{"id":176073,"date":"2010-09-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010"},"modified":"2018-11-04T19:34:12","modified_gmt":"2018-11-04T14:04:12","slug":"ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Akil Kureshi,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCR.MA\/832\/2007\t 6\/ 6\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nMISC.APPLICATION No. 832 of\n2007 \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nASHOK\nCHATRABHUJ &amp; 3 - Applicant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT &amp; 2 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nUTPAL M PANCHAL for\nApplicant(s) : 1 - 3. \nASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) :\n1, \nRULE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent(s) : 2, \nMR MG NAGARKAR for\nRespondent(s) : 3, \nMR MAULIK G NANAVATI for Respondent(s) :\n3, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 24\/09\/2010 \n\n \n\nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>1.\t\tHeard learned<br \/>\nAdvocates for the petitioners. The petitioners seek quashing of the<br \/>\ncomplaint at  Annexure-A , bearing I-C.R.<br \/>\nNo.512\/06, filed by respondent No.2 before Varachha Police Station,<br \/>\nSurat, for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467,<br \/>\n468, 471, 34, 506(2), 387 read with Sections 120-B and 114 of the<br \/>\nIndian Penal Code. The complainant has alleged that the petitioners<br \/>\nhave systematically conspired to defeat the rights of the<br \/>\ncomplainant. Different documents were entered into between the<br \/>\nparties, however, to dupe the complainant, by the petitioners herein.<br \/>\nIt is alleged that for the aforesaid purpose, the petitioners have<br \/>\ncreated false documents. It is also the allegation of the complainant<br \/>\nthat in the above manner, the petitioners are trying to forcibly<br \/>\nenter into the mill \/ factory premises.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\t\tThe learned Counsel<br \/>\nfor the petitioners, at the very outset, submitted that insofar as<br \/>\nthe offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 387, 506(2), read<br \/>\nwith Sections 120-B and 114 of the Indian Penal Code are concerned,<br \/>\nhe DOES NOT PRESS<br \/>\nthis petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\t\tHe, however,<br \/>\nsubmitted that there are no allegations in the complaint of the<br \/>\ncommission of offences punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468 and<br \/>\n471, read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\t\tTo this limited<br \/>\nextent, I have examined the documents on record.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\t\tAs already noted,<br \/>\nthe complaint mainly alleges that the accused, present petitioners,<br \/>\nhad after entering into certain agreements and documents with the<br \/>\ncomplainant, in order to dupe the complainant, tried to re-possess<br \/>\nthe factory and that from the beginning their intention was to cheat<br \/>\nthe complainant.  Whatever the validity of these allegations, there<br \/>\nis no allegation with respect to fabrication of documents.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\t\tSection 465 of the<br \/>\nIndian Penal Code pertains to  punishment for forgery . Other<br \/>\nsections under consideration, such as 467, 468 and 471 provides for<br \/>\nthe punishment for forgery for the purpose of cheating, in aggravated<br \/>\nform.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.\t\tThe term &#8216;forgery&#8217;<br \/>\nhas been defined in Section 463 of the Indian Penal Code, in the<br \/>\nfollowing manner:\n<\/p>\n<p> 463. Forgery.-\n<\/p>\n<p>[Whoever makes any false documents or false electronic record or part<br \/>\nof a document or electronic record, with intent to cause damage or<br \/>\ninjury], to the public or to any person, or to support any claim or<br \/>\ntitle, or to contract, or with intent to commit fraud or that fraud<br \/>\nmay be committed, commits forgery.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\t\tThe term &#8216;making<br \/>\nfalse document&#8217; is defined in Section 464 of the Indian Penal Code<br \/>\nand provides that a person is stated to create a false document,<br \/>\nunder certain circumstances.  The relevant portion of Section 464 is,<br \/>\nas follows:\n<\/p>\n<p> 464. Making a<br \/>\nfalse document.- [A person is said to make a false document<br \/>\nor false electronic record-\n<\/p>\n<p>First- who<br \/>\ndishonestly or fraudulently-\n<\/p>\n<p>(a)  makes, signs, seals<br \/>\nor executes a document or part of a document;\n<\/p>\n<p>(b)   makes or transmits<br \/>\nany electronic record or part of any electronic record;\n<\/p>\n<p>(c)\t affixes any<br \/>\n[electronic signature] on any electronic record;\n<\/p>\n<p>(d) makes any mark<br \/>\ndenoting the execution of a document or the authenticity of the<br \/>\n[electronic signature],<\/p>\n<p>with the intention of<br \/>\ncausing it to be believed that such document or part of document,<br \/>\nelectronic record or [electronic signature] was made, signed, sealed,<br \/>\nexecuted, transmitted or affixed by or by the authority of a person<br \/>\nby whom or by whose authority he knows that it was not made, signed,<br \/>\nsealed, executed or affixed, or<\/p>\n<p>Secondly- Who,<br \/>\nwithout lawful authority, dishonestly or fraudulently, by<br \/>\ncancellation or otherwise, alters a document or an electronic record<br \/>\nin any material part thereof, after it has been made, executed or<br \/>\naffixed with [electronic signature]either by himself or by any other<br \/>\nperson, whether such person be living or dead the time of such<br \/>\nalteration; or<\/p>\n<p>Thirdly- Who<br \/>\ndishonestly or fraudulently causes any person to sign, seal, execute<br \/>\nor later a document or an electronic record or to affix his<br \/>\n[electronic signature] on any electronic record knowing that such<br \/>\nperson by reason of unsoundness of mind or intoxication cannot, or<br \/>\nthat by reason of deception practiced upon him, he does not know the<br \/>\ncontents of the document or electronic record or the nature of the<br \/>\nalteration.] <\/p>\n<p>9.\t\tFrom the above, it<br \/>\nappears that none of the ingredients of Section 463, 464 of the<br \/>\nIndian Penal Code are found in the impugned complaint.  All that is<br \/>\nstated in the complainant is that the accused, to defeat the rights<br \/>\nof the complainant and to misappropriate his properties, had taken<br \/>\nhelp of forged documents. Except, this bare statement, in one line,<br \/>\nin the entire complaint there are no averments regarding the manner<br \/>\nin which such documents were forged.  To my mind, such bald statement<br \/>\nof one line, cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution, for such<br \/>\nserious offences.\n<\/p>\n<p>10.\t\tIn the result, as<br \/>\nthe complaint stands, as noted earlier, none of the ingredients of<br \/>\nSections 465, 467, 468 and 471, read with Section 34 of the Indian<br \/>\nPenal Code, are disclosed and the same are ordered to be DELETED<br \/>\nfrom the COMPLAINT. For the REMAINING<br \/>\nSections, the investigation may CONTINUE.\n<\/p>\n<p>11.\t\tThis<br \/>\npetition is disposed of, in the above terms.\n<\/p>\n<p>(AKIL<br \/>\nKURESHI, J.)<\/p>\n<p>Umesh\/<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010 Author: Akil Kureshi,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CR.MA\/832\/2007 6\/ 6 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 832 of 2007 ========================================================= ASHOK CHATRABHUJ &amp; 3 &#8211; Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT &amp; 2 &#8211; Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-176073","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-04T14:04:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-04T14:04:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":829,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-04T14:04:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-04T14:04:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-04T14:04:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010"},"wordCount":829,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010","name":"Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-04T14:04:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ashok-vs-state-on-24-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ashok vs State on 24 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176073","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=176073"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176073\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=176073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=176073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=176073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}