{"id":17581,"date":"2009-01-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009"},"modified":"2014-03-22T20:44:32","modified_gmt":"2014-03-22T15:14:32","slug":"dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Dr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City … on 19 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Dr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City … on 19 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT 0}?  A  \n\nDATED THIS mm 19th DAY;:6F g}};;\u00a713AI\u00a7\u00a5?: _ \n   %%   \nma: I-IOIWBLE M12. wsrxcz\u00e9 am V1\u00a5I\u20ac)aIiz\u00a5iN. EftEi)9Y\nwar': PETITIQR..I\u20aco.\u00a7A\ufb01\u00a7Q6:;fV;?=.\u00a7B8 (L\ufb01hlit\ufb01)\n\nBETWEEN    i%  'V\n\nDR. H     \n3\/0 LATE Pms'     %\nAC\u00a3}:) ABOUT 55'v\u00bbY}i\u00a7ARS'   .% \nR\/AT No.32    \"\nAF~}AI~i'I'E-iN1?x(}A5R    \n\nMANIPAL  ,   \nUDUP1TALU\u00a7w;&%D1s% RIC'i' '----._ Y  PETYHONER\n\n( BY SR: .;ASHO\u00a3{HA1\u00a7ANH}'xL1l ADVOCATE)\n\n 1. C@\u00a7:MM%1S\u00e9'zL@N$R%\n\nUmafpl CITY\" {MUNICIPAL COUNCIL\n\n V L KM 1x\u00ab1AR(3'%%\n~ ~ .. : :.mUP1;  %\n\n 'z;\u00a7;m:1fAL COOPERATIVE HOUSE\n\n- . . BUILSING SCJCEETY LTD,\n\n  V     REPRESENTED BY ITS\n \"\u00ab_SECRE\"I'ARY, MANIPAL. ..RIasPoNBEm*s\n\n( SR1 S VISHWAJITH SHE'I'TY FOR ORR} SR1 TL\nABDULLA FOR R1, SR1 AANQNIDSHETTYFQR K)\n\nM\n\n\n\nTHIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED PRAYING, TC)\nQUASH THE CIRBER DATED 5.2.2008 P..ASSE}D\n\nBYRESPONDENT NO.1 VIBE ANNEXURE:~A.   R<\/pre>\n
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR (L’*’.F._:\u00a7I3.EV’3E”S” H
\nINTERLOCUTORY APPL1cATIoN,j:HE ‘.’c<3u.1%T'*%MA:;33'. "V<\/p>\n
THE FOLLOWING: O R 3) E <\/p>\n
This petition though 1is\u00bb'\u00a3c:;d_. for  -:3:L1 'Lv'3&tz\u00e9;f_1.oc1j'1t::aV13,\u00bb <\/p>\n
appiication, for modi\ufb01cation. the  or\u00e9ifer dated
\n1.8.2008, with the co\u00a7\ufb01.$\u00e9'3.1t    ceunsc-:1 for the<\/p>\n
parties, is flzlaliy    this erder.\n<\/p>\n
2. Et is _,t’mt_V  d\u00a75s\u00a71:1.ts{:’j  }’;”5 respondent Co\u00bb<\/p>\n
Operative “19E_g\u00a7s’f\u00a7re%d–  ,Co.Operative Societies
\nAct, *m:1$s~ V15′”\u00a7a.cr\u00e9s ‘5?VVV–\u00e9:e11ts in $E\u00a7y.No.183\/2 of
\nShivah:a1_1i”” ” fzaiuk for an upset price of<\/p>\n
I~”_se. The bye iaws sf ths s\ufb01cieiy, it is stated,<\/p>\n
  f:Ef1$;1?iV’\u00a3.1;1# sita aiiotted to its members shall be made<\/p>\n
_ “SEW. {Of-__’At};\u00e9”.Vpurpos& of C\u20ac3I1S'{I’E1a’CtiOI1 of house m t, for<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\nany other purpose. in the year, 2004~05 the General Body of<\/p>\n
the 235 respondent society was informed that xnuitietoyjed<\/p>\n
buildings were being put up in and around  <\/p>\n
consttuction of the :-;aid buildings would $e1\u00b0\u00a7ot;s1j,f”  ._ <\/p>\n
the hygiene and cleanliness of  <\/p>\n
o underground drainage provithjd. in\u00e9tmeizipal   <\/p>\n
View of the mater, the   2nd V<\/p>\n
respondent, held   decided
\nnot to permit any   or buildirig in
\nthe property  any other sites
\nallotted to   It is further not in
\ndispute”  eavteiiector of the society and
\nparty    dated 10.9.2005 which<\/p>\n
gra\ufb01\ufb01ed by the ._ ‘._(}egteI*a1 Body meeting held on<\/p>\n
 , &_ 28:Q32{)(jE”:  e’f’fe(_:1_;_\u20acHC1 Wicie publication in the newspaper.<\/p>\n
  tfmtispizes that the petitioner made an<\/p>\n
app\u00e9ieateion a licence to erect multistorieti building and<\/p>\n
R.””~._VV”‘z;e;ighi\u00a7ou\u00a3i’h0od shops in the property measuring 33 cents<\/p>\n
\u00ab   –.it1~.S;t%’.N.Z83\/2 allotted to his father by the society in the<\/p>\n
year 1964 and obtained a licencs for <:011strt_1:a'\u00a7'i;i<:ianj…_i_:\u00a7i;s\u00e9iri\ufb01;v:ii<\/p>\n
Municipality and the Town Pianning Authazity.   i <\/p>\n
it is thereafter on 7.6.2007', the p\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01giiiefiinatig  <\/p>\n
to the society to issue 3 N0VC}bj:3c\u00a5;i(\u00a713, C\ufb01rti\ufb01cai\ufb02 A. Vito: \u20ac1"'\u20ac?C.'ii'{i "'.<\/p>\n
buiiding to which the 23\u00b0' mspfinidi\u00e9nt so\u00e9istjr   reply'
\ndatec} 1 1.6.2007 b\ufb01ng\u00a7ig'~3p thT\u00e9'iiii:1:oiig*eii"6f\u00a21.:he gi\u00e9fi\ufb01kiner over
\nthe decision of the Genersii  a.ti(ivAi.i.:'g:s? ” iiifaveur of the petitiemzr, caused a<\/p>\n
 shmi. gauge ni}ti3\u00a7:___g:i\u00a7fs*3c1 26.11.2007 Amexure–;~:: which<\/p>\n
  __to by the petitioner’s reply date\u00e9 8.12.290′?<\/p>\n
  ls: respondent it appears secured legal<\/p>\n
opiiiion’—‘:da’~:;:\u00a3\u00a71 13.12.2007 from its kzzgal counsel and by<\/p>\n
 (;3,’rf\u00a3\u00a7r d\u00e9ied 5.2.2088 Amziexure-A cramzelled the licence<\/p>\n
 granted is the gietitianer to erect; the building,<\/p>\n
  “‘~i:{iv0king Sec:.188 of the Kagmataka Municigialities Act,<\/p>\n
1964,f0r short the Act.\n<\/p>\n
.5. There is considerable force in the S11bIIli\u00a7SiCIl ‘Qf<\/p>\n
Sri Ashok Harem halli, learned counsel for the  V’<\/p>\n
that the 1st respondent instead of _,9;pp_lyiI1gl   ‘A ll<\/p>\n
facts, ciztunlstances and matexi\u00e9gl\u00e9, if\u00e9ll\u00e9iwed. “t}_1e <\/p>\n
secured by its legal cou31se1′,l_j.%:;–l;ic:11 lead 1;)  off’<\/p>\n
the petitionefs l;in::en.<:e.V__ I say eel   the Ac':
\nprovides that it is forvtlael' _B\/lnngejvigm\u00e9i.fjlemignissioner who is
\nrequired to take  intiepell\u00e9le\ufb01vt  the material
\non record.  ecifiistitute an opinion
\n0f 21 leaxned.   l\\duI1icipality. Having
\nexamiiled   _' tltlere is no more deubt, in
\nmy flat   did not apply its mind<\/p>\n
inde]\u00a7:;c1rden1ll"y..,v"t0' {hell nlaterials, but simply followed the<\/p>\n
I of the leg\u00e9illeeunsel to cancel the licence iseued<\/p>\n
   On this ecere alone, this writ petition<\/p>\n
des.efve$;.  a\ufb02eweci.\n<\/p>\n
6;” ,Le1arned counsel for the petitioner submits that<\/p>\n
  to the interim order dated 21.2.2068, the<\/p>\n
 ee\ufb01\ufb01ener put up construction, however at his risk and<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
peril without seeking any equities, in thc evcx.1\u00e9,~–.\u00bbthe<\/p>\n
cons\ufb01uc\ufb01on is not said to be legal and that <\/p>\n
{stopped further CO1’iStI’11CtiOIl immediately  <\/p>\n
order was modified by ordcr dated.-‘ “1,a.2Qc\u00a728. _o  ta,<\/p>\n
the learned cmmscl, the constxixciioxij\ufb01’  <\/p>\n
except for plastering of the v\u20ac\u00a7\u20act:\u00e9:”1~’\u00a7,(\u00a7I    that ‘V<\/p>\n
tho petitioner be pemnittcd  tZ:{c’v::m1s\u00a7’Lt11ctio1:1,
\nhowever with a rider to  woulti not seek
\noccupancy certificate   t.v<_)    property until
\nthe mattec.     131; respondent<\/p>\n
Mu.13ioip;_e1_1ityI" V V" ' 5%.; Z: 1; _ _<\/p>\n
7.  Pg Ana\ufb01\ufb01i  learned counsel for the 2″”!<\/p>\n
res;;oi1i:ie:1t~Socic_%Lj,%V’ vchemcn\ufb02y contends that if the<\/p>\n
  is perrnitted to complete the ccnstrucizion, it<\/p>\n
“”-.\u00a7?_0*-Ixldx  e3AV.T ‘ve’;’i’c:x:\u00a2:;.g signal to the other persons in the<\/p>\n
ioc\u00e9tiity j\u00a7?\u00a77}”1(\u00a5\u00abf\u00a7\\?Oi1Id also be intcmstcd in ercc\ufb01ng some<\/p>\n
  “sAug:h louii\u00e9ings, contzaxy to {I16 bye laws of the society<\/p>\n
    decision taken by the Genera} Bod}; not to put to<\/p>\n
use the property allotted to the members of the society
\nother th\u00a3EiI1\u00e9h\u00a5’C0\ufb02S1ZI’L1C\ufb01Oi’1 ef house. T ”<\/p>\n
8. Undoubtedly, the rainy season has  ”\n<\/p>\n
if the exterior of the building is 11:61: ‘p}a’ste-re<3.. <\/p>\n
at this stage, nothing serious   1iQ. \ufb01f;1I3  <\/p>\n
if it is not done so and if t11evis.:._t;'i<espo3:.1(1g;;;11  is <\/p>\n
directed to secure tfE1e..pa11ieee~~*31mti V"-pass drdersvvv\u00e9within a<\/p>\n
fortnight.  & __ V V<\/p>\n
In the ci1t;11mstav13.<:\u20aci:e_,:V.  is allowed.
\nThe order  ist zespondem
\nis quaehedi.   for consideration
\n1 oppertunity of hearing
\nis bet11 t.h}%:  to be present before the<\/p>\n
1st respondex\ufb01iyon. at 3 11.13. and the Is:<\/p>\n
 V'  .,zesi3<3nd,ent"e\u00a7g  'to hear ami pass orders immediateiy<\/p>\n
 ,._.t}jereaf\u00a7\u00a3:r;A iii  event, not beyond a fortnight therefrom.<\/p>\n
 shall not put up \u00a311152" further Construction<\/p>\n
 " disposal of the proceeding before the 1st<\/p>\n
mspondent. it is needless to state that boi\u00a3*; "thv,ci V'<\/p>\n
should Cooperate in the heaIing,\u00bbAA\u00bbVax?it\u00a71o*s'_\ufb01m$*;g\u00e9:t:.\u00a3\u00a7:i\ufb01g  VV<\/p>\n
adjouznment.\n<\/p>\n
All the conten\ufb01ons of b01;h_ }’}E31’\u00a7if:’…<\u00a7! "   oyen.<\/p>\n
csg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Dr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City … on 19 January, 2009 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy IN THE HIGH COURT 0}? A DATED THIS mm 19th DAY;:6F g}};;\u00a713AI\u00a7\u00a5?: _ %% ma: I-IOIWBLE M12. wsrxcz\u00e9 am V1\u00a5I\u20ac)aIiz\u00a5iN. EftEi)9Y war’: PETITIQR..I\u20aco.\u00a7A\ufb01\u00a7Q6:;fV;?=.\u00a7B8 (L\ufb01hlit\ufb01) BETWEEN i% ‘V DR. H 3\/0 LATE Pms’ % AC\u00a3}:) ABOUT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City ... on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City ... on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-22T15:14:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City … on 19 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-22T15:14:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1031,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Dr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City ... on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-22T15:14:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City … on 19 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City ... on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City ... on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-22T15:14:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City … on 19 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-22T15:14:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009"},"wordCount":1031,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009","name":"Dr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City ... on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-22T15:14:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-h-ganesh-pai-vs-commissioner-udupi-city-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr H Ganesh Pai vs Commissioner Udupi City … on 19 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17581"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17581\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}