{"id":176070,"date":"2011-11-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011"},"modified":"2018-08-22T10:19:41","modified_gmt":"2018-08-22T04:49:41","slug":"mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                               New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                             File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002037\n                                                                                     CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002038\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0November\u00a02,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0November\u00a02,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Ved\u00a0Prakash\u00a0Singhal (CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002037)\n           R\/o\u00a0Gate\u00a0Wali\u00a0Gali\n           Extension\u00a0No.01\n           Nangloi\n           Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0041\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0represented\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0Dinesh\u00a0Singhal\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\n\n           Shri\u00a0Dinesh\u00a0Singhal       (CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002038)\n           R\/o\u00a0Gate\u00a0Wali\u00a0Gali\n           Extension\u00a0No.01\n           Nangloi\n           Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0041\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\n\n           Respondents\n\n           O\/o\u00a0Principal\u00a0Judge\n           Family\u00a0Courts\n           Dwarka\n           New\u00a0Delhi\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Ms.Sunita\u00a0Gosain,\u00a0PIO\n\n\n\n                         Information\u00a0Commissioner           :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                          In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                                 at\n                                                        New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                                File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002037\n                                                                                                         CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002038\n\n\n(Since\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0captioned\u00a0cases\u00a0are\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0issue,\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0is\u00a0same\u00a0it\u00a0\nis\u00a0decided\u00a0to\u00a0dispose\u00a0them\u00a0off\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0common\u00a0order)\n\n\n\n                                                             ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.      The\u00a0Applicants\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.5.11\u00a0and\u00a06.6.11\u00a0with\u00a0respect\u00a0to\u00a0decree\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        no.302\/10\u00a0(Dinesh\u00a0Singhal\u00a0Vs.Neetu\u00a0Jain)\u00a0dt.20.11.10.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0replies\u00a0dt.16.6.11\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        and\u00a0 17.6.11\u00a0 by\u00a0 the\u00a0 PIO\u00a0 and\u00a0 also\u00a0on\u00a0not\u00a0 receiving\u00a0 any\u00a0 reply\u00a0 to\u00a0the\u00a0 first\u00a0 appeals\u00a0dt.17.6.11\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        18.6.11,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicants\u00a0filed\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0petition\u00a0s\u00a0before\u00a0Commission.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>2.      During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0sought\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decree\u00a0referred\u00a0to\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0instant\u00a0case.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        The\u00a0 Respondent\u00a0 from\u00a0 the\u00a0 Family\u00a0Court\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        decree\u00a0after\u00a0he\u00a0applies\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0same,\u00a0following\u00a0the\u00a0procedure\u00a0laid\u00a0down\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Rules\u00a0and\u00a0Regulations\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        for\u00a0obtaining\u00a0such\u00a0documents\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Court.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0insisted\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        of\u00a0the\u00a0judgment\u00a0on\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.2\/\u00ad\u00a0per\u00a0page\u00a0as\u00a0prescribed\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.<\/p>\n<p>3.      The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0by\u00a0both\u00a0sides,\u00a0while\u00a0relying\u00a0upon\u00a0Section\u00a022\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        RTI \u00a0 Act \u00a0 holds \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 overriding \u00a0 powers \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 Act \u00a0 will \u00a0 be \u00a0 applicable \u00a0 only \u00a0 if \u00a0 there \u00a0 is \u00a0 an\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        inconsistency\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0contained\u00a0in\u00a0any\u00a0Act\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0since,\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        instant\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0Family\u00a0Courts\u00a0Act\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0deny\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0such\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Appellant,\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0obtain\u00a0the\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decree\u00a0following\u00a0the\u00a0procedures\u00a0laid\u00a0down\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        for\u00a0this\u00a0purpose.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0also\u00a0holds\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0interpretations\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decree\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         PIO,\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0subject\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0remarriage\u00a0falls\u00a0outside\u00a0the\u00a0ambit\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0obliged\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         provide\u00a0such\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.<\/p>\n<p>5.       In\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0however,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0also\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0allow\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         the\u00a0relevant\u00a0file\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0him\u00a0with\u00a0attested\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0documents\u00a0identified\u00a0by\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         him,\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0entire\u00a0exercise\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0completed\u00a0by\u00a02.12.11.<\/p>\n<p>6.       The\u00a0appeals\u00a0are\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                              \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                      Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0Ved\u00a0Prakash\u00a0Singhal<br \/>\n         R\/o\u00a0Gate\u00a0Wali\u00a0Gali<br \/>\n         Extension\u00a0No.01<br \/>\n         Nangloi<br \/>\n         Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0041<\/p>\n<p>2.       Shri\u00a0Dinesh\u00a0Singhal<br \/>\n         R\/o\u00a0Gate\u00a0Wali\u00a0Gali<br \/>\n         Extension\u00a0No.01<br \/>\n         Nangloi<br \/>\n         Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0041<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n         O\/o\u00a0Principal\u00a0Judge<br \/>\n         Family\u00a0Courts<br \/>\n         Dwarka<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>4.       Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<br \/>\n Note:\u00a0In\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0above\u00a0directives\u00a0have\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0complied\u00a0with\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents,\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(3)\u00a0any\u00a0<br \/>\nother\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002037 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002038 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0November\u00a02,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0November\u00a02,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Ved\u00a0Prakash\u00a0Singhal (CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002037) R\/o\u00a0Gate\u00a0Wali\u00a0Gali Extension\u00a0No.01 Nangloi Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0041 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0represented\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0Dinesh\u00a0Singhal\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing Shri\u00a0Dinesh\u00a0Singhal (CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002038) R\/o\u00a0Gate\u00a0Wali\u00a0Gali Extension\u00a0No.01 Nangloi Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0041 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing Respondents O\/o\u00a0Principal\u00a0Judge Family\u00a0Courts Dwarka New\u00a0Delhi Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Ms.Sunita\u00a0Gosain,\u00a0PIO Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002037 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002038 (Since\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0captioned\u00a0cases\u00a0are\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0issue,\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0is\u00a0same\u00a0it\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-176070","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-22T04:49:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-22T04:49:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011\"},\"wordCount\":474,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-22T04:49:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-22T04:49:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011","datePublished":"2011-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-22T04:49:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011"},"wordCount":474,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011","name":"Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-22T04:49:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ved-prakashsinghal-vs-district-session-judge-delhi-on-2-november-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Ved Prakashsinghal vs District Session Judge, Delhi on 2 November, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176070","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=176070"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176070\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=176070"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=176070"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=176070"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}