{"id":175723,"date":"2008-10-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008"},"modified":"2018-10-23T04:03:02","modified_gmt":"2018-10-22T22:33:02","slug":"ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 1592 of 2008()\n\n\n1. RAMACHANDRAN, S\/O.SUBRAMANYAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. EASOW VARGHESE, MOTHEDATHU GRACE VILLA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. RAJAN, S\/O.KOSHY THARAKAN,\n\n3. M\/S.NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.A.MOHAMMED NAZIR\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN\n\n Dated :29\/10\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                          M.N. KRISHNAN, J\n                         -----------------------\n                   M.A.C.A.Nos. 1592 OF 2008\n                                   &amp;\n                            1593 OF 2008\n                    ---------------------------------\n               Dated this the 29th day of October, 2008\n\n\n                              JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>      These appeals are preferred against the award of the Motor<\/p>\n<p>Accident    Claims    Tribunal,  Muvattupuzha      in O.P.(MV)  Nos.<\/p>\n<p>1214\/2004 and 1207\/2004. The brief facts necessary for disposal<\/p>\n<p>of these appeals are stated as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. The claimant in O.P. 1207\/04 was a rider of a two wheeler<\/p>\n<p>with the petitioner in O.P. 1214\/04 as the pillion rider.     A lorry<\/p>\n<p>bearing Registration No. KL-3D\/5814 driven by the 2nd respondent<\/p>\n<p>in the claim application was going ahead of this motorbike. It is the<\/p>\n<p>case of the petitioners that the driver of the lorry applied sudden<\/p>\n<p>brake as a result of which the bike went and hit on the back of the<\/p>\n<p>lorry resulting injuries to both the occupants of the motorbike. The<\/p>\n<p>Insurance Company would contend that the accident took place only<\/p>\n<p>on account of the negligence of the motorcyclist and therefore the<\/p>\n<p>claim petitions are liable to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. The Tribunal after consideration of the materials agreed<\/p>\n<p>with the contention of the Insurance Company and dismissed the<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A.Nos. 1592 OF 2008 &amp; 1593 OF 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>claim applications. It is against that decision, the appeals are<\/p>\n<p>preferred.     The question that arise for determination in these<\/p>\n<p>appeals is whether the motorcyclist alone is negligent or the lorry<\/p>\n<p>driver alone is negligent or whether both are negligent. It is true<\/p>\n<p>that there is a statutory obligation for driver or rider of a vehicle to<\/p>\n<p>keep a distance of 10 metres from the vehicle going in front of it.<\/p>\n<p>When such a condition is always satisfied then there will be no<\/p>\n<p>chance for a hit from behind in all cases. It does not mean that one<\/p>\n<p>may be always able to keep a distance of 10 metres in a road for<\/p>\n<p>the reason that the vehicle traffic in the present condition is so thick<\/p>\n<p>and there can not be a distance of even one or two metres between<\/p>\n<p>the vehicles. This is a practical difficulty which is experienced in the<\/p>\n<p>present set up. It does not mean that one can go so close and<\/p>\n<p>later blaming ongoing vehicles for the accident. In these cases it<\/p>\n<p>has to be specifically understood that the strong contention of the<\/p>\n<p>rider of the motorbike is that the lorry which was going in front of<\/p>\n<p>him applied sudden brake which resulted in the dashing of the<\/p>\n<p>motorcycle on the back of the lorry. There may be circumstances<\/p>\n<p>where the on moving vehicle may have to apply sudden brake. But<\/p>\n<p>it is for that party to come before the court and give evidence what<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A.Nos. 1592 OF 2008 &amp; 1593 OF 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>prompted or forced him to apply          a sudden brake.  Instead of<\/p>\n<p>rendering an explanation, what the driver of the lorry has done is,<\/p>\n<p>on receipt of the summons from the criminal court, appears before<\/p>\n<p>the court and pleads guilty and pays the fine. So by his conduct<\/p>\n<p>after understanding the allegations in the criminal case he had<\/p>\n<p>pleaded guilty which shows that he had applied sudden brake.<\/p>\n<p>When he had applied sudden brake and if the motorcycle was<\/p>\n<p>coming at a reasonable speed even then he might not have been in<\/p>\n<p>a position to stop the vehicle because it was so unexpected and in<\/p>\n<p>some cases if sudden brake is applied the rider as well as the pillion<\/p>\n<p>rider will be thrown out resulting in serious injuries. It has also<\/p>\n<p>to be born in mind that no person will like to go and hit on the back<\/p>\n<p>of a vehicle and sustain injury for himself. Therefore here is a case<\/p>\n<p>where the lorry driver was primarily responsible for applying a<\/p>\n<p>sudden brake without proper care and a motorcyclist on account of<\/p>\n<p>the lack of non compliance of the statutory regulations had gone<\/p>\n<p>and hit on the back of the lorry.          So both the drivers had<\/p>\n<p>contributed equally to the accident. The Tribunal has extracted the<\/p>\n<p>deposition of PW1 wherein PW1 admits that he knows that a<\/p>\n<p>reasonable distance has to be kept from the on moving vehicle and<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A.Nos. 1592 OF 2008 &amp; 1593 OF 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>when a question was put him regarding application of sudden brake<\/p>\n<p>he had given the explanation that if sudden brake was applied, both<\/p>\n<p>of them would have fallen from the bike.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4. Therefore from the circumstances available in this case<\/p>\n<p>I hold this is a case where the rider of the bike as well as the lorry<\/p>\n<p>has equally contributed to the accident and therefore I apportion<\/p>\n<p>the negligence at 50% each on both the rider of the bike and the<\/p>\n<p>lorry driver. The next question is regarding compensation. In view<\/p>\n<p>of this finding the Tribunal may have to consider the quantum of<\/p>\n<p>compensation. For that purpose both the parties are permitted to<\/p>\n<p>produce documentary as well as oral evidence and the matter be<\/p>\n<p>disposed of in accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Both the parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on<\/p>\n<p>15.12.2008.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                        M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>vkm<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 1592 of 2008() 1. RAMACHANDRAN, S\/O.SUBRAMANYAN, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. EASOW VARGHESE, MOTHEDATHU GRACE VILLA &#8230; Respondent 2. RAJAN, S\/O.KOSHY THARAKAN, 3. M\/S.NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., For Petitioner :SRI.A.A.MOHAMMED NAZIR For Respondent :SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-175723","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-22T22:33:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-22T22:33:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":839,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-22T22:33:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-22T22:33:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-22T22:33:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008"},"wordCount":839,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008","name":"Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-22T22:33:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandran-vs-easow-varghese-on-29-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramachandran vs Easow Varghese on 29 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175723","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175723"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175723\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}