*\\LAjMI\\*iA'DEiVI   '- \n4 KE}a4?;3\u00a7A_H  * \"  .' V\n\n 31.9 \"s%ANM. .KEMPAIA\u00a7-1... ,  \n\n SINC'i';*DEA3D 13Y=;:11s_1,9s\n\n3..AA)'--SANNP\u00a7KEVMPA1A'P\u00a3 '\n:;::;CsLA1'\u00a7; K:3MPA,1AH~\"\noix: PLRCHAK c31f\u00ab\"_.~\n\n, _ UDA'S3\u00e9kLA.MMA DEV?\n Af3~ED ABQUT40 YEARS\n\n_ ;3}S3.I4DDAPPA\n_  ~;~3;o'*L.A*rg KEMPAIAH\nEABOUT 35 YEARS\nQCGARCHAKA 0;?\n ..LrmSALAMMA DEVI.  RESPONBENTS\n{By~~ssx'-3;: ; G GACHCHENAMATH, ma R3.\n\n' .. SRIEASAVARAJ KAREBDY GA FOR R: AND 2\" )\n\nTHES WRIT APPEAL IS FILED {HS 4 :3? THE\nKARNATAKA Hm\u00bb: comm' AC'? PRAYING TO SET ASISE\nfrag 03332:? mssm IN THE wan' pmmom\n\nrmgsgo\/2008 DATED 27\/02\/2009.\n\nThis Writ Appeal comirzg up for Prciiminary Healing on\nthis day, SAB}-iAHfT J., dciivenitd the following.\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
This appea} is \ufb01led by zwespoz1deI1t$j”‘;3\u00ab’ A’ in<\/p>\n
W.P.No.9590\/2008 being aggrieved  <\/p>\n
27.2.2009 wherein the learned  df  ‘<\/p>\n
allowed the Writ petitioxz  qua$31_\u00e9<\u00a7 the 1 \u00a751':1V\u00e9:'1"" <\/p>\n
and further or\u00e9ered that .2'z\u00a7*  –i'h\u00a3*:. ;"\\1V3;Vtl3oz'itics
\nearlier, the pariias to    the pooja<\/p>\n
in thfi" H ii:-\u00a7r3'ra1";i\u00a2':V)\u00bbI1.  t
\nResp\u00a77n\u00a73i\u00a2nis\u00ab_ 3fT%%-:2\u00a7V.& B) and 4 (A 55 B} herein filed
\nWP,N0.9L59O']2QQ8AA::g{i\u00e9};\u00a7fz1g fer quashizxg of the mder dated<\/p>\n
 pas\u00a7e<i——by the secand n::spondeI1t—-C0mm3lssi0ner,<\/p>\n
V  and Charitaiaict Endownzents, Bangalore. it<\/p>\n
.' Ais " av\u00e9Ii4ii?ij1  in the writ pe\ufb01tion that petitioners and<\/p>\n
m\ufb01poizgi\u00e9\ufb01ts 3 to 6 are the Archaks of Sziudasalamma Devi<\/p>\n
'L V.  Th\u00e9ppur Vi\ufb02aga, Kasaba Hobli, Gnbbi Taluk, Tumkur<\/p>\n
 Si\u00e9uict. Sinc\ufb01 from the \ufb01me of the ancestors of the _<\/p>\n
" pe\ufb01tioners and respondents 3 to 6, the petitioxmrs and the<\/p>\n
respendents 3 to 5 are worshipping the said cicity on the<\/p>\n
yeariy ro'\u00a3atio11 basis. The pe\ufb01\ufb01o9ers__and_–'f1ie   _ <\/p>\n
to 6 are persona\ufb02y cultivating ti::.\u00a2  .<\/p>\n
Sy.No.113 measuring 5 ac1e_s'\u00ab-22 giintss siti\u00e9{\u00e9iie\u00a7;1v.z\u00a7;tVV'l_5hi1speL1i:"L'<\/p>\n
village, Kasaha I-Iobii,   Ilistrici.<\/p>\n
Respondents 3 to 6  _pc\u00a7\ufb01t\u00a7eisixs'1ski{1g undue advantage<\/p>\n
of the innocence of  to dis%:urb the '<\/p>\n
peaceful   ti;\u00e9'V.'ivc1*'shippiI1g of the deity
\nduring   A in the year 1999 an\u00e9
\n;)e1:i\ufb01vos'er':sA " \ufb01le an appeal before the
\nAssig\u00a3ag\u00a7:'– V  Tumkur. The Assistant<\/p>\n
Cernmiss\ufb01igzer ' V.   the famiiy genea1\u20ac;tg*, after<\/p>\n
   aspects of the ease and also {he<\/p>\n
  Land ma} evi\u00e9ence held that the petitioners and<\/p>\n
 :es\u00a7:'\ufb01;gdTents 3 to 6 are en\ufb01tleci to Worship on yeariy<\/p>\n
rotaiieiz basis and further they are also entitled to ctlitivate<\/p>\n
V' iand in accoxdance with the respective shaxes. Aggxieveci<\/p>\n
by the said order, respondents 3 to 6 \ufb02ied appeal befcre the<\/p>\n
Deputy Commissioner, Tumkur. The Deputy Commissioner,<\/p>\n
'I'um},(ur, dismisse\ufb01 the appeal. After verifying the elder of
\nL?\n<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
the Assistant Commissioner and the Deputy Comteissinner,<\/p>\n
the Tahsildar, Gubbi gassed order permitt\u00a7ng_ <\/p>\n
and the respondents to worship the S-ai.o:1…  yeailyet <\/p>\n
rotation basis, The Tahsileiar has! else A’g1~g:e’:;   t<\/p>\n
to maintain. the order of warship enfeariy  b\u00e9gsis  ”<\/p>\n
the petitioners and respondents\u00bb 3 to \u00a73.~.  eggneved by
\nthe said order, Iespendente\u00e9g ._6: “ii1ed  before the<\/p>\n
second respondent and ~t-the t’V’s’e\u00ab;:ond_:Z’1ese\u00a2.ndent passed an<\/p>\n
ordeze     approach the eivii court.\n<\/p>\n
Respeu\ufb01ents 3._teA:_:6.’tfileei”\u00ab(‘}’.S.No.Q 12\/95 on the file of Civil<\/p>\n
Judge (.,\u00a5”r:ul’3n.:V.}   permanent injuxxetion and the suit<\/p>\n
  i,;1j_s:32issec1tV\u00aben'”V4.6w2O{)5. The judgment and decree<\/p>\n
V  4VO.eS_.’_No.212\/96 has attained \ufb01nality as no appea}<\/p>\n
   against the said judgment an\u00e9 decree.<\/p>\n
Respenxdent No.2 without verii\ufb01zing all these aspects of the<\/p>\n
  i.e. the order of the Tahsildar, orzier ef the Assistant<\/p>\n
fC’.ommissioner, order ef the Deputy Commissioner and<\/p>\n
judgment made in Q.S.NG.212\/96, order iaasseci by the<\/p>\n
Tahsildar giving police preteetion, record of rights which
\n\\)’<\/p>\n
stands in the name of the  <\/p>\n
Ittspondents; 3 to 6 has strangely?-gaasvscdji’ <\/p>\n
rcjec\ufb01ng the claim of _V petiiipiicrs 1<\/p>\n
respondents 3 to 6 alone    ion yearly
\nrotation basis IeavinVg r;\ufb01.t_    “aggrieved by
\nthe same, writ Apei:itio;;..is:.*–;\u00a3::hat the said order
\nis co1:1\u00a3:ra1’yfV     the judgment and
\ndecree   ‘fespO1’ld\u20acI1tS 3 to 6 in
\n _  is unsustainable and
\npetit:i;)’13\u00a7:;r;s-  3 to 6 are entitled to Worship
\nt1::\u00a2’:wit5r\u00a7r; 1\u00a7\u20acJi\u00a31.{;%01\ufb01.;’- V <\/p>\n
V.  ‘i”‘hy._=:  Singlrt Judge after heann’ g the iearned<\/p>\n
     for the petitioners and the learned<\/p>\n
AC.–I)_i1I1$(:i  for resgaondents 3, 5 and 6(A) by order<\/p>\n
 AA ;iat\u00e9dV_. ;27.2.20O9 held that the order of the Assistant<\/p>\n
V’ ‘VC\u00a3\u00a7Ai>3missi0ncr, Deputy Commissioner and the: Tahsildar in<\/p>\n
 the earlier groceedings before the same parties would Show<\/p>\n
that petitioners and mspo\ufb01dents 3 to 6 were pexmitizd to<\/p>\n
worshig by mta\ufb01en. {).S.Nt).212\/96 was \ufb01led by zespandents<\/p>\n
\\?’<\/p>\n
3 to 6 clairning that they are the poojaries of  <\/p>\n
and petitioners herein should be  <\/p>\n
with the pexfonnance of pooja in the   Id <\/p>\n
suit, it was held that Iespond\u00e9nigs 3    ;i1:.d’<\/p>\n
the said suit have no \u00a3:xc11.1siv_{\u00a7:__VVi’ight;._\u00bb_to p\ufb01foml the worship
\nin the temple and ‘ad{:c1t\u00a3_inggi3%, ‘4 dismissed and
\ntherefore, the osdcr of  SccG;1d_ rdtxspg\ufb01iiti\u00e9dnt is conaazy to<\/p>\n
the judgme\ufb01\ufb01v  ‘f311t’:.{E;i’Ee::  13}; Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.)<\/p>\n
Gubbi’aridd.z\u00a7c\u00a7,1rIi\u00e9f:~\u00a7prd\u00e9e\u00a7\u00e9ding\u00e9[‘\u00e9aiinot be sustained and the
\noxderidig\u00e9cdting ig\u00e9igdhfespa\ufb01dents 3 to 6 to perfonn<\/p>\n
the poojd  on rota\ufb01on was restored by tha<\/p>\n
 V.  If3_5;?3I3’?.1\u20acE(1:v. Sjng1eh”JL1.d.gc and accordingiy, writ f.}\u20ac’ti\ufb01OI1 was<\/p>\n
‘  the impugned order. Being aggrieved by<\/p>\n
“\ufb01:iev~’s\u00e9a:d dated 27.2.2009, respozldents 3 to 6 have<\/p>\n
  appeal.\n<\/p>\n
 4. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n
V’  H @116 apgseiiants, learncd counsel appearing fer respondents<\/p>\n
3(A and B) and 4 {A and B) and tbs learmizd Government<\/p>\n
Advocate: appearing for mspczzndents 1 and 2. There was<\/p>\n
0*<\/p>\n
daiay of one day in \ufb01ling the appeal and   -‘;1\u00bbtv=’:”enV bb <\/p>\n
condoned by separate older.\n<\/p>\n
5. Lcarxled counse1V\u00bb[.a@}_:;peaIii:igV__ \u00a3111: <\/p>\n
submitted that the  seco11Ad…VVi:t<;spe1;de1.1't" was Hj\u00e9ilsiiififtd in<\/p>\n
setting aside the ord\u00e9f'  .i\u00a76fif\ufb01.0ncrs alse along
\nwith mspondezfx-Nsv_.3 tq\ufb01;  to perform the
\npooja on    might to have been
\nciisr\u00a3ii\u00a7.S'.f::.(i~''~~\/.Vi:-. ;'_ '' " " " V' <\/p>\n
  for respondants 3 and 4
\nsubmitt\u00e9:'i<–..that c'1f\u20ac1e;-~'Lpassed by thc: learned Single: Judge<\/p>\n
is ji;stji'"ied.\n<\/p>\n
V’ ”  1 ‘v;+I;v\u00e9::a\u00a71:ri,d Govemmsnt Advocate arguad in support: of<\/p>\n
 by tha lcarned Single Judge.\n<\/p>\n
~  We have considered the contentions of the learned<\/p>\n
A f_” V\u00e9\ufb01iunsel appearing for the parties and scru\ufb01niseii the<\/p>\n
Vfmatexiai on record.\n<\/p>\n
v’<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
9. The material on record Wojtxld cicarlyliiishoi\ufb01r vthai \u00bb <\/p>\n
the earlier proceedings the Tahsiidar   <\/p>\n
the basis of the order passed  the” AS”sista2.1\u00a3’ *<\/p>\n
and the Deputy Commissioner’ eetieioncrs and
\nrespondents 3413′) 6′ the  on yearly
\nrotatioa, therea\ufb01er,   \ufb01led a suit in
\nO,S.No.2}2\/96″*\u00ab:oi1   (Jr.Dn.) Gzlbbi,
\nclaiming  V\u00e9eido Vsuit are the exclusive
\npoojairie\u00e9vor  ‘t;u1ieVV’\u00a7i\ufb02efenda:a1s i\ufb01 the suit-writ
\npetitioi}erS.’_ in ‘Z:  petition have no right to<\/p>\n
perform   corztention of respondents 3 to 6<\/p>\n
 V.  h2;fs*.’3’\u00ab:be,e:1 xgegafiveu.—–\u00a7;’1 the said suit and the judgment and<\/p>\n
‘ ;;7Iee:?eev.;\u00a7$\u00e9*1s:see:i’i1:1 the said suit has become \ufb01nal Despite the<\/p>\n
 an& the judgment anti decree passed in the<\/p>\n
s13i4f}’g::ii:1i1\u00a7\u00a7gf that respondents 3 to 6 have 110 exclusive right<\/p>\n
 .. ‘to’ the pooja by the inclusion of the petitioners, the<\/p>\n
‘he:-eeohil\ufb01 respondent has passed the impugied order \ufb01ated<\/p>\n
 ” ‘}[1.6.2OU8 permitting nesponcients 3 to 6 to perforxn the<\/p>\n
gooja 01:2 yearly mtatiozii excluding the Wr\u00e9t petitioners an\u00e9<\/p>\n
K\/”\n<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
therefore, having Iegand t0 the above sai\u20aci”f\u00e9ief;s,  cL~:ee~’ ; a<\/p>\n
that the impugned order is <\/p>\n
set aside and could not be   (mier L’<\/p>\n
passed by the learned Single    petition
\nand setting aside  ” __a11d dimcting the
\nAuthorities to the    like pooja in the
\ntemple on  is  Anot suffer from any
\nerror or   in this infra court
\nappeal.”    there is no merit in this
\nappeaieamr:1″d.   order:\n<\/p>\n
 ‘ The wfit’ is dismissed,<\/p>\n
    -4 sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Chief Justice<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n
 I;1(iex:Yes\/No<\/p>\n
Web Host: Yes\/N0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri.Ningayya S\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit “: 2 IN THE HIGH COURT op’ KARNATAKA AT BANG. j\u00a7’.-\u00a2;)I2_ .\u20ac DATED THIS THE 13*}: DAY op JULY’ f\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9 . PRESENT’ _ THE HGNBLE MR. RD. ::):NA\u00bb13<A\u00a7;AN; C:ei_iEei\u00ab*;IU"fsf1?\u00a7c;%:_A' THE I-ION'BLE MR.J{i'sfi\u00a7:cE v;'G.'$A_:B :Hm;T WRIT;\u00a7PP\u00a7Ez5;I, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-175710","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri.Ningayya S\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri.Ningayya S\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-12T20:02:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri.Ningayya S\\\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-12T20:02:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1280,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri.Ningayya S\\\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-12T20:02:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri.Ningayya S\\\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri.Ningayya S\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri.Ningayya S\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-12T20:02:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri.Ningayya S\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-12T20:02:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009"},"wordCount":1280,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009","name":"Sri.Ningayya S\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-12T20:02:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ningayya-so-udasi-rangaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri.Ningayya S\/O Udasi Rangaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175710","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175710"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175710\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175710"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175710"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175710"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}